Remark 3.4 . [049F]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Remark 3.4.
If there are degree self intersections of , then the choice of is only unique up to of some element in . The corresponding choice of would be ambiguous by the boundary of an -dimensional integration current. As a closely related issue, our conditions on are merely cohomological, so in general we can adjust and by coboundary terms, which would affect also by the boundary of an dimensional current. If we impose to be almost calibrated, then there are no elements to begin with, and these phenomena do not happen.
On the other hand, still depends on the choice of local systems and bounding cochains, which may contribute nontrivial holonomy factors. Gauge equivalent choices affect by the boundary of an -dimensional current. One may naturally ask:
Question 3.
Up to gauge equivalence of bounding cochains and local systems, is there an optimal representative of ?
Question 4.
Given an exact isotopy with surgery between and among unobstructed Lagrangians, is there a preferred choice of (cf. Question 2)?