4 A ∞ -algebras and A ∞ -categories [03QY]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
4 -algebras and -categories
4.1 Two problems with the general definition
The purpose of this section is to describe the framework in which the results concerning -categories will be formulated. We would like to make few comments even before recalling a definition of the Fukaya category. There are two main problems with the definition. First, morphisms can be defined only for transversal Lagrangian submanifolds (in particular, the identity morphism is never defined). Second, since there are pseudo-holomorphic discs with the boundary on a given Lagrangian submanifold, one has to add a composition to the set of compositions . As a result, the spaces of morphisms are not complexes: . On the other hand, the derived category of coherent sheaves arises from an -category without and with the condition . Hence one should explain in which sense two -categories in question are equivalent.
The above-mentioned problems can be resolved by an appropriate generalization of the notion of -category. This generalization involves numerous preparations and will be given elsewhere (see [KoS]). On the other hand, the problem with does not appear in the case of abelian varieties, which is the main application of the approach offered in this paper. Hence, for the purposes of present paper it is sufficient to work with -pre-categories (or -categories with transversal structure, cf. [P1]). This gives a partial solution to the transversality problem, and provides a solution to the problem with the identity morphisms.
Using -pre-categories we formulate and prove a variant of the homological mirror symmetry conjecture. It can be applied to the case of abelian varieties. In particular, one can obtain certain formulas for Massey products for abelian varieties in terms of partial theta-sums similar to those considered in [P1].
4.2 Non-unital -algebras and -categories
Let be a -graded module over a -graded commutative associative algebra . As usual, we will denote by the graded -module such that for all .
Definition 3
A structure of non-unital -algebra on is given by a codifferential of degree on the cofree tensor coalgebra .
The codifferential is by definition a coderivation, such that . It is uniquely determined by its “Taylor coefficients” . The condition can be rewritten as a sequence of quadratic equations
where , and . In particular, .
Definition 4
A morphism of non-unital -algebras (-morphism for short) is a morphism of tensor coalgebras of degree zero, which commutes with the codifferentials.
A morphism of non-unital -algebras is determined by its “Taylor coefficients” satisfying the system of equations
We leave to the reader as an exercise to write down the formulas for the signs in terms of degrees of and .
Definition 5
A non-unital -category over is given by the following data:
1) A class of objects .
2) For any two objects and a -graded -module of morphisms .
3) For any sequence of objects , , a morphism of -modules (called a composition map) .
It is required that for any sequence of objects , the graded -module , equipped with the direct sum of the compositions , is a non-unital -algebra.
The class of objects will be often denoted by . We hope it will not lead to a confusion.
Remark 8
A non-unital -algebra can be considered as a non-unital -category with one object such that .
Definition 6
A functor between non-unital -categories is given by the following data:
1) A map of classes of objects .
2) For any finite sequence of objects , , a morphism of graded -modules
The following condition holds for any : the sequence defines an -morphism
Remark 9
Let be a non-unital -category. Let us replace spaces of morphisms by their cohomology with respect to . In other words, we define , where is the composition map. Then gives rise to a “non-unital” category structure with the class of objects and composition of morphisms induced by . We write “non-unital” because there are no identity morphisms .
4.3 -pre-categories
We start with the notion of non-unital -pre-category. It allows us to work with ‘‘transversal’’ sequences of objects. 33 3 The notion of “transversality” is purely formal in this section. The choice of the name will become clear after concrete applications in the geometric context, see next sections. Then we will introduce the notion of -pre-category. It provides us with a replacement of the identity morphisms. Roughly speaking, we will have the identity morphism up to homotopy.
Definition 7
Let be a -graded commutative associative ring as before. A non-unital -pre-category over is defined by the following data:
a) A class of objects .
b) For any a subclass of , , called the class of transversal sequences.
c) For a -graded -module of morphisms .
d) For a transversal sequence of objects , , a morphism of -modules (composition map) .
It is required that a subsequence of a transversal sequence is transversal, and that the composition maps satisfy the same system of equations as for non-unital -categories. Explicitly:
,
where , and .
Definition 8
A functor between non-unital -pre-categories is given by the following data:
1) A map of classes of objects , such that .
2) For any transversal sequence of objects in , a morphism of graded -modules
These data satisfy the following property: the sequence defines an -morphism .
The reader have noticed that we use the summation only over the increasing pairs of indices . It differs from the case of non-unital -pre-categories. The reason is that we do not require the transversality to be a symmetric relation on objects. It is possible that exists, but does not. In the case when all are defined, two discussed definitions agree. In particular, a non-unital -category is the same as a non-unital -pre-category such that for any .
Definition 9
Let be a non-unital -pre-category, . We say that (zero stands for degree) is a quasi-isomorphism if , and for any objects and such that and one has: and are quasi-isomorphisms of complexes.
Definition 10
An -pre-category is a non-unital -pre-category , satisfying the following extension property:
For any finite collection of transversal sequences in and an object there exist objects and and quasi-isomorphisms , such that extended sequences are transversal.
Remark 10
Let be an -pre-category. Then partially defined on ) composition extends uniquely, so that it defines a structure of a category on .
Definition 11
Let and be -pre-categories over . An -functor is a functor between the corresponding non-unital -pre-categories such that takes quasi-isomorphisms in to quasi-isomorphisms in .
There is an important notion of equivalence of -pre-categories (and -categories). We are planning to provide all the details elsewhere (see [KoS]). For the purposes of present paper we will be using the following definition (which is in fact a theorem in the more general framework).
Definition 12
An -functor between -pre-categories is called an -equivalence functor if:
a) Every object is quasi-isomorphic to an object .
b) The functor induces quasi-isomorphisms of non-unital -algebras of morphisms, corresponding to all transversal sequences of objects.
Definition 13
Two -pre-categories and are called equivalent if there exists a finite sequence of -pre-categories such that for every there exists an -equivalence functor from to or vice versa.
We suggest the language of -pre-categories in order to replace more conventional -categories with strict identity morphisms.
Definition 14
An -category with strict identity morphisms is a non-unital -category , such that for any object there exists an element (identity morphism) such that and for any morphisms .
An -category with strict identity morphisms is an -pre-category, because (in the previous notation) we can extend a transversal sequence to , and set , . Another remark is that if has only one object, it is an -algebra with the strict unit. One can try to develop the deformation theory of such algebras along the lines of [KoS1]. The problem is that the corresponding operad is not free, and the standard theory becomes complicated. We hope that the framework of -pre-categories is appropriate for the purposes of deformation theory of -categories. The following conjecture gives another evidence in favor of such a generalization of -categories.
Conjecture 4
Let us define the notion of equivalent -categories with strict identity morphisms) similarly to the case of -pre-categories (see above). Then the equivalence classes of -pre-categories are in one-to-one correspondence with the equivalence classes of -categories with strict identity morphisms.
4.4 Example: directed -pre-categories
There is a useful special case of the notion of -pre-category (independently a similar notion was suggested in [Se]).
Definition 15
A directed -pre-category is an -pre-category such that
a) There is bijection of the class of objects and the set integer numbers: . We denote by the object corresponding to .
b) Transversal sequences are .
The extension property is equivalent to the following one: for any object there are exist objects and which are quasi-isomorphic to . Then one can formulate the following version of the previous conjecture.
Conjecture 5
Equivalence classes of directed -pre-categories are in one-to-one correspondence with the equivalences classes of -categories with strict identity morphisms and countable class of objects.
Having an -category with strict identity morphisms, and countable class of objects, one can construct an infinite sequence of objects such that each objects appears infinitely many times for positive and negative . Then a directed -pre-category is defined by setting for . All other are not defined.