ScalingStacks

3.1 Integrable systems [03TQ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3.1 Integrable systems

Let (X,ω)(X,\omega) be a smooth symplectic manifold of dimension 2​n2n, B0B_{0} a smooth manifold of dimension nn, π:X→B0\pi:X\to B_{0} a smooth map with compact fibers, such that {π∗​(f),π∗​(g)}=0\{\pi^{\ast}(f),\pi^{\ast}(g)\}=0 for any f,g∈C∞​(B0)f,g\in C^{\infty}(B_{0}). Here {⋅,⋅}\{\cdot,\cdot\} denotes the Poisson bracket on XX. We assume that π\pi is a submersion on an open dense subset X′⊂XX^{\prime}\subset X. Such a triple (X,π,B0)(X,\pi,B_{0}) is called an integrable system. In applications it is typically given by a collection of smooth functions (H1,…,Hn)(H_{1},...,H_{n}) on XX (these functions are called Hamiltonians) such that {Hi,Hj}=0,1≤i,j≤n\{H_{i},H_{j}\}=0,1\leq i,j\leq n. Usually first Hamiltonian H=H1H=H_{1} is identified with the energy of mechanical system.

Let us consider the case when π\pi is proper. It is a natural restriction, because in applications the energy H1H_{1} is already a proper map H1:X→𝐑H_{1}:X\to{{\bf R}}.

Let x∈B0x\in B_{0} be a point such that the restriction of π\pi to π−1​(x)\pi^{-1}(x) is a submersion. We call such points π\pi-smooth. According to Sard theorem π\pi-smooth points form an open dense subset of B0B_{0}. The fiber π−1​(x)\pi^{-1}(x) is a compact Lagrangian submanifold of XX. The Liouville integrability theorem (see [Ar]) says that π−1​(x)\pi^{-1}(x) is a disjoint union of finitely many tori TαnT^{n}_{\alpha}. Moreover, for each torus TαnT^{n}_{\alpha} there exists a local coordinate system (φ1,…,φn,I1,…,In)(\varphi_{1},...,\varphi_{n},I_{1},...,I_{n}) in a neighborhood WαW_{\alpha} of TαnT^{n}_{\alpha} such that φi∈𝐑/2​π​𝐙,(I1,…,In)∈𝐑n\varphi_{i}\in{{\bf R}}/2\pi{{\bf Z}},(I_{1},...,I_{n})\in{{\bf R}}^{n} and ω=∑1≤i≤nd​Ii∧d​φi\omega=\sum_{1\leq i\leq n}dI_{i}\wedge d\varphi_{i}. These coordinates are called action-angle coordinates. The map π\pi in action-angle coordinates is given by the projection (φ1,…,φn,I1,…,In)↦(I1,…,In)(\varphi_{1},...,\varphi_{n},I_{1},...,I_{n})\mapsto(I_{1},...,I_{n}). There is an ambiguity in the choice of action-angle coordinates. In particular action coordinates I=(I1,…,In)I=(I_{1},...,I_{n}) are defined up to a transformation I′=A⁡(I)+b,A∈G​L​(n,𝐙),b∈𝐑nI^{\prime}=A(I)+b,A\in GL(n,{{\bf Z}}),b\in{{\bf R}}^{n}. Indeed, the free abelian group generated by 11-forms d​Ii,1≤i≤ndI_{i},1\leq i\leq n in each cotangent space Tx∗​B0T_{x}^{\ast}B_{0} admits an invariant description. It is the free abelian group generated by the restrictions of 11-forms ∫γω\int_{\gamma}\omega to Tx∗​B0T_{x}^{\ast}B_{0}, where γ\gamma runs through closed singular 11-chains in π−1​(x)∩Wα\pi^{-1}(x)\cap W_{\alpha}. In this way we obtain a 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine structure on π⁡(Wα)\pi(W_{\alpha}).

Let BB be the set of connected components of fibers of π\pi. Endowed with the natural topology it becomes a locally compact Hausdorff space, projection from XX to BB will be denoted by the same letter π\pi. The natural continuous map B→B0B\to B_{0} is a kind of “ramified finite covering”. Let us define Bs​m⊂BB^{sm}\subset B as the set of connected components on which π\pi is a submersion (i.e. the set of all Liouville tori). Then Bs​mB^{sm} is an open dense subset in BB. Hence it carries a 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine structure given by the action coordinates.

The singular part Bs​i​n​g=B∖Bs​mB^{sing}=B\setminus B^{sm} consists of projections of singular fibers. Typically the codimension of Bs​i​n​gB^{sing} is greater or equal to 11. The codimension 11 stratum consists of the boundary of the image of π\pi and of the ramification locus of the map B→B0B\to B_{0}. The structure of singularities of the integral affine structure in higher codimensions is less understood. It seems that the following property is always satisfied:
Fixed Point property . For any x∈Bs​i​n​gx\in B^{sing} there is a small neighborhood UU such that the monodromy representation π1​((U∖Bs​i​n​g)α)→G​L​(n,𝐙)⋉𝐑n\pi_{1}((U\setminus B^{sing})_{\alpha})\to GL(n,{{\bf Z}})\ltimes{{\bf R}}^{n} for any connected component (U∖Bs​i​n​g)α(U\setminus B^{sing})_{\alpha} of U∖Bs​i​n​gU\setminus B^{sing} has a fixed vector in 𝐑n{{\bf R}}^{n} in the natural representation by affine transformations.

We will discuss this property in Section 6 devoted to compactifications.

3.1.1 Cohomological interpretation of class [ρ][\rho]

In Section 2.2 we introduced an invariant [ρ]∈H1​(Bs​m,T𝐙⊗𝐑)[\rho]\in H^{1}(B^{sm},T^{{\bf Z}}\otimes{{\bf R}}) of a 𝐙{\bf Z}-affine structure. Here we will give an interpretation of [ρ][\rho] for integrable systems.

Let us consider X′=π−1​(Bs​m)X^{\prime}=\pi^{-1}(B^{sm}) which is a Lagrangian torus fibration over Bs​mB^{sm} (i.e. fibers are Lagrangian tori such that the fiber over x∈Bs​mx\in B^{sm} is isomorphic up to a shift to the torus Tx∗​Bs​m/(Tx∗​Bs​m)𝐙T_{x}^{*}B^{sm}/(T_{x}^{*}B^{sm})^{{\bf Z}}\,).

Any singular closed 11-chain cc on Bs​mB^{sm} with values in the local system

(Tx∗​Bs​m)𝐙≃H1​(Tx∗​Bs​m/(Tx∗​Bs​m)𝐙,𝐙)(T^{\ast}_{x}B^{sm})^{{\bf Z}}\simeq H_{1}(T_{x}^{*}B^{sm}/(T_{x}^{*}B^{sm})^{{\bf Z}},{{\bf Z}})

gives a 22-chain c¯\overline{c} on X′X^{\prime} with the boundary belonging to a finite collection of fibers π−1​(x(i)),1≤i≤N\pi^{-1}(x^{(i)}),1\leq i\leq N of the fibration π:X′→Bs​m\pi:X^{\prime}\to B^{sm}. Moreover, for every point x(i)x^{(i)} the part of ∂c¯\partial\overline{c} over x(i)x^{(i)} is homologous to zero in π−1​(x(i))\pi^{-1}(x^{(i)}). Therefore, there exists a collection of 22-chains c¯i,1≤i≤N\overline{c}_{i},1\leq i\leq N supportred on OPENπ−1​(x(i)))\pi^{-1}(x^{(i)})) such that the 22-chain c¯+∑1≤i≤Nc¯i\overline{c}+\sum_{1\leq i\leq N}\overline{c}_{i} is closed. In this way we obtain a group homomorphism Js:H1​(Bs​m,(T∗)𝐙)→H2​(X′,𝐙)/H20​(X′,𝐙)J_{s}:H_{1}(B^{sm},(T^{\ast})^{{\bf Z}})\to H_{2}(X^{\prime},{{\bf Z}})/H_{2}^{0}(X^{\prime},{{\bf Z}}), where H20​(X′,𝐙)⊂H2​(X′,𝐙)H_{2}^{0}(X^{\prime},{{\bf Z}})\subset H_{2}(X^{\prime},{{\bf Z}}) denotes the sum of images of H2​(π−1​(y),𝐙)H_{2}(\pi^{-1}(y),{{\bf Z}}) where y∈Bs​my\in B^{sm} (it is enough to pick one base point yy for any connected component of Bs​mB^{sm}). It is easy to see that ⟨[ρ],[c]⟩=⟨[ω],Js​([c])⟩\langle[\rho],[c]\rangle=\langle[\omega],J_{s}([c])\rangle, where [ω][\omega] is the class of the symplectic form ω\omega.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.