7.1 Rigid analytic space [03SJ]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
7.1 Rigid analytic space
It will be helpful (although not necessary) for the reader of this section to be familiar with basic facts of non-archimedean analysis (see [BGR]). For any smooth manifold with integral affine structure we will construct a sheaf of -algebras on . Stalks of this sheaf are noetherian algebras, and one can define the notion of coherent sheaves of -modules. If is the torus with the standard integral affine structure then the category of coherent -modules will be equivalent (by a non-archimedean version of GAGA) to the category of coherent sheaves on an abelian variety over the field .
We start with the local picture. We denote by a (non-discrete) valuation defined by if and .
Definition 21
Let be an open subset of the standard vector space . We define as the vector space over consisting of formal Laurent series
where are formal variables, , and for any we have: .
It follows from the definition that if and then the series converges in the adic topology as long as .
We introduce an action of the group on such as follows:
a) acts simultaneously by the linear change of coordinates and linear transformation of indices in the series;
b) translations act on the coordinates by the shift , and on the series by the rescaling of coefficients
Using this action we define the sheaf for an arbitrary smooth manifold with integral affine structure.
We claim that there is a canonically associated to a rigid analytic space defined over . Here is the construction. Let us consider a covering of by open subsets such that all non-empty intersections in some local affine coordinates are convex polyhedra whose faces have rational slopes. Every can be identified with the intersection of finitely many half-spaces, such that their pre-images under the map are sets of the type for some rational . It is known after Tate that such a system of inequalities defines an affinoid domain (i.e. a local model for a rigid analytic space over .
Definition 22
We define as the rigid analytic space over obtained by gluing the local data by means of the action of .
It is easy to see that is canonically defined, and that the category of coherent analytic sheaves on (in the sense on analytic geometry) is equivalent to the category of coherent -modules (i.e. locally finitely generated -modules).
To every algebraic variety over one can associate canonically a rigid analytic space . If is projective then the category is equivalent to the category of algebraic coherent sheaves on (GAGA theorem).
Assume that is an -dimensional torus equipped with the standard integral affine structure induced by , and is a lattice commensurable with . The following result can be derived from [Mum].
Proposition 7
In the previous notation one has where is an abelian variety over .
Let us return to the picture of metric collapse in the case of abelian varieties. Since the collapse was defined by rescaling of the lattice (see Section 2) one can prove that is isomorphic to the original abelian variety over . Therefore in the case of abelian varieties we have two equivalent descriptions of the collapse: the one in terms of Riemannian geometry and the one in terms of analytic non-archimedean geometry.
Remark 18
For the case of collapse with singular fibers, the rigid analytic space constructed as above, seems to be a βwrongβ one. First of all, it is not compact because is not compact. But there is also a more fundamental problem. It seems that can not be embedded into a compact analytic space associated with a projective algebraic variety. There are several indications that there exists another sheaf of algebras which is (locally on ) isomorphic to , and the rigid analytic space associated with admits an algebraic compactification. In general, sheaves which are twisted versions of are classified by the first non-abelian cohomology where is the sheaf of groups of automorphisms of . Thus, in the mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau manifolds which are not abelian varieties, we expect a new ingredient, the cohomology class .