ScalingStacks

4 B-model construction [03TY]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

4 B-model construction

4.1 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine structure on smooth points

Here we are going to define an analog of the notion of integrable system in the framework of rigid analytic geometry. Roughly speaking, it is a triple (X,Ο€,B)(X,\pi,B), where XX is a variety defined over a non-archimedean field (see [Be1] and Appendix A), BB a CW complex and Ο€:Xβ†’B\pi:X\to B a continuous map. More precisely, let KK be a field with non-trivial valuation, XX an irreducible algebraic variety over KK of dimension nn, f=(f1,…,fN)f=(f_{1},...,f_{N}) a collection of non-zero rational functions on XX. Then we have a multivalued map

X⁑(KΒ―)β†’[βˆ’βˆž,+∞]N,x↦v​a​lK¯​(f⁑(x)):=(v​a​lK¯​(f1​(x)),…,v​a​lK¯​(fN​(x))).X(\overline{K})\to[-\infty,+\infty]^{N},\,\,x\mapsto val_{\overline{K}}(f(x)):=\left(val_{\overline{K}}\left(f_{1}(x)),\dots,val_{\overline{K}}(f_{N}(x)\right)\right)\,.

Here KΒ―\overline{K} is the algebraic closure of KK, and v​a​lKΒ―val_{\overline{K}} denotes valuation on KΒ―\overline{K}.

Let ψ:[βˆ’βˆž,+∞]Nβ†’B\psi:[-\infty,+\infty]^{N}\to B be a continuous map such that the composition Ο€=ψ∘v​a​l​(f)\pi=\psi\circ val(f) is single-valued. Our map Ο€\pi will always be of this form. More generally, we can take XX to be a (not necessarily algebraic) compact smooth KK-analytic space, and Ο€:Xβ†’B\pi:X\to B be a continuous map which factorizes as the composition of the projection p𝒳:Xβ†’S𝒳p_{\cal X}:X\to S_{\cal X} to the Clemens polytope S𝒳S_{\cal X} of some model 𝒳{\cal X} of XX and a continuous map Ο€β€²:S𝒳→B\pi^{\prime}:S_{\cal X}\to B (see Section 4.2.3).

Now we would like to be more precise. Let KK be a complete non-archimedean field, with valuation v​a​lval and the corresponding norm |x|:=exp⁑(βˆ’v​a​l​(x))βˆˆπ‘β‰₯0|x|:=\exp(-val(x))\in{\bf R}_{\geq 0}. Before giving next definition we observe that there is a canonical continuous map Ο€c​a​n:(𝐆ma​n)n→𝐑n\pi_{can}:({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{n}\to{{\bf R}}^{n} (see Section A.2 in Appendix A). Here 𝐆ma​n{\bf G}_{m}^{an} is a multiplicative group (considered as an analytic space over KK) and the restriction of Ο€c​a​n\pi_{can} to (KΒ―Γ—)n(\overline{K}^{\times})^{n} is given by the formula

Ο€c​a​n​(z1,…,zn)=(log⁑|z1|,…,log⁑|zn|).\pi_{can}(z_{1},...,z_{n})=(\log|z_{1}|,\dots,\log|z_{n}|)\,\,.

The sheaf π’ͺ𝐑nc​a​n:=(Ο€c​a​n)βˆ—β€‹(π’ͺ(𝐆ma​n)n){\cal O}^{can}_{{{\bf R}}^{n}}:=(\pi_{can})_{\ast}({\cal O}_{({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{n}}) of KK-algebras is called the canonical sheaf.

Let XX be a smooth KK-analytic space of dimension nn, π:X→B\pi:X\to B a continuous map of XX into a Hausdorff topological space BB.

Definition 4

We call a point x∈Bx\in B smooth (or Ο€\pi-smooth) if there is a neighborhood UU of xx such that the fibration Ο€βˆ’1​(U)β†’U\pi^{-1}(U)\to U is isomorphic to a fibration Ο€c​a​nβˆ’1​(V)β†’V\pi_{can}^{-1}(V)\to V for some open subset VβŠ‚π‘nV\subset{{\bf R}}^{n}. Here the isomorphism Ο€βˆ’1​(U)≃πc​a​nβˆ’1​(V)\pi^{-1}(U)\simeq\pi_{can}^{-1}(V) is taken in the category of KK-analytic spaces while U≃VU\simeq V is a homeomorphism.

In this case we will call Ο€\pi (or the triple (Ο€βˆ’1​(U),Ο€,U)(\pi^{-1}(U),\pi,U)) an analytic torus fibration.

Let Bs​mB^{sm} denotes the set of smooth points of BB. It is a topological subspace of BB (in fact a topological manifold of dimension nn).

Theorem 1

The space Bs​mB^{sm} carries a sheaf of 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine functions, which is locally isomorphic to the canonical sheaf of 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine functions on 𝐑n{{\bf R}}^{n}.

Proof. We start with the following Lemma.

Lemma 1

Let VβŠ‚π‘nV\subset{{\bf R}}^{n} be a connected open set, Ο†βˆˆπ’ͺ(𝐆ma​n)n×​(Ο€c​a​nβˆ’1​(V))\varphi\in{\cal O}^{\times}_{{({\bf G}_{m}^{an})}^{n}}(\pi_{can}^{-1}(V)) be an invertible analytic function. Then the function v​a​lx​(φ⁑(x))val_{x}(\varphi(x)) is constant along fibers of Ο€c​a​n\pi_{can}, and it is a pull-back of a 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine function on 𝐑n{{\bf R}}^{n}.

In order to prove Lemma we observe that any analytic function ψ∈π’ͺ(𝐆ma​n)n×​(Ο€c​a​nβˆ’1​(V))\psi\in{\cal O}^{\times}_{{({\bf G}_{m}^{an})}^{n}}(\pi_{can}^{-1}(V)) can be decomposed into Laurent series:

ψ=βˆ‘I=(i1,…,in)βˆˆπ™ncI​zI,cI∈K\psi=\sum_{I=(i_{1},\dots,i_{n})\in{{\bf Z}}^{n}}c_{I}z^{I},\,\,\,c_{I}\in K

satisfying certain convergence conditions (see Section A.2).

Then for a non-zero analytic function ψ\psi on Ο€c​a​nβˆ’1​(V)\pi_{can}^{-1}(V) we introduce a real-valued function V​a​l​(ψ)​(x):=infIβˆˆπ™n(v​a​l​(cI)βˆ’βŸ¨I,x⟩),x∈VVal(\psi)(x):=\inf_{I\in{{\bf Z}}^{n}}(val(c_{I})-\langle I,x\rangle),x\in V. It is a concave, locally piecewise-linear function on VV. It is easy to see that

a)

there is a dense open subset V1βŠ‚VV_{1}\subset V such that for any x∈V1x\in V_{1} the infimum in the definition of V​a​l​(ψ)Val(\psi) is achieved for a single multi-index II;

b)

V​a​l​(ψ1β€‹Οˆ2)=V​a​l​(ψ1)+V​a​l​(ψ2)Val(\psi_{1}\psi_{2})=Val(\psi_{1})+Val(\psi_{2}).

For an invertible function Ο†\varphi we have 0=V​a​l​(1)=V​a​l​(Ο†β€‹Ο†βˆ’1)=V​a​l​(Ο†)+V​a​l​(Ο†βˆ’1)0=Val(1)=Val(\varphi\varphi^{-1})=Val(\varphi)+Val(\varphi^{-1}). Since both V​a​l​(Ο†)Val(\varphi) and V​a​l​(Ο†βˆ’1)Val(\varphi^{-1}) are concave, their sum can be equal to zero iff they are both affine. Moreover they are both 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine since the linear part of V​a​l​(Ο†)Val(\varphi) is given by the integer vector II for some single multi-index II. Finally, observe that v​a​lx​(φ⁑(x))β‰₯Ο€c​a​nβˆ—β€‹(V​a​l​(Ο†))​(x),xβˆˆΟ€c​a​nβˆ’1​(V)val_{x}(\varphi(x))\geq\pi_{can}^{*}(Val(\varphi))(x),x\in\pi_{can}^{-1}(V). Therefore v​a​lx​(φ⁑(x))=V​a​l​(Ο†)​(Ο€c​a​n​(x))val_{x}(\varphi(x))=Val(\varphi)(\pi_{can}(x)) for invertible Ο†\varphi. β– \blacksquare

Now we can finish the proof of the Theorem. The above formula gives us a coordinate-free description of Ο€c​a​nβˆ—β€‹(V​a​l​(Ο†))\pi_{can}^{*}(Val(\varphi)). It is easy to see that any 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine function on VV is of the form V​a​l​(Ο†)+c,cβˆˆπ‘Val(\varphi)+c,c\in{{\bf R}} for some invertible Ο†\varphi (in the case of 𝐑n{{\bf R}}^{n} it suffices to take monomials as Ο†\varphi). We can identify Ο€βˆ’1​(U)β†’U\pi^{-1}(U)\to U with Ο€c​a​nβˆ’1​(V)β†’V\pi_{can}^{-1}(V)\to V for some small open UβŠ‚XU\subset X and VβŠ‚π‘nV\subset{{\bf R}}^{n}. Then we can define V​a​l​(Ο†)Val(\varphi) for any invertible Ο†βˆˆπ’ͺX​(Ο€βˆ’1​(U))\varphi\in{\cal O}_{X}(\pi^{-1}(U)) by the above formula. Finally we define a sheaf of 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine functions on Bs​mB^{sm} by taking all functions of the form V​a​l​(Ο†)+c,cβˆˆπ‘Val(\varphi)+c,c\in{{\bf R}}. It follows from the above discussion that in this way we obtain a 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine structure on Bs​mB^{sm}, which is locally isomorphic to the standard one on 𝐑n{{\bf R}}^{n}. β– \blacksquare

We will denote by A​f​f𝐙,Bs​mc​a​nAff^{can}_{{{\bf Z}},B^{sm}} the sheaf of 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine functions constructed in the proof.

4.2 Examples

4.2.1 Logarithmic map

This is a basic example

Ο€=Ο€c​a​n=log|β‹…|:X=(𝐆ma​n)nβ†’B0=B=𝐑n\pi=\pi_{can}=\log|\cdot|:X=({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{n}\to B_{0}=B={{\bf R}}^{n}

described in details in Appendix A. For any algebraic (or analytic) subvariety ZβŠ‚(𝐆ma​n)nZ\subset({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{n} of dimension m≀nm\leq n its image π⁑(Z)\pi(Z) is a non-compact piecewise-linear closed subset of 𝐑n{\bf R}^{n} of real dimension mm. Smooth points for Ο€|Z\pi_{|Z} are dense in π⁑(Z)\pi(Z).

In particular, if ZZ is a curve then π⁑(Z)\pi(Z) is a graph in BB with straight edges having rational directions. One can try to make a dictionary which translates the properties of the algebraic variety ZβŠ‚π†mnZ\subset{\bf G}_{m}^{n} to the properties of the PL set π⁑(Za​n)\pi(Z^{an}) which is the closure of π⁑(Z⁑(KΒ―))\pi(Z(\overline{K})) in 𝐑n{\bf R}^{n}. This circle of ideas is a subject of the so-called β€œtropical geometry” (see e.g. [Mi]).

4.2.2 Tate tori

Let ρ:𝐙nβ†’(KΓ—)n\rho:{{\bf Z}}^{n}\to(K^{\times})^{n} be a group homomorphism such that the image of the composition v​a​l∘ρ:𝐙n→𝐑nval\circ\rho:{{\bf Z}}^{n}\to{{\bf R}}^{n} is a rank nn lattice in 𝐑n{{\bf R}}^{n}. Group (KΓ—)n(K^{\times})^{n} acts by translations on the analytic space (𝐆ma​n)n({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{n}. Restriction of this action to 𝐙n{{\bf Z}}^{n} (via ρ\rho) is discrete and cocompact. The quotient is a KK-analytic space XX called Tate torus. There is an obvious map Ο€:Xβ†’B:=𝐑n/(v​a​l∘ρ)​(𝐙n)\pi:X\to B:={{\bf R}}^{n}/(val\circ\rho)({{\bf Z}}^{n}). All points of BB are smooth. The space XX depends on n2n^{2} parameters taking values in KΓ—K^{\times}(cf. with the flat tori example in Section 3.2.1).

4.2.3 Clemens polytopes and their contractions

For any smooth projective variety XX of dimension nn, and and a snc model 𝒳{\cal X} of it (see Appendix A) we have a canonical projection to the corresponding Clemens polytope

p𝒳:Xa​nβ†’S𝒳.p_{{\cal X}}:X^{an}\rightarrow S_{{\cal X}}\,\,.

All interior points of nn-dimensional simplices of S𝒳S_{{\cal X}} are p𝒳p_{{\cal X}}-smooth, although there might be other smooth points too. More generally, one can compose projection p𝒳p_{{\cal X}} with a continuous surjection Ο€β€²:S𝒳↠B\pi^{\prime}:S_{{\cal X}}\twoheadrightarrow B where BB is a finite CW complex and map Ο€β€²\pi^{\prime} is a cell map for some cell subdivision of S𝒳S_{{\cal X}}. We assume that fibers of the composition Ο€:=Ο€β€²βˆ˜p𝒳:Xa​nβ†’B\pi:=\pi^{\prime}\circ p_{{\cal X}}:X^{an}\to B are connected. This seems to be the most general case of maps from projective varieties over complete local fields to CW complexes relevant for our purposes.

4.2.4 Curves

Let X/KX/K be a connected smooth projective curve of genus g>1g>1. After passing to a finite extension Kβ€²K^{\prime} of KK we may assume that XX has a canonical model 𝒳{\cal X} with stable reduction. The graph Ξ“β€²\Gamma^{\prime} corresponding to the special fiber 𝒳0{\cal X}_{0} is a retraction of (XβŠ—KKβ€²)a​n(X\otimes_{K}K^{\prime})^{an}. The quotient graph Ξ“=Ξ“β€²/G​a​l​(Kβ€²/K)\Gamma=\Gamma^{\prime}/Gal(K^{\prime}/K) is a retraction of the analytic curve Xa​nX^{an} (see [Be1]). We define B:=Ξ“B:=\Gamma. Then Bs​mB^{sm} is a complement to a finite set. As in Section 3.2.2, a 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine structure on a graph is the same as a length element (i.e. a metric). Therefore Ξ“\Gamma is a metrized graph. Notice also that the maximal number of edges of the graph corresponding to a genus gg curve is 3​gβˆ’33g-3, which is the dimension of the moduli space of genus gg curves.

Notice that if in Section 4.2.1 subvariety ZZ is a curve then its projection is a noncompact metrized graph with unbounded edges corresponding to punctures ZΒ―βˆ–Z{\overline{Z}}\setminus Z.

4.2.5 K3 surfaces

Here we will describe a particular case of the construction from Section 4.2.3 (a contraction of a Clemens polytope).

Let field KK be 𝐂⁑((t)){{\bf C}}((t)) and XβŠ‚πK3X\subset{\bf P}^{3}_{K} be a formal family of complex K3 surfaces given by the equation

x0​x1​x2​x3+t​P4​(x0,x1,x2,x3)=0,x_{0}x_{1}x_{2}x_{3}+tP_{4}(x_{0},x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})=0\,\,,

where P4P_{4} is a generic homogeneous polynomial of degree four, and tt is a formal parameter.

The special fiber at t=0t=0 of this family is singular, it is given by the equation x0​x1​x2​x3=0x_{0}x_{1}x_{2}x_{3}=0. Let us denote by 𝐏3~\widetilde{{\bf P}^{3}} the blow-up of the total space of the trivial 𝐏3{\bf P}^{3}-bundle over S​p​e​c​(π’ͺK)Spec({\cal O}_{K}) at 2424 points pΞ±,1≀α≀24p_{\alpha},1\leq\alpha\leq 24 of the special fiber, where each pΞ±p_{\alpha} is a solution of the equation

P4​(x0,x1,x2,x3)=0,xi=xj=0,  1≀i<j≀4.P_{4}(x_{0},x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})=0,\,\,x_{i}=x_{j}=0,\,\,1\leq i<j\leq 4\,\,.

The closure 𝒳{\cal X} of XX in 𝐏3~\widetilde{{\bf P}^{3}} is a model with simple normal crossings. The associated Clemens polytope S𝒳S_{\cal X} has 2828 vertices. Four of them correspond to coordinate hyperplanes xi=0x_{i}=0 in 𝐏3{\bf P}^{3}, and 2424 other correspond to divisors sitting at the pre-images of the points pΞ±p_{\alpha}. Therefore S𝒳S_{\cal X} is the union of the boundary βˆ‚Ξ”3\partial\Delta^{3} of the standard 33-simplex Ξ”3\Delta^{3} with 2424 copies of the standard 22-simplex Ξ”2\Delta^{2}. Those 2424 triangles Δα2,1≀α≀24\Delta_{\alpha}^{2},1\leq\alpha\leq 24 are decomposed into six groups of four triangles in each. All triangles from the same group have a common edge, which is identified with an edge of βˆ‚Ξ”3\partial\Delta^{3} (tetrahedron with 2424 β€œwings”). As we mentioned in the previous example, there is a continuous map p:Xa​nβ†’S𝒳p:X^{an}\to S_{\cal X}. We are going to construct BB as a retraction of S𝒳S_{\cal X}.

In order to do this we observe that for an edge eβŠ‚Ξ”2e\subset\Delta^{2} and a point a∈ea\in e one has the canonical retraction pa,e:Ξ”2β†’ep_{a,e}:\Delta^{2}\to e. Namely, let us identify the edge ee with the interval [βˆ’1,1][-1,1] of the real line, so that aa is identified with the point a=(a0,0)a=(a_{0},0), and Ξ”2\Delta^{2} is bounded by ee and the segments 0≀y≀1βˆ’|x|0\leq y\leq 1-|x|. Then we define pa,ep_{a,e} by the formulas (see Figure 2)

(x,y)↦(x+y,0),x+y≀a0;(x,y)↦(xβˆ’y,0),xβˆ’yβ‰₯a0;(x,y)↦(a0,0),Β otherwise.\begin{array}[]{llcl}(x,y)&\mapsto&(x+y,0)\,,&x+y\leq a_{0}\,\,;\\ (x,y)&\mapsto&(x-y,0)\,,&x-y\geq a_{0}\,\,;\\ (x,y)&\mapsto&(a_{0},0)\,,&\mbox{ otherwise.}\end{array}

Refer to caption

Figure 2: Triangle contracted to one side. The dashed area maps to point aa.

Now we choose a point qi​j,0≀i<j≀3q_{ij},0\leq i<j\leq 3 in the interior of each edge ei​je_{ij} of βˆ‚Ξ”3\partial\Delta^{3} (here i,ji,j are identified with the vertices of βˆ‚Ξ”3\partial\Delta^{3}). There are four β€œwings” Δα2\Delta_{\alpha}^{2} having ei​je_{ij} as a common edge. Then we retract each Δα2\Delta_{\alpha}^{2} to ei​je_{ij} by the map pqi​j,ei​jp_{q_{ij},e_{ij}}. This gives us a retraction Ο€β€²=Ο€(qi​j)β€²:Sπ’³β†’βˆ‚Ξ”3\pi^{\prime}=\pi^{\prime}_{(q_{ij})}:S_{\cal X}\to\partial\Delta^{3}. Let Ο€:=pπ’³βˆ˜Ο€(qi​j)β€²:Xa​nβ†’B\pi:=p_{\cal X}\circ\pi^{\prime}_{(q_{ij})}:X^{an}\to B be the composition of the projection p𝒳:Xa​nβ†’S𝒳p_{\cal X}:X^{an}\to S_{\cal X} with the above retraction. One can show that all points of B:=βˆ‚Ξ”3B:=\partial\Delta^{3} are Ο€\pi-smooth except of the chosen six points qi​j,0≀i<j≀3q_{ij},0\leq i<j\leq 3. According to Theorem 1 we obtain a 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine structure on S2βˆ–βˆͺ1≀i<j≀3{qi​j}S^{2}\setminus\cup_{1\leq i<j\leq 3}\{q_{ij}\}. One can show that the local monodromy around each point qi​jq_{ij} is conjugate to the matrix

(1401).\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&4\\ 0&1\end{array}\right)\,\,.

We skip the computations here.

4.3 Stein property

A KK-analytic space XX is called Stein if the natural map

Xβ†’S​p​e​ca​n​(Γ⁑(X,π’ͺX))X\to Spec^{an}(\Gamma(X,{\cal O}_{X}))

is a homeomorphism. Here Γ⁑(X,π’ͺX)\Gamma(X,{\cal O}_{X}) is considered as a topological KK-algebra. This definition is equivalent to the standard one. Let us call the projection Ο€:Xβ†’B\pi:X\to B Stein if for any b∈Bb\in B there exists a fundamental systems of neighborhoods UiU_{i} of xx such that Ο€βˆ’1​(Ui)βŠ‚X\pi^{-1}(U_{i})\subset X is a Stein domain. If Ο€\pi is Stein then we can reconstruct (X,π’ͺX)(X,{\cal O}_{X}) and Ο€\pi from the space BB endowed with the sheaf Ο€βˆ—β€‹(π’ͺX)\pi_{*}({\cal O}_{X}) of topological KK-algebras.

Proposition 1

Let BB be a contraction of Clemens polytope S𝒳S_{{\cal X}} of some model 𝒳\cal{X} of XX as in Section 4.2.3, and Ο€\pi a Stein map. Then Bs​mB^{sm} is dense in BB.

Proof.33 3 We thank to Ofer Gabber for suggesting the proof below It suffices to prove that nn-dimensional cells are dense in BB, where n=dimXn=\dim X. For any open UβŠ‚B,Uβ‰ βˆ…U\subset B,\,\,U\neq\emptyset we have Hcn​(U,Ο€βˆ—β€‹(Ξ©Xn))≃Hcn​(Ο€βˆ’1​(U),Ξ©Xn)H_{c}^{n}(U,\pi_{\ast}(\Omega^{n}_{X}))\simeq H_{c}^{n}(\pi^{-1}(U),\Omega^{n}_{X}).

The last group is nontrivial, because for any non-empty open VβŠ‚Xa​nV\subset X^{an} the integration map ∫:Hcn​(V,Ξ©Xn)β†’K\int:H_{c}^{n}(V,\Omega^{n}_{X})\to K is onto. Therefore dim(U)β‰₯n\dim(U)\geq n. β– \blacksquare

All the examples in Sections 4.2.1–4.2.5 (except Section 4.2.3) have Stein property.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.