2.2 Physical picture of a simple collapse [03Q8]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2.2 Physical picture of a simple collapse
In order to compactify we consider degenerations of CFTs as . A degeneration is given by a one-parameter (discrete or continuous) family of bi-graded spaces as above, where . These spaces are equipped with OPEs. The subspace of fields with conformal dimensions vanishing as gives rise to a commutative algebra (the algebra structure is given by the leading terms in OPEs). The spectrum of is expected to be a compact space (“manifold with singularities”) such that . It follows from the conformal invariance and the OPE, that the grading of (rescaled as ) is given by the eigenvalues of a second order differential operator defined on the smooth part of . The operator has positive eigenvalues and is determined up to multiplication by a scalar. This implies that the smooth part of carries a metric , which is also defined up to multiplication by a scalar. Other terms in OPEs give rise to additional differential-geometric structures on .
Thus, as a first approximation to the real picture, we assume the following description of a “simple collapse” of a family of CFTs. The degeneration of the family is described by the point of the boundary of which is a triple , where the metric is defined up to a positive scalar factor, and is a map. One can have some extra conditions on the data. For example, the metric can satisfy the Einstein equation.
Although the scalar factor for the metric is arbitrary, one should imagine that the curvature of is “small”, and the injectivity radius of is “large”. The map appears naturally from the point of view of the simple collapse of CFTs described above. Indeed, in the limit , the space becomes an -module. It can be thought of as a space of sections of an infinite-dimensional vector bundle . One can argue that fibers of generically are spaces of states of CFTs with central charges less or equal than . This is encoded in the map . In the case when CFTs from have non-trivial symmetry groups, one expects a kind of a gauge theory on as well.
Purely bosonic sigma-models correspond the case when and the residual theories (CFTs in the image of ) are all trivial. The target space in this case should carry a Ricci flat metric. In the supersymmetric case the target space is a Calabi-Yau manifold, and the residual bundle of CFTs is a bundle of free fermion theories.
Remark 3
We expect that all compact Ricci flat manifolds (with the metric defined up to a constant scalar factor) appear as target spaces of degenerating CFTs. Thus, the construction of the compactification of the moduli space of CFTs should include as a part a compactification of the moduli spaces of Einstein manifolds. Notice that in differential geometry there is a fundamental result of Gromov (see [G]) about the precompactness of the moduli space of pointed connected complete Riemannian manifolds of a given dimension, with the Ricci curvature bounded from below. One can speculate about the relationship between the compactification of the moduli space of CFTs and the Gromov’s compactification. For example, is it true that all target spaces appearing as limits of CFTs have non-negative Ricci curvature?