ScalingStacks

7.1 Rigid analytic space [03SJ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

7.1 Rigid analytic space

It will be helpful (although not necessary) for the reader of this section to be familiar with basic facts of non-archimedean analysis (see [BGR]). For any smooth manifold YY with integral affine structure we will construct a sheaf π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y} of 𝐂Ρ{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}-algebras on YY. Stalks π’ͺY,y{\cal O}_{Y,y} of this sheaf are noetherian algebras, and one can define the notion of coherent sheaves of π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y}-modules. If Y=𝐑n/𝐙nY={{\bf R}}^{n}/{{\bf Z}}^{n} is the torus with the standard integral affine structure then the category of coherent π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y}-modules will be equivalent (by a non-archimedean version of GAGA) to the category of coherent sheaves on an abelian variety over the field 𝐂Ρ{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}.

We start with the local picture. We denote by v:𝐂Ρ→𝐑βˆͺ{+∞}v:{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}\to{{\bf R}}\cup\{+\infty\} a (non-discrete) valuation defined by v(βˆ‘Ξ»1<Ξ»2<…cieβˆ’Ξ»i/Ξ΅)=βˆ’Ξ»1v(\sum_{\lambda_{1}<\lambda_{2}<...}c_{i}e^{-\lambda_{i}/\varepsilon})=-\lambda_{1} if c1β‰ 0c_{1}\neq 0 and v⁑(0)=+∞v(0)=+\infty.

Definition 21

Let UβŠ‚π‘nU\subset{{\bf R}}^{n} be an open subset of the standard vector space 𝐑n{{\bf R}}^{n}. We define π’ͺ𝐑n​(U){\cal O}_{{{\bf R}}^{n}}(U) as the vector space over 𝐂Ρ{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon} consisting of formal Laurent series

f=βˆ‘k1,…,knβˆˆπ™nak1​…​kn​z1k1​…​znkn,f=\sum_{k_{1},...,k_{n}\in{{\bf Z}}^{n}}a_{k_{1}...k_{n}}z_{1}^{k_{1}}...z_{n}^{k_{n}},

where z1,…,znz_{1},...,z_{n} are formal variables, ak1​…​knβˆˆπ‚Ξ΅a_{k_{1}...k_{n}}\in{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}, and for any (y1,…,yn)∈U(y_{1},...,y_{n})\in U we have: l​i​mβˆ‘i|ki|β†’βˆžβ€‹(v⁑(ak1​…​kn)+βˆ‘iki​yi)=+∞lim_{\sum_{i}|k_{i}|\to\infty}(v(a_{k_{1}...k_{n}})+\sum_{i}k_{i}y_{i})=+\infty.

It follows from the definition that if f∈π’ͺ𝐑n​(U)f\in{\cal O}_{{{\bf R}}^{n}}(U) and (z1,…,zn)∈(π‚Ξ΅βˆ—)n(z_{1},...,z_{n})\in({{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}^{\ast})^{n} then the series βˆ‘k1,…,knak1​…​kn​z1k1​…​znkn\sum_{k_{1},...,k_{n}}a_{k_{1}...k_{n}}z_{1}^{k_{1}}...z_{n}^{k_{n}} converges in the adic topology as long as (v⁑(z1),…,v⁑(zn))∈U(v(z_{1}),...,v(z_{n}))\in U.

We introduce an action of the group G​L​(n,𝐙)⋉𝐑nGL(n,{{\bf Z}})\ltimes{{\bf R}}^{n} on (𝐑n,π’ͺ𝐑n)({{\bf R}}^{n},{\cal O}_{{{\bf R}}^{n}}) such as follows:

a) G​L​(n,𝐙)GL(n,{{\bf Z}}) acts simultaneously by the linear change of coordinates and linear transformation of indices (k1,…,kn)(k_{1},...,k_{n}) in the series;

b) translations (t1,…,tn)βˆˆπ‘n(t_{1},...,t_{n})\in{{\bf R}}^{n} act on the coordinates (y1,…,yn)(y_{1},...,y_{n}) by the shift (y1,…,yn)↦(y1+t1,…,yn+tn)(y_{1},...,y_{n})\mapsto(y_{1}+t_{1},...,y_{n}+t_{n}), and on the series by the rescaling of coefficients

βˆ‘k1,…,knak1​…​knz1k1…znknβ†¦βˆ‘k1,…,kn(ak1​…​kneβˆ’βˆ‘itiki/Ξ΅)z1k1…znkn.\sum_{k_{1},...,k_{n}}a_{k_{1}...k_{n}}z_{1}^{k_{1}}...z_{n}^{k_{n}}\mapsto\sum_{k_{1},...,k_{n}}(a_{k_{1}...k_{n}}e^{-\sum_{i}t_{i}k_{i}/\varepsilon})z_{1}^{k_{1}}...z_{n}^{k_{n}}.

Using this action we define the sheaf π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y} for an arbitrary smooth manifold YY with integral affine structure.

We claim that there is a canonically associated to YY a rigid analytic space Ya​nY^{an} defined over 𝐂Ρ{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}. Here is the construction. Let us consider a covering of YY by open subsets UiU_{i} such that all non-empty intersections Ui1​i2​…​ik:=Ui1βˆ©β€¦βˆ©UikU_{i_{1}i_{2}...i_{k}}:=U_{i_{1}}\cap...\cap U_{i_{k}} in some local affine coordinates are convex polyhedra whose faces have rational slopes. Every Ui1​i2​…​ikU_{i_{1}i_{2}...i_{k}} can be identified with the intersection of finitely many half-spaces, such that their pre-images under the map vn:(π‚Ξ΅βˆ—)n→𝐑nv^{n}:({{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}^{\ast})^{n}\to{{\bf R}}^{n} are sets of the type {(z1,…,zn)|v⁑(z1k1​…​znkn)β‰₯C}\{(z_{1},\dots,z_{n})|\,v(z_{1}^{k_{1}}...z_{n}^{k_{n}})\geq C\} for some rational C>0C>0. It is known after Tate that such a system of inequalities defines an affinoid domain (i.e. a local model for a rigid analytic space over OPEN𝐂Ρ){{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}).

Definition 22

We define Ya​nY^{an} as the rigid analytic space over 𝐂Ρ{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon} obtained by gluing the local data (Ui,π’ͺUi)(U_{i},{\cal O}_{U_{i}}) by means of the action of G​L​(n,𝐙)⋉𝐑nGL(n,{{\bf Z}})\ltimes{{\bf R}}^{n}.

It is easy to see that Ya​nY^{an} is canonically defined, and that the category C​o​h​(Ya​n)Coh(Y^{an}) of coherent analytic sheaves on Ya​nY^{an} (in the sense on analytic geometry) is equivalent to the category of coherent π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y}-modules (i.e. locally finitely generated π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y}-modules).

To every algebraic variety 𝒴{\cal Y} over 𝐂Ρ{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon} one can associate canonically a rigid analytic space 𝒴a​n{\cal Y}^{an}. If 𝒴{\cal Y} is projective then the category C​o​h​(𝒴a​n)Coh({\cal Y}^{an}) is equivalent to the category C​o​h​(𝒴)Coh({\cal Y}) of algebraic coherent sheaves on 𝒴{\cal Y} (GAGA theorem).

Assume that Y=𝐑n/Ξ›Y={{\bf R}}^{n}/\Lambda is an nn-dimensional torus equipped with the standard integral affine structure induced by 𝐙nβŠ‚π‘n{{\bf Z}}^{n}\subset{{\bf R}}^{n}, and Ξ›\Lambda is a lattice commensurable with 𝐙n{{\bf Z}}^{n}. The following result can be derived from [Mum].

Proposition 7

In the previous notation one has Ya​n≃𝒴a​nY^{an}\simeq{\cal Y}^{an} where 𝒴{\cal Y} is an abelian variety over 𝐂Ρ{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}.

Let us return to the picture of metric collapse in the case of abelian varieties. Since the collapse was defined by rescaling of the lattice (see Section 2) one can prove that 𝒴{\cal Y} is isomorphic to the original abelian variety over 𝐂Ρ{{\bf C}}_{\varepsilon}. Therefore in the case of abelian varieties we have two equivalent descriptions of the collapse: the one in terms of Riemannian geometry and the one in terms of analytic non-archimedean geometry.

Remark 18

For the case of collapse with singular fibers, the rigid analytic space Ya​nY^{an} constructed as above, seems to be a β€œwrong” one. First of all, it is not compact because YY is not compact. But there is also a more fundamental problem. It seems that Ya​nY^{an} can not be embedded into a compact analytic space associated with a projective algebraic variety. There are several indications that there exists another sheaf of algebras π’ͺYβ€²{\cal O}^{\prime}_{Y} which is (locally on YY) isomorphic to π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y}, and the rigid analytic space (Ya​n)β€²(Y^{an})^{\prime} associated with (Y,π’ͺYβ€²)(Y,{\cal O}^{\prime}_{Y}) admits an algebraic compactification. In general, sheaves π’ͺYβ€²{\cal O}^{\prime}_{Y} which are twisted versions of π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y} are classified by the first non-abelian cohomology H1​(Y,A​u​t¯​(π’ͺY))H^{1}(Y,{\underline{Aut}}({\cal O}_{Y})) where A​u​t¯​(π’ͺY){\underline{Aut}}({\cal O}_{Y}) is the sheaf of groups of automorphisms of π’ͺY{\cal O}_{Y}. Thus, in the mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau manifolds which are not abelian varieties, we expect a new ingredient, the cohomology class [π’ͺYβ€²][{\cal O}^{\prime}_{Y}].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.