ScalingStacks

10.1 Pro-nilpotent Lie algebra [03WC]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

10.1 Pro-nilpotent Lie algebra

Here it will be convenient to work in local coordinates (x,y)=(log⁡|ξ|,log⁡|η|)(x,y)=(\log|\xi|,\log|\eta|) on YY.

Let (x0,y0)∈𝐑2(x_{0},y_{0})\in{\bf R}^{2} be a point, α1,α2∈(𝐙2)∗\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2}\in({\bf Z}^{2})^{\ast} be 11-covectors such that α1∧α2>0\alpha_{1}\wedge\alpha_{2}>0. Denote by V=V(x0,y0),α1,α2V=V_{(x_{0},y_{0}),\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2}} the closed angle

{(x,y)∈𝐑2|⟨αi,(x,y)−(x0,y0)⟩≥0,i=1,2}.\{(x,y)\in{\bf R}^{2}|\langle\alpha_{i},(x,y)-(x_{0},y_{0})\rangle\geq 0,i=1,2\,\}\,\,.

Let 𝒪⁡(V){\cal O}(V) be a KK-algebra consisting of series f=∑n,m∈𝐙cn,m​ξn​ηmf=\sum_{n,m\in{\bf Z}}c_{n,m}\xi^{n}\eta^{m}, such that cn,m∈Kc_{n,m}\in K and for all (x,y)∈V(x,y)\in V we have:

  1. 1.

    if cn,m≠0c_{n,m}\neq 0 then ⟨(n,m),(x,y)−(x0,y0)⟩≤0\langle(n,m),(x,y)-(x_{0},y_{0})\rangle\leq 0, where we identified (n,m)∈𝐙2(n,m)\in{\bf Z}^{2} with a covector in (Tp∗​Y)𝐙(T_{p}^{\ast}Y)^{{\bf Z}};

  2. 2.

    log⁡|cn,m|+n​x+m​y→−∞\log|c_{n,m}|+nx+my\to-\infty as long as |n|+|m|→+∞|n|+|m|\to+\infty.

Algebra 𝒪⁡(V){\cal O}(V) is a Poisson algebra with respect to the bracket {ξ,η}=ξ​η\{\xi,\eta\}=\xi\eta.

For an integer covector μ=a​d​x+b​d​y∈(𝐙2)∗\mu=adx+bdy\in({\bf Z}^{2})^{*} we denote by RμR_{\mu} the monomial ξa​ηb\xi^{a}\eta^{b}.

Let us consider a pro-nilpotent Lie algebra 𝐠:=𝐠α1,α2,V⊂𝒪⁡(V){\bf g}:={\bf g}_{\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},V}\subset{\cal O}(V) consisting of series

f=∑n1,n2≥0,n1+n2>0cn1,n2​Rα1−n1​Rα2−n2f=\sum_{n_{1},n_{2}\geq 0,n_{1}+n_{2}>0}c_{n_{1},n_{2}}R_{\alpha_{1}}^{-n_{1}}R_{\alpha_{2}}^{-n_{2}}

satisfying the condition

log⁡|cn,m|−n1​⟨α1,(x,y)⟩−n2​⟨α2,(x,y)⟩≤0​∀(x,y)∈V.\log|c_{n,m}|-n_{1}\langle\alpha_{1},(x,y)\rangle-n_{2}\langle\alpha_{2},(x,y)\rangle\leq 0\,\,\,\,\forall\,(x,y)\in V\,\,.

The latter condition is equivalent to log⁡|cn,m|−⟨n1​α1+n2​α2,(x0,y0)⟩≤0\log|c_{n,m}|-\langle n_{1}\alpha_{1}+n_{2}\alpha_{2},(x_{0},y_{0})\rangle\leq 0.

Lie algebra 𝐠{\bf g} admits a filtration by Lie subalgebras 𝐠≥k,k∈𝐙,k≥1{\bf g}^{\geq k},k\in{\bf Z},k\geq 1, 𝐠=𝐠≥1{\bf g}={\bf g}^{\geq 1}, such that 𝐠≥k{\bf g}^{\geq k} consists of the above series which satisfy the condition n1+n2≥kn_{1}+n_{2}\geq k. Clearly [𝐠≥k1,𝐠≥k2]⊂𝐠≥k1+k2[{\bf g}^{\geq k_{1}},{\bf g}^{\geq k_{2}}]\subset{\bf g}^{\geq k_{1}+k_{2}}, and 𝐠=lim←k→+∞⁡𝐠/𝐠≥k{\bf g}=\varprojlim_{k\to+\infty}{\bf g}/{\bf g}^{\geq k}.

Thus, 𝐠{\bf g} is a topological complete pro-nilpotent Lie algebra over KK. We denote by GG the corresponding pro-nilpotent Lie group exp⁡(𝐠)\exp({\bf g}). It inherits the filtration by normal subgroups G≥kG^{\geq k} obtained from the corresponding Lie algebras.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.