ScalingStacks

Appendix B Torelli theorem for K3 surfaces [03XZ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Appendix B Torelli theorem for K3 surfaces

Here we recall the classification theory of complex K3 sufaces (see [PSS] and its extension to non-algebraic case in [LP]). Let XX be a complex K3 surface, i.e. smooth connected complex manifold with dim𝐂X=2\dim_{{\bf C}}X=2 which admits a nowhere vanishing holomorphic 22-form Ω\Omega, and such that H1​(X,𝐙)=0H^{1}(X,{{\bf Z}})=0.

It is known that the group H2​(X,𝐙)H^{2}(X,{{\bf Z}}) endowed with the Poincare pairing (⋅,⋅)(\cdot,\cdot) is isomorphic to the lattice

ΛK​3=(0110)⊕(0110)⊕(0110)⊕(−E8)⊕(−E8)\Lambda_{K3}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&0\end{array}\right)\oplus\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&0\end{array}\right)\oplus\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&0\end{array}\right)\oplus\left(-E_{8}\right)\oplus\left(-E_{8}\right)

of signature (3,19)(3,19).

Complex 11-dimensional vector space H2,0​(X)=𝐂⋅[Ω]⊂H2​(X,𝐙)⊗𝐂H^{2,0}(X)={{\bf C}}\cdot[\Omega]\subset H^{2}(X,{{\bf Z}})\otimes{{\bf C}} satisfies the condition (v,v)=0,(v,v¯)>0(v,v)=0,(v,\overline{v})>0 for any non-zero vector vv. Finally, it is known that XX admits a Kähler metric, and Kähler cone 𝒦X⊂H2​(X,𝐑){\cal K}_{X}\subset H^{2}(X,{{\bf R}}) of all Kähler metrics on XX is an open subset of CX:={[ω]∈H2(X,𝐙)⊗𝐑|([ω],[Ω])=0,([ω],[ω])>0}C_{X}:=\{[\omega]\in H^{2}(X,{{\bf Z}})\otimes{{\bf R}}|([\omega],[\Omega])=0,([\omega],[\omega])>0\}. In fact 𝒦X{\cal K}_{X} is a connected component of the set CX∖∪v∈H2​(X,𝐙),(v,v)=−2,(v,[Ω])=0HvC_{X}\setminus\cup_{v\in H^{2}(X,{{\bf Z}}),(v,v)=-2,(v,[\Omega])=0}H_{v}, where HvH_{v} is the hyperplane orthogonal to vv.

Axiomatizing these data we arrive to the following definition.

Definition 23

K3 period data is a quadruple (Λ,(⋅,⋅),H2,0,𝒦)(\Lambda,(\cdot,\cdot),H^{2,0},{\cal K}) consisting of a free abelian group Λ\Lambda, a symmetric pairing (⋅,⋅):Λ×Λ→𝐙(\cdot,\cdot):\Lambda\times\Lambda\to{{\bf Z}}, a 11-dimensional complex vector subspace H2,0⊂Λ⊗𝐂H^{2,0}\subset\Lambda\otimes{{\bf C}} and a set 𝒦⊂Λ⊗𝐑{\cal K}\subset\Lambda\otimes{{\bf R}} satisfying the following conditions:

  1. 1.

    r​k​Λ=22rk\,\Lambda=22;

  2. 2.

    (Λ,(⋅,⋅))(\Lambda,(\cdot,\cdot)) is isomorphic to ΛK​3\Lambda_{K3};

  3. 3.

    for any v∈H2,0∖{0}v\in H^{2,0}\setminus\{0\} one has (v,v)=0(v,v)=0 and (v,v¯)>0(v,\overline{v})>0;

  4. 4.

    the set 𝒦{\cal K} is a connected component of C∖∪v∈Λ,(v,v)=−2,(v,H2,0)=0HvC\setminus\cup_{v\in\Lambda,(v,v)=-2,(v,H^{2,0})=0}H_{v}\,, where C={w∈Λ⊗𝐑|(w,H2,0)=0,(w,w)>0}C=\{w\in\Lambda\otimes{{\bf R}}|(w,H^{2,0})=0,(w,w)>0\} and HvH_{v} is the hyperplane orthogonal to vv.

The K3 period data form a groupoid. On the other hand, K3 surfaces also form a groupoid (morphisms are isomorphisms of K3 surfaces). Then classical global Torelli theorem can be formulated in the following way.

Theorem 11

Groupoid of K3 surfaces is equivalent to the groupoid of K3 period data.

In particular the automorphism group of a K3 surface is isomorphic to the automorphism group of its period data.

More generally one can speak about holomorphic families of K3 surfaces over complex analytic spaces. For a K3 surface over an analytic space MM the period data consist of a local system of integral lattices (Λ,(⋅,⋅))(\Lambda,(\cdot,\cdot)) pointwise isomorphic to ΛK​3\Lambda_{K3}, a holomorphic line subbundle H2,0H^{2,0} of Λ⊗𝐙𝒪M\Lambda\otimes_{{\bf Z}}{\cal O}_{M} which is isotropic with respect to the symmetric pairing (⋅,⋅)(\cdot,\cdot), and satisfies pointwise the condition (v,v¯)>0,v∈Hx2,0∖{0},x∈Mr​e​d(v,\overline{v})>0,v\in H^{2,0}_{x}\setminus\{0\},x\in M^{red}, and an open subset of the total space of the bundle over Mr​e​dM^{red} with the fibers Λx⊗𝐑∩(H2,0)⟂\Lambda_{x}\otimes{{\bf R}}\cap(H^{2,0})^{\perp} ((H2,0)⟂(H^{2,0})^{\perp} is the orthogonal complement) satisfying pointwise the condition 4) from the definition of K3 period data. Then Torelli theorem holds for families as well.

References

[AKMW], D. Abramovich, K. Karu, K. Matsuki, J. Wlodarczyk, Torification and factorization of birational maps, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), no. 3, 531–572, and preprint math.AG/9904135.

[Ar] V. Arnold, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, Springer, 1997.

[Au] M. Audin, Spinning tops. A course on integrable systems, Cambridge Studies Adv. Math., vol. 51, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[Be1] V. Berkovich, Spectral theory and analytic geometry over non-archimedean fields, AMS Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, n. 33, 1990.

[Be2] V. Berkovich, Smooth p-adic analytic spaces are locally contractible, Inv.Math., 137, 1–84 (1999).

[Be3] V. Berkovich, Smooth p-adic analytic spaces are locally contractible, II, to appear.

[GS] M. Gross, B. Siebert, Mirror Symmetry via Logarithmic degeneration data, I, preprint math.AG/0309070.

[GW] M. Gross, P. M. H. Wilson, Large complex structure limits of K3 surfaces, J. Differential Geom. 55 (2000), no. 3, 475–546, and preprint math.DG/0008018.

[HZh] C. Haase, I. Zharkov, Integral affine structures on spheres and torus fibrations of Calabi-Yau toric hypersurfaces I, preprint math.AG/0205321.

[KN] S. Kobayashi, K. Nomizu, Foundations of differential geometry, vol. 1, John Wiley and Sons, 1963.

[Ko] M. Kontsevich, Homological algebra of mirror symmetry, Proc. ICM Zürich, vol.1, 1994, and preprint math.AG/9411018.

[KoSo] M. Kontsevich, Y. Soibelman, Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations, in Symplectic geometry and mirror symmetry (Seoul, 2000), World Sci. Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 2001, 203–263, and math.SG/0011041.

[KoT] M. Kontsevich, Yu. Tschinkel, Non-archimedean Kähler geometry, in preparation.

[LeS] N. C. Leung, M. Symington, Almost toric symplectic four-manifolds, preprint math.SG/0312165.

[LYZ] J. Loftin, S.-T. Yau, R. Zaslow, Affine manifolds, SYZ geometry and the “Y” vertex, preprint math.DG/0405061.

[LP] E. Looijenga, C. Peters, Torelli theorems for Kähler K3 surfaces, Comp. Math. 42 (1981), 145–186.

[Mi] G. Mikhalkin, Amoebas of algebraic varieties and tropical geometry, preprint math.AG/0403015.

[Mor] D. R. Morrison, Mathematical aspects of mirror symmetry, in Complex algebraic geometry (Park City, UT, 1993), IAS/Park City Math. Ser., 3, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, 265–327, and preprint alg-geom/9609021.

[PSS] I. I. Pjateckiĭ-S̆apiro, I. R. S̆afarevic̆, A Torelli theorem for algebraic surfaces of type K3, Math. USSR Izvestija 5 (1971), No. 3, 547–588.

[SYZ] A. Strominger, S.-T. Yau, E. Zaslow, Mirror symmetry is T-duality, Nucl. Phys. B479 (1996), 243-259.

[Tyu] A. Tyurin, On Bohr-Sommerfeld bases, Izv. Math. 64 (2000), no. 5, 1033–1064, and preprint math.AG/9909084.

[Zu] N. Zung, Symplectic topology of integrable Hamiltonian systems, II: Topological classification , Compositio Math., 138:2 (2003), 125-156.

Addresses:

M.K.: IHES, 35 route de Chartres, F-91440, France

maxim@ihes.fr

Y.S.: Department of Mathematics, KSU, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA

soibel@math.ksu.edu

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.