ScalingStacks

Weighted Sobolev space with exponential growth [04A7]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Weighted Sobolev space with exponential growth

We now discuss solutions to linearized Cauchy-Riemann equations in weighted Sobolev spaces W1,2;μW^{1,2;\mu} (cf. [70, section 2]). These spaces agree with their unweighted counterparts along the strip like input ends, but at the strip like output end s≫0s\gg 0, a vector field v∈Wl,2;μv\in W^{l,2;\mu} means that exp⁡(−μ​s)​v\exp(-\mu s)v lies in Wl,2W^{l,2}. Generally we choose μ\mu to avoid a discrete set of indicial values. The main point of these weighted Sobolev spaces is that they allow for holomorphic vector fields with prescribed exponential growth along the output end, which is conceptually similar to allowing for meromorphic functions in Riemann surface theory. If we think of the strip like end qq as the infinity (resp. the origin) in the upper half plane model of Σ\Sigma, then the natural coodinate is z=eπ⁡(s+i​t)z=e^{\pi(s+it)} (resp. z=e−π⁡(s+i​t)z=e^{-\pi(s+it)}), and the exponential growth o⁡(eμ​s)o(e^{\mu s}) becomes o⁡(|z|μ/π)o(|z|^{\mu/\pi}) (resp. o(|z|−μ/π)o(|z|^{-\mu/\pi}).

For larger μ\mu more vector fields are included in the Sobolev space, and the index increases by one each time μ\mu crosses an indicial value (counted with multiplicity). In our problem, the indicial values are

ϕ1+π​ℤ,ϕ2+π​ℤ,…,ϕn+π​ℤ,\phi_{1}+\pi\mathbb{Z},\quad\phi_{2}+\pi\mathbb{Z},\ldots,\phi_{n}+\pi\mathbb{Z},

where ϕ1,…​ϕn\phi_{1},\ldots\phi_{n} are the characterizing angles at the Lagrangian intersection point qq at the output end. Then the index for the linearized Cauchy-Riemann operator W1,2;μ→L2,μW^{1,2;\mu}\to L^{2,\mu} is

deg⁡q−∑1kdeg⁡pi+number of indicial values between 0 and μ,\deg q-\sum_{1}^{k}\deg p_{i}+\text{number of indicial values between $0$ and $\mu$}, (25)

where kk is the number of input ends. In particular, for holomorphic strips with deg⁡p=deg⁡q\deg p=\deg q (resp. deg⁡q−deg⁡p=1\deg q-\deg p=1), then the index for μ=π\mu=\pi is equal to nn (resp. n+1n+1). In contrast, the ordinary index (for the μ=0\mu=0 case) is zero, and the moduli space obtained by taking ℝ\mathbb{R}-quotient has virtual dimension −1-1 (resp. zero). There are in fact sufficient conditions to rule out the negative dimension moduli spaces, and constrain the zero dimensional moduli spaces:

Lemma 3.9.

In the holomorphic strip case, assume v1,…​vnv_{1},\ldots v_{n} are in the kernel of the linearized Cauchy-Riemann operator on W1,2;μ=πW^{1,2;\mu=\pi}, such that Ω⁡(v1,…​vn)\Omega(v_{1},\ldots v_{n}) does not vanish identically. Then deg⁡q−deg⁡p≥1\deg q-\deg p\geq 1. When the equality is achieved, the holomorphic strip is an immersion up to the boundary with minimal vanishing at the corner, and the zero dimensional moduli space is regular.

Proof.

We modify the proof of Lemma 3.5 and Cor. 3.6. We think of the corner qq as the origin in the upper half plane model. Without loss of generality vnv_{n} is the ℝ\mathbb{R}-translation vector field of the holomorphic strip. Then the leading order asymptotic is

vk=(ak​1zϕ1/π−1,…,ak​nzϕn/π−1)+O(1),k=1,2,…n−1,v_{k}=(a_{k1}z^{\phi_{1}/\pi-1},\ldots,a_{kn}z^{\phi_{n}/\pi-1})+O(1),\quad k=1,2,\ldots n-1,

and

vn=(an​1​zϕ1/π,…,an​n​zϕn/π)+O⁡(z).v_{n}=(a_{n1}z^{\phi_{1}/\pi},\ldots,a_{nn}z^{\phi_{n}/\pi})+O(z).

hence

Ω⁡(v1,…​vn)=z(∑ϕk)/π−n+1​(det(ak​j)+o⁡(1)),\Omega(v_{1},\ldots v_{n})=z^{(\sum\phi_{k})/\pi-n+1}(\det(a_{kj})+o(1)),

The excess vanishing order is ≥1−n\geq 1-n, where negative order stands for poles. By the index formula (23) for the ordinary linearized Cauchy-Riemann equation, we have

deg⁡q−deg⁡p≥1−n+n=1,\deg q-\deg p\geq 1-n+n=1,

and equality forces Ω⁡(v1,…​vn)\Omega(v_{1},\ldots v_{n}) to have no interior zero, no boundary zero, minimal zero at pp, and det(ak​j)≠0\det(a_{kj})\neq 0 at qq. The argument in Cor. 3.6 shows v1,…​vn,vnzv_{1},\ldots v_{n},\frac{v_{n}}{z} span the real vector space of first order deformations in W1,2;πW^{1,2;\pi}. In particular, the only first order deformation which decays at qq is the ℝ\mathbb{R}-translation vector field. Thus the cokernel to the ordinary linearized Cauchy-Riemann operator vanishes, and the moduli space is regular. ∎

A very analogous statement holds in the polygon case, and is left to the reader:

Lemma 3.10.

In the holomorphic polygon case, assume v1,…​vn−1v_{1},\ldots v_{n-1} are in the kernel of the extended linearized Cauchy-Riemann operator on W1,2;μ=πW^{1,2;\mu=\pi}, such that Ω⁡(⋅,v1,…​vn−1)\Omega(\cdot,v_{1},\ldots v_{n-1}) does not vanish identically as a 1-form on Σ\Sigma. Then deg⁡q−∑1kdeg⁡pk+k−2≥0\deg q-\sum_{1}^{k}\deg p_{k}+k-2\geq 0. When the equality is achieved, the holomorphic polygon is an immersion up to the boundary with minimal vanishing at the corner, and the zero dimensional moduli space of holomorphic polygons is regular at u:Σ→Xu:\Sigma\to X.

A similar statement applies to teardrop curves:

Lemma 3.11.

(Regularity of teardrops) Let u:Σ→Xu:\Sigma\to X be a teardrop curve with a unique output qq and no input ends. Assume v1,…​vn−1v_{1},\ldots v_{n-1} are in the kernel of the linearized Cauchy-Riemann operator on W1,2;μ=πW^{1,2;\mu=\pi}, such that Ω⁡(⋅,v1,…​vn−1)\Omega(\cdot,v_{1},\ldots v_{n-1}) does not vanish identically as a 1-form on Σ\Sigma. Then deg⁡q≥2\deg q\geq 2. When the equality is achieved, the teardrop curve is an immersion up to the boundary with minimal vanishing at the corner, and the kernel of the ordinary Cauchy-Riemann operator is spanned as a real vector space by the Möbius vector fields on Σ\Sigma fixing the qq corner, and the cokernel vanishes.

Proof.

We modify the proof of Lemma 3.9. We think of the corner qq as the origin in the upper half plane model, and take vnv_{n} instead to be the Möbius vector field z2∂zz^{2}\partial_{z} on Σ\Sigma. This has one higher order of vanishing:

vn=(an​1​zϕ1/π+1,…​an​n​zϕn/π+1)+O⁡(z2).v_{n}=(a_{n1}z^{\phi_{1}/\pi+1},\ldots a_{nn}z^{\phi_{n}/\pi+1})+O(z^{2}).

This leads to

Ω⁡(v1,…​vn)=z(∑ϕk)/π−n+2​(det(ak​j)+o⁡(1)),\Omega(v_{1},\ldots v_{n})=z^{(\sum\phi_{k})/\pi-n+2}(\det(a_{kj})+o(1)),

so the excess vanishing order at qq is ≥2−n\geq 2-n. The index of the ordinary linearized Cauchy-Riemann operator is

deg⁡q=2​∑(interior zeros)+∑(boundary zeros)+∑(excess corner zeros)+n,\deg q=2\sum(\text{interior zeros})+\sum(\text{boundary zeros})+\sum(\text{excess corner zeros})+n,

whence deg⁡q≥2\deg q\geq 2.

When the equality is achieved, then there is no interior or boundary zero, and det(ak​j)≠0\det(a_{kj})\neq 0 at the corner, hence the immersion claim. The argument in Cor. 3.6 shows that v1,…​vn,vnz,vnz2v_{1},\ldots v_{n},\frac{v_{n}}{z},\frac{v_{n}}{z^{2}} span the real vector space of first order deformations in W1,2;πW^{1,2;\pi}. In particular, the only first order deformation which decays at qq are spanned by vnv_{n} and z−1​vnz^{-1}v_{n}, namely the Möbius generators. Since the index of the ordinary Cauchy-Riemann operator is two, the cokernel must have dimension zero, namely the obstruction vanishes. ∎

The above lemma describes the optimal case for teardrop curves. Such deg⁡q=2\deg q=2 teardrop curves arise in isolated zero dimensional moduli spaces after taking the A​u​t​(D2,q)Aut(D^{2},q) quotient, and the counting contribution to m0m_{0} are ±1\pm 1 depending on the spin structure and the orientation issues.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.