Remark 18 [03SN]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Remark 18
For the case of collapse with singular fibers, the rigid analytic space constructed as above, seems to be a “wrong” one. First of all, it is not compact because is not compact. But there is also a more fundamental problem. It seems that can not be embedded into a compact analytic space associated with a projective algebraic variety. There are several indications that there exists another sheaf of algebras which is (locally on ) isomorphic to , and the rigid analytic space associated with admits an algebraic compactification. In general, sheaves which are twisted versions of are classified by the first non-abelian cohomology where is the sheaf of groups of automorphisms of . Thus, in the mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau manifolds which are not abelian varieties, we expect a new ingredient, the cohomology class .