ScalingStacks

3.8.2 Lower bound of the Solomon functional [04CH]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3.8.2 Lower bound of the Solomon functional

The theme of Chapter 5 will be on the variational approach to find special Lagrangians by minimizing the Solomon functional in a fixed derived category class. As an important motivation, special Lagrangians are formal local minimizers of the Solomon functional under Hamiltonian deformations (cf. section 2.8). In fact we can do better under the automatic transversality and the positivity condition:

Proposition 3.40.

(‘special Lagrangians are minimizers’) Suppose L0L_{0} is an exact immersed special Lagrangian of phase θ^∈(−π2,π2)\hat{\theta}\in(-\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2}), with unobstructed bounding cochain structure. Let LL be an almost calibrated, exact, immersed Lagrangian in the same Db​F​u​k​(X)D^{b}Fuk(X) class, which intersects L0L_{0} transversely. Suppose the bordism current 𝒞\mathcal{C} with ∂𝒞=L−L0\partial\mathcal{C}=L-L_{0} satisfies automatic transversality and the positivity condition. Then 𝒮⁡(L)≥𝒮⁡(L0)\mathcal{S}(L)\geq\mathcal{S}(L_{0}).

Proof.

The incline angle of the tangent vector to F⁡(∂Σ)⊂ℂF(\partial\Sigma)\subset\mathbb{C} is equal to the Lagrangian angle modulo π​ℤ\pi\mathbb{Z}. Since L0L_{0} is a special Lagrangian, along the L0L_{0} boundary portion arg⁡F=θ^\arg F=\hat{\theta}. Thus Im​(e−i​θ^​F)=0\text{Im}(e^{-i\hat{\theta}}F)=0 at p,qp,q and the self intersections on L0L_{0}. The Solomon functional integrand simplifies to

Im​∫Σe−i​θ^​F​ω+∑L-self intersections on ∂ΣIm​(e−i​θ^​F)​fL|−+.\text{Im}\int_{\Sigma}e^{-i\hat{\theta}}F\omega+\sum_{\text{$L$-self intersections on $\partial\Sigma$}}\text{Im}(e^{-i\hat{\theta}}F)f_{L}|^{+}_{-}.

By the almost calibrated assumption on L,L0L,L_{0}, and the positivity condition, we obtain Claim 3.23, namely F⁡(Σ)F(\Sigma) lies above its L0L_{0} boundary,

Im​(e−i​θ^​F)≥0on ​Σ.\text{Im}(e^{-i\hat{\theta}}F)\geq 0\quad\text{on }\Sigma.

Morever, the Novikov positivity requirement for the bounding cochain on LL says that fL|−+≥0f_{L}|^{+}_{-}\geq 0 at the degree one self intersections on ∂Σ∩L\partial\Sigma\cap L. Thus the Solomon functional integrand is nonnegative, which implies 𝒮⁡(L)≥0=𝒮⁡(L0)\mathcal{S}(L)\geq 0=\mathcal{S}(L_{0}). ∎

Remark 3.20.

Suppose we drop the positivity condition, then the key step Im​(e−i​θ^​F)≤0\text{Im}(e^{-i\hat{\theta}}F)\leq 0 would break down, so the above proof of Prop. 3.40 would be invalidated. However, the conclusion may still be true (cf. section 5.7.1).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.