ScalingStacks

Remark 5.20 . [04FV]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 5.20.

As mentioned in section 3.5, the mere requirement for the Floer theoretic obstruction criterion (i.e. the stability condition) to make sense for Lagrangian currents is already very constraining. Most statements are simply impossible to make without concepts that need at least C1C^{1}-regularity, and the bordism currents between integration cycles are among the rare exceptions. This was one of the heuristic arguments in section 3.5 that obstructions must come from bordism currents.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.