Proof: [03X4]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof: First of all, the condition on from Lemma 6 is the condition on a loop of scalar products on 2-dimensional spaces, here . We can write where and is a smooth function. Then we have
The equation of Lemma 6 gives . The RHS of this expression is known as long as we know . Hence we can say that , where is a 1-form depending on the restriction . We see that it suffices to find such that (then and hence does exist).
Let us consider the functional . We can interpret a metric as a point in the Lobachevsky plane . More precisely, let us consider the space of pairs where is a positive quadratic form on such that and is a half-plane in (the meaning of is the inward oriented tangent half-plane to at point ). This space is naturally diffeomorphic to . The latter manifold can be identified in -equivariant way with the manifold consisting of pairs , where and belongs to the absolute. Hence is (locally) a non-parametrized path in (it would be a global path, if the bundle over given by the all metrics on with the determinant was trivial).
Next we observe that the variation , where is a -dimensional surface bounded by the paths defined by and , and is a canonical -invariant -form on . One can show that even by a small variation of the path defined by we can make an arbitrary real number. In particular, we can find such that . This concludes the proof of Lemma 6.