ScalingStacks

4.1 ๐™ -affine structure on smooth points [03TZ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context ยท Original author HTML

4.1 ๐™{\bf Z}-affine structure on smooth points

Here we are going to define an analog of the notion of integrable system in the framework of rigid analytic geometry. Roughly speaking, it is a triple (X,ฯ€,B)(X,\pi,B), where XX is a variety defined over a non-archimedean field (see [Be1] and Appendix A), BB a CW complex and ฯ€:Xโ†’B\pi:X\to B a continuous map. More precisely, let KK be a field with non-trivial valuation, XX an irreducible algebraic variety over KK of dimension nn, f=(f1,โ€ฆ,fN)f=(f_{1},...,f_{N}) a collection of non-zero rational functions on XX. Then we have a multivalued map

Xโก(Kยฏ)โ†’[โˆ’โˆž,+โˆž]N,xโ†ฆvโ€‹aโ€‹lKยฏโ€‹(fโก(x)):=(vโ€‹aโ€‹lKยฏโ€‹(f1โ€‹(x)),โ€ฆ,vโ€‹aโ€‹lKยฏโ€‹(fNโ€‹(x))).X(\overline{K})\to[-\infty,+\infty]^{N},\,\,x\mapsto val_{\overline{K}}(f(x)):=\left(val_{\overline{K}}\left(f_{1}(x)),\dots,val_{\overline{K}}(f_{N}(x)\right)\right)\,.

Here Kยฏ\overline{K} is the algebraic closure of KK, and vโ€‹aโ€‹lKยฏval_{\overline{K}} denotes valuation on Kยฏ\overline{K}.

Let ฯˆ:[โˆ’โˆž,+โˆž]Nโ†’B\psi:[-\infty,+\infty]^{N}\to B be a continuous map such that the composition ฯ€=ฯˆโˆ˜vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(f)\pi=\psi\circ val(f) is single-valued. Our map ฯ€\pi will always be of this form. More generally, we can take XX to be a (not necessarily algebraic) compact smooth KK-analytic space, and ฯ€:Xโ†’B\pi:X\to B be a continuous map which factorizes as the composition of the projection p๐’ณ:Xโ†’S๐’ณp_{\cal X}:X\to S_{\cal X} to the Clemens polytope S๐’ณS_{\cal X} of some model ๐’ณ{\cal X} of XX and a continuous map ฯ€โ€ฒ:S๐’ณโ†’B\pi^{\prime}:S_{\cal X}\to B (see Section 4.2.3).

Now we would like to be more precise. Let KK be a complete non-archimedean field, with valuation vโ€‹aโ€‹lval and the corresponding norm |x|:=expโก(โˆ’vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(x))โˆˆ๐‘โ‰ฅ0|x|:=\exp(-val(x))\in{\bf R}_{\geq 0}. Before giving next definition we observe that there is a canonical continuous map ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹n:(๐†maโ€‹n)nโ†’๐‘n\pi_{can}:({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{n}\to{{\bf R}}^{n} (see Section A.2 in Appendix A). Here ๐†maโ€‹n{\bf G}_{m}^{an} is a multiplicative group (considered as an analytic space over KK) and the restriction of ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹n\pi_{can} to (Kยฏร—)n(\overline{K}^{\times})^{n} is given by the formula

ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโ€‹(z1,โ€ฆ,zn)=(logโก|z1|,โ€ฆ,logโก|zn|).\pi_{can}(z_{1},...,z_{n})=(\log|z_{1}|,\dots,\log|z_{n}|)\,\,.

The sheaf ๐’ช๐‘ncโ€‹aโ€‹n:=(ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹n)โˆ—โ€‹(๐’ช(๐†maโ€‹n)n){\cal O}^{can}_{{{\bf R}}^{n}}:=(\pi_{can})_{\ast}({\cal O}_{({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{n}}) of KK-algebras is called the canonical sheaf.

Let XX be a smooth KK-analytic space of dimension nn, ฯ€:Xโ†’B\pi:X\to B a continuous map of XX into a Hausdorff topological space BB.

Definition 4

We call a point xโˆˆBx\in B smooth (or ฯ€\pi-smooth) if there is a neighborhood UU of xx such that the fibration ฯ€โˆ’1โ€‹(U)โ†’U\pi^{-1}(U)\to U is isomorphic to a fibration ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ’1โ€‹(V)โ†’V\pi_{can}^{-1}(V)\to V for some open subset VโŠ‚๐‘nV\subset{{\bf R}}^{n}. Here the isomorphism ฯ€โˆ’1โ€‹(U)โ‰ƒฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ’1โ€‹(V)\pi^{-1}(U)\simeq\pi_{can}^{-1}(V) is taken in the category of KK-analytic spaces while Uโ‰ƒVU\simeq V is a homeomorphism.

In this case we will call ฯ€\pi (or the triple (ฯ€โˆ’1โ€‹(U),ฯ€,U)(\pi^{-1}(U),\pi,U)) an analytic torus fibration.

Let Bsโ€‹mB^{sm} denotes the set of smooth points of BB. It is a topological subspace of BB (in fact a topological manifold of dimension nn).

Theorem 1

The space Bsโ€‹mB^{sm} carries a sheaf of ๐™{\bf Z}-affine functions, which is locally isomorphic to the canonical sheaf of ๐™{\bf Z}-affine functions on ๐‘n{{\bf R}}^{n}.

Proof. We start with the following Lemma.

Lemma 1

Let VโŠ‚๐‘nV\subset{{\bf R}}^{n} be a connected open set, ฯ†โˆˆ๐’ช(๐†maโ€‹n)nร—โ€‹(ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ’1โ€‹(V))\varphi\in{\cal O}^{\times}_{{({\bf G}_{m}^{an})}^{n}}(\pi_{can}^{-1}(V)) be an invertible analytic function. Then the function vโ€‹aโ€‹lxโ€‹(ฯ†โก(x))val_{x}(\varphi(x)) is constant along fibers of ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹n\pi_{can}, and it is a pull-back of a ๐™{\bf Z}-affine function on ๐‘n{{\bf R}}^{n}.

In order to prove Lemma we observe that any analytic function ฯˆโˆˆ๐’ช(๐†maโ€‹n)nร—โ€‹(ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ’1โ€‹(V))\psi\in{\cal O}^{\times}_{{({\bf G}_{m}^{an})}^{n}}(\pi_{can}^{-1}(V)) can be decomposed into Laurent series:

ฯˆ=โˆ‘I=(i1,โ€ฆ,in)โˆˆ๐™ncIโ€‹zI,cIโˆˆK\psi=\sum_{I=(i_{1},\dots,i_{n})\in{{\bf Z}}^{n}}c_{I}z^{I},\,\,\,c_{I}\in K

satisfying certain convergence conditions (see Section A.2).

Then for a non-zero analytic function ฯˆ\psi on ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ’1โ€‹(V)\pi_{can}^{-1}(V) we introduce a real-valued function Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯˆ)โ€‹(x):=infIโˆˆ๐™n(vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(cI)โˆ’โŸจI,xโŸฉ),xโˆˆVVal(\psi)(x):=\inf_{I\in{{\bf Z}}^{n}}(val(c_{I})-\langle I,x\rangle),x\in V. It is a concave, locally piecewise-linear function on VV. It is easy to see that

a)

there is a dense open subset V1โŠ‚VV_{1}\subset V such that for any xโˆˆV1x\in V_{1} the infimum in the definition of Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯˆ)Val(\psi) is achieved for a single multi-index II;

b)

Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯˆ1โ€‹ฯˆ2)=Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯˆ1)+Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯˆ2)Val(\psi_{1}\psi_{2})=Val(\psi_{1})+Val(\psi_{2}).

For an invertible function ฯ†\varphi we have 0=Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(1)=Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†โ€‹ฯ†โˆ’1)=Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†)+Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†โˆ’1)0=Val(1)=Val(\varphi\varphi^{-1})=Val(\varphi)+Val(\varphi^{-1}). Since both Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†)Val(\varphi) and Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†โˆ’1)Val(\varphi^{-1}) are concave, their sum can be equal to zero iff they are both affine. Moreover they are both ๐™{\bf Z}-affine since the linear part of Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†)Val(\varphi) is given by the integer vector II for some single multi-index II. Finally, observe that vโ€‹aโ€‹lxโ€‹(ฯ†โก(x))โ‰ฅฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ—โ€‹(Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†))โ€‹(x),xโˆˆฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ’1โ€‹(V)val_{x}(\varphi(x))\geq\pi_{can}^{*}(Val(\varphi))(x),x\in\pi_{can}^{-1}(V). Therefore vโ€‹aโ€‹lxโ€‹(ฯ†โก(x))=Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†)โ€‹(ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโ€‹(x))val_{x}(\varphi(x))=Val(\varphi)(\pi_{can}(x)) for invertible ฯ†\varphi. โ– \blacksquare

Now we can finish the proof of the Theorem. The above formula gives us a coordinate-free description of ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ—โ€‹(Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†))\pi_{can}^{*}(Val(\varphi)). It is easy to see that any ๐™{\bf Z}-affine function on VV is of the form Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†)+c,cโˆˆ๐‘Val(\varphi)+c,c\in{{\bf R}} for some invertible ฯ†\varphi (in the case of ๐‘n{{\bf R}}^{n} it suffices to take monomials as ฯ†\varphi). We can identify ฯ€โˆ’1โ€‹(U)โ†’U\pi^{-1}(U)\to U with ฯ€cโ€‹aโ€‹nโˆ’1โ€‹(V)โ†’V\pi_{can}^{-1}(V)\to V for some small open UโŠ‚XU\subset X and VโŠ‚๐‘nV\subset{{\bf R}}^{n}. Then we can define Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†)Val(\varphi) for any invertible ฯ†โˆˆ๐’ชXโ€‹(ฯ€โˆ’1โ€‹(U))\varphi\in{\cal O}_{X}(\pi^{-1}(U)) by the above formula. Finally we define a sheaf of ๐™{\bf Z}-affine functions on Bsโ€‹mB^{sm} by taking all functions of the form Vโ€‹aโ€‹lโ€‹(ฯ†)+c,cโˆˆ๐‘Val(\varphi)+c,c\in{{\bf R}}. It follows from the above discussion that in this way we obtain a ๐™{\bf Z}-affine structure on Bsโ€‹mB^{sm}, which is locally isomorphic to the standard one on ๐‘n{{\bf R}}^{n}. โ– \blacksquare

We will denote by Aโ€‹fโ€‹f๐™,Bsโ€‹mcโ€‹aโ€‹nAff^{can}_{{{\bf Z}},B^{sm}} the sheaf of ๐™{\bf Z}-affine functions constructed in the proof.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.