ScalingStacks

6.3 De Rham A ∞ -category of smooth functions [03S5]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

6.3 De Rham A∞A_{\infty}-category of smooth functions

The other A∞A_{\infty}-pre-category we are interested in will be a differential-graded category (dg-category for short). In other words, it is an A∞A_{\infty}-category with strict identity morphisms and vanishing compositions mn,n≥3m_{n},n\geq 3. We will call it de Rham category of YY and denote by D​R​(Y)DR(Y). Objects of D​R​(Y)DR(Y) are same as for M⁡(Y)M(Y). They are pairs (f,ρ)(f,\rho), where f:Y→𝐑f:Y\to{\bf R} is a smooth function and ρ\rho is a local system on YY. Morphisms are complexes defined by the formula

HomD​R​(Y)((f0,ρ0),(f1,ρ1))=Γ(Y,∧∗TY∗⊗Hom(ρ0,ρ1)).Hom_{DR(Y)}((f_{0},\rho_{0}),(f_{1},\rho_{1}))=\Gamma(Y,\wedge^{\ast}T^{\ast}_{Y}\otimes Hom(\rho_{0},\rho_{1})).

Notice that the space of morphisms does not depend on f0f_{0} and f1f_{1}. The composition of morphisms is defined in the obvious way: in a local trivialization of ρ0\rho_{0} and ρ1\rho_{1} it is given by the product of matrices with the coefficients in Ω∗​(Y)\Omega^{\ast}(Y).

Now we can formulate the main result of this section.

Theorem 2

A∞A_{\infty}-pre-categories M⁡(Y)M(Y) and D​R​(Y)DR(Y) are equivalent.

The proof of the theorem will occupy the rest of the section. First, we will discuss a version of formulas from “homological perturbation theory” (see [GS], [Me]). They will give an A∞A_{\infty}-structure on a subcomplex of a dg-algebra. Then we will discuss an approach to the proof based on the ideas of [HL]. It seems plausible that an alternative proof (but, presumably, much more difficult) can be obtained within the framework of Witten complex, using methods of [BZ].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.