Remark 6.10 . [04H7]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Remark 6.10.
Once immersed Lagrangians are admitted as objects of Fukaya categories, the twisted complexes are largely redundant. Joyce [41, conjecture 3.6] claims that by including immersed and singular Lagrangians with rank one local systems, then is automatically idempotent closed, so there is no difference between and . However, it is highly nonobvious why direct summands are Yoneda represented by geometric Lagrangian objects,6565 65 There exist some wild speculations, such as incorporating coisotropic branes into the Fukaya category in order to have more geometric objects. so this claim is regarded by many experts as a weakness of Joyce’s proposal. For this reason, in our more restrictive proposal we stick with the more geometric (including immersed and singular objects, but not formal idempotent summands) in favour of , and the idempotent closure problem does not falsify our program.