ScalingStacks

6.6 Proof of the theorem [03SH]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

6.6 Proof of the theorem

For simplicity we will assume that all local systems are trivial and have rank one. The general case is completely similar.

We are going to construct the following chain of A∞A_{\infty}-equivalences connecting D​R​(Y)DR(Y) and M⁡(Y)M(Y):

OPEND​R​(Y)↪D​R0​(Y)↩D​R0t​r​(Y)↩D​R0t​r,Π​(Y))←M⁡(Y)DR(Y)\hookrightarrow DR_{0}(Y)\hookleftarrow DR_{0}^{tr}(Y)\hookleftarrow DR_{0}^{tr,\Pi}(Y))\leftarrow M(Y)

Classes of objects of all these categories will be the same, and all functors will be identical on objects.

The A∞A_{\infty}-pre-category D​R0​(Y)DR_{0}(Y) is in fact a dg-category, i.e. all sequences of objects are transversal, compositions mkm_{k} vanish for k≥3k\geq 3 and it has strict identity morphisms. The space H​o​mD​R0​(Y)​(f0,f1)Hom_{DR_{0}(Y)}(f_{0},f_{1}) is defined as lim→δ→0⁡Ω∗​(Y×(0,δ))=Ω0∗​(Y).\varinjlim_{\delta\to 0}\Omega^{\ast}(Y\times(0,\delta))=\Omega_{0}^{\ast}(Y). Clearly the space of morphisms does not depend on objects. Using the wedge product of differential forms we make D​R0​(Y)DR_{0}(Y) into a dg-category over the field 𝐂{\bf C}. There is a natural functor D​R​(Y)→D​R0​(Y)DR(Y)\to DR_{0}(Y), which is the identity map on objects. On morphisms it is the natural embedding of Ω∗​(Y)\Omega^{\ast}(Y) as the subspace of forms on Y×(0,δ)Y\times(0,\delta), which are pullbacks of forms on YY. Clearly it establishes an equivalence of A∞A_{\infty}-categories.

The A∞A_{\infty}-pre-category D​R0t​r​(Y)DR_{0}^{tr}(Y) is defined as the full subcategory of D​R0​(Y)DR_{0}(Y), and it differs from the latter only by the choice of transversal sequences. Namely, we use the same notion of transversality in D​R0t​r​(Y)DR_{0}^{tr}(Y) as in the Morse category.

The next A∞A_{\infty}-pre-category D​R0t​r,Π​(Y)DR_{0}^{tr,\Pi}(Y) is obtained from D​R0t​r​(Y)DR_{0}^{tr}(Y) by applying homological perturbation theory. For any two transversal objects f0,f1f_{0},f_{1} of D​R0t​r​(Y)DR_{0}^{tr}(Y) we define H​o​mD​R0t​r,Π​(Y)​(f0,f1)Hom_{DR_{0}^{tr,\Pi}(Y)}(f_{0},f_{1}) as Πf0,f1​(Ω0∗​(Y))\Pi_{f_{0},f_{1}}(\Omega^{\ast}_{0}(Y)). Here Πf0,f1\Pi_{f_{0},f_{1}} is the projector Π\Pi corresponding to the Morse function f0−f1f_{0}-f_{1}, it was described at the end of the previous subsection. We also have homotopies Hf0,f1H_{f_{0},f_{1}} associated with f0−f1f_{0}-f_{1}. Then formulas of homological perturbation theory (summation over trees) give rise to an A∞A_{\infty}-pre-category D​R0t​r,Π​(Y)DR_{0}^{tr,\Pi}(Y) and an equivalence D​R0t​r,Π​(Y)→D​R0t​r​(Y)DR_{0}^{tr,\Pi}(Y)\to DR_{0}^{tr}(Y).

The last functor Ψ:M(Y)→DR0t​r,Π(Y))\Psi:M(Y)\to DR_{0}^{tr,\Pi}(Y)) will have no non-trivial higher components Ψn\Psi_{n} for n≥2n\geq 2. The first component Ψ1\Psi_{1} of it is a linear map

Ψ1:H​o​mM⁡(Y)​(f0,f1)→H​o​mD​R0t​r,Π​(Y)​(f0,f1)\Psi_{1}:Hom_{M(Y)}(f_{0},f_{1})\to Hom_{DR_{0}^{tr,\Pi}(Y)}(f_{0},f_{1})

for every transversal pair (f0,f1)(f_{0},f_{1}). Recall that H​o​mM⁡(Y)​(f0,f1)Hom_{M(Y)}(f_{0},f_{1}) has a basis {[x]}\{[x]\} labeled by critical points x∈C​r​(f0−f1)x\in Cr(f_{0}-f_{1}). We define Ψ1​([x])\Psi_{1}([x]) as R⁡([Sx])R([S_{x}]). It is clear that Ψ1\Psi_{1} gives a quasi-isomorphism of complexes for every transversal pair (f0,f1)(f_{0},f_{1}).

Now, we claim that Ψ\Psi is an A∞A_{\infty}-functor. This means that Ψ1\Psi_{1} maps all higher compositions in M⁡(Y)M(Y) to higher compositions in D​R0t​r,Π​(Y)DR_{0}^{tr,\Pi}(Y). This follows directly from the descriptions of higher compositions in both categories in terms of planar trees and the lemma in the previous subsection. Indeed, the number of functions in any given sequence is finite. For all sufficiently small δ\delta every summand in the formula for mkM⁡(Y)m_{k}^{M(Y)}, corresponding to a binary tree TT, coincides with the summand for mkM⁡(Y)m_{k}^{M(Y)} corresponding to the same TT (we can assume that δ\delta is so small that the part 2) of the Lemma can be applied). The theorem is proved. ■\blacksquare

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.