ScalingStacks

Proposed extension of the Solomon functional [049N]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proposed extension of the Solomon functional

Taking the homological interpretation of (19) as starting point, a natural way to extend the Solomon functional is to make use of the bordism current 𝒞\mathcal{C} between an unobstructed Lagrangian LL and a fixed unobstructed reference Lagrangian L0L_{0}. We have ∂𝒞=L−L0\partial\mathcal{C}=L-L_{0} as currents, and 𝒞\mathcal{C} comes from the universal family of holomorphic curves. Our proposed formula is

𝒮⁡(L)=∫LfL​Im​(e−i​θ^​Ω)−∫L0fL0​Im​(e−i​θ^​Ω)−Im​∫𝒞λ∧e−i​θ^​Ω.\mathcal{S}(L)=\int_{L}f_{L}\text{Im}(e^{-i\hat{\theta}}\Omega)-\int_{L_{0}}f_{L_{0}}\text{Im}(e^{-i\hat{\theta}}\Omega)-\text{Im}\int_{\mathcal{C}}\lambda\wedge e^{-i\hat{\theta}}\Omega. (20)

A few conceptual points are in order:

  • •

    We emphasize that this depends not only on the underlying Lagrangian, but also on the potential fLf_{L}.

  • •

    There is no need to pass to any universal cover in the space of Lagrangians, as in Solomon’s work (cf. section 2.8).

  • •

    The topology of LL is no longer fixed, and in particular the Hamiltonian isotopy class may change.

  • •

    We view (20) as a unification of the very different viewpoints of Solomon and Lotay-Pacini. In section 2.10 we suggested that this extended Solomon functional may be relevant for quantum tunneling amplitudes between the branes L0L_{0} and LL.

  • •

    Suppose we vary the Lagrangian LL within a 1-parameter exact isotopy family of unobstructed Lagrangians LtL_{t}. The bordism currents 𝒞t\mathcal{C}_{t} between LtL_{t} and L0L_{0} satisfy

    𝒞t2=𝒞t1+∪t1≤t≤t2Lt modulo exact (n+1)-dim currents,\mathcal{C}_{t_{2}}=\mathcal{C}_{t_{1}}+\cup_{t_{1}\leq t\leq t_{2}}L_{t}\text{ modulo exact $(n+1)$-dim currents},

    then the computation in Lem 3.3 proves the first variation formula for the Solomon functional

    dd​t​𝒮​(Lt)=∫Ltht​Im​(e−i​θ^​Ω)\frac{d}{dt}\mathcal{S}(L_{t})=\int_{L_{t}}h_{t}\text{Im}(e^{-i\hat{\theta}}\Omega) (21)

    which is of course the defining feature of the Solomon functional. Consequently, the formula (20) extends Solomon’s definition in our exact setting, and fixes the multivaluedness problem (i.e. the need to pass to universal covers) in Solomon’s work.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.