ScalingStacks

2.6 A-model and B-model of N = 2 SCFT as boundary strata [03QD]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

2.6 A-model and B-model of N=2N=2 SCFT as boundary strata

The boundary of the compactified moduli space β„³Β―N=2\overline{{\cal M}}^{N=2} of N=2N=2 SCFTs with a given central charge contains an open stratum given by sigma models with Calabi-Yau targets. Each stratum is parametrized by the classes of equivalence of quadruples (X,JX,𝐑+βˆ—β‹…gX,B)(X,J_{X},{{\bf R}}_{+}^{\ast}\cdot g_{X},B) where XX is a compact real manifold, JXJ_{X} a complex structure, gXg_{X} is a Calabi-Yau metric, and B∈H2​(X,i​𝐑/𝐙)B\in H^{2}(X,i{\bf R}/{\bf Z}) is a BB-field. The residual bundle of CFTs is a bundle of free fermion theories.

As a consequence of supersymmetry, the moduli space β„³N=2{\cal M}^{N=2} of superconformal field theories is a complex manifold which is locally isomorphic to the product of two complex manifolds. 11 1 Strictly speaking, one should exclude models with chiral fields of conformal dimension (2,0)(2,0), e.g. sigma models on hyperkΓ€hler manifolds, see [AM]. It is believed that this decomposition (up to certain corrections) is global. Also, there are two types of sigma models with Calabi-Yau targets: AA-models and BB-models. Hence, the traditional picture of the compactified moduli space looks as follows:

[Uncaptioned image]

Here the boundary consists of two open strata (A-stratum and B-stratum) and a mysterious meeting point. This point corresponds, in general, to a submanifold of codimension one in the closure of A-stratum and of B-stratum.

We argue that this picture should be modified. There is another open stratum of βˆ‚β„³Β―N=2\partial\overline{{\cal M}}^{N=2} (we call it T-stratum). It consists of toroidal models (i.e. CFTs associated with Narain lattices), parametrized by a manifold YY with a Riemannian metric defined up to a scalar factor. This subvariety meets both AA and BB strata along the codimension one stratum corresponding to the double collapse. Therefore the β€œtrue” picture is obtained from the traditional one by the real blow-up at the corner:

[Uncaptioned image]

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.