ScalingStacks

A.3 Clemens polytopes [03XI]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

A.3 Clemens polytopes

Let XX be a smooth proper scheme over the non-archimedean field KK. We assume that KK carries a discrete valuation v​a​lval such that v​a​l​(K×)=𝐙val(K^{\times})={{\bf Z}}.

Definition 18

A model of XX is a scheme of finite type 𝒳/𝒪K{\cal X}/{{\cal O}}_{K} flat and proper over 𝒪K{{\cal O}}_{K}, together with an isomorphism 𝒳×S​p​e​c​(K)S​p​e​c​(𝒪K)≃X{\cal X}\times_{Spec(K)}Spec({{\cal O}}_{K})\simeq X. Denote the special fiber of 𝒳{\cal X} by

𝒳0:=𝒳×S​p​e​c​(K)S​p​e​c​(k).{\cal X}^{0}:={\cal X}\times_{Spec(K)}Spec(k)\,\,.

A model has no nontrivial automorphisms. Thus, the stack of equivalence classes of models is in fact a set, which we denote by M​o​dXMod_{X}. It carries a natural partial order. Namely, we say that 𝒳1≥𝒳2{\cal X}_{1}\geq{\cal X}_{2} if there exists a map 𝒳1→𝒳2{\cal X}_{1}\to{\cal X}_{2} over S​p​e​c​(𝒪K)Spec({{\cal O}}_{K}). Such a map is automatically unique.

Definition 19

A model 𝒳{\cal X} has normal crossings if the scheme 𝒳{\cal X} is regular and the reduced subscheme 𝒳r​e​d0{\cal X}^{0}_{red} is a divisor with normal crossings.

By the resolution of singularities, in the case c​h​a​r​k=0char\,k=0 we know that every model is dominated by a model with normal crossings.

Definition 20

A model 𝒳{\cal X} has simple normal crossings (snc model for short) if

  • •

    it has normal crossings;

  • •

    all irreducible components of 𝒳r​e​d0{\cal X}^{0}_{red} are smooth and

  • •

    all intersections of irreducible components of 𝒳r​e​d0{\cal X}^{0}_{red} are either empty or irreducible.

The set of equivalence classes of snc models will be denoted by M​o​dXs​n​cMod_{X}^{snc}. It is a filtered partially ordered set. The order is given by dominating maps of models which give the identity automorphism on the generic fiber.

It is easy to show that starting with any model with normal crossings and applying blow-ups centered at certain self-intersection loci of the special fiber we can get a snc model. In what follows we use snc models only. This choice is dictated by convenience and not by necessity. Working with snc models has the advantage that all definitions and calculations can be made very transparent. The reader can consult [Be2] for the approach in the general case, without the use of the resolution of singularities.

Let 𝒳{\cal X} be an snc model and I=I𝒳I=I_{{\cal X}} the set of irreducible components of 𝒳r​e​d0{\cal X}^{0}_{red}. Denote by Di⊂𝒳D_{i}\subset{\cal X} the divisor corresponding to i∈Ii\in I. For any finite non-empty subset J⊂IJ\subset I put

DJ:=⋂j∈JDj.D_{J}:=\bigcap_{j\in J}D_{j}\,\,.

By the snc property the set DJD_{J} is either empty or is a smooth connected proper variety over kk of dimension dim(DJ)=(n−|J|+1)\dim(D_{J})=(n-|J|+1). For a divisor Di⊂𝒳0D_{i}\subset{\cal X}^{0} we denote by di∈𝐙>0d_{i}\in{\bf Z}_{>0} the order of vanishing of uu at DiD_{i}, where u∈Ku\in K is an uniformizing element, v​a​lK​(u)=1val_{K}(u)=1. Equivalently, did_{i} is the multiplicity of DiD_{i} in 𝒳0{\cal X}^{0}.

Definition 21

The Clemens polytope S𝒳S_{\cal X} is the finite simplicial subcomplex of the simplex ΔI\Delta^{I} such that ΔJ\Delta^{J} is a face of S𝒳S_{\cal X} iff DJ≠∅D_{J}\neq\emptyset.

Clearly, S𝒳S_{\cal X} is a nonempty connected CW-complex. We will also consider the cone over S𝒳S_{\cal X}:

C𝒳(𝐑):={∑i∈Iai⟨Di⟩|ai∈𝐑≥0,⋂i:ai>0Di≠∅}∖{0}⊂𝐑I.C_{\cal X}({\bf R}):=\left\{\sum_{i\in I}a_{i}\langle D_{i}\rangle|\,a_{i}\in{{\bf R}}_{\geq 0},\,\,\,\bigcap_{i:\,a_{i}>0}D_{i}\neq\emptyset\right\}\setminus\{0\}\subset{\bf R}^{I}\,\,.

Analogously, we can define C𝒳​(𝐙),C_{\cal X}({\bf Z}),\,.

We identify S𝒳S_{\cal X} with the following subset of C𝒳​(𝐑)C_{\cal X}({\bf R}):

{∑i∈Iai​⟨Di⟩∈C𝒳​(𝐑)|∑iai​di=1}.\left\{\sum_{i\in I}a_{i}\langle D_{i}\rangle\in C_{\cal X}({\bf R})|\,\sum_{i}a_{i}d_{i}=1\right\}\,\,.

Obviously, we can also describe S𝒳S_{\cal X} as a quotient of C𝒳​(𝐑)C_{\cal X}({\bf R}):

S𝒳=C𝒳​(𝐑)/𝐑+×.S_{\cal X}=C_{\cal X}({\bf R})/{\bf R}^{\times}_{+}\,\,.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.