ScalingStacks

Structure of linearized Cauchy-Riemann equation [04AD]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Structure of linearized Cauchy-Riemann equation

Let Σ\Sigma be a holomorphic polygon with k≥0k\geq 0 input ends pip_{i}, and one output end at qq. The case k=0k=0 corresponds to teardrops, and k=1k=1 corresponds to strips. We consider the ordinary linearized Cauchy-Riemann operator in weighted Sobolev spaces W1,2;μW^{1,2;\mu}, to classify the structure of the first order deformation theory. As usual, the complex structure is integrable. Since ∂¯\bar{\partial} is elliptic, its cokernel in L2L^{2} is finite dimensional, represented by holomorphic 1-forms on Σ\Sigma, which must have finite order of vanishing at qq. For large enough μ\mu, the dual space L2;−μL^{2;-\mu} for L2;μL^{2;\mu} imposes an exponential decay condition O⁡(e−μ​s)O(e^{-\mu s}) at qq, so the cokernel evantually vanishes for μ≫1\mu\gg 1. Then the kernel dimension in W1,2;μW^{1,2;\mu} is equal to the index, computed by (25). For convenience, we use μ∈π​ℕ\mu\in\pi\mathbb{N}, which avoids the indicial values. Then

dim(ker⁡∂¯⊂W1,2;μ)=deg⁡q−∑1kdeg⁡pi+n​μπ.\dim(\ker\bar{\partial}\subset W^{1,2;\mu})=\deg q-\sum_{1}^{k}\deg p_{i}+\frac{n\mu}{\pi}. (26)

It is convenient to view the domain Σ\Sigma of the holomorphic polygon as the upper half plane with coordinate zz, with corners pip_{i} on the real line and qq at infinity.

Lemma 3.12.

If v∈ker⁡∂¯⊂W1,2;μv\in\ker\bar{\partial}\subset W^{1,2;\mu}, then v=f​wv=fw for some real coefficient polynomial function ff on the upper half plane, such that ww is nonvanishing on ℝ∖{p1,…​pk}\mathbb{R}\setminus\{p_{1},\ldots p_{k}\}, and vanishes minimally at pip_{i} (meaning ww is indivisible by z−piz-p_{i}).

Proof.

If vv vanishes at any boundary point aa on ℝ∖{p1,…​pk}\mathbb{R}\setminus\{p_{1},\ldots p_{k}\}, or if vv vanishes at pip_{i} beyond minimal order, then vz−a\frac{v}{z-a} (resp. vz−pi\frac{v}{z-p_{i}}) is also a first order deformation with the same T​LTL boundary condition, subject to the growth constraints at infinity. Since the kernel dimension is finite, the divisions can only happen a finite number of times, producing the polynomial ff. ∎

Let p∈∂Σ≃∂ℍp\in\partial\Sigma\simeq\partial\mathbb{H}, and let KK be the maximal number depending on pp, such that there exist ℝ\mathbb{R}-linearly independent v1,…​vK∈ker⁡∂¯v_{1},\ldots v_{K}\in\ker\bar{\partial}, satisfying

  • •

    In case pp is not a corner point, then v1​(p),…,vK​(p)v_{1}(p),\ldots,v_{K}(p) are ℝ\mathbb{R}-linearly independent vectors,

  • •

    In case p=pip=p_{i} is a corner point, then the nonzero elements in the ℝ\mathbb{R}-span of v1,…​vKv_{1},\ldots v_{K} are vector fields vanishing minimally at pp.

Lemma 3.13.

Any v∈ker⁡∂¯⊂W1,2;μv\in\ker\bar{\partial}\subset W^{1,2;\mu} is of the form g1​v1+…​gK​vKg_{1}v_{1}+\ldots g_{K}v_{K} for some real coefficient rational functions g1,…​gKg_{1},\ldots g_{K}, nonsingular at pp.

Proof.

Without loss of generality p=0p=0. Let w0w_{0} be any first order deformation. By the maximality of KK, we can choose real numbers aia_{i}, such that the first order deformation w0−∑1Kai​viw_{0}-\sum_{1}^{K}a_{i}v_{i} vanishes at zero, so w0−∑1Kai​1​vi=zk1​w1w_{0}-\sum_{1}^{K}a_{i1}v_{i}=z^{k_{1}}w_{1} for some first order deformation w1w_{1} which is nonzero at the origin. Finite dimensionality means this process can be repeated for only a finite number of times:

{w0=∑ai​1​vi+zk1​w1,w1=∑ai​2​vi+zk2​w2,…wN−1=∑ai​N​vi+zkN​wN.\begin{cases}w_{0}=\sum a_{i1}v_{i}+z^{k_{1}}w_{1},\\ w_{1}=\sum a_{i2}v_{i}+z^{k_{2}}w_{2},\\ \ldots\\ w_{N-1}=\sum a_{iN}v_{i}+z^{k_{N}}w_{N}.\end{cases}

We choose the smallest NN such that v1,…​vK,w0,…​wNv_{1},\ldots v_{K},w_{0},\ldots w_{N} are ℝ\mathbb{R}-linearly dependent as vector fields; notice v1,…​vKv_{1},\ldots v_{K} are linearly independent, so N≥0N\geq 0. We then get a linear relation

f0​(z)​wN=∑1Kfi​(z)​vi,f_{0}(z)w_{N}=\sum_{1}^{K}f_{i}(z)v_{i},

where f0,…​fKf_{0},\ldots f_{K} are polynomials, and f0​(0)≠0f_{0}(0)\neq 0. This implies the claim. ∎

We can also apply a Möbius transform to make the output end qq lie at the origin. The growth condition translates to o(|z|−μ/π)o(|z|^{-\mu/\pi}) at zero. Let KK be maximal, such that there are ℝ\mathbb{R}-linearly independent vector fields z−μ/πv1,…,z−μ/πvK∈ker∂¯⊂W1,2;μz^{-\mu/\pi}v_{1},\ldots,z^{-\mu/\pi}v_{K}\in\ker\bar{\partial}\subset W^{1,2;\mu}, and any nonzero element in the ℝ\mathbb{R}-span of v1,…​vKv_{1},\ldots v_{K} vanishes mimimally at q=0q=0. As a caveat, this does not assume v1,…​vKv_{1},\ldots v_{K} satisfy the growth constraints at infinity to lie in ker⁡∂¯⊂W1,2;μ\ker\bar{\partial}\subset W^{1,2;\mu}. Minor adaptions give

Lemma 3.14.

Any v∈ker⁡∂¯⊂W1,2;μv\in\ker\bar{\partial}\subset W^{1,2;\mu} is of the form z−μ/π(g1v1+…gKvK)z^{-\mu/\pi}(g_{1}v_{1}+\ldots g_{K}v_{K}) for some real coefficient rational functions g1,…​gKg_{1},\ldots g_{K}, nonsingular at qq.

Corollary 3.15.

The number KK is independent of the boundary and corner points on ∂Σ\partial\Sigma.

We view the boundary ∂Σ≃ℙ1​(ℝ)\partial\Sigma\simeq\mathbb{P}^{1}(\mathbb{R}). By the above lemmas, there is a real algebraic vector bundle ℰ\mathcal{E} of rank KK over ℙ1​(ℝ)\mathbb{P}^{1}(\mathbb{R}) such that v1,…​vKv_{1},\ldots v_{K} provide the basis of local sections. By Grothendieck’s classification of vector bundles,

Proposition 3.16.

ℰ≃⊕1K𝒪(ni)\mathcal{E}\simeq\oplus_{1}^{K}\mathcal{O}(n_{i}) for some ni∈ℤn_{i}\in\mathbb{Z}.

Since the rank KK is nondecreasing in μ\mu, it evantually stabilizes for μ≫0\mu\gg 0. Since around any given point, the same choice of v1,…​vKv_{1},\ldots v_{K} is valid for all large μ\mu, the algebraic vector bundle ℰ\mathcal{E} is independent of μ≫0\mu\gg 0. The elements of ker⁡∂¯⊂W1,2;μ\ker\bar{\partial}\subset W^{1,2;\mu} can be interpreted as global sections of ℰ⊗𝒪⁡(μπ)\mathcal{E}\otimes\mathcal{O}(\frac{\mu}{\pi}). Thus for all large μ\mu,

dim(ker⁡∂¯⊂W1,2;μ)=dimΓ⁡(ℙ1​(ℝ),ℰ⊗𝒪⁡(μπ))=K⁡(μπ+1)+∑1Kni.\dim(\ker\bar{\partial}\subset W^{1,2;\mu})=\dim\Gamma(\mathbb{P}^{1}(\mathbb{R}),\mathcal{E}\otimes\mathcal{O}(\frac{\mu}{\pi}))=K(\frac{\mu}{\pi}+1)+\sum_{1}^{K}n_{i}. (27)

Contrasting with the index formula (26),

Corollary 3.17.

The rank K=nK=n, and the degree ∑1nni=deg⁡q−∑1kdeg⁡pi−n\sum_{1}^{n}n_{i}=\deg q-\sum_{1}^{k}\deg p_{i}-n.

The structure of ℰ≃⊕1K𝒪(ni)\mathcal{E}\simeq\oplus_{1}^{K}\mathcal{O}(n_{i}) provides meromorphic sections v1,…​vnv_{1},\ldots v_{n} which are a basis of local sections on ℝ⊂ℙ1​(ℝ)\mathbb{R}\subset\mathbb{P}^{1}(\mathbb{R}), and have excess vanishing orders n1,…​nnn_{1},\ldots n_{n} at qq. Consider the function Ω⁡(v1,…​vn)\Omega(v_{1},\ldots v_{n}). By construction, it has no boundary zero, and its excess corner vanishing order is ∑1nni\sum_{1}^{n}n_{i}. Comparing with the index formula (23),

deg⁡q−∑1kpi=2​∑(interior zeros)+∑ni+n.\begin{split}\deg q-\sum_{1}^{k}p_{i}=2\sum(\text{interior zeros})+\sum n_{i}+n.\end{split}

Since all interior vanishing orders are nonnegative by holomorphicity,

Corollary 3.18.

We have Ω⁡(v1,…​vn)≠0\Omega(v_{1},\ldots v_{n})\neq 0 in the interior of Σ\Sigma.

The significance is that the algebraic vector bundle structure on ℰ→ℙ1​(ℝ)\mathcal{E}\to\mathbb{P}^{1}(\mathbb{R}) now extends over the entire Σ\Sigma. The v1,…​vnv_{1},\ldots v_{n} now provide the basis of local sections for the vector bundle u∗​T​X|Σu^{*}TX|_{\Sigma}. One upshot is that an algebraic structure arises on u∗​T​X→Σu^{*}TX\to\Sigma from solving the Cauchy-Riemann equation with Lagrangian boundary:

(u∗TX,u∗TL)≃(⊕1n𝒪(ni),natural real structure).(u^{*}TX,u^{*}TL)\simeq(\oplus_{1}^{n}\mathcal{O}(n_{i}),\text{natural real structure}). (28)

In contrast, the Lagrangians are only assumed to be smooth, not necessarily real analytic.

To analyze obstructions, Serre duality motivates us to consider the dualized cokernel to the ordinary (unweighted, unextended) linearized Cauchy-Riemann operator. A dualized cokernel element η\eta is represented by a holomorphic 1-forms in Ω1,0​(Σ,u∗​T∗​X)\Omega^{1,0}(\Sigma,u^{*}T^{*}X) with L2L^{2} integrablity, and its T∗​XT^{*}X factor lies in the annilator of the T​LTL boundary condition. Equivalently, for all test vector fields v∈W1,2​(Σ,T​X,T​L)v\in W^{1,2}(\Sigma,TX,TL),

∫Σ⟨∂¯​v∧η⟩=0,\int_{\Sigma}\langle\bar{\partial}v\wedge\eta\rangle=0,

where ⟨,⟩\langle,\rangle is the pairing of T​XTX with T∗​XT^{*}X, and the wedge takes care of the forms on Σ\Sigma. In the canonical form (28), this dualized cokernel is isomorphic to Γ(ℝℙ1,⊕1n𝒪(−2−ni)).\Gamma(\mathbb{RP}^{1},\oplus_{1}^{n}\mathcal{O}(-2-n_{i})). In particular,

Corollary 3.19.

In the teardrop curve case k=0k=0, the strip case k=1k=1 and the triangle case k=2k=2, the vanishing of cokernel is equivalent to ni≥−1n_{i}\geq-1 for all ii.

For k≥3k\geq 3 the deformation of the holomorphic polygons is governed instead by the extended Cauchy-Riemann equation, since the punctured Riemann surface structure on Σ\Sigma is allowed to vary. The dualized cokernel of the extended Cauchy-Riemann operator, is the subspace of the dualized cokernel of the ordinary Cauchy-Riemann operator, which pairs trivially with JX∘d​u∘ρJ_{X}\circ du\circ\rho for any ρ\rho representing some tangent vector of the Stasheff associahedron.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.