ScalingStacks

Démonstration. [01UG]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Démonstration.

Partons de la formule

d′​d′′⁡h=∑i,j=1n∂2∂xi​∂xj​d′⁡xi​d′′⁡xj.\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime}\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}h=\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}}\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{i}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{j}.

Alors, dans l’expression

(d′​d′′⁡h)n=∑i1,…,inj1,…,jn∏k=1n∂2∂xik​∂xjk​d′⁡xik​d′′⁡xjk,(\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime}\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}h)^{n}=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}i_{1},\dots,i_{n}\\ j_{1},\dots,j_{n}\end{subarray}}\prod_{k=1}^{n}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x_{i_{k}}\partial x_{j_{k}}}\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{i_{k}}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{j_{k}},

tous les termes pour lesquels {i1,…,in}≠{1,…,n}\{i_{1},\dots,i_{n}\}\neq\{1,\dots,n\} ou {j1,…,jn}≠{1,…,n}\{j_{1},\dots,j_{n}\}\neq\{1,\dots,n\} sont nuls. Ainsi,

(d′​d′′⁡h)n=∑σ,τ∈𝔖n∏k=1n∂2∂xσ⁡(k)​∂xτ⁡(k)​d′⁡xσ⁡(1)​d′′⁡xτ⁡(1)​…​d′⁡xσ⁡(n)​d′′⁡xτ⁡(n).(\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime}\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}h)^{n}=\sum_{\sigma,\tau\in\mathfrak{S}_{n}}\prod_{k=1}^{n}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x_{\sigma(k)}\partial x_{\tau(k)}}\,\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{\sigma(1)}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{\tau(1)}\dots\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{\sigma(n)}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{\tau(n)}.

Remarquons aussi que

d′⁡xσ⁡(1)​d′′⁡xτ⁡(1)​…​d′⁡xσ⁡(n)​d′′⁡xτ⁡(n)=ε⁡(σ)​ε​(τ)​d′⁡x1​d′′⁡x1​…​d′⁡xn​d′′⁡xn,\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{\sigma(1)}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{\tau(1)}\dots\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{\sigma(n)}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{\tau(n)}=\varepsilon(\sigma)\varepsilon(\tau)\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{1}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{1}\dots\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{n}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{n},

où ε⁡(⋅)\varepsilon(\cdot) désigne la signature d’une permutation. En outre, si ψ=τ∘σ−1\psi=\tau\circ\sigma^{-1}, on a

∏k=1n∂2∂xσ⁡(k)​∂xτ⁡(k)=∏k=1n∂2∂xk​∂xψ⁡(k)\prod_{k=1}^{n}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x_{\sigma(k)}\partial x_{\tau(k)}}=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x_{k}\partial x_{\psi(k)}}

et

ε⁡(σ)​ε​(τ)=ε⁡(ψ).\varepsilon(\sigma)\varepsilon(\tau)=\varepsilon(\psi).

Par suite,

(d′​d′′⁡h)n=n!​∑ψ∈𝔖n∏k=1n∂2∂xk​∂xψ⁡(k)​ε​(ψ)​d′⁡x1​d′′⁡x1​…​d′⁡xn​d′′⁡xn,(\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime}\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}h)^{n}=n!\sum_{\psi\in\mathfrak{S}_{n}}\prod_{k=1}^{n}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x_{k}\partial x_{\psi(k)}}\varepsilon(\psi)\,\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{1}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{1}\dots\mathop{\mathrm{d^{\prime}}}x_{n}\mathop{\mathrm{d}^{\prime\prime}}x_{n},

ainsi qu’il fallait démontrer. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.