5.3 Variational strategy [04FE]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
5.3 Variational strategy
The variational strategy to find special Lagrangians is the following:
- •
Find a suitable subset among all the quantitatively almost calibrated, exact Lagrangian integral currents homologous to . The class is closed in the varifold/current topology. It is very desirable to ensure Allard compactness and Federer-Fleming compactness both apply to .
- •
Extend enough of Floer theory from the smooth setting to Lagrangian currents. Morally, the class consists of those Lagrangians that can be equipped with unobstructed brane structures in some weak sense, all isomorphic to in .
- •
When the Lagrangian is equipped with the potential , the additive constant freedom of is a source of non-compactness, which affects . We need to ultimately match up the asymptotic behaviour of with the Floer theoretic obstructions. In other words, the role of stability conditions is to ensure the properness of the Solomon functional.
- •
Once the Solomon functional is proper, we will follow the direct minimization strategy to find its minimum. We need to justify that the minimum must be a special Lagrangian closed integral current, and then Almgren regularity will be able to ensure smoothness away from codimension two. Furthermore, we need a sufficiently robust version of the Thomas-Yau uniqueness argument to prove that the special Lagrangian representative is unique.
The class is a balance between two requirements: the approximability by sufficiently smooth objects, and the existence of sufficiently many competitors. A moral definition of is:
- •
Among all the quantitatively almost calibrated, exact Lagrangian integral currents homologous to , we include all sufficiently smooth Lagrangians (eg. immersed, -cones singularities, etc) which admit unobstructed brane structures isomorphic to in .
- •
Then take the closure under the varifold/current topology.
Remark 5.14.
Joyce’s LMCF is expected to preserve the exactness, the quantitative almost calibrated condition, and the unobstructedness of the brane structure, so sufficiently smooth objects in should remain in under Joyce’s LMCF. It is interesting to ask when the flow also preserves the positivity condition on the bordism current.
While at present several ingredients are missing, if this program can be carried through, it would prove the existence of special Lagrangians under the assumption of Thomas-Yau semistability (cf. Definition 3.32).
-Smoothing property and Joyce’s LMCF
Allard compactness requires an a priori bound , which cannot be implied by the quantitative almost calibrated condition, since the mean curvature involves one more derivative than the Lagrangian angle. However, for the purpose of our variational strategy, it is enough to ensure any minimization sequence of can be replaced by a sequence with .
Conjecture 5.20.
(-smoothing property) There exists and a uniform constant , such that for any , we can find with , and .
Remark 5.15.
This is called a ‘smoothing property’ because quantitatively improves the regularity of . It does not suggest is smooth, and indeed we expect the special Lagrangians which minimize may have codimension two singularity. Since the volume is a priori bounded, the Hölder inequality shows that the -smoothing property is stronger for bigger , and in particular -smoothing implies -smoothing.
We think the smoothing property may be quite deep, and our limited attempt here is to explain how it relates to Joyce’s LMCF program, which suggests the smoothing property may hold with . Recall the defining feature of the Solomon functional is its variation property under exact isotopies among unobstructed objects:
which holds under sufficient smoothness assumptions. Under a sufficiently smooth LMCF in a Calabi-Yau manifold, the Lagrangians evolve by the local Hamiltonian function up to an inconsequential additive constant (cf. section 4.1), so evolves by
| (57) |
If is almost calibrated, then , so . We conclude that the Solomon functional decreases in time along Joyce’s LMCF under the almost calibrated assumption, at least for the time between the surgeries. It is plausible is either continuous or jumps downwards at the surgeries in Joyce’s LMCF,6161 61 A somewhat analogous phenomenon in the Brakke flow is that the total volume mass is either continuous or can only jump downwards in time. The mass loss is typically related to the disappearance of a component of the evolving varifold, which is conceptually similar to ‘collapsing zero objects’ in Joyce’s LMCF. This is ruled out by the almost calibrated condition, so optimistically one can even hope for the continuity of the Solomon functional in the almost calibrated setting. which would then imply the Solomon functional is monotone decreasing for all time.
Now recall that the heat equation on the Lagrangian angle implies an integral bound on the mean curvature (53). In particular, if the LMCF can be run for a definite amount of time , then there exists some , with
where crucially the a priori constant does not depend on any quantitative smoothness assumption on the initial Lagrangian, provided it is quantitatively almost calibrated. Such would be a good candidate for , subject to the hypothesis that Joyce’s LMCF remains within the class of Lagrangians .
Morally the class arises as varifold/current limits of those Lagrangians admissible in Joyce’s program. Under the plausible assumption that Joyce’s LMCF can be passed to the varifold/current limit, then the -smoothing property can be well explained. The condition comes from the decrease of the Solomon functional along the flow, and the condition would follow if Joyce’s LMCF can be run for a uniform amount of time . If can be taken arbitrarily large, then we can demand further that the mean curvature is arbitrarily small.
Remark 5.16.
In minimal surface theory, the ability to approximate an unknown object by objects with quantitative derivative controls, is frequently the key of the regularity theory. Notable examples include the Lipschitz and harmonic approximations that lie at the core of De Giorgi’s -regularity theorem, and the center manifolds at the core of Almgren’s big regularity theorem. An excellent survey is [25]. While there are plenty of techniques for constructing area competitors in geometric measure theory, we lack useful ways to construct competitors within the Lagrangian world. Developing such techniques is essential to the -smoothing property, and possibly also to the Floer theoretic aspects of the variational program.