ScalingStacks

Proof: [03X4]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof: First of all, the condition on gg from Lemma 6 is the condition on a loop g|TzBg_{|T_{z}B} of scalar products on 2-dimensional spaces, here z∈∂U1≃S1z\in\partial U_{1}\simeq S^{1}. We can write g=exp⁡(ψ)​g0g=\exp(\psi)g_{0} where det(g0)=1\det(g_{0})=1 and ψ\psi is a smooth function. Then we have

∇ez(exp⁡ψ​g0)=exp⁡(ψ)​∇ezg0+exp⁡(ψ)​∂ez(ψ)​g0.\nabla_{e_{z}}(\exp{\psi}g_{0})=\exp({\psi})\nabla_{e_{z}}g_{0}+\exp(\psi)\partial_{e_{z}}(\psi)\,g_{0}\,\,.

The equation of Lemma 6 gives ∂ezψ=−(∇ezg0)(nz,nz)/g0(nz,nz)\partial_{e_{z}}\psi=-(\nabla_{e_{z}}g_{0})(n_{z},n_{z})/g_{0}(n_{z},n_{z}). The RHS of this expression is known as long as we know g0g_{0}. Hence we can say that d​ψ=βg0d\psi=\beta_{g_{0}}, where βg0\beta_{g_{0}} is a 1-form depending on the restriction (g0)|∂U1(g_{0})_{|\partial U_{1}}. We see that it suffices to find such g0g_{0} that ∫∂U1βg0=0\int_{\partial U_{1}}\beta_{g_{0}}=0 (then ψ\psi and hence gg does exist).

Let us consider the functional I⁡(g0)=∫S1βg0I(g_{0})=\int_{S^{1}}\beta_{g_{0}}. We can interpret a metric g0g_{0} as a point in the Lobachevsky plane ℋ=S​L​(2,𝐑)/S​O​(2){\cal H}=SL(2,{\bf R})/SO(2). More precisely, let us consider the space SS of pairs (g0,P)(g_{0},P) where g0g_{0} is a positive quadratic form on 𝐑2{\bf R}^{2} such that det(g0)=1\det(g_{0})=1 and PP is a half-plane in 𝐑2{\bf R}^{2} (the meaning of PP is the inward oriented tangent half-plane to ∂U1\partial U_{1} at point z∈∂U1z\in\partial U_{1}). This space is naturally diffeomorphic to S∗​(𝐑2)×ℋS^{\ast}({\bf R}^{2})\times{\cal H}. The latter manifold can be identified in S​L​(2,𝐑)SL(2,{\bf R})-equivariant way with the manifold consisting of pairs (x,y)(x,y), where x∈ℋx\in{\cal H} and yy belongs to the absolute. Hence (g0)|∂U1(g_{0})_{|\partial U_{1}} is (locally) a non-parametrized path in SS (it would be a global path, if the bundle over S1S^{1} given by the all metrics on S1S^{1} with the determinant 11 was trivial).

Next we observe that the variation δ​I​(g0)=∫Nω\delta I(g_{0})=\int_{N}\omega, where NN is a 22-dimensional surface bounded by the paths defined by g0g_{0} and g0+δ​g0g_{0}+\delta g_{0}, and ω\omega is a canonical S​L​(2,𝐑)SL(2,{\bf R})-invariant 22-form on SS. One can show that even by a small variation of the path defined by g0g_{0} we can make I⁡(g0)I(g_{0}) an arbitrary real number. In particular, we can find g0g_{0} such that I⁡(g0)=0I(g_{0})=0. This concludes the proof of Lemma 6. ■\blacksquare

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.