ScalingStacks

3.3. Green’s currents on a cylinder [050P]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3.3. Green’s currents on a cylinder

In this subsection we assume Q≡D×ℝQ\equiv D\times\mathbb{R} is a Riemannian product of a Kähler manifold (D,ωD,JD)(D,\omega_{D},J_{D}) of complex dimension n−1n-1, and the real line ℝ\mathbb{R} with coordinate zz. Given a smooth divisor H⊂DH\subset D, let P≡H×{0}⊂D×{0}P\equiv H\times\{0\}\subset D\times\{0\}. In our discussion sometimes we also naturally identify HH with PP. The results of this subsection will be purely local so DD and HH are not necessarily compact.

The splitting of a line ℝ\mathbb{R} allows us to study the normal exponential map in QQ in terms of the normal exponential map in DD. Notice the normal bundle of PP in QQ is naturally a Riemannian direct sum

(3.253) N=N0⊕ℝz,{N}=N_{0}\oplus\mathbb{R}_{z},

where N0N_{0} is the normal bundle of HH in DD given as the orthogonal complement (T​H)⟂(TH)^{\perp} of T​HTH in T​D|HTD|_{H} (with respect to ωD\omega_{D}). So N0N_{0} is naturally a hermitian line bundle. We also naturally identify N0N_{0} with the holomorphic normal bundle T​D|H/T​HTD|_{H}/TH, as complex line bundles. Therefore, N0N_{0} can be viewed as a holomorphic hermitian line bundle. The normal exponential map of HH in DD is defined by

(3.254) ExpH:N0→D,(p,v)↦Expp⁡(v),\Exp_{H}:N_{0}\to D,\ (p,v)\mapsto\Exp_{p}(v),

which gives a local diffeomorphism from a neighborhood of the zero section in N0N_{0} to a tubular neighborhood of HH in DD. Immediately,

(3.255) d​ExpH:T​N0|H⟶T​D|Hd\text{Exp}_{H}:TN_{0}|_{H}\longrightarrow TD|_{H}

is the identity map under the natural isomorphisms T​N0|H≅N0⊕T​HTN_{0}|_{H}\cong N_{0}\oplus TH and T​D|H≅N0⊕T​HTD|_{H}\cong N_{0}\oplus TH.

Given any point p∈Hp\in H, we may choose local holomorphic coordinates {wi}i=1n−1\{w_{i}\}_{i=1}^{n-1} on DD, centered at pp, such that HH is locally defined by w1=0w_{1}=0. Then d​w1,w2,…,wn−1dw_{1},w_{2},\ldots,w_{n-1} induces local holomorphic coordinates on N0N_{0}, which we denote by {ζ,w2′,…,wn−1′}\{\zeta,w_{2}^{\prime},\ldots,w_{n-1}^{\prime}\}. Given any (p,v)∈N0(p,v)\in N_{0}, its coordinates are by definition given as

(3.256) {ζ=(d​w1)p​(v),wj′=wj​(p),j≥2.\displaystyle\begin{cases}\zeta=(dw_{1})_{p}(v),\\ w_{j}^{\prime}=w_{j}(p),&j\geq 2.\end{cases}

Under the normal exponential map ExpH\Exp_{H}, these coordinates can also be viewed as local (non-holomorphic) coordinates on DD, and when restricted to HH we have wj′=wj​(j≥2)w_{j}^{\prime}=w_{j}(j\geq 2) and d​ζ=d​w1d\zeta=dw_{1}. In particular, {w2′,⋯,wn−1′}\{w_{2}^{\prime},\cdots,w_{n-1}^{\prime}\} still gives holomorphic coordinates on HH.

Similarly using ExpH\Exp_{H}, the coordinate vector field ∂ζ\partial_{\zeta}, originally defined on the normal bundle N0N_{0}, can also be viewed as a local (non-holomorphic) vector field on DD. When restricted to HH, the vector field ∂ζ\partial_{\zeta} can hence be identified with the local section σ\sigma of (T​H)⟂⊂T​D|H(TH)^{\perp}\subset TD|_{H} given by the orthogonal projection of the holomorphic vector field ∂w1\partial_{w_{1}}. Then we obtain a local unitary frame ee of (T​H)⟂(TH)^{\perp} given by

(3.257) e≡σ/|σ|.e\equiv\sigma/|\sigma|.

These generate fiber coordinates y,y¯y,\bar{y} on N0N_{0} such that

(3.258) y=|σ|⋅ζ.y=|\sigma|\cdot\zeta.

In this way we obtain local coordinates {y,y¯,y3=z,w2′,w¯2′,…,wn−1′,w¯n−1′}\{y,\bar{y},y_{3}=z,w_{2}^{\prime},\bar{w}_{2}^{\prime},\ldots,w_{n-1}^{\prime},\bar{w}_{n-1}^{\prime}\} in a neighborhood of pp in QQ. To match with the notation in the previous subsection, with respect to the local orthonormal basis {σ+σ¯,−1(σ−σ¯),∂z}\{\sigma+\bar{\sigma},\sqrt{-1}(\sigma-\bar{\sigma}),\partial_{z}\}, the normal geodesic coordinates are given by {y1=R​e​(y),y2=I​m​(y),y3=z}\{y_{1}=Re(y),y_{2}=Im(y),y_{3}=z\}, and

(3.259) r2=|y|2+z2.r^{2}=|y|^{2}+z^{2}.

Also, the convention for orientation is given such that

(3.260) 2−(n−1)​−1​d​y∧d​y¯∧d​z∧∏j=2n−1(−1​d​wj′∧d​w¯j′)2^{-(n-1)}\sqrt{-1}dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge dz\wedge\prod\limits_{j=2}^{n-1}(\sqrt{-1}dw_{j}^{\prime}\wedge d\bar{w}_{j}^{\prime})

defines a positive volume form. In the following, we will also use ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle to denote the hermitian inner product on (1,0)(1,0)-type vectors. The relation with the Riemannian inner product is seen as

(3.261) ⟨ξ,ξ⟩=2​⟨R​e​(ξ),R​e​(ξ)⟩.\langle\xi,\xi\rangle=2\langle Re(\xi),Re(\xi)\rangle.

What the notation means will be clear in the context.

By making PP and QQ smaller we get local existence of Green’s current GPG_{P} for PP in QQ, by Theorem 3.10, with the expansion given there. In our case the formula can be written in terms of the above complex coordinates

Proposition 3.24.

let GPG_{P} be a Green’s current for P≡H×{0}P\equiv H\times\{0\} in QQ, then locally

(3.262) GP=ψ∧d​z+ℛ,G_{P}=\psi\wedge dz+\mathcal{R},

where ℛ∈C∞\mathcal{R}\in C^{\infty} and ψ\psi is family of real-valued (1,1)(1,1)-forms on DD parametrized by zz, satisfying

(3.263) ψ⁡(−z)−ψ⁡(z)∈C∞.\psi(-z)-\psi(z)\in C^{\infty}.

Moreover, in terms of the above local coordinates we can write

(3.264) ψ=−14​r​d​y∧d​y¯+12​r​(y​d​y¯+y¯​d​y)∧Γ+r⋅d​Γ+r−3​Π2(4)+O′​(r2),\psi=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4r}dy\wedge d\bar{y}+\frac{1}{2r}(yd\bar{y}+\bar{y}dy)\wedge\Gamma+r\cdot d\Gamma+r^{-3}\Pi_{2}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(r^{2}),

where Γ\Gamma is a smooth real-valued 11-form locally defined on HH given by

(3.265) Γ(v)≡−−12⟨∇v∂y,∂y⟩|H,v∈TpH,\Gamma(v)\equiv-\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}\langle\nabla_{v}\partial_{y},\partial_{y}\rangle\Big|_{H},\ v\in T_{p}H,

and Π2(4)\Pi_{2}^{(4)} is the 22-form given by Notation 3.9 such that it contains at least one of the d​ydy or d​y¯d\bar{y}.

Proof.

This essentially follows from the fact that PP is located on the slice {z=0}\{z=0\} and HH is a complex submanifold of DD. Indeed, we can decompose

(3.266) GP=ψ1∧d​z+ℛ1,G_{P}=\psi_{1}\wedge dz+\mathcal{R}_{1},

where ℛ1\mathcal{R}_{1} does not involve d​zdz. Given any compactly supported test form χ∈Ω02​n−4​(Q)\chi\in\Omega_{0}^{2n-4}(Q), we can write

(3.267) χ=β∧d​z+γ,\chi=\beta\wedge dz+\gamma,

where γ\gamma does not involve d​zdz. Immediately,

(3.268) (ℛ1,Δ​γ)=∫Qℛ1∧Δ​γ=0(\mathcal{R}_{1},\Delta\gamma)=\int_{Q}\mathcal{R}_{1}\wedge\Delta\gamma=0

and

(3.269) (ψ1∧𝑑z,Δ⁡(β∧𝑑z))=∫Qψ1∧𝑑z∧Δ⁡(β∧𝑑z)=0.(\psi_{1}\wedge dz,\Delta(\beta\wedge dz))=\int_{Q}\psi_{1}\wedge dz\wedge\Delta(\beta\wedge dz)=0.

So it follows that

(3.270) (ℛ1,Δ​χ)=(ℛ1,Δ⁡(β∧𝑑z))=(GP,Δ⁡(β∧𝑑z))=2​π​∫P(β∧𝑑z)=0.(\mathcal{R}_{1},\Delta\chi)=(\mathcal{R}_{1},\Delta(\beta\wedge dz))=(G_{P},\Delta(\beta\wedge dz))=2\pi\int_{P}(\beta\wedge dz)=0.

This implies that Δ​ℛ1=0\Delta\mathcal{R}_{1}=0 in the distributional sense. By the standard elliptic regularity, we have ℛ1∈C∞\mathcal{R}_{1}\in C^{\infty}.

Now write

(3.271) ψ1=ψ+ψ2,\psi_{1}=\psi+\psi_{2},

where ψ\psi is JDJ_{D}-invariant, i.e. of type (1,1)(1,1) in DD, and ψ2\psi_{2} is anti-JDJ_{D}-invariant. Since HH is a complex submanifold of DD, the Dirac current δP\delta_{P} is JDJ_{D}-invariant, hence JD​(GP)J_{D}(G_{P}) is also a Green’s current for PP, so we see that ψ2=12​(GP−J⁡(GP))\psi_{2}=\frac{1}{2}(G_{P}-J(G_{P})) is smooth. Then we have

(3.272) GP=ψ∧d​z+ℛ,G_{P}=\psi\wedge dz+\mathcal{R},

where ℛ=ℛ1+ψ2∧d​z\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{R}_{1}+\psi_{2}\wedge dz is smooth. Similarly since the δP\delta_{P} is invariant under z↦−zz\mapsto-z, the difference ψ⁡(z)−ψ⁡(−z)\psi(z)-\psi(-z) is smooth.

To see the expansion of ψ\psi, we notice that HH is a Kähler, in particular minimal, submanifold of DD. So the mean curvature of HH in DD vanishes. Also notice ∂z\partial_{z} is parallel on QQ so Ai​α​β=0A_{i\alpha\beta}=0 if either α=3\alpha=3 or β=3\beta=3. This then implies that

(3.273) ψ=−14​r​d​y∧d​y¯+12​r​(y​d​y¯+y¯​d​y)∧Γ+r⋅𝔸+r−3​Π2(4)+O~​(r2),\psi=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4r}dy\wedge d\bar{y}+\frac{1}{2r}(yd\bar{y}+\bar{y}dy)\wedge\Gamma+r\cdot\mathbb{A}+r^{-3}\Pi_{2}^{(4)}+\widetilde{O}(r^{2}),

where

(3.274) Γ\displaystyle\Gamma =−12​Ai​12​d​xi,\displaystyle=-\frac{1}{2}A_{i12}dx_{i},
(3.275) 𝔸\displaystyle\mathbb{A} =−14​Ai​j​α​β​d​xi∧d​xj.\displaystyle=-\frac{1}{4}A_{ij\alpha\beta}dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}.

In particular, 𝔸=d​Γ\mathbb{A}=d\Gamma. Re-writing

(3.276) Ai​12=⟨∇∂xi∂y2,∂y1⟩A_{i12}=\langle\nabla_{\partial_{x_{i}}}\partial_{y_{2}},\partial_{y_{1}}\rangle

in terms of the complex coordinates y,y¯y,\bar{y} and bearing in mind (3.261) we obtain the desired formula for Γ\Gamma. ∎

Proposition 3.24 has a quick corollary which will be used in our later calculations.

Corollary 3.24.1.

For any positive integer k≥2k\geq 2, we have

(3.277) ψk=O′​(rk−1).\psi^{k}=O^{\prime}(r^{k-1}).
Proof.

By Proposition 3.24, we write

(3.278) ψ\displaystyle\psi =𝔗1+𝔗2+𝔗3,\displaystyle=\FT_{1}+\FT_{2}+\FT_{3},
(3.279) 𝔗1\displaystyle\FT_{1} ≡−14​r​d​y∧d​y¯,\displaystyle\equiv\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4r}dy\wedge d\bar{y},
(3.280) 𝔗2\displaystyle\FT_{2} ≡12​r​(y​d​y¯+y¯​d​y)∧Γ=O′​(1),\displaystyle\equiv\frac{1}{2r}(yd\bar{y}+\bar{y}dy)\wedge\Gamma=O^{\prime}(1),
(3.281) 𝔗3\displaystyle\FT_{3} ≡r⋅d​Γ+r−3​Π2(4)+O′​(r2)=O′​(r).\displaystyle\equiv r\cdot d\Gamma+r^{-3}\Pi_{2}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(r^{2})=O^{\prime}(r).

Immediately we have (𝔗1)2=(𝔗2)2=𝔗1∧𝔗2=0(\FT_{1})^{2}=(\FT_{2})^{2}=\FT_{1}\wedge\FT_{2}=0 and for all k≥2k\geq 2, 𝔗2∧(𝔗3)k=(𝔗3)k=O′​(rk)\FT_{2}\wedge(\FT_{3})^{k}=(\FT_{3})^{k}=O^{\prime}(r^{k}). Moreover,

(3.282) 𝔗1∧𝔗3=−14​dy∧d​y¯∧d​Γ+−14​r4​dy∧d​y¯∧Π2(4)+O′​(r).\FT_{1}\wedge\FT_{3}=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4}dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge d\Gamma+\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4r^{4}}dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge\Pi_{2}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(r).

Notice that −14​d​y∧d​y¯∧d​Γ\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4}dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge d\Gamma is a smooth term and by definition d​y∧d​y¯∧Π2(4)=0dy\wedge d\bar{y}\wedge\Pi_{2}^{(4)}=0, then

(3.283) 𝔗1∧𝔗3=O′​(r).\FT_{1}\wedge\FT_{3}=O^{\prime}(r).

So for all k≥1k\geq 1,

(3.284) 𝔗1∧(𝔗3)k=O′​(rk).\FT_{1}\wedge(\FT_{3})^{k}=O^{\prime}(r^{k}).

Now by direct calculation,

(3.285) ψk=k⁡((𝔗1)∧(𝔗3)k−1+(𝔗2)∧(𝔗3)k−1)+(𝔗3)k.\displaystyle\psi^{k}=k\Big((\FT_{1})\wedge(\FT_{3})^{k-1}+(\FT_{2})\wedge(\FT_{3})^{k-1}\Big)+(\FT_{3})^{k}.

The conclusion then follows. ∎

Notice that the above local coordinates {y,y¯}\{y,\bar{y}\} are not canonical, and depend on the initial choice of the local coordinates {wi}i=1n−1\{w_{i}\}_{i=1}^{n-1} on DD. However, a different choice of local holomorphic coordinates on DD will induce the coordinates y~,y~¯\tilde{y},\bar{\tilde{y}} on fibers of N0N_{0} such that

(3.286) y=e−1​ϕ⋅y~y=e^{\sqrt{-1}\phi}\cdot\tilde{y}

for some real function ϕ\phi on HH. In particular, we have the transformation

(3.287) d​y∧d​y¯=d​y~∧d​y~¯−−1​d​|y|2∧d​ϕdy\wedge d\bar{y}=d\tilde{y}\wedge d\bar{\tilde{y}}-\sqrt{-1}d|y|^{2}\wedge d\phi

and

(3.288) Γ=Γ~−12​d​ϕ,\Gamma=\widetilde{\Gamma}-\frac{1}{2}d\phi,

This suggests viewing Γ\Gamma as a connection 1-form on the normal bundle. Indeed this is exactly the case.

Lemma 3.25.

2​−1​Γ2\sqrt{-1}\Gamma is the Chern connection 1-form of the normal bundle N0N_{0} with respect to the above hermitian holomorphic structure, in the local holomorphic frame σ\sigma. In other words,

(3.289) Γ=12​dHc​log⁡|σ|.\Gamma=\frac{1}{2}d^{c}_{H}\log|\sigma|.
Proof.

By definition

(3.290) σ=f∂y=∂w1−∑j≥2μj∂wj,\sigma=f\partial_{y}=\partial_{w_{1}}-\sum_{j\geq 2}\mu_{j}\partial_{w_{j}},

where f=|σ|>0f=|\sigma|>0 is local real valued function on HH, and μ2,⋯,μn−1\mu_{2},\cdots,\mu_{n-1} are local complex valued function on HH. The key property we will use is that along HH, ∇∂w¯kσ\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}}\sigma is tangential to HH for k≥2k\geq 2. In fact, the Kähler condition implies ∇∂¯wk∂wj=0\nabla_{\bar{\partial}_{w_{k}}}\partial_{w_{j}}=0 for all jj, and hence

(3.291) ∇∂w¯kσ=∇∂w¯k(∂w1−∑j=2n−1μj∂wj)=−∑j=2n−1∂w¯k(μj)∂wj.\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}}\sigma=\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}}\Big(\partial_{w_{1}}-\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}\mu_{j}\partial_{w_{j}}\Big)=-\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}(\mu_{j})\partial_{w_{j}}.

Therefore,

(3.292) ∂wkf=∂wk⟨∂y,σ⟩=⟨∇∂wk∂y,f∂y⟩+⟨∂y,∇∂w¯kσ⟩=f⟨∇∂wk∂y,∂y⟩,\partial_{w_{k}}f=\partial_{w_{k}}\langle\partial_{y},\sigma\rangle=\langle\nabla_{\partial_{w_{k}}}\partial_{y},f\partial_{y}\rangle+\langle\partial_{y},\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}}\sigma\rangle=f\langle\nabla_{\partial_{w_{k}}}\partial_{y},\partial_{y}\rangle,

and hence

(3.293) ⟨∇∂wk∂y,∂y⟩=f−1∂wkf=∂wk(logf).\langle\nabla_{\partial_{w_{k}}}\partial_{y},\partial_{y}\rangle=f^{-1}\partial_{w_{k}}f=\partial_{w_{k}}(\log f).

Differentiating |∂y|2=1|\partial_{y}|^{2}=1, we get

(3.294) ⟨∇∂wk∂y,∂y⟩+⟨∂y,∇∂w¯k∂y⟩=0,\langle\nabla_{\partial_{w_{k}}}\partial_{y},\partial_{y}\rangle+\langle\partial_{y},\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}}\partial_{y}\rangle=0,

which implies

(3.295) ⟨∇∂w¯k∂y,∂y⟩=−∂w¯klogf.\langle\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}}\partial_{y},\partial_{y}\rangle=-\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}\log f.

Therefore,

Γ\displaystyle\Gamma =−−12(∑k≥2⟨∇∂wk∂y,∂y⟩dwk+∑k≥2⟨∇∂w¯k∂y,∂y⟩dw¯k)\displaystyle=-\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}(\sum_{k\geq 2}\langle\nabla_{\partial_{w_{k}}}\partial_{y},\partial_{y}\rangle dw_{k}+\sum_{k\geq 2}\langle\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}}\partial_{y},\partial_{y}\rangle d\bar{w}_{k})
=−−12​(∑k≥2∂wk(log⁡f)​d​wk−∑k≥2∂w¯k(log⁡f)​d​w¯k)\displaystyle=-\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}(\sum_{k\geq 2}\partial_{w_{k}}(\log f)dw_{k}-\sum_{k\geq 2}\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}(\log f)d\bar{w}_{k})
=−−12​(∂Hlog⁡f−∂¯H​log⁡f)\displaystyle=-\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}(\partial_{H}\log f-\bar{\partial}_{H}\log f)
(3.296) =12​dHc​log⁡f.\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}d^{c}_{H}\log f.

∎

For later applications we will need a few more local expansion results. We will also use the notation O′O^{\prime} and O~\widetilde{O} in Definition 3.3. The meaning is similar, but here we work on a neighborhood of HH in DD, and the distance function is locally given by |y||y|. Notice the following expansions are given in the local (non-holomorphic) coordinates {y,y¯,w2′,w¯2′,⋯,wn−1,w¯n−1′}\{y,\bar{y},w_{2}^{\prime},\bar{w}_{2}^{\prime},\cdots,w_{n-1},\bar{w}_{n-1}^{\prime}\}, and by definition we have wj′|H=wj|Hw_{j}^{\prime}|_{H}=w_{j}|_{H} for j≥2j\geq 2.

Proposition 3.26.

The following holds locally near the point p∈Hp\in H,

(3.297) dDc​|y|2=−1​(y​d​y¯−y¯​d​y)+4​|y|2⋅Γ+O~​(|y|3).d^{c}_{D}|y|^{2}=\sqrt{-1}(yd\bar{y}-\bar{y}dy)+4|y|^{2}\cdot\Gamma+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}).

The proof relies on the following expansions of the holomorphic coordinate functions wjw_{j}.

Lemma 3.27.

We have the expansion

(3.298) {w1=a1​y+a2​y2+O~​(|y|3)wj=wj′+cj​y+dj​y2+O~​(|y|3),j≥2,\displaystyle\begin{cases}w_{1}=a_{1}y+a_{2}y^{2}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3})\\ w_{j}=w_{j}^{\prime}+c_{j}y+d_{j}y^{2}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}),&j\geq 2,\end{cases}

where a1=|σ|−1>0a_{1}=|\sigma|^{-1}>0, a2a_{2}, cjc_{j}, djd_{j} are local smooth functions on HH.

Proof.

By definition, σ\sigma is the orthogonal projection of ∂w1\partial_{w_{1}} onto (T​H)⟂(TH)^{\perp}, so we have along HH,

(3.299) a1−1∂y=∂w1+∑j=2n−1bj∂wj,a_{1}^{-1}\partial_{y}=\partial_{w_{1}}+\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}b_{j}\partial_{w_{j}},

where a1=|σ|−1>0a_{1}=|\sigma|^{-1}>0 and bjb_{j} are smooth functions on HH. Now write

(3.300) ∂y=∑j=1n−1∂wj∂y∂wj+∑j=1n−1∂w¯j∂y∂w¯j.\partial_{y}=\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}\frac{\partial w_{j}}{\partial y}\partial_{w_{j}}+\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}\frac{\partial\bar{w}_{j}}{\partial{y}}\partial_{\bar{w}_{j}}.

then we get that along HH,

(3.301) ∂w¯j∂y=0,j≥1,\displaystyle\frac{\partial\bar{w}_{j}}{\partial y}=0,\ j\geq 1,

which in particular implies

(3.302) ∂wj∂y¯=∂w¯j∂y¯=0,j≥1.\frac{\partial w_{j}}{\partial\bar{y}}=\overline{\frac{\partial\bar{w}_{j}}{\partial y}}=0,\ j\geq 1.

Now by the definition of the normal exponential map, we have at pp,

(3.303) ∇∂y∂y=∇∂y¯∂y=∇∂y¯∂y¯=0.\nabla_{\partial_{y}}\partial_{y}=\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{y}}}\partial_{y}=\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{y}}}\partial_{\bar{y}}=0.

Using the Kähler condition we have

(3.304) ∇∂wj∂w¯k=∇∂w¯j∂wk=0,j,k≥1.\nabla_{\partial_{w_{j}}}{\partial_{\bar{w}_{k}}}=\nabla_{\partial_{\bar{w}_{j}}}\partial_{w_{k}}=0,\ \ j,k\geq 1.

Then by (3.300) we get

(3.305) ∂2wj∂y​∂y¯=∂2wj∂y¯2=0,j≥1.\frac{\partial^{2}w_{j}}{\partial y\partial\bar{y}}=\frac{\partial^{2}w_{j}}{\partial\bar{y}^{2}}=0,\ \ \ j\geq 1.

Therefore, the conclusion follows.

∎

Proof of Proposition 3.26.

Given the above Lemma we first obtain that

(3.306) d​w¯1=a1​d​y¯+y¯​(d​a1+2​a¯2​d​y¯)+O~​(|y|2),d\bar{w}_{1}=a_{1}d\bar{y}+\bar{y}(da_{1}+2\bar{a}_{2}d\bar{y})+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}),

then

(3.307) w1​d​w¯1=a12​y​d​y¯+|y|2​a1​d​a1+a1​y​(2​a¯2​y¯+a2​y)​d​y¯+O~​(|y|3).w_{1}d\bar{w}_{1}=a_{1}^{2}yd\bar{y}+|y|^{2}a_{1}da_{1}+a_{1}y(2\bar{a}_{2}\bar{y}+a_{2}y)d\bar{y}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}).

Hence

(3.308) dDc​|w1|2=−1​a12​(y​d​y¯−y¯​d​y)+−1​a1​a¯2​y¯​(2​y​d​y¯−y¯​d​y)−−1​a1​a2​y​(2​y¯​d​y−y​d​y¯)+O~​(|y|3).d_{D}^{c}|w_{1}|^{2}=\sqrt{-1}a_{1}^{2}(yd\bar{y}-\bar{y}dy)+\sqrt{-1}a_{1}\bar{a}_{2}\bar{y}(2yd\bar{y}-\bar{y}dy)-\sqrt{-1}a_{1}a_{2}y(2\bar{y}dy-yd\bar{y})+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}).

On the other hand, we have

(3.309) |w1|2=a12​|y|2+a1​(a2​y+a¯2​y¯)​|y|2+O~​(|y|4).|w_{1}|^{2}=a_{1}^{2}|y|^{2}+a_{1}(a_{2}y+\bar{a}_{2}\bar{y})|y|^{2}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{4}).

So

(3.310) dDc​|w1|2=a12​dDc​|y|2+|y|2​dDc​a12+dDc​(a1​(a2​y+a¯2​y¯)​|y|2)+O~​(|y|3).d_{D}^{c}|w_{1}|^{2}=a_{1}^{2}d_{D}^{c}|y|^{2}+|y|^{2}d_{D}^{c}a_{1}^{2}+d_{D}^{c}(a_{1}(a_{2}y+\bar{a}_{2}\bar{y})|y|^{2})+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}).

Now by Lemma 3.27,

(3.311) dDc​(a1​y)=dDc​w1+O~​(|y|)=−−1​d​w1+O~​(|y|),d_{D}^{c}(a_{1}y)=d_{D}^{c}w_{1}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)=-\sqrt{-1}dw_{1}+\widetilde{O}(|y|),

so

(3.312) dDc​y=−−1​d​y+O~​(|y|).d_{D}^{c}y=-\sqrt{-1}dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|).

Similarly, dDc​y¯=−1​d​y¯+O~​(|y|)d_{D}^{c}\bar{y}=\sqrt{-1}d\bar{y}+\widetilde{O}(|y|). Plugging these into (3.310), and compare with (3.308) we obtain

(3.313) dDc​|y|2=−1​(y​d​y¯−y¯​d​y)−2​|y|2​dDc​log⁡a1+O~​(|y|3).\displaystyle d_{D}^{c}|y|^{2}=\sqrt{-1}(yd\bar{y}-\bar{y}dy)-2|y|^{2}d_{D}^{c}\log a_{1}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}).

Thanks to Lemma 3.27, a1=|σ|−1a_{1}=|\sigma|^{-1} which is a smooth function on HH, so

(3.314) dDc​|y|2=−1​(y​d​y¯−y¯​d​y)+2​|y|2​dHc​log⁡|σ|+O~​(|y|3).\displaystyle d_{D}^{c}|y|^{2}=\sqrt{-1}(yd\bar{y}-\bar{y}dy)+2|y|^{2}d_{H}^{c}\log|\sigma|+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}).

By Lemma 3.25, Γ=12​dHc​log⁡|σ|\Gamma=\frac{1}{2}d_{H}^{c}\log|\sigma|, so we conclude

(3.315) dDc​|y|2=−1​(y​d​y¯−y¯​d​y)+4​|y|2​Γ+O~​(|y|3).d_{D}^{c}|y|^{2}=\sqrt{-1}(yd\bar{y}-\bar{y}dy)+4|y|^{2}\Gamma+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}).

∎

Now we prove an expansion result for the trace of ψ\psi.

Proposition 3.28.

Let ψ\psi be the 22-form on QQ given as in (3.264), then we have the following expansion near PP

(3.316) TrωD⁡ψ=12​r+O′​(r).\Tr_{\omega_{D}}\psi=\frac{1}{2r}+O^{\prime}(r).

Using (3.264) it is easy to see TrωD⁡ψ\Tr_{\omega_{D}}\psi admits an expansion of the form

(3.317) TrωD⁡ψ=A0r+A1​y+A¯1​y¯r+O′​(r).\Tr_{\omega_{D}}\psi=\frac{A_{0}}{r}+\frac{A_{1}y+\bar{A}_{1}\bar{y}}{r}+O^{\prime}(r).

for local functions A0,A1A_{0},A_{1} defined on HH. It suffices to show A0≡1A_{0}\equiv 1 and A1≡0A_{1}\equiv 0. Since the left hand side is independent of the choice of local holomorphic coordinates, it suffices to we only need to work on the slice z=0z=0 with special local holomorphic coordinates in a neighborhood of p∈Hp\in H, and it suffices to understand the Taylor expansion along the fiber N0​(p)N_{0}(p) of N0N_{0} over the fixed point pp.

Lemma 3.29.

We may choose the above holomorphic coordinates {wi}i=1n−1\{w_{i}\}_{i=1}^{n-1} centered at pp, so that HH is given by w1=0w_{1}=0 and

(3.318) ωD=−12​gi​j¯​d​wi∧d​w¯j,\omega_{D}=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}g_{i\bar{j}}dw_{i}\wedge d\bar{w}_{j},

where

(3.319) {gi​j¯​(0)=δi​j,1≤i,j≤n−1,∂w1gi​j¯​(0)=0,1≤i,j≤n−1,∂wkg1​1¯​(0)=∂wkgi​j¯​(0)=0,2≤i,j,k≤n−1.\displaystyle\begin{cases}g_{i\bar{j}}(0)=\delta_{ij},&1\leq i,j\leq n-1,\\ \partial_{w_{1}}g_{i\bar{j}}(0)=0,&1\leq i,j\leq n-1,\\ \partial_{w_{k}}g_{1\bar{1}}(0)=\partial_{w_{k}}g_{i\bar{j}}(0)=0,&2\leq i,j,k\leq n-1.\end{cases}
Remark 3.29.1.

In fact, the only non-trivial Christoffel symbols at pp are

(3.320) Γi​j1​(0)=∂igj​1¯​(0),Γi¯​j¯1¯=∂i¯g1​j¯​(0)\Gamma_{ij}^{1}(0)=\partial_{i}g_{j\bar{1}}(0),\ \ \Gamma_{\bar{i}\bar{j}}^{\bar{1}}=\partial_{\bar{i}}g_{1\bar{j}}(0)

for i,j≥2i,j\geq 2. This is due to the constraint that the equation w1=0w_{1}=0 defines HH, which prevents us from using substitutions like

(3.321) w1=z1+∑i,j=2n−1C1​i​j​zi​zj.w_{1}=z_{1}+\sum\limits_{i,j=2}^{n-1}C_{1ij}z_{i}z_{j}.

Intrinsically, {Γi​j1}i,j≥2\{\Gamma^{1}_{ij}\}_{i,j\geq 2} captures the second fundamental form of the complex hypersurface HH at pp.

Proof of Lemma 3.29.

This follows from elementary manipulation. First, the holomorphic coordinates {wi}i=1n−1\{w_{i}\}_{i=1}^{n-1} can be chosen such that gi​j¯​(0)=δi​jg_{i\bar{j}}(0)=\delta_{ij} for all 1≤i,j≤n−11\leq i,j\leq n-1. By the substitution of the form

(3.322) {wi=zi+12∑j,k=2n−1Ci​j​kzjzk+∑j=2n−1Di​jz1zj+Eiz12, 2≤i≤n−1,w1=z1+∑j=1n−1Fj​z1​zj,\begin{cases}w_{i}=z_{i}+\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{j,k=2}^{n-1}C_{ijk}z_{j}z_{k}+\sum\limits_{j=2}^{n-1}D_{ij}z_{1}z_{j}+E_{i}z_{1}^{2},\ \ 2\leq i\leq n-1,\\ w_{1}=z_{1}+\sum\limits_{j=1}^{n-1}F_{j}z_{1}z_{j},\end{cases}

with suitable choices of coefficients, where Ci​j​k=Ci​k​jC_{ijk}=C_{ikj} for 2≤i,j,k≤n−12\leq i,j,k\leq n-1. One can plug both the Taylor expansion of gi​j¯g_{i\bar{j}} along zkz_{k}’s and (3.322) into ωD\omega_{D}. Comparing the coefficients, then it follows that,

(3.323) {Ci​j​k=−∂wkgj​i¯(0),Di​j=−∂wjg1​i¯(0),Ei=−12∂w1g1​j¯(0),Fi=−∂wjg1​1¯(0),F1=−12∂w1g1​1¯(0),\displaystyle\begin{cases}C_{ijk}=-\partial_{w_{k}}g_{j\bar{i}}(0),\\ D_{ij}=-\partial_{w_{j}}g_{1\bar{i}}(0),\\ E_{i}=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_{w_{1}}g_{1\bar{j}}(0),\\ F_{i}=-\partial_{w_{j}}g_{1\bar{1}}(0),\\ F_{1}=-\frac{1}{2}\partial_{w_{1}}g_{1\bar{1}}(0),\end{cases}

where 2≤i,j,k≤n−12\leq i,j,k\leq n-1. Then we can achieve (3.319) with {wi}i=1n−1\{w_{i}\}_{i=1}^{n-1} replaced by {zi}i=1n−1\{z_{i}\}_{i=1}^{n-1}.

∎

Now we prove Proposition 3.28.

Proof of Proposition 3.28.

The goal is to show A0=1A_{0}=1 and A1=0A_{1}=0 in the expansion (3.317). We work in the above special coordinates centered at p∈Hp\in H.

The first step is to show that the O′​(1)O^{\prime}(1)-term in the expansion of ψ\psi given by Proposition 3.24 in fact vanishes along N0​(p)N_{0}(p). To this end, notice that ∂y=σ=∂w1\partial_{y}=\sigma=\partial_{w_{1}} at p∈Hp\in H and hence by Lemma 3.27,

(3.324) w1=y+a2​y2+O~​(|y|3).w_{1}=y+a_{2}y^{2}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{3}).

Since the only non-trivial Christofell symsbols at pp are Γi​j1\Gamma_{ij}^{1} and Γi¯​j¯1¯\Gamma_{\bar{i}\bar{j}}^{\bar{1}} for i,j≥2i,j\geq 2, it easily follows that

(3.325) d​|σ|​(p)=0.d|\sigma|(p)=0.

Combining (3.325) and Lemma 3.25,

(3.326) Γ⁡(p)=12​(dHc​log⁡|σ|)​(p)=0,\Gamma(p)=\frac{1}{2}(d_{H}^{c}\log|\sigma|)(p)=0,

for each p∈Hp\in H. Therefore, along the fiber N0​(p)N_{0}(p) of the normal bundle N0​(p)N_{0}(p), the expansion of ψ\psi in Proposition 3.24 becomes

(3.327) ψ=−14​|y|​d​y∧d​y¯+O⁡(|y|).\psi=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4|y|}dy\wedge d\bar{y}+O(|y|).

Next, we will compute the coefficients A0​(p)A_{0}(p) and A1​(p)A_{1}(p) in (3.317). As in the proof of Lemma 3.27, we obtain that

(3.328) ∂wj∂y​(p)=∂wj∂y¯=0,j≥2,\frac{\partial w_{j}}{\partial y}(p)=\frac{\partial w_{j}}{\partial\bar{y}}=0,\ \ j\geq 2,

and

(3.329) ∂2wj∂y2​(p)=∂2wj∂y​∂y¯​(p)=∂2wj∂y¯2​(p)=0,j≥1.\frac{\partial^{2}w_{j}}{\partial y^{2}}(p)=\frac{\partial^{2}w_{j}}{\partial y\partial\bar{y}}(p)=\frac{\partial^{2}w_{j}}{\partial\bar{y}^{2}}(p)=0,\ \ j\geq 1.

This particularly implies that a2​(p)=0a_{2}(p)=0 and along the fiber N0​(p)N_{0}(p),

(3.330) wj=O⁡(|y|3),j≥2.w_{j}=O(|y|^{3}),\ \ j\geq 2.

By Lemma 3.29, ∂w1gi​j¯​(p)=0\partial_{w_{1}}g_{i\bar{j}}(p)=0 for all 1≤i,j≤n−11\leq i,j\leq n-1, then the expansion of ωD\omega_{D} along the fiber N0​(p)N_{0}(p) is at least quadratic in the w1w_{1}-direction, i.e.

(3.331) ωD\displaystyle\omega_{D} =\displaystyle= −12​(d​w1∧d​w¯1+∑j=2n−1d​wj∧d​w¯j)+O⁡(∑j=2n−1|wj|2)+O⁡(|w1|2)\displaystyle\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}\Big(dw_{1}\wedge d\bar{w}_{1}+\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}dw_{j}\wedge d\bar{w}_{j}\Big)+O\Big(\sqrt{\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}|w_{j}|^{2}}\Big)+O(|w_{1}|^{2})
=\displaystyle= −12​(d​w1∧d​w¯1+∑j=2n−1d​wj∧d​w¯j)+O⁡(|y|2).\displaystyle\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}(dw_{1}\wedge d\bar{w}_{1}+\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}dw_{j}\wedge d\bar{w}_{j})+O(|y|^{2}).

By (3.324) and (3.330), along the fiber N0​(p)N_{0}(p), we have

(3.332) d​w1=d​y+O⁡(|y|2).dw_{1}=dy+O(|y|^{2}).

and

(3.333) d​wj=d​wj′+O⁡(|y|2),j≥2.dw_{j}=dw_{j}^{\prime}+O(|y|^{2}),\ \ j\geq 2.

So we get

(3.334) ωD=−12​(d​y∧d​y¯+∑j=2n−1d​wj′∧d​w¯j′)+O⁡(|y|2)\omega_{D}=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}(dy\wedge d\bar{y}+\sum_{j=2}^{n-1}dw_{j}^{\prime}\wedge d\bar{w}_{j}^{\prime})+O(|y|^{2})

Since by definition,

(3.335) (TrωD⁡ψ)⋅ωDn−1(n−1)!=ψ∧ωDn−2(n−2)!.\Big(\Tr_{\omega_{D}}\psi\Big)\cdot\frac{\omega_{D}^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}=\psi\wedge\frac{\omega_{D}^{n-2}}{(n-2)!}.

by elementary manipulations we get that A0​(p)=1A_{0}(p)=1 and A1​(p)=0A_{1}(p)=0. ∎

We close this subsection by proving an expansion of a local holomorphic volume form on DD. Given the choice of local holomorphic coordinates on DD as before, let ΩD\Omega_{D} be a local holomorphic volume form in a neighborhood of pp, then we can always write

(3.336) ΩD=f⋅d​w1∧d​w2∧⋯∧d​wn−1,\Omega_{D}=f\cdot dw_{1}\wedge dw_{2}\cdots\wedge dw_{n-1},

for a local nowhere vanishing holomorphic function ff. Denote the local holomorphic volume form on HH

(3.337) ΩH≡dw2′∧⋯dwn−1′=(dw2∧⋯∧dwn−1)|H\Omega_{H}\equiv dw_{2}^{\prime}\wedge\cdots dw_{n-1}^{\prime}=(dw_{2}\wedge\cdots\wedge dw_{n-1})|_{H}

Then ΩH\Omega_{H} can be naturally viewed as a complex (n−2)(n-2)-form in some neighborhood of pp in DD, in the coordinate system given by {y,y¯,w2′,w¯2′,⋯,wn−1′,w¯n−1′}\{y,\bar{y},w_{2}^{\prime},\bar{w}_{2}^{\prime},\cdots,w_{n-1}^{\prime},\bar{w}_{n-1}^{\prime}\}.

Proposition 3.30.

We have the following expansion

(3.338) ΩD=F⁡(d​y+2​−1​y​Γ)∧ΩH+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2)\Omega_{D}=F(dy+2\sqrt{-1}y\Gamma)\wedge\Omega_{H}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2})

for some local smooth function FF on HH.

Proof.

We need to calculate the expansion for d​w1∧…∧d​wn−1dw_{1}\wedge\ldots\wedge dw_{n-1}. First, by Lemma 3.27,

(3.339) d​w1=a1​(d​y+y​dH​log⁡a1)+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2),dw_{1}=a_{1}(dy+yd_{H}\log a_{1})+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}),

where a1=|σ|−1a_{1}=|\sigma|^{-1}. Notice that

(3.340) dH​log⁡a1=2​∂Hlog⁡a1−−1​dHc​log⁡a1.d_{H}\log a_{1}=2\partial_{H}\log a_{1}-\sqrt{-1}d_{H}^{c}\log a_{1}.

Applying Lemma 3.25,

(3.341) dH​log⁡a1=2​(∂Hlog⁡a1+−1​Γ).d_{H}\log a_{1}=2(\partial_{H}\log a_{1}+\sqrt{-1}\Gamma).

Next, applying Lemma 3.27 to wjw_{j}’s for j≥2j\geq 2,

(3.342) d​wj=d​wj′+cj​d​y+y​d​cj+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2).dw_{j}=dw_{j}^{\prime}+c_{j}dy+ydc_{j}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).

Since it holds that

(3.343) ∂Hlog⁡a1∧ΩH≡0,\partial_{H}\log a_{1}\wedge\Omega_{H}\equiv 0,

then taking the wedge product,

(3.344) d​w1∧⋯∧d​wn−1=a1​(d​y+2​−1​y​Γ)∧ΩH+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2).dw_{1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dw_{n-1}=a_{1}(dy+2\sqrt{-1}y\Gamma)\wedge\Omega_{H}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).

On the other hand, we have the expansion of ff,

(3.345) f=f|H+∂f∂y|H⋅y+∂f∂y¯|H⋅y¯+O~​(|y|2).f=f|_{H}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}|_{H}\cdot y+\frac{\partial f}{\partial\bar{y}}|_{H}\cdot\bar{y}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).

Therefore,

(3.346) ΩD=f|H​a1​(d​y+2​−1​y​Γ)∧ΩH+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2).\Omega_{D}=f|_{H}a_{1}(dy+2\sqrt{-1}y\Gamma)\wedge\Omega_{H}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).

So we obtain the conclusion by taking F=f|H⋅a1F=f|_{H}\cdot a_{1}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.