5.2 Quantitative almost calibratedness [04EI]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
5.2 Quantitative almost calibratedness
One major advantage of the quantitative almost calibrated condition is that within a fixed homology class of Lagrangians, it guarantees an a priori volume upper bound (cf. Lemma 2.1). We shall explain that, under very mild asymptotic conditions on the ambient Calabi-Yau manifolds, it also guarantees that the Lagrangian remains within a bounded region. As such, the Federer-Fleming compactness applies automatically, and Allard compactness applies under the additional hypothesis of a uniform bound on . We also discuss a number of instructive but not particularly difficult consequences of quantitative almost calibratedness.
Remark 5.9.
The arguments in this section are adaptions of Neves [63]. They can also be easily adapted to the almost Calabi-Yau setting under mild conditions on the volume density.
As a preliminary, we will say the regularity scale near a given point on the Calabi-Yau manifold is at least , if is contained in a complex coordinate ball with Euclidean radius at least , on which , and6060 60 We will actually only use the metric uniform equivalence. But for Calabi-Yau metrics, the higher derivative estimates are in any event implied by metric equivalence, after shrinking the balls slightly, by Evans-Krylov theory.
| (55) |
From now on we will assume the regularity scale tends to infinity for . This is a very mild condition on the Calabi-Yau manifold, for instance satisfied by asymptotically conical Calabi-Yaus.
Remark 5.10.
This asymptotic condition is essentially the weakest that can prevent the almost calibrated Lagrangian in a given homology class from escaping to infinity. For instance, if is a special Lagrangian in , then is a special Lagrangian in the product , which can obviously be translated in the direction to escape to infinity, albeit not preserving the class. One can still hope to obstruct escaping to infinity using Floer theory, but then incorporating singular Lagrangians requires more foundational work.
Isoperimetric inequality
Lemma 5.10.
(Isoperimetric inequality cf. [63, Lem 3.10]) Let be a closed Lagrangian integral current in , and consider a Euclidean coordinate ball on which the regularity scale is at least . Assume the quantitative almost calibrated condition . Then there is a universal constant depending only on and the metric uniform equivalence constant in (55), so that
for all closed subsets of with rectifiable boundary. Here the Hausdorff measures are computed using the Calabi-Yau metric.
Proof.
The isoperimetric theorem [71, Thm 6.1] guarantees the existence of an integral current supported in such that and for which
Notice the metric uniform equivalence means we do not need to be careful to distinguish the Hausdorff measure for the Euclidean metric and the Calabi-Yau metric. Let denote the cone over the current , then , and thus by the quantitative calibrated condition,
which is the isoperimetric inequality. ∎
Remark 5.11.
The standard isoperimetric theorem inside the Euclidean space [71, Thm 6.1] does not state . Once we have found some with with mass control, we can pushforward by a Lipschitz retraction map :
Replacing by , the mass cannot increase, and , and we have ensured the support is contained in .
The following version of the isoperimetric theorem should be well known to experts, but for lack of a reference we include a proof below.
Proposition 5.11.
(Isoperimetric theorem on complete manifolds) Let be a complete Riemannian manifold, and be an -dimensional exact integral current supported in a fixed bounded open subset . Then there is an integral current supported in a fixed large bounded subset of , with and
Proof.
We first isometrically embed into an ambient Euclidean space , so can be regarded as an integral current compactly supported in . Fix a small number such that over the -neighbourhood in is isomorphic to the normal bundle, so there is a smooth retraction map back to . The Lipschitz norm of is approximately one.
Applying the deformation theorem for [71, section 5.3] to the current , with a parameter to be fixed, we can write
where are integral currents inside , supported in the neighbourhood of , with
where the constant depends only on . Morever, is an integral linear sum of -dimensional faces in the standard grid decomposition of with cube size . We now push forward via :
since is fixed by . Note that both live inside , and their mass bounds are essentially the same as respectively.
Suppose first that . If is nonzero, then by the grid description of ,
So by choosing in the above, we force , so , with mass bound , so it suffices to take .
Now suppose , then we choose . Without loss of generality, we can replace by , and pretend . We know
- •
is an integral linear combination of grid cube faces, where all the cubes lie in a bounded region of a fixed grid,
- •
is an exact current on .
The set of all such form a finitely generated abelian group, which by classification is isomorphic to the direct sum of and a finite abelian group. For any given element
the linear coefficients of for are bounded by . Each gives rise to an exact simplicial chain inside , which is the boundary of a finite mass integral current . Thus
The finite group part gives rise to another simplicical chain inside which is the boundary of some finite mass integral current. Thus we have produced an integral current with , and mass bound
since we are in the case. ∎
Volume monotonicity and lower bound
Corollary 5.12.
(Volume lower bound) If is in the support of , then there is a uniform lower bound on the volume of inside Eulidean coordinate balls of radius less than :
| (56) |
Proof.
Let , then is increasing in , and for a.e. , by the coarea formula,
The last inequality is the isoperimetric inequality. Thus whence we have the volume lower bound . ∎
Remark 5.12.
Volume lower bounds like (56) are familiar in minimal surface theory, but usually require some integral bound on the mean curvature. Notably, here we need no such assumption; the quantitative almost calibrated condition only concerns the antiderivative of .
No escape to spatial infinity
Corollary 5.13.
Assume near the infinity of , the regularity scale grows to infinity. Fix the homology class of the quantitatively almost calibrated Lagrangian . Then is contained in a fixed compact subset of .
Proof.
From Lemma 2.1 there is an a priori volume bound . But if is in the support of , then the regularity scale of near is bounded by
whence must remain in a fixed compact subset. ∎
Nontriviality of homology classes
Corollary 5.14.
(Nontriviality of homology classes) There is a lower bound depending only on the ambient Calabi-Yau and the almost calibratedness constant . Here we do not a priori specify the homology class of .
Proof.
The asymptotic hypothesis on the regularity scale implies in particular that the regularity scale has a global lower bound on . This gives a uniform lower bound on , which by the quantitative almost calibratedness gives a lower bound on the homological integral . ∎
The significance is that in a variational setup to find special Lagrangians among certain Lagrangian currents in the fixed homology class , it may happen that the Lagrangian breaks into several connected components, each given by a closed Lagrangian current with . The nontriviality of each homology class then puts an upper bound on the number of connected components. Morever, each would inherit a volume upper bound from . Since all Lagrangians are contained in a fixed compact region, Poincaré duality easily gives an upper bound on the homology classes of :
Combining the above, only finitely many homology classes, multiplicities, and number of components can appear in a given variational problem.
5.2.1 Intrinsic distance bound and potential clustering
Suppose is a smooth immersed Lagrangian, then it inherits a Riemannian metric from the restriction of the Calabi-Yau metric, so we can speak of the intrinsic distance function on . Instead of extrinsic balls such as , we can talk about intrinsic balls . A key distinction is that intrinsic distance does not need to extend to a continuous function on , the prototypical example being the union of two embedded Lagrangians, whose domains are disjoint, but whose images in intersect. Clearly, the intrinsic distance bounds extrinsic geodesic distance, so is always contained in an extrinsic geodesic ball of radius , but the converse is far from true. The intrinsic distance between two distinct connected components would simply be infinity. One can think of intrinsic distance as a quantitative measurement of connectedness.
As usual, the regularity scale on grows to infinity asymptotically by assumption, so the regularity scale has a global lower bound. The following lemma has the same proof as Cor. 5.12. (The essence of this argument also appears in Neves [63, Lem 3.9]).
Lemma 5.15.
(Intrinsic ball volume lower bound) Let be a smooth immersed compact Lagrangian in , satisfying the quantitative almost calibrated condition. For any in the support of , there is a uniform bound
Corollary 5.16.
(Intrinsic diameter bound) Assume further that the smooth, quantitatively almost calibrated compact Lagrangian has connected domain. Then within a fixed homology class, the intrinsic distance of has a uniform upper bound.
Proof.
Let be the intrinsic diameter of . By connectedness, we can find with . Now the intrinsic balls are disjoint, but each takes up a nontrivial amount of volume . Thus
so there is an a priori bound on , hence on . ∎
Corollary 5.17.
(Potential oscillation bound) Assume is an exact, immersed, compact Lagrangian, satisfying the almost calibrated condition, such that the Lagrangian potential has connected range. Then the potential has an a priori bound
Proof.
Given any on , we write the potential as a line integral of the Liouville 1-form
Thus the intrinsic ball volume lower bound implies that if lies in the range of , then
The range of is by assumption a closed interval. If the interval has length , then we can find distinct values of with disjoint , so
This provides an a priori bound on , hence on the potential oscillation. ∎
Corollary 5.18.
Assume is an exact, immersed, compact Lagrangian, satisfying the almost calibrated condition, then it satisfies -potential clustering (cf. section 5.1.2) for some with uniform bounds. Morever, if carries an unobstructed brane structure, then the potential clustering property is consistent with the twisted complex interpretation.
Proof.
By Lemma 6.3, a general immersed Lagrangian can be decomposed into a union of Lagrangians such that the ranges of the potentials are connected, and any bounding cochain structure naturally produces a twisted complex. The oscillation of each is bounded in terms of the quantitative almost calibration condition, and the ambient features of . Morever, the number of Lagrangian components is also a priori bounded. ∎
As a notable consequence, we obtain the uniform energy bound on the holomorphic curves (cf. Prop. 3.41).
Remark 5.13.
Although it is unclear how to make sense of the intrinsic distance on a general Lagrangian integral current, mildly singular Lagrangians (for instance with local conical singularities) do have a sensible notion of intrinsic distance, and the arguments in this section extend practically to all non-pathological examples, covering all Lagrangians that appear in Joyce’s LMCF program. Furthermore, the potential clustering is robust under limits (cf. Cor. 5.9). As such, we believe it holds for all Lagrangians relevant to our variational program (cf. the class in section 5.3 below).
5.2.2 Bounded part of the Solomon functional revisited
In section 3.8.3, we discussed a Floer theoretic method to bound the difference between the Solomon functional and the elementary functional. The following alternative method is based on the homological nature of the Solomon functional (20), and has a more geometric measure theory flavour. Holomorphic curves do not feature in this approach, so the automatic transversality and the positivity conditions are not needed, and in fact the discussion works in the weak setting of varifolds and currents. It is vital to this approach that for Stein manifolds, so no homological ambiguity can arise for the bordism current.
Proposition 5.19.
Assume the Lagrangian with potential is quantitatively almost calibrated, homologous to , and satisfies -potential clustering. The elementary functional (45) makes sense verbatim, with no smoothness assumptions. Then has a uniform upper bound independent of .
Proof.
We know is homologous to zero in , and contained in a bounded subset of by Cor. 5.13. By a version of the isoperimetric theorem (cf. Prop. 5.11), we can find some compactly supported integral current with , with mass bound
This has no relation to holomorphic curves. The quantitative almost calibratedness implies a volume bound on (cf. Lemma 2.1), hence is a priori bounded. The homological nature of the Solomon functional (20) gives
The mass bound then implies
Here since is contained in a bounded region, the terms and are bounded. Finally, using the potential clustering bound,
Combining the above shows the a priori bound on . ∎