3.7.3 First variation formula revisited
We now explain how to semi-heuristically understand the first variation formula (21) as a consequence of Prop. 3.4, from the perspective of the moduli space integral formula (39). We hope this viewpoint is better suited for generalization to compact Calabi-Yau settings.
Suppose we are given a 1-parameter exact isotopy of unobstructed exact immersed Lagrangians , and we wish to calculate at . The change of reference Lagrangian formula (cf. Prop. 3.4) allows us to replace by . The Lagrangian
for is approximately the graph of in (understood in an immersed sense), for the Hamiltonian function on .
The holomorphic discs between and for have small energy of order , and are locally approximated by Morse trajectories of . Write as the Hamiltonian vector field, namely , then
|
|
|
Now we examine for very small . The Lagrangian intersections come in two types:
- •
The corners and correspond to the local extrema of the Hamiltonian .
- •
Any self intersection between two local sheets of can be paired with a very nearby self intersection of between two sheets of . The bounding cochain on is thus induced from the bounding cochain on .
At the intersection points ,
|
|
|
The self intersections are usually not important here, because the smallness of energy prevents their appearance on , unless , and , which is a rather nongeneric situation. When the self intersections do appear, the evolution of the potential under exact isotopy gives
|
|
|
where keeps track of the hamiltonian on the different sheets of . Thus
|
|
|
Here we have a tricky sign reversal, because if and are clockwise ordered on , then and are counterclockwise ordered. In summary,
|
|
|
Combining the above, and integrating by parts,
|
|
|
Observe that for very small , as the holomorphic curves vary in the -dimensional moduli spaces , under the counterclockwise sign convention for , the boundary evaluation of sweeps out the cycle (beware of the sign!), and any generic point on is swept out precisely once due to the Morse theory limiting description. Consequently, the moduli space integral
|
|
|
hence
|
|
|
By the moduli integral formula (39) of the Solomon functional,
|
|
|
This recovers the first variation formula (21).