ScalingStacks

Proof. [03W4]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof. Here is the plan of the proof.

  1. 1.

    We define three open domains Ti,i=1,2,3T_{i},\,\,i=1,2,3 in three copies of the standard two-dimensional analytic torus (𝐆ma​n)2({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{2}, and continuous maps Ο€i:Ti→𝐑2\pi_{i}:T_{i}\to{{\bf R}}^{2} such that all points of the image Ui=Ο€i​(Ti)U_{i}=\pi_{i}(T_{i}) are Ο€i\pi_{i}-smooth (i.e. each Ο€i\pi_{i} is an analytic torus fibration). Domains UiU_{i} cover 𝐑2βˆ–{(0,0)}{\bf R}^{2}\setminus\{(0,0)\}.

  2. 2.

    For each i,1≀i≀3i,1\leq i\leq 3 we construct an open embedding gi:Tiβ†ͺXa​ng_{i}:T_{i}\hookrightarrow X^{an}.

  3. 3.

    We construct an embedding j:𝐑2β†ͺ𝐑3j:{{\bf R}}^{2}\hookrightarrow{{\bf R}}^{3} such that each open set UiU_{i} is homeomorphically identified with f​(gi​(Ti))f(g_{i}(T_{i})) and j⁑((,,,))=(0,0,0)j((0,0))=(0,0,0). Moreover, Ο€i\pi_{i}-smooth points are mapped into ff-smooth points.

The Proposition will follow from 1)-3).

Let us describe the constructions and formulas. We start with open sets Ui,1≀i≀3U_{i},1\leq i\leq 3. Let us fix a number 0<Ξ΅<10<\varepsilon<1 and define

U1={(x,y)βˆˆπ‘2|x<Ρ​|y|}U2={(x,y)βˆˆπ‘2|x>0,y<Ξ΅x}U3={(x,y)βˆˆπ‘2|x>0,y>0}\begin{array}[]{lll}U_{1}&=&\{(x,y)\in{{\bf R}}^{2}|x<\varepsilon|y|\,\}\\ U_{2}&=&\{(x,y)\in{{\bf R}}^{2}|x>0,y<\varepsilon x\,\}\\ U_{3}&=&\{(x,y)\in{{\bf R}}^{2}|x>0,y>0\}\end{array}

Clearly 𝐑2βˆ–{(0,0)}=U1βˆͺU2βˆͺU3{{\bf R}}^{2}\setminus\{(0,0)\}=U_{1}\cup U_{2}\cup U_{3}. We define also a slightly modified domain U2β€²U_{2}^{\prime} as {(x,y)βˆˆπ‘2|x>0,y<Ξ΅1+Ξ΅x}\{(x,y)\in{{\bf R}}^{2}|x>0,y<\frac{\varepsilon}{1+\varepsilon}x\,\}.

We define Ti:=Ο€c​a​nβˆ’1(Ui)βŠ‚(𝐆ma​n)2,i=1,3T_{i}:=\pi_{can}^{-1}(U_{i})\subset({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{2},i=1,3 and T2:=Ο€c​a​nβˆ’1​(U2β€²)βŠ‚(𝐆ma​n)2T_{2}:=\pi_{can}^{-1}(U_{2}^{\prime})\subset({\bf G}_{m}^{an})^{2}. Then the projections Ο€i:Tlβ†’Ul\pi_{i}:T_{l}\to U_{l} are given by the formulas

Ο€i(ΞΎi,Ξ·i)=Ο€c​a​n(ΞΎi,Ξ·i)=(log|ΞΎi|,log|Ξ·i|),i=1,3,\pi_{i}(\xi_{i},\eta_{i})=\pi_{can}(\xi_{i},\eta_{i})=(\log|\xi_{i}|,\log|\eta_{i}|),\,\,\,i=1,3\,\,,
Ο€2​(ΞΎ2,Ξ·2)={(log⁑|ΞΎ2|,log⁑|Ξ·2|)Β if ​|Ξ·2|<1(log⁑|ΞΎ2|βˆ’log⁑|Ξ·2|,log⁑|Ξ·2|)Β if ​|Ξ·2|β‰₯1.\pi_{2}(\xi_{2},\eta_{2})=\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}(\log|\xi_{2}|,\log|\eta_{2}|)&\mbox{ if }|\eta_{2}|<1\\ (\log|\xi_{2}|-\log|\eta_{2}|,\log|\eta_{2}|)&\mbox{ if }|\eta_{2}|\geq 1\end{array}\right.\,\,.

In these formulas (ΞΎi,Ξ·i)(\xi_{i},\eta_{i}) are coordinates on Ti,1≀i≀3T_{i},1\leq i\leq 3.

We define inclusion gi:Tiβ†ͺX,1≀i≀3g_{i}:T_{i}\hookrightarrow X,1\leq i\leq 3 by the following formulas:

g1​(ΞΎ1,Ξ·1)=(1ΞΎ1,ΞΎ1​(1+Ξ·1),1Ξ·1)g2​(ΞΎ2,Ξ·2)=(1+Ξ·2ΞΎ2,ΞΎ2,1Ξ·2)g3​(ΞΎ3,Ξ·3)=(1+Ξ·3ΞΎ3​η3,ΞΎ3​η3,1Ξ·3)\begin{array}[]{lll}g_{1}(\xi_{1},\eta_{1})&=&({1\over{\xi_{1}}},\xi_{1}(1+\eta_{1}),{1\over{\eta_{1}}})\\ g_{2}(\xi_{2},\eta_{2})&=&({1+\eta_{2}\over{\xi_{2}}},\xi_{2},{1\over{\eta_{2}}})\\ g_{3}(\xi_{3},\eta_{3})&=&({1+\eta_{3}\over{\xi_{3}\eta_{3}}},\xi_{3}\eta_{3},{1\over{\eta_{3}}})\end{array}

Let us decompose Xa​n=Xβˆ’βˆͺX0βˆͺX+X^{an}=X_{-}\cup X_{0}\cup X_{+} according to the sign of log⁑|Ξ³|p\log|\gamma|_{p} where p∈Xa​np\in X^{an} is a point. It is easy to see that

f⁑(Xβˆ’)={(a,b,c)βˆˆπ‘3|c<0,aβ‰₯0,bβ‰₯0,ab(a+b+c)=0}f⁑(X0)={(a,b,c)βˆˆπ‘3|c=0,aβ‰₯0,bβ‰₯0,ab=0}f⁑(X+)={(a,b,c)βˆˆπ‘3|c>0,aβ‰₯0,bβ‰₯0,ab=0}\begin{array}[]{lll}f(X_{-})&=&\{\,(a,b,c)\in{{\bf R}}^{3}\,|\,c<0,a\geq 0,b\geq 0,\,ab(a+b+c)=0\,\}\\ f(X_{0})&=&\{\,(a,b,c)\in{{\bf R}}^{3}\,|\,c=0,a\geq 0,b\geq 0,\,ab=0\,\}\\ f(X_{+})&=&\{\,(a,b,c)\in{{\bf R}}^{3}\,|\,c>0,a\geq 0,b\geq 0,\,ab=0\,\}\end{array}

From this explicit description we see that ff is proper and the image of ff is homeomorphic to 𝐑2{{\bf R}}^{2}.

Let us consider the embedding j:𝐑2→𝐑3j:{{\bf R}}^{2}\to{{\bf R}}^{3} given by formula

j⁑(x,y)={(βˆ’x,max⁑(x+y,0),βˆ’y)Β ifΒ x≀0( 0,x+max⁑(y,0),βˆ’y)Β ifΒ xβ‰₯0j(x,y)=\left\{\begin{array}[]{lll}(-x\,,\,\max(x+y,0)\,,\,-y\,)&\mbox{ if }&x\leq 0\\ (\,0\,,\,x+\max(y,0)\,,\,-y\,)&\mbox{ if }&x\geq 0\end{array}\right.

One can easily check that the image of jj coincides with the image of ff, jβˆ˜Ο€i=f∘gij\circ\pi_{i}=f\circ g_{i} and fβˆ’1​(j⁑(Ui))=gi​(Ti)f^{-1}(j(U_{i}))=g_{i}(T_{i}) for all 1≀i≀31\leq i\leq 3. This concludes the proof of Proposition. β– \blacksquare

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.