ScalingStacks

Remark 18 [03SN]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 18

For the case of collapse with singular fibers, the rigid analytic space Ya​nY^{an} constructed as above, seems to be a “wrong” one. First of all, it is not compact because YY is not compact. But there is also a more fundamental problem. It seems that Ya​nY^{an} can not be embedded into a compact analytic space associated with a projective algebraic variety. There are several indications that there exists another sheaf of algebras 𝒪Y′{\cal O}^{\prime}_{Y} which is (locally on YY) isomorphic to 𝒪Y{\cal O}_{Y}, and the rigid analytic space (Ya​n)′(Y^{an})^{\prime} associated with (Y,𝒪Y′)(Y,{\cal O}^{\prime}_{Y}) admits an algebraic compactification. In general, sheaves 𝒪Y′{\cal O}^{\prime}_{Y} which are twisted versions of 𝒪Y{\cal O}_{Y} are classified by the first non-abelian cohomology H1​(Y,A​u​t¯​(𝒪Y))H^{1}(Y,{\underline{Aut}}({\cal O}_{Y})) where A​u​t¯​(𝒪Y){\underline{Aut}}({\cal O}_{Y}) is the sheaf of groups of automorphisms of 𝒪Y{\cal O}_{Y}. Thus, in the mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau manifolds which are not abelian varieties, we expect a new ingredient, the cohomology class [𝒪Y′][{\cal O}^{\prime}_{Y}].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.