ScalingStacks

6.7.1 Integrable systems [03VD]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context ยท Original author HTML

6.7.1 Integrable systems

Recall that in Section 3.3 we constructed a 3838-dimensional space ๐’ซ{\cal P} parameterizing integrable systems (X,ฯ‰)โ†’B(X,\omega)\to B with Bโ‰ƒS2B\simeq S^{2}. The space ๐’ซ{\cal P} carries a codimension 2020 foliation โ„ฑ{\cal F} corresponding to small deformations of integrable systems which do not change the invariant [ฯ][\rho] of the local system ฯ:ฯ€1โ€‹(Bsโ€‹m)โ†’Sโ€‹Lโ€‹(2,๐™)โ‹‰๐‘2\rho:\pi_{1}(B^{sm})\to SL(2,{{\bf Z}})\ltimes{{\bf R}}^{2}. We explained that the fundamental group of a leaf of โ„ฑ{\cal F} acts by PL homeomorphisms of S2S^{2}. Here we are going to give a (partial) description of ๐’ซ{\cal P} and โ„ฑ{\cal F} in cohomological terms using Torelli theorem (see Appendix B).

An algebraic polarized K3 surface X/๐‚X/{{\bf C}} elliptically fibered over ๐‚โ€‹P1{{\bf C}}P^{1}, equipped with a holomorphic volume form ฮฉ\Omega can be encoded by the data (ฮ›,(โ‹…,โ‹…),[ฯ‰],[ฮฉ],[ฮณ],๐’ฆX)(\Lambda,(\cdot,\cdot),[\omega],[\Omega],[\gamma],{\cal K}_{X}), where

  1. 1.

    (ฮ›,(โ‹…,โ‹…),๐‚โก[ฮฉ],๐’ฆX)(\Lambda,(\cdot,\cdot),{\bf C}[\Omega],{\cal K}_{X}) is a K3 period data;

  2. 2.

    [ฯ‰],[ฮณ]โˆˆฮ›[\omega],[\gamma]\in\Lambda, ฮฉโˆˆฮ›โŠ—๐‚\Omega\in\Lambda\otimes{{\bf C}}\,\,;

  3. 3.

    [ฯ‰]โˆˆ๐’ฆX,ฮณโˆˆโˆ‚๐’ฆX,([ฯ‰],[ฮฉ])=([ฮณ],[ฮฉ])=([ฮณ],[ฮณ])=0[\omega]\in{\cal K}_{X},\,\,\,\gamma\in\partial{\cal K}_{X},\,\,\,([\omega],[\Omega])=([\gamma],[\Omega])=([\gamma],[\gamma])=0\,\,;

  4. 4.

    ฮณ\gamma is a non-zero primitive lattice vector.

Here [ฯ‰][\omega] is the class of polarization (projective embedding) of XX, [ฮณ][\gamma] is dual to the class of generic fiber of the elliptic fibration ฯ€:Xโ†’๐‚โ€‹P1\pi:X\to{{\bf C}}P^{1}.

Perhaps one can express in cohomological terms the fact that ฯ€\pi has exactly 2424 critical values. The latter is an open condition.

Let LโŠ‚H2โ€‹(X,๐™)L\subset H_{2}(X,{{\bf Z}}) be a subgroup consisting of homology classes which can be represented by cycles which are projected into graphs in Bsโ€‹mB^{sm} (such cycles are circle fibrations over graphs). When we move along a leaf of โ„ฑ{\cal F} then the pairing of Rโ€‹eโ€‹([ฮฉ])Re([\Omega]) with LL remains unchanged (see Section 3.1.1). Clearly LโŠ‚[ฮณ]โŸ‚L\subset[\gamma]^{\perp}, and moreover, one can check that L=[ฮณ]โŸ‚โ‰ƒ๐™21L=[\gamma]^{\perp}\simeq{{\bf Z}}^{21}. The pairing with Rโ€‹eโ€‹([ฮฉ])Re([\Omega]) gives a map ฮ›2,18:=[ฮณ]โŸ‚/๐™โก[ฮณ]โ†’๐‘\Lambda_{2,18}:=[\gamma]^{\perp}/{{\bf Z}}[\gamma]\to{{\bf R}}, where ฮ›2,18\Lambda_{2,18} is the following even unimodular lattice of signature (2,18)(2,18):

ฮ›2,18=(0110)โŠ•(0110)โŠ•(โˆ’E8)โŠ•(โˆ’E8),\Lambda_{2,18}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&0\end{array}\right)\oplus\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&0\end{array}\right)\oplus\left(-E_{8}\right)\oplus\left(-E_{8}\right)\,\,,

where โˆ’E8-E_{8} is the Cartan matrix for Dynkin diagram E8E_{8} taken with the minus sign.

The functional (Rโ€‹eโ€‹[ฮฉ],โ‹…)(Re[\Omega],\cdot) on ฮ›2,18\Lambda_{2,18} can be represented as (vRโ€‹eโ€‹[ฮฉ],โ‹…)(v_{Re[\Omega]},\cdot) where vRโ€‹eโ€‹[ฮฉ]โˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘v_{Re[\Omega]}\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}} is a vector with the strictly positive square norm. One can show that the (non-Hausdorff) space of leaves of โ„ฑ{\cal F} is canonically identified with the set {vโˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘|(v,v)>0}/Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(ฮ›2,18)\{v\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}}|(v,v)>0\}/Aut(\Lambda_{2,18}).

The fundamental group of the leaf โ„ฑv{\cal F}_{v} corresponding to a vector vโˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘v\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}} maps onto the group ฮ“vโŠ‚Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(ฮ›2,18)\Gamma_{v}\subset Aut(\Lambda_{2,18}). This group is (up to a conjugation) the stabilizer in (Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(ฮ›2,18),(โ‹…,โ‹…)2,18,v)(Aut(\Lambda_{2,18}),(\cdot,\cdot)_{2,18},v) of the cone KvK_{v}, which is a connected component of the set

{wโˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘|(w,v)=0,(w,w)>0}โˆ–โ‹ƒฮณโˆˆฮ›2,18,(ฮณ,ฮณ)=โˆ’2,(ฮณ,v)=0Hฮณ\{w\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}}|(w,v)=0,(w,w)>0\}\setminus\bigcup_{\gamma\in\Lambda_{2,18},(\gamma,\gamma)=-2,(\gamma,v)=0}H_{\gamma}

and Hฮณโˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘H_{\gamma}\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}} is the hyperplane orthogonal to ฮณ\gamma (cf. Appendix B). Let us denote by Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vโ€‹(S2)Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v}(S^{2}) the group of piecewise-linear transformations of S2S^{2} with integer linear part. Index vv signifies the dependence of ๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L{\bf Z}PL-structure on S2S^{2} on vv.

Conjecture 7

The homomorphism ฯ€1โ€‹(โ„ฑv)โ†’Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vโ€‹(S2)\pi_{1}({\cal F}_{v})\to Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v}(S^{2}) arising from the monodromy of the local system along the leaf โ„ฑv{\cal F}_{v} (see Sections 3.3, 6.4) is equal to the composition

ฯ€1โ€‹(โ„ฑv)โ† ฮ“vโ†’Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vโ€‹(S2),\pi_{1}({\cal F}_{v})\twoheadrightarrow\Gamma_{v}\to Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v}(S^{2})\,\,,

where the homomorphism ฯ•v:ฮ“vโ†’Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vโ€‹(S2)\phi_{v}:\Gamma_{v}\to Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v}(S^{2}) is uniquely determined by this property.

One can consider the whole moduli space โ„ณ44{\cal M}_{44} of ๐™{\bf Z}-affine structures on S2S^{2} with 2424 standard singularities. This space is a Hausdorff orbifold (with a natural ๐™{\bf Z}-affine structure!) of dimension 4444, and it carries a foliation of codimension 2020 as before. It seems that using our main result (Theorem 5 in Part III) together with certain natural assumption (see Conjecture 11 in Section 11.6) one can show that the action by ๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L{\bf Z}PL transformations of S2S^{2} of the fundamental group of leaves of the foliation on the larger space โ„ณ44{\cal M}_{44} is again reduced to the action of ฮ“v\Gamma_{v}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.