ScalingStacks

2.2 Physical picture of a simple collapse [03Q8]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.2 Physical picture of a simple collapse

In order to compactify ℳc≤c0{\cal M}_{c\leq c_{0}} we consider degenerations of CFTs as Em​i​n→0E_{min}\to 0. A degeneration is given by a one-parameter (discrete or continuous) family Hε,ε→0H_{\varepsilon},\varepsilon\to 0 of bi-graded spaces as above, where (p,q)=(p⁡(ε),q⁡(ε))(p,q)=(p(\varepsilon),q(\varepsilon)). These spaces are equipped with OPEs. The subspace of fields with conformal dimensions vanishing as ε→0\varepsilon\to 0 gives rise to a commutative algebra Hs​m​a​l​l=⊕p⁡(ε)≪1Hεp⁡(ε),p⁡(ε)H^{small}=\oplus_{p(\varepsilon)\ll 1}H_{\varepsilon}^{p(\varepsilon),p(\varepsilon)} (the algebra structure is given by the leading terms in OPEs). The spectrum XX of Hs​m​a​l​lH^{small} is expected to be a compact space (“manifold with singularities”) such that d​i​m​X≤c0dim\,X\leq c_{0}. It follows from the conformal invariance and the OPE, that the grading of Hs​m​a​l​lH^{small} (rescaled as ε→0\varepsilon\to 0) is given by the eigenvalues of a second order differential operator defined on the smooth part of XX. The operator has positive eigenvalues and is determined up to multiplication by a scalar. This implies that the smooth part of XX carries a metric gXg_{X}, which is also defined up to multiplication by a scalar. Other terms in OPEs give rise to additional differential-geometric structures on XX.

Thus, as a first approximation to the real picture, we assume the following description of a “simple collapse” of a family of CFTs. The degeneration of the family is described by the point of the boundary of ℳ¯c≤c0\overline{{\cal M}}_{c\leq c_{0}} which is a triple (X,𝐑+∗⋅gX,ϕX)(X,{{\bf R}}_{+}^{\ast}\cdot g_{X},\phi_{X}), where the metric gXg_{X} is defined up to a positive scalar factor, and ϕX:X→ℳc≤c0−d​i​m​X\phi_{X}:X\to{\cal M}_{c\leq c_{0}-dim\,X} is a map. One can have some extra conditions on the data. For example, the metric gXg_{X} can satisfy the Einstein equation.

Although the scalar factor for the metric is arbitrary, one should imagine that the curvature of gXg_{X} is “small”, and the injectivity radius of gXg_{X} is “large”. The map ϕX\phi_{X} appears naturally from the point of view of the simple collapse of CFTs described above. Indeed, in the limit ε→0\varepsilon\to 0, the space HεH_{\varepsilon} becomes an Hs​m​a​l​lH^{small}-module. It can be thought of as a space of sections of an infinite-dimensional vector bundle W→XW\to X. One can argue that fibers of WW generically are spaces of states of CFTs with central charges less or equal than c0−d​i​m​Xc_{0}-dim\,X. This is encoded in the map ϕX\phi_{X}. In the case when CFTs from ϕX​(X)\phi_{X}(X) have non-trivial symmetry groups, one expects a kind of a gauge theory on XX as well.

Purely bosonic sigma-models correspond the case when c0=c⁡(ε)=d​i​m​Xc_{0}=c(\varepsilon)=dim\,X and the residual theories (CFTs in the image of ϕX\phi_{X}) are all trivial. The target space XX in this case should carry a Ricci flat metric. In the supersymmetric case the target space XX is a Calabi-Yau manifold, and the residual bundle of CFTs is a bundle of free fermion theories.

Remark 3

We expect that all compact Ricci flat manifolds (with the metric defined up to a constant scalar factor) appear as target spaces of degenerating CFTs. Thus, the construction of the compactification of the moduli space of CFTs should include as a part a compactification of the moduli spaces of Einstein manifolds. Notice that in differential geometry there is a fundamental result of Gromov (see [G]) about the precompactness of the moduli space of pointed connected complete Riemannian manifolds of a given dimension, with the Ricci curvature bounded from below. One can speculate about the relationship between the compactification of the moduli space of CFTs and the Gromov’s compactification. For example, is it true that all target spaces appearing as limits of CFTs have non-negative Ricci curvature?

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.