ScalingStacks

6.7 K3 surfaces and ๐™ โ€‹ P โ€‹ L -actions on S 2 [03VC]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context ยท Original author HTML

6.7 K3 surfaces and ๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L{{\bf Z}}PL-actions on S2S^{2}

6.7.1 Integrable systems

Recall that in Section 3.3 we constructed a 3838-dimensional space ๐’ซ{\cal P} parameterizing integrable systems (X,ฯ‰)โ†’B(X,\omega)\to B with Bโ‰ƒS2B\simeq S^{2}. The space ๐’ซ{\cal P} carries a codimension 2020 foliation โ„ฑ{\cal F} corresponding to small deformations of integrable systems which do not change the invariant [ฯ][\rho] of the local system ฯ:ฯ€1โ€‹(Bsโ€‹m)โ†’Sโ€‹Lโ€‹(2,๐™)โ‹‰๐‘2\rho:\pi_{1}(B^{sm})\to SL(2,{{\bf Z}})\ltimes{{\bf R}}^{2}. We explained that the fundamental group of a leaf of โ„ฑ{\cal F} acts by PL homeomorphisms of S2S^{2}. Here we are going to give a (partial) description of ๐’ซ{\cal P} and โ„ฑ{\cal F} in cohomological terms using Torelli theorem (see Appendix B).

An algebraic polarized K3 surface X/๐‚X/{{\bf C}} elliptically fibered over ๐‚โ€‹P1{{\bf C}}P^{1}, equipped with a holomorphic volume form ฮฉ\Omega can be encoded by the data (ฮ›,(โ‹…,โ‹…),[ฯ‰],[ฮฉ],[ฮณ],๐’ฆX)(\Lambda,(\cdot,\cdot),[\omega],[\Omega],[\gamma],{\cal K}_{X}), where

  1. 1.

    (ฮ›,(โ‹…,โ‹…),๐‚โก[ฮฉ],๐’ฆX)(\Lambda,(\cdot,\cdot),{\bf C}[\Omega],{\cal K}_{X}) is a K3 period data;

  2. 2.

    [ฯ‰],[ฮณ]โˆˆฮ›[\omega],[\gamma]\in\Lambda, ฮฉโˆˆฮ›โŠ—๐‚\Omega\in\Lambda\otimes{{\bf C}}\,\,;

  3. 3.

    [ฯ‰]โˆˆ๐’ฆX,ฮณโˆˆโˆ‚๐’ฆX,([ฯ‰],[ฮฉ])=([ฮณ],[ฮฉ])=([ฮณ],[ฮณ])=0[\omega]\in{\cal K}_{X},\,\,\,\gamma\in\partial{\cal K}_{X},\,\,\,([\omega],[\Omega])=([\gamma],[\Omega])=([\gamma],[\gamma])=0\,\,;

  4. 4.

    ฮณ\gamma is a non-zero primitive lattice vector.

Here [ฯ‰][\omega] is the class of polarization (projective embedding) of XX, [ฮณ][\gamma] is dual to the class of generic fiber of the elliptic fibration ฯ€:Xโ†’๐‚โ€‹P1\pi:X\to{{\bf C}}P^{1}.

Perhaps one can express in cohomological terms the fact that ฯ€\pi has exactly 2424 critical values. The latter is an open condition.

Let LโŠ‚H2โ€‹(X,๐™)L\subset H_{2}(X,{{\bf Z}}) be a subgroup consisting of homology classes which can be represented by cycles which are projected into graphs in Bsโ€‹mB^{sm} (such cycles are circle fibrations over graphs). When we move along a leaf of โ„ฑ{\cal F} then the pairing of Rโ€‹eโ€‹([ฮฉ])Re([\Omega]) with LL remains unchanged (see Section 3.1.1). Clearly LโŠ‚[ฮณ]โŸ‚L\subset[\gamma]^{\perp}, and moreover, one can check that L=[ฮณ]โŸ‚โ‰ƒ๐™21L=[\gamma]^{\perp}\simeq{{\bf Z}}^{21}. The pairing with Rโ€‹eโ€‹([ฮฉ])Re([\Omega]) gives a map ฮ›2,18:=[ฮณ]โŸ‚/๐™โก[ฮณ]โ†’๐‘\Lambda_{2,18}:=[\gamma]^{\perp}/{{\bf Z}}[\gamma]\to{{\bf R}}, where ฮ›2,18\Lambda_{2,18} is the following even unimodular lattice of signature (2,18)(2,18):

ฮ›2,18=(0110)โŠ•(0110)โŠ•(โˆ’E8)โŠ•(โˆ’E8),\Lambda_{2,18}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&0\end{array}\right)\oplus\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&0\end{array}\right)\oplus\left(-E_{8}\right)\oplus\left(-E_{8}\right)\,\,,

where โˆ’E8-E_{8} is the Cartan matrix for Dynkin diagram E8E_{8} taken with the minus sign.

The functional (Rโ€‹eโ€‹[ฮฉ],โ‹…)(Re[\Omega],\cdot) on ฮ›2,18\Lambda_{2,18} can be represented as (vRโ€‹eโ€‹[ฮฉ],โ‹…)(v_{Re[\Omega]},\cdot) where vRโ€‹eโ€‹[ฮฉ]โˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘v_{Re[\Omega]}\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}} is a vector with the strictly positive square norm. One can show that the (non-Hausdorff) space of leaves of โ„ฑ{\cal F} is canonically identified with the set {vโˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘|(v,v)>0}/Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(ฮ›2,18)\{v\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}}|(v,v)>0\}/Aut(\Lambda_{2,18}).

The fundamental group of the leaf โ„ฑv{\cal F}_{v} corresponding to a vector vโˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘v\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}} maps onto the group ฮ“vโŠ‚Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(ฮ›2,18)\Gamma_{v}\subset Aut(\Lambda_{2,18}). This group is (up to a conjugation) the stabilizer in (Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(ฮ›2,18),(โ‹…,โ‹…)2,18,v)(Aut(\Lambda_{2,18}),(\cdot,\cdot)_{2,18},v) of the cone KvK_{v}, which is a connected component of the set

{wโˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘|(w,v)=0,(w,w)>0}โˆ–โ‹ƒฮณโˆˆฮ›2,18,(ฮณ,ฮณ)=โˆ’2,(ฮณ,v)=0Hฮณ\{w\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}}|(w,v)=0,(w,w)>0\}\setminus\bigcup_{\gamma\in\Lambda_{2,18},(\gamma,\gamma)=-2,(\gamma,v)=0}H_{\gamma}

and Hฮณโˆˆฮ›2,18โŠ—๐‘H_{\gamma}\in\Lambda_{2,18}\otimes{{\bf R}} is the hyperplane orthogonal to ฮณ\gamma (cf. Appendix B). Let us denote by Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vโ€‹(S2)Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v}(S^{2}) the group of piecewise-linear transformations of S2S^{2} with integer linear part. Index vv signifies the dependence of ๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L{\bf Z}PL-structure on S2S^{2} on vv.

Conjecture 7

The homomorphism ฯ€1โ€‹(โ„ฑv)โ†’Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vโ€‹(S2)\pi_{1}({\cal F}_{v})\to Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v}(S^{2}) arising from the monodromy of the local system along the leaf โ„ฑv{\cal F}_{v} (see Sections 3.3, 6.4) is equal to the composition

ฯ€1โ€‹(โ„ฑv)โ† ฮ“vโ†’Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vโ€‹(S2),\pi_{1}({\cal F}_{v})\twoheadrightarrow\Gamma_{v}\to Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v}(S^{2})\,\,,

where the homomorphism ฯ•v:ฮ“vโ†’Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vโ€‹(S2)\phi_{v}:\Gamma_{v}\to Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v}(S^{2}) is uniquely determined by this property.

One can consider the whole moduli space โ„ณ44{\cal M}_{44} of ๐™{\bf Z}-affine structures on S2S^{2} with 2424 standard singularities. This space is a Hausdorff orbifold (with a natural ๐™{\bf Z}-affine structure!) of dimension 4444, and it carries a foliation of codimension 2020 as before. It seems that using our main result (Theorem 5 in Part III) together with certain natural assumption (see Conjecture 11 in Section 11.6) one can show that the action by ๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L{\bf Z}PL transformations of S2S^{2} of the fundamental group of leaves of the foliation on the larger space โ„ณ44{\cal M}_{44} is again reduced to the action of ฮ“v\Gamma_{v}.

6.7.2 Analytic surfaces

Let X=(Xt)tโ†’0X=(X_{t})_{t\to 0} be a maximally degenerate K3 surface over the field ๐‚tmโ€‹eโ€‹r{{\bf C}}_{t}^{mer} (see Section 5.1). We denote by ฮ›X\Lambda_{X} the quotient group [ฮณ0]โŸ‚/๐™โก[ฮณ0][\gamma_{0}]^{\perp}/{{\bf Z}}[\gamma_{0}] where [ฮณ0]โˆˆH2โ€‹(Xt,๐™)[\gamma_{0}]\in H_{2}(X_{t},{\bf Z}) is the vanishing cycle. Then ฮ›Xโ‰ƒฮ›2,18\Lambda_{X}\simeq\Lambda_{2,18}. Let us assume that the monodromy acts trivially on ฮ›X\Lambda_{X}.

We define a natural homomorphism ฯX:ฮ›Xโ†’(๐‚tmโ€‹eโ€‹r)ร—\rho_{X}:\Lambda_{X}\to({{\bf C}}_{t}^{mer})^{\times} by the formula

ฯXโ€‹([ฮณ])=expโก(2โ€‹ฯ€โ€‹iโ€‹โˆซฮณฮฉtโˆซฮณ0ฮฉt),[ฮณ]โˆˆ[ฮณ0]โŸ‚.\rho_{X}([\gamma])=\exp\left(2\pi i{\int_{\gamma}\Omega_{t}\over{\int_{\gamma_{0}}\Omega_{t}}}\right),\,\,\,[\gamma]\in[\gamma_{0}]^{\perp}\,\,.

One can give a more abstract definition of ฯX\rho_{X} in terms of the variation of Hodge structure. It is easy to see that (vโ€‹aโ€‹l๐‚tmโ€‹eโ€‹rโˆ˜ฯX)โ€‹([ฮณ])=(vX,[ฮณ])\left(val_{{{\bf C}}_{t}^{mer}}\circ\rho_{X}\right)([\gamma])=(v_{X},[\gamma]) where vXโˆˆฮ›Xv_{X}\in\Lambda_{X} is a vector such that (vX,vX)>0(v_{X},v_{X})>0, and vโ€‹aโ€‹l๐‚tmโ€‹eโ€‹rval_{{{\bf C}}_{t}^{mer}} is the standard valuation on the field ๐‚tmโ€‹eโ€‹rโŠ‚๐‚โก((t)){{\bf C}}_{t}^{mer}\subset{{\bf C}}((t)).

Let Xaโ€‹nX^{an} be the corresponding analytic K3 surface over the field K=๐‚โก((t))K={{\bf C}}((t)). We have an analytic torus fibration over S2โˆ–{x1,โ€ฆ,x24}S^{2}\setminus\{x_{1},...,x_{24}\} which can be extended to a continuous map Xaโ€‹nโ†’S2X^{an}\to S^{2}. Let us call such an extension a singular analytic torus fibration with standard singularities.

Conjecture 8

For any analytic K3 surface Xaโ€‹n/KX^{an}/K admitting an analytic torus fibration Xaโ€‹nโ†’S2X^{an}\to S^{2} with standard singularities, one can define intrinsically the lattice ฮ›Xaโ€‹n\Lambda_{X^{an}} and the homomorphism ฯXaโ€‹n:ฮ›Xaโ€‹nโ†’Kร—\rho_{X^{an}}:\Lambda_{X^{an}}\to K^{\times}.

Notice that for K3 surfaces any birational automorphism is biregular. Hence the group of birational automorphisms Aโ€‹uโ€‹tbโ€‹rโ€‹tโ€‹(X)Aut^{brt}(X) acts by a ZPL-transformations of the sphere S2S^{2} which is equipped with a singular ๐™{\bf Z}-affine structure (see Section 6.6), i.e. we have a homomorphism

Aโ€‹uโ€‹tbโ€‹rโ€‹tโ€‹(X)=Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(X)โ†’Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vXโ€‹(Sโ€‹kโ€‹(Xaโ€‹n,ฮฉ))โ‰ƒAโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vXโ€‹(S2).Aut^{brt}(X)=Aut(X)\to Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v_{X}}(Sk(X^{an},\Omega))\simeq Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v_{X}}(S^{2})\,\,.
Conjecture 9

1) The image ฮ“ฯX\Gamma_{\rho_{X}} of Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(X)Aut(X) in Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(ฮ›X,ฯX)Aut(\Lambda_{X},\rho_{X}) is a subgroup of ฮ“vX\Gamma_{v_{X}} where vX:=vโ€‹aโ€‹lKโˆ˜ฯX:ฮ›Xโ†’๐‘v_{X}:=val_{K}\circ\rho_{X}:\Lambda_{X}\to{{\bf R}}.

2) The homomorphism Aโ€‹uโ€‹tโ€‹(X)โ†’Aโ€‹uโ€‹t๐™โ€‹Pโ€‹L,vXโ€‹(S2)Aut(X)\to Aut_{{{\bf Z}}PL,v_{X}}(S^{2}) is conjugate to the restriction to ฮ“ฯX\Gamma_{\rho_{X}} of the homomorphism ฯ•vX\phi_{v_{X}} defined in the previous subsection.

6.7.3 Lattice points

Let us consider the special case when vector vv is a lattice vector, i.e. vโˆˆฮ›2,18v\in\Lambda_{2,18}. In A-model picture it corresponds to the integrality of the class [ฯ‰][\omega] of symplectic 2-form. In B-model this means that the non-archimedean field KK has valuation in ๐™โŠ‚๐‘{\bf Z}\subset{\bf R}. In terms of ๐™{\bf Z}-affine structures it means that the monodromy of the affine connection is reduced to Sโ€‹Lโ€‹(2,๐™)โ‹‰๐™2SL(2,{\bf Z})\ltimes{\bf Z}^{2}. Group ฮ“v\Gamma_{v} is a subgroup (and also a quotient group) of an arithmetic subgroup in the Lie group Sโ€‹Oโ€‹(1,18)SO(1,18). Also in this case there is a ฮ“v\Gamma_{v}-invariant notion of a point with integer coordinates on Bโ‰ƒS2B\simeq S^{2}, as well of points with coordinates in 1Nโ€‹๐™\frac{1}{N}{\bf Z} for any integer Nโ‰ฅ1N\geq 1. The number Mv,NM_{v,N} of such points is finite. It is not hard to see that Mv,N=Aโ€‹rโ€‹eโ€‹av+2=(v,v)2โ€‹N2+2M_{v,N}=Area_{v}+2={{(v,v)}\over{2}}N^{2}+2 where Aโ€‹rโ€‹eโ€‹avArea_{v} is the area of BB with a ๐™{\bf Z}-PL structure corresponding to vv. This is analogous to the Riemann-Roch formula rโ€‹kโ€‹(ฮ“โก(X๐‚,LโŠ—N))=โˆซXc1โ€‹(L)22+2rk\,\left(\Gamma(X_{\bf C},L^{\otimes N})\right)=\int_{X}{{c_{1}(L)^{2}}\over{2}}+2 for an ample line bundle LL on a complex K3 surface X๐‚X_{\bf C}.

The action of ฮ“v\Gamma_{v} on S2S^{2} gives rise to a homomorphism ฮ“vโ†’SMv,n\Gamma_{v}\to S_{M_{v,n}} where SMv,nS_{M_{v,n}} is the symmetric group. Also the action gives a homomorphism from ฮ“v\Gamma_{v} to the mapping class group ฯ€1โ€‹(โ„ณ0,Mv,Nuโ€‹nโ€‹oโ€‹rโ€‹d)\pi_{1}({\cal{M}}_{0,M_{v,N}}^{unord}), the fundamental group of the moduli space of genus zero complex curves with Mv,NM_{v,N} unordered distinct marked points. The last group is closely related to the braid group. The conclusion is that we have constructed homomorphisms from arithmetic groups to a tower of braid groups.

One can deduce from Torelli theorem an interpretation of ฮ“v\Gamma_{v} as a quotient group of the fundamental group of a neighborhood UU of a cusp in 19-dimensional moduli space of polarized complex algebraic K3-surfaces, where vector vv corresponds to the polarization. Therefore the homomorphism ฮ“vโ†’SMv,n\Gamma_{v}\to S_{M_{v,n}} gives a finite covering Uโ€ฒU^{\prime} of UU. One may wonder whether there exists a line bundle over Uโ€ฒU^{\prime} whose direct image to UU coinsides with the direct image of the sheaf LโŠ—NL^{\otimes N} from the universal family of K3 surfaces (this question is in spirit of some ideas of Andrey Tyurin, see e.g. [Tyu]).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.