4.1. Construction of a family of Kähler structures
In this subsection we shall use (2.19) to construct a family of Kähler structures on certain fibrations over increasing domains in . So we need to construct a family of pairs parametrized by .
Most of the quantities defined in this subsection will depend on the parameter , but for simplicity of notation we will not always keep track of this if it is clear from the context.
For , we define
| (4.5) |
|
|
|
It can be viewed as a family of closed -forms on parametrized by .
Using the Kähler identity, we obtain
| (4.6) |
|
|
|
So if we define
| (4.7) |
|
|
|
for any smooth function , then the pair satisfies the first equation in (2.19):
| (4.8) |
|
|
|
For our purpose we need to make a special choice of the function . First we define by
the following co-homological condition
| (4.9) |
|
|
|
By Lemma 3.33, we know that the cohomology class is piecewise linear in , so
| (4.10) |
|
|
|
It follows that is identically zero if , which corresponds to the case of the classical Gibbons-Hawking anstaz used in [HSVZ18]. But if then is only at and we need to smooth it. We shall fix throughout this section a smooth function satisfying
| (4.11) |
|
|
|
and let
| (4.12) |
|
|
|
Then we define
| (4.13) |
|
|
|
It follows that is smooth and agrees with when . It is also easy to see that correspondingly we have
| (4.14) |
|
|
|
We refer to Remark 4.3.1 for an explanation of this choice of .
To apply the construction in Section 2, we need to restrict to the region in where is a positive form and is a positive function.
For large we define and by
| (4.15) |
|
|
|
and denote by the region where .
Lemma 4.1.
For large, over , both and are positive. Moreover, has the following approximation formula
| (4.16) |
|
|
|
|
| (4.17) |
|
|
|
|
where is a fixed function independent of , and it has the singular behavior near given by Definition 3.3.
Proof.
We first consider .
As the behavior of is governed by (3.349), so for we know is positive over the region where for some number independent of . By the expansion of in a neighborhood of given in Proposition 3.24, for sufficiently large, is also positive when . Hence is positive over the region where Since this contains we see in particular is positive over .
To deal with we need to analyze . When , we have
| (4.18) |
|
|
|
where the choice of or depends on whether or .
By (3.349) we then get
| (4.19) |
|
|
|
So we can find such that is positive when . On the other hand, on we know by definition
| (4.20) |
|
|
|
Hence by the expansion in Proposition 3.28 we obtain (4.17). This implies that for , is also positive when .
∎
Now we define the 2-form
| (4.21) |
|
|
|
Then (4.6) implies that is closed on and hence .
Moreover, we have
Lemma 4.2.
The cohomology class is integral.
Proof.
As mentioned in the beginning of this section, we identify a tubular neighborhood of in with a neighborhood of the zero section in its normal bundle . For simplicity we may assume this neighborhood is given by , the 2-ball bundle over consisting of the set of all elements in with norm smaller than or equal to , and we denote by the boundary of .
Fix , then the composition of the natural maps
| (4.22) |
|
|
|
is the identity map, which implies that for all , the map is surjective and we have a natural splitting
| (4.23) |
|
|
|
for some .
By assumption for ,
| (4.24) |
|
|
|
so is integral. Hence it suffices to show the integral of over any element in is also an integer.
By the Mayer-Vietoris sequence applied to , we get
| (4.25) |
|
|
|
So we obtain the exact sequence
| (4.26) |
|
|
|
On the other hand,
by the Gysin sequence applied to the 2-sphere bundle we get
| (4.27) |
|
|
|
where denotes integration over the 2-sphere fibers, and denotes the wedge product with Euler class of .
Since the Euler class of vanishes, the above becomes
| (4.28) |
|
|
|
(4.26) and (4.28) together imply that modulo torsion, is generated by the homology class of a 2-sphere fiber of . So we just need to show is an integer.
By the expansion of and in Proposition 3.24 and Proposition 3.28, it is easy to check that by restricting to the fiber of over , we have
| (4.29) |
|
|
|
Further restricting to the -sphere with radius , we get
| (4.30) |
|
|
|
where is the area form of the standard -sphere in . Taking the integral and let gives that
| (4.31) |
|
|
|
By Lemma 4.2, standard theory yields a connection -form on a principal -bundle
| (4.32) |
|
|
|
with curvature form . Moreover, restricts to the standard Hopf bundle on each normal to (it has degree if we use the natural orientation). Then we have the second equation in (2.19) satisfied:
| (4.33) |
|
|
|
On we define a real-valued 2-form
| (4.34) |
|
|
|
and a complex-valued -form
| (4.35) |
|
|
|
One can directly check that both and are closed. By the discussion in Section 2, we know defines a smooth Kähler metric on , so that is the holomorphic volume form and is the Kähler form. Also has an intrinsic geometric meaning as the norm squared of the Killing field generating the action.
By (4.1) and straightforward calculations, we have
| (4.36) |
|
|
|
Definition 4.3.
Given the above constructed Kähler metric , the error function is defined by
| (4.37) |
|
|
|
In particular, is a Calabi-Yau metric if .
Next we move on to the study the compactified geometry of near . We shall first construct a smooth model for the compactification and then study the regularity of the Kähler metric on this model.
As before we will always identify a neighborhood of in with a tubular neighborhood of the zero section in over .
Denote by and the complex line bundles over given by the restriction
| (4.39) |
|
|
|
Then as complex line bundles is isomorphic to , and we fix such an isomorphism now. Notice is equipped with a natural hermitian metric induced from the Kähler metric on (c.f. Section 3.3). This then determines a hermitian metric on hence on and . Define
| (4.40) |
|
|
|
and consider the map
| (4.41) |
|
|
|
Away from the zero section in , is a principal bundle, with the action given by
| (4.42) |
|
|
|
As Section 3.3, locally choosing holomorphic coordinates on centered at . These give rise to local coordinates on , and also a local unitary section of in the form . Then we choose a local section of with . Correspondingly we get local unitary sections of respectively. Then we obtain local fiber coordinates on respectively by writing
| (4.43) |
|
|
|
Then the map can be represented in coordinates as
| (4.44) |
|
|
|
Hence is the standard Hopf fibration over each fiber.
Lemma 4.4.
Over , the principal bundle is isomorphic to .
Proof.
Notice a principal bundle is topologically determined by its first Chern class. It suffices to compare the first Chern classes of and over the sphere bundle for a small . As in the proof of Lemma 4.2 th Gysin sequence gives
| (4.45) |
|
|
|
From the proof of Lemma 4.2 we know
| (4.46) |
|
|
|
Also by (2.49) we have
| (4.47) |
|
|
|
So
| (4.48) |
|
|
|
for some bundle over . Now we restrict both and to the subset where and for a fixed . We can identify with by the projection map. Now we claim both restrictions have first Chern class equal to . For this follows from construction and for we notice that implies that and , so the projection map gives an isomorphism between the restriction of and the unit circle bundle in . This also explains the choice of the weight of the action in (4.42).
Now it follows from the claim that is indeed a trivial principal bundle, and this finishes the proof.
∎
By Lemma 4.4 we may glue and together to obtain a differentiable compactfication of . The projection map naturally extends to a map
| (4.49) |
|
|
|
which is a singular fibration, with discriminant locus given by . We shall identify
| (4.50) |
|
|
|
with the zero section in , and identify a neighborhood of with a neighborhood of the zero section in and the projection map with the above .
To study the regularity of the Kähler metric on the compactification , we shall make a special choice of the connection 1-form on a neighborhood of in , with curvature form , which has explicit regularity behavior across . To do this, we need a few steps. First, we notice that provides local coordinates on , and we can define a local model connection 1-form on by simply taking the model formula (2.47):
| (4.51) |
|
|
|
Just as in the discussion in Section 2, we see , where is the vector field generating the action. It is clear that the definition of only depends on the choice of and does not depend on the choice of and (which has the freedom of multiplying by a constant root of unity).
To make a globally defined connection 1-form, we need to add a correction term, and define
| (4.52) |
|
|
|
where is the local 1-form given in Section 3.3, and we have implicitly viewed forms on as forms on using the pull-back .
Proposition 4.5.
is a globally-defined connection 1-form on the bundle , and we have
| (4.53) |
|
|
|
where
| (4.54) |
|
|
|
and we have adopted the notation in Section 3.1 for the submanifold .
Proof.
To see is a well-defined, we consider the change of unitary frame on to , then we have
| (4.55) |
|
|
|
for some local real-valued function on . Then we get
| (4.56) |
|
|
|
|
| (4.57) |
|
|
|
|
| (4.58) |
|
|
|
|
Then it is a straightforward to compute that , which shows that is globally defined.
Now we consider the local expansion of . First differentiating the expansion of in Proposition 3.24 we get
| (4.59) |
|
|
|
Next, applying Proposition 3.28 and Proposition 3.26, we obtain
| (4.60) |
|
|
|
Putting together these, and noting that is given as in (2.50), we obtain
| (4.61) |
|
|
|
Now translating into the coordinates on we obtain the conclusion.
The next Lemma allows us to correct term on the right hand side. We fix any invariant Riemannian metric on .
Lemma 4.6.
There exists a local 1-form on a neighborhood of in with the following properties:
- (1)
,
- (2)
is smooth away from ,
- (3)
,
- (4)
,
- (5)
.
Proof.
From the above Remark we know is cohomologous to zero. The existence of a solution to is obtained by adding the gauge fixing condition , and solving the elliptic system with Neumann boundary condition
| (4.62) |
|
|
|
on a tubular neighborhood of in . See Proposition 3.7 in [DS14] for example.
By Proposition 4.5 we know , particularly, for all . Hence standard elliptic regularity guarantees a solution and is smooth away from . Since both and are -invariant, by averaging we may assume is -invariant too, hence on the smooth part. Also since and are pulled-back from the base , we have
| (4.63) |
|
|
|
So we get
| (4.64) |
|
|
|
This implies is a constant. Now as we approach , the norm of , with respect to the fixed metric on , must go to zero, hence we see
| (4.65) |
|
|
|
The higher regularity of follows just as in the proof of Lemma 3.22 in Section 3.
∎
Now we define a fixed connection 1-form on .
| (4.66) |
|
|
|
Therefore, in a neighborhood of minus , the original choice of can be written as
| (4.67) |
|
|
|
where is a flat connection, which is gauge equivalent to the pull-back of a flat connection on . Without loss of generality, we can then assume is smooth.
Proposition 4.7.
With respect to the choice of the connection form given in (4.67),
defined by (4.34) and (4.35) gives a (for all ) Kähler structure on which is invariant under the natural -action and is smooth outside .
Proof.
At the first stage, we will analyze the regularity of .
By definition,
| (4.68) |
|
|
|
To start with, let us compute the lifting . By (3.264),
| (4.69) |
|
|
|
where
| (4.70) |
|
|
|
is the standard form in the model setting (2.45).
We also notice that
| (4.71) |
|
|
|
|
| (4.72) |
|
|
|
|
Now by definition
| (4.73) |
|
|
|
Moreover, according to the discussions in Section 2, we have
| (4.74) |
|
|
|
where is the standard Kähler form of .
Therefore,
| (4.75) |
|
|
|
|
Using the relation and the simple computation
| (4.76) |
|
|
|
we have
|
|
|
|
| (4.77) |
|
|
|
|
where we use the fact that and hence is smooth on . Then it follows that
| (4.78) |
|
|
|
Hence we see the -form locally extends to a -form across the subset .
Now we analyze the regularity of the holomorphic volume form which is given by
| (4.79) |
|
|
|
By Lemma 3.30, locally we have
| (4.80) |
|
|
|
Also
| (4.81) |
|
|
|
Therefore,
| (4.82) |
|
|
|
This implies that also extends to a form across . This is equivalent to saying that the almost complex structure determined by extends to a almost complex structure on .
∎
Using the Newlander-Nirenberg theorem , we may find locally holomorphic coordinates, making the complex structure locally standard while still keeping the Kähler form in the class .
By construction the Kähler structure is preserved by the natural action. The corresponding Killing field is given by
| (4.83) |
|
|
|
The zero set
is a complex submanifold of which bi-holomorphic to .
We also dnote the corresponding holomorphic vector field
| (4.84) |
|
|
|
We also have a smooth holomorphic projection whose fibers are holomorphic cylinders (isomorphic to annuli in ).
In the next subsection we shall understand the underlying complex manifold and the Kähler potentials on .