ScalingStacks

2.4 Example: Toroidal models [03QB]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

2.4 Example: Toroidal models

Non-supersymmetric toroidal model is described by the so-called Narain lattice, endowed with some additional data. More precisely, let us fix the central charge c=nc=n which is a positive integer number. What physicists call the Narain lattice Ξ“n,n\Gamma^{n,n} is a unique unimodular lattice of rank 2​n2n and the signature (n,n)(n,n). It can be described as 𝐙2​n{{\bf Z}}^{2n} equipped with the quadratic form Q⁑(x1,…,xn,y1,…,yn)=βˆ‘ixi​yiQ(x_{1},...,x_{n},y_{1},...,y_{n})=\sum_{i}x_{i}y_{i}. The moduli space of toroidal CFTs is

β„³c=nt​o​r=O⁑(n,n,𝐙)\O⁑(n,n,𝐑)/O⁑(n,𝐑)Γ—O⁑(n,𝐑).{\cal M}_{c=n}^{tor}=O(n,n,{{\bf Z}})\backslash O(n,n,{{\bf R}})/O(n,{{\bf R}})\times O(n,{{\bf R}}).

Equivalently, it is a quotient of the open part of the Grassmannian {V+βŠ‚π‘n,n|dimV+=n,Q|V>0}\{V_{+}\subset{{\bf R}}^{n,n}|\,dim\,V_{+}=n,Q_{|V}>0\} by the action of O⁑(n,n,𝐙)=A​u​t​(Ξ“n,n,Q)O(n,n,{{\bf Z}})=Aut(\Gamma^{n,n},Q). Let Vβˆ’V_{-} be the orthogonal complement to V+V_{+}. Then every vector of Ξ“n,n\Gamma^{n,n} can be uniquely written as Ξ³=Ξ³++Ξ³βˆ’\gamma=\gamma_{+}+\gamma_{-}, where γ±∈VΒ±\gamma_{\pm}\in V_{\pm}. For the corresponding CFT one has

βˆ‘p,qd​i​m​(Hp,q)​zp​zΒ―q=|∏kβ‰₯1(1βˆ’zk)|βˆ’2​nβ€‹βˆ‘Ξ³βˆˆΞ“n,nzQ⁑(Ξ³+)​zΒ―βˆ’Q⁑(Ξ³βˆ’)\sum_{p,q}dim(\,H^{p,q})z^{p}\bar{z}^{q}=\bigl|\prod_{k\geq 1}(1-z^{k})\bigr|^{-2n}\sum_{\gamma\in\Gamma^{n,n}}z^{Q(\gamma_{+})}\bar{z}^{\,-Q(\gamma_{-})}

Let us try to compactify the moduli space β„³c=nt​o​r{\cal M}_{c=n}^{tor}. Suppose that we have a one-parameter family of toroidal theories such that Em​i​n​(Ξ΅)E_{min}(\varepsilon) approaches zero. Then for corresponding vectors in HΞ΅H_{\varepsilon} one gets p⁑(Ξ΅)=q⁑(Ξ΅)β†’0p(\varepsilon)=q(\varepsilon)\to 0. It implies that Q⁑(γ⁑(Ξ΅))=0,Q⁑(Ξ³+​(Ξ΅))β‰ͺ1Q(\gamma(\varepsilon))=0,Q(\gamma_{+}(\varepsilon))\ll 1. It is easy to see that one can add vectors γ⁑(Ξ΅)\gamma(\varepsilon) satisfying these conditions. Thus one gets a (part of) lattice of the rank less or equal than nn. In the case of β€œmaximal” simple collapse the rank will be equal to nn. One can see that the corresponding points of the boundary give rise to the following data: (X,𝐑+βˆ—β‹…gX,Ο•Xt​r​i​v,B)(X,{{\bf R}}_{+}^{\ast}\cdot g_{X},\phi_{X}^{triv};B), where (X,gX)(X,g_{X}) is a flat nn-dimensional torus, B∈H2​(X,𝐑/𝐙)B\in H^{2}(X,{{\bf R}}/{{\bf Z}}) and Ο•Xt​r​i​v\phi_{X}^{triv} is the constant map form XX to the trivial theory point in the moduli space of CFTs. These data in turn give rise to a toroidal CFT, which can be realized as a sigma model with the target space (X,gX)(X,g_{X}) and given B-field BB. The residual bundle of CFTs on XX is trivial.

Let us consider a 11-parameter family of CFTs defined by the family (X,λ​gX,Ο•Xt​r​i​v,B=0)(X,\lambda g_{X},\phi_{X}^{triv};B=0), where λ∈(0,+∞)\lambda\in(0,+\infty). There are two degenerations of this family, which define two points of the boundary βˆ‚β„³Β―βŒ‹=\βŠ”β‰€βˆ‡\partial\overline{\cal M}_{c=n}^{tor}. As Ξ»β†’+∞\lambda\to+\infty, we get a toroidal CFT defined by (X,𝐑+βˆ—β‹…gX,Ο•Xt​r​i​v,B=0)(X,{{\bf R}}_{+}^{\ast}\cdot g_{X},\phi_{X}^{triv};B=0). As Ξ»β†’0\lambda\to 0 we get (X∨,𝐑+βˆ—β‹…gX∨,Ο•Xt​r​i​v,B=0)(X^{\vee},{{\bf R}}_{+}^{\ast}\cdot g_{X^{\vee}},\phi_{X}^{triv};B=0), where (X∨,gX∨)(X^{\vee},g_{X^{\vee}}) is the dual flat torus.

There might be further degenerations of the lattice. Thus one obtains a stratification of the compactified moduli space of lattices (and hence CFTs). Points of the compactification are described by flags of vector spaces 0=V0βŠ‚V1βŠ‚V2βŠ‚β€¦βŠ‚VkβŠ‚π‘n0=V_{0}\subset V_{1}\subset V_{2}\subset...\subset V_{k}\subset{{\bf R}}^{n}. In addition one has a lattice Ξ“i+1βŠ‚Vi+1/Vi\Gamma_{i+1}\subset V_{i+1}/V_{i}, considered up to a scalar factor. These data give rise to a tower of torus bundles Xkβ†’Xkβˆ’1→…→X1β†’{p​t}X_{k}\to X_{k-1}\to...\to X_{1}\to\{pt\} over tori with fibers (Vi+1/Vi)/Ξ“i+1(V_{i+1}/V_{i})/\Gamma_{i+1}. If Vk≃𝐑nβˆ’l,lβ‰₯1V_{k}\simeq{{\bf R}}^{n-l},l\geq 1, then one has also a map from the total space XkX_{k} of the last torus bundle to the point [Hk][H_{k}] in the moduli space of toroidal theories of smaller central charge: Ο•n:Xkβ†’β„³c=lt​o​r\phi_{n}:X_{k}\to{\cal M}_{c=l}^{tor}, Ο•k​(Xk)=[Hk]\phi_{k}(X_{k})=[H_{k}].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.