ScalingStacks

10.2 Lie groups G λ [03WD]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

10.2 Lie groups GλG_{\lambda}

For each λ∈[0,+∞]𝐐:=𝐐≥0∪∞\lambda\in[0,+\infty]_{{\bf Q}}:={\bf Q}_{\geq 0}\cup\infty we define a Lie subalgebra

𝐠λ={∑n1,n2cm,nRα1−n1Rα2−n2∈𝐠|cn1,n2∈K,n2n1=λ}.{\bf g}_{\lambda}=\left\{\sum_{n_{1},n_{2}}c_{m,n}R_{\alpha_{1}}^{-n_{1}}R_{\alpha_{2}}^{-n_{2}}\in{\bf g}\,|\,\,c_{n_{1},n_{2}}\in K,\,\,{n_{2}\over{n_{1}}}=\lambda\,\right\}\,\,.

Each 𝐠λ{\bf g}_{\lambda} is an abelian Lie algebra. It carries the induced filtration by Lie algebras 𝐠λ≥k=𝐠λ∩𝐠≥k{\bf g}_{\lambda}^{\geq k}={\bf g}_{\lambda}\cap{\bf g}^{\geq k}. Denote by Gλ=exp⁡(𝐠λ)G_{\lambda}=\exp({\bf g}_{\lambda}) the corresponding pro-nilpotent group.

Lemma 4

For any given k≥1k\geq 1 there exist finitely many λ1<λ2<⋯<λNk\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}<\dots<\lambda_{N_{k}} such that 𝐠λ/𝐠λ≥k=0{\bf g}_{\lambda}/{\bf g}^{\geq k}_{\lambda}=0 for λ≠λi,1≤i≤Nk\lambda\neq\lambda_{i},1\leq i\leq N_{k}.

Proof. Indeed, for the monomial Rα1−n1​Rα2−n2∈𝐠λR_{\alpha_{1}}^{-n_{1}}R_{\alpha_{2}}^{-n_{2}}\in{\bf g}_{\lambda} which maps non-trivially to the quotient 𝐠λ/𝐠λ≥k{\bf g}_{\lambda}/{\bf g}^{\geq k}_{\lambda} we have: n1+n2≤k,n1/n2=λn_{1}+n_{2}\leq k,n_{1}/n_{2}=\lambda, where n1,n2n_{1},n_{2} are non-negative integers. There are finitely many such non-negative integers n1n_{1} and n2n_{2}. ■\blacksquare

It follows from the Lemma that we have a natural isomorphism of vector spaces ∏λ∈[0,+∞]𝐐𝐠λ/𝐠λ≥k→𝐠/𝐠≥k\prod_{\lambda\in[0,+\infty]_{{\bf Q}}}{\bf g}_{\lambda}/{\bf g}_{\lambda}^{\geq k}\to{\bf g}/{\bf g}^{\geq k}, hence the map

(fλ)λ∈[0,+∞]𝐐↦∑λfλ=∑i=1Nifλi, where fλ∈𝐠λ/𝐠λ≥k∀λ∈[0,+∞]𝐐(f_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in[0,+\infty]_{{\bf Q}}}\mapsto\sum_{\lambda}f_{\lambda}=\sum_{i=1}^{N_{i}}f_{\lambda_{i}},\,\,\,\,\mbox{ where }f_{\lambda}\in{\bf g}_{\lambda}/{\bf g}_{\lambda}^{\geq k}\,\,\,\forall\lambda\in[0,+\infty]_{{\bf Q}}

is well-defined and gives rise (after taking the projective limit as k→+∞k\to+\infty) to the isomorphism 𝐠≃∏λ∈[0,+∞]𝐐𝐠λ{\bf g}\simeq\prod_{\lambda\in[0,+\infty]_{{\bf Q}}}{\bf g}_{\lambda}.

In a similar way we define the map ∏→:∏λ∈[0,+∞]𝐐Gλ→G\prod_{\to}:\prod_{\lambda\in[0,+\infty]_{{\bf Q}}}G_{\lambda}\to G, the product is taken with respect to the natural order on 𝐐{\bf Q}. Namely, for any k≥1k\geq 1 we define

∏→(k):∏i=1NkGλi/Gλi≥k→G/G≥k,(g1,…,gNk)↦g1​…​gNk, for ​gi∈Gλi/Gλi≥k{\textstyle\prod_{\to}^{(k)}}:\prod_{i=1}^{N_{k}}G_{\lambda_{i}}/G_{\lambda_{i}}^{\geq k}\to G/G^{\geq k}\,,\,(g_{1},\dots,g_{N_{k}})\mapsto g_{1}\dots g_{N_{k}},\,\mbox{ for }g_{i}\in G_{\lambda_{i}}/G_{\lambda_{i}}^{\geq k}

and then set ∏→:=lim←k∏→(k)\prod_{\to}:=\varprojlim_{k}\prod_{\to}^{(k)}\,.

Theorem 6

Map ∏→\prod_{\to} is a bijection of sets.

Proof. Let k≥1k\geq 1 be an integer. We claim that ∏→(k)\prod_{\to}^{(k)} is a bijection of sets (this implies the proposition by taking the projective limit as k→+∞k\to+\infty). We will prove the bijection by induction in kk . Case k=1k=1 is obvious because all the groups under considerations are trivial.

We would like to prove that ∏→(k+1)\prod_{\to}^{(k+1)} is a bijection assuming that ∏→(k)\prod_{\to}^{(k)} is a bijection. Let hh be an element of G/G≥k+1G/G^{\geq k+1} and h¯\overline{h} its image in G/G≥kG/G^{\geq k}. By the induction assumption there exist unique h¯i∈Gλi/Gλi≥k+1,1≤i≤Nk+1\overline{h}_{i}\in G_{\lambda_{i}}/G_{\lambda_{i}}^{\geq k+1},1\leq i\leq N_{k+1} such that h¯1​…​h¯Nk+1=h¯\overline{h}_{1}\dots\overline{h}_{N_{k+1}}=\overline{h}. Let hi,1≤i≤Nk+1h_{i},1\leq i\leq N_{k+1} be any liftings of h¯i\overline{h}_{i} to Gi/Gi≥kG_{i}/G_{i}^{\geq k}. Then h1​…​hNk+1=h(modG≥k)h_{1}\dots h_{N_{k+1}}=h\pmod{G^{\geq k}}, hence c:=h1​…​hNk+1​h−1c:=h_{1}\dots h_{N_{k+1}}h^{-1} belongs to G≥k/G≥k+1⊂C​e​n​t​e​r​(G/G≥k+1)G^{\geq k}/G^{\geq k+1}\subset Center(G/G^{\geq k+1}). The last inclusion holds because [𝐠,𝐠≥k]=[𝐠≥1,𝐠≥k]⊂𝐠≥k+1[{\bf g},{\bf g}^{\geq k}]=[{\bf g}^{\geq 1},{\bf g}^{\geq k}]\subset{\bf g}^{\geq k+1}.

Next we observe that the isomorphism of abelian Lie algebras

⨁1≤i≤Nk+1𝐠λi≥k/𝐠λi≥k+1≃𝐠≥k/𝐠≥k+1\bigoplus_{1\leq i\leq{N_{k+1}}}{\bf g}_{\lambda_{i}}^{\geq k}/{\bf g}_{\lambda_{i}}^{\geq k+1}\simeq{\bf g}^{\geq k}/{\bf g}^{\geq k+1}

implies an isomorphism of the corresponding abelian groups

∏1≤i≤Nk+1Gi≥k/Gi≥k+1≃G≥k/G≥k+1.\prod_{1\leq i\leq{N_{k+1}}}G_{i}^{\geq k}/G_{i}^{\geq k+1}\simeq G^{\geq k}/G^{\geq k+1}\,\,.

Hence we can write uniquely c=c1​…​cNk+1c=c_{1}\dots c_{N_{k+1}}, where ci∈G≥k/G≥k+1⊂C​e​n​t​e​r​(G/G≥k+1)c_{i}\in G^{\geq k}/G^{\geq k+1}\subset Center(G/G^{\geq k+1}). It follows that ∏→(k+1)((hi​ci−1))=h\prod_{\to}^{(k+1)}\left((h_{i}c_{i}^{-1})\right)=h. Also it is now clear that this decomposition of hh is unique. This concludes the proof. ■\blacksquare

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.