7.3 Lifting Problem [03VU]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
7.3 Lifting Problem
Let be as in Section 7.2, be a space with singular -affine structure (see Section 6.3), and an extension of -affine structure on to a -affine structure satisfying fixed point property (see 7.1). We assume that -affine structure cannot be extended to a larger open set . Slightly abusing notation we will denote simply by . We want to have a -analytic space , meromorphic non-zero top degree form and a continuous proper (and maybe also Stein) map such that:
- 1.
coincides with , and -affine structure on arising from the projection coincides with the given one;
- 2.
the restriction is a nowhere vanishing analytic form which satisfies the Constant Norm Assumption;
- 3.
the -affine structure on arising from the pair coincides with the initial one.
We call the problem of finding such data Lifting Problem.
Remark 3
If a solution of the Lifting Problem exists then is orientable. Indeed, is locally a constant defined up to a sign which depends on the orientation of . Global choice of the constant gives an orientation. For oriented we can rescale canonically in such a way that
Question. What restrictions on the behavior of the -affine structure near should we impose in order to guarantee the existence of a solution of the Lifting Problem?
Let be a flat torus (see Section 3.2.1). Then the Lifting Problem has a solution (canonical up to rescaling of ) for any compatible -affine structure. More precisely, the groupoid of Tate tori and isomorphisms between them is equivalent to the groupoid of -affine structures on real flat tori.
In Sections 8-11 we are going to discuss a solution of the Lifting Problem for K3 surfaces. In that case .
If we restrict ourselves only to the smooth part (i.e. we allow non-compact ) then there is a canonical solution of this “reduced” Lifting Problem. In other words one can construct a smooth -analytic space with an analytic top degree form and a map satisfying the above conditions 1–3. Let us explain this construction assuming that is oriented.
First of all we notice that the orientation of gives a reduction to of the structure group of the torsor defining the -affine structure. The reduced group naturally acts by automorphisms of the fibration preserving the form . The action on is induced from the action on monomials. Namely, the inverse to an element acts on monomials as
The action of the same element on is given by the similar formula
Let be an open covering by coordinate charts such that for any we are given elements satisfying the -cocycle condition for any triple . Then the space is obtained from by gluing by means of the transformations . The form gives rise to a nowhere vanishing analytic top degree form on . Thus we have obtained a solution of the reduced Lifting Problem. The sheaf is called the canonical sheaf.
In the case this solution seems to be a “wrong” one, i.e. it cannot be extended to a solution , where and are compact. In the case of K3 surfaces we will show later how to modify it in order to obtain a “true” solution of the Lifting Problem.