3 Integral affine structures [04P9]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
3 Integral affine structures
Let be a smooth -dimensional maximally degenerate Calabi–Yau variety. In this chapter we compute the transition functions between the charts of the integral affine structure on associated with a minimal model of , or obtained by combining several minimal models. This relies on and generalizes the construction in [NXY19].
We then focus on certain degenerations of quartic surfaces (Section 3.3), and later of quintic -folds (Section 4): we apply Theorem B to reconstruct integral affine structures on the essential skeleton, and provide explicit formulas for the monodromy transformations around the singularities.
3.1 Integral affine structure induced by a model
Let be a minimal model of ; we assume that the special fiber is reduced. We consider a one-dimensional stratum of , which is therefore a smooth rational curve, and is such that is an snc pair in a formal neighbourhood of by [NXY19, Corollary 4.6]. Since is log Calabi–Yau, we may write its boundary as , where and for two irreducible components of meeting transversally.
Following [NXY19], we write for ; from we infer . The consists on the union of two maximal faces corresponding to the zero-dimensional strata , meeting along . The goal of this section is to describe the integral affine structure on in terms of the intersection numbers ’s, with no assumption on their positivity.
Proposition 3.1.1.
Let be the retraction associated with the model , and endow with the -affine structure induced by away from the codimension 2 faces of . Then is -affine isomorphic to the union of the simplices and in where
, ,…, and .
Proof.
We write ; we assume to be negative or zero by the condition , as the case and is already treated in the proof of [NXY19, prop. 5.4].
The blow-up of the point in yields a new irreducible component (we denote the strict transforms by the same letters for notational simplicity) with multiplicity , the point and the intersection numbers . If we repeat the process times, we obtain the models , the exceptional divisors with multiplicity , the points and the intersection numbers .
For , we have , and by [NXY19] the integral affine structure induced by on is given by and
| (3.1.2) |
The sequence of blow-ups induces (weighted) barycentric subdivisions of the faces with vertices such that
| (3.1.3) |
Combining Eq. 3.1.2 and Eq. 3.1.3, at each step we obtain that
and in particular . The proposition follows from the following lemma. ∎
Lemma 3.1.4.
Let be the union of two -dimensional simplices along a face of codimension one. Assume we are given a -affine structure on , compatible with those on the ’s.
Suppose there exists a sequence of (weighted) star subdivisions of such that (with respect to this subdivision) can be embedded in compatibly with the -affine structure. Then this embedding extends to , and the -affine structure on is uniquely recovered by this embedding.
Proof.
The assumptions yield two charts for the -affine structure on : the -affine subsets and . These two charts are glued along which is a simplex and thus has no non-trivial -automorphisms preserving the vertices, hence the affine structure on is uniquely determined. The set can be obtained as the result of the same star subdivisions of a subset , and uniqueness of the affine structure ensures a -affine isomorphism . ∎
Remark 3.1.5.
Consider an irreducible component of and write . By adjunction, the pair is log Calabi–Yau, i.e. is a smooth projective variety over and is a divisor such that is trivial. By [EM21, Theorem 6.14] there exists a Lagrangian torus fibration
where is a symplectic tubular neighborhood of the -dimensional strata of , is a retract of , and is the union of cells of codimension in . The fibration is constructed gluing toric moment maps defined in the neighborhood of each stratum curve of . Evans and Mauri compare the monodromy induced by on to the monodromy induced by the affinoid torus fibration
and conclude that they are dual. This means that given a loop , we have . Thus the affine structure constructed in [NXY19] has a symplectic topological analog. The duality is due to the fact that the image of the moment maps is , while the image of the tropicalization map is in .
3.1.1 Case of K3 surfaces
Let be a maximally degenerate surface and let be a minimal model of with reduced special fiber . The dual complex is well-known to be a triangulated sphere, whose vertices correspond to the irreducible components of .
We focus our attention to such a vertex , and hence to the corresponding irreducible component of , which has boundary . Since the simple normal crossing curve is an anticanonical curve by adjunction, it follows from general surface theory that is a cycle of rational curves , whose geometry is encoded by the . We label the curves so that for , , with convention .
One can associate to the pair a pseudo-fan, which is a singular affine structure on , singular at most at . The singularity at is a way to measure the defect of of being toric: the affine structure affine extends smoothly at if and only is a toric pair [Eng18, Proposition 3.9].
The construction, as explained in [GHK15, §1.2], is the following. For each node , consider a cone , being a basis of the lattice . The cones and are then glued to each other along , and the affine structure is extended through the edge by pretending that the pair is toric. If the pair was toric, the ’s would be the maximal cones of its fan, and the relation
would hold by Eq. 1.2.4, so that the chart that defines the -affine structure satisfies , , and , and is extended by dilatation. The unions of the ’s glued along the successive edge is homeomorphic to , and we obtain this way an -affine structure away from the origin, extending to if and only the pair is toric.
It follows from Proposition 3.1.1 that the singular -affine structure induced by the Berkovich retraction coincides with the one described above. We now determine the monodromy around the singularities.
Corollary 3.1.6.
Let be a component of , with boundary . Writing , the monodromy of the -affine structure induced by around is given by
with respect to the basis and origin .
Proof.
By Proposition 3.1.1 the integral affine structure on identifies with
while on identifies with
It follows that the transition map from the chart to of the integral affine structure on is given by the matrix . Thus, the composition of such matrices gives the monodromy around , along a loop oriented as the path connecting . ∎
Remark 3.1.7.
It is well-known (see for instance [GHK15]) that if and only the pair is toric, or if and only if the charge vanishes, where
3.2 Integral affine structure induced by combining several models
We start with a general definition.
Definition 3.2.1.
Let be a simplex of dimension and consider the first barycentric subdivision of . For each vertex of , we denote the star of in by and define to be the polyhedral complex of dimension given by
For instance, if , is the union of the three line segments joining the barycenter of the triangle to the barycenters of the edges.
We return to the setting of Section 3, that is, let be a smooth -dimensional maximally degenerate Calabi–Yau variety.
Assume we are given two minimal models , of such that , so that , not only as sets but also with the same triangulation. We fix an ordered labelling of the vertices of , equivalently of the irreducible components of the special fiber of (resp. ).
Fix a codimension 1 face of , with vertices . We write (resp. ) for the corresponding strata curves of (resp. ), and (resp. ), the corresponding components. We then have , and similarly for . We write
the intersection number computed inside , and similarly:
for . The -dimensional face is contained in two maximal faces and of , since the boundary of in consists of two strata points and ; we assume .
We set , and as in Definition 3.2.1.
Given two vertices of , with corresponding components and of containing , we assume and construct a loop as follows:
- -
is contained in ;
- -
goes around the segment joining the barycenter of with the barycenter of the edge between and ;
- -
has an orientation induced by the fixed ordered labelling on the vertices of in the following way: in , is homotopy equivalent to the closed path given by the edges which connect in order
Two examples of loops in the case and
Suppose we are given a retraction such that
Proposition 3.2.2.
The monodromy along the loop , of the -affine structure induced by on is
| (3.2.3) |
with respect to the basis and origin .
Proof.
We need to compute the parallel transport of the vectors
along the loop . By Proposition 3.1.1 the -affine structure on induced by is described by the chart which has the following vertices:
, and
while the -affine structure induced by is given by:
, and
Moreover, the vectors correspond to the vectors (resp. ) in the chart for (resp. ). We now have , so that the vectors we are transporting are written on
in the chart for . These are thus mapped to the tuple by the chart for . We now transport back across in the chart for , to get the tuple of vectors
according to the relation . We now see that after parallel transport the vectors have changed to
hence the formula Eq. 3.2.3 for the monodromy matrix. ∎
3.2.1 Case of K3 surfaces
We focus on the case of a maximally degenerate surface . We have , is a point in the interior of and is a loop around , oriented as the path joining in order . We assume we have a retraction such that
where is the part of the edge joining the vertex to , but not including . Then Proposition 3.2.2 may be rewritten as follows.
Corollary 3.2.4.
The monodromy along the loop , of the -affine structure induced by on , is
| (3.2.5) |
with respect to the basis and origin .
3.3 Degeneration of quartic K3 surfaces
We consider , where is a generic homogeneous polynomial of degree 4. The degeneration has the following properties:
- 1.
the special fiber is reduced, consisting of four Weil divisors, i.e. ;
- 2.
has singular points, given by , hence 4 on each ; the local model around a singular point is given by ;
- 3.
the pair is dlt. Indeed, it is snc away from the singularities, and around a singular point is log canonical by [CLS11, Proposition 11.4.24];
- 4.
the dual complex is a PL-isomorphic to a tetrahedron, and hence homeomorphic to ;
- 5.
by adjunction, the canonical bundle is trivial.
We conclude that is a minimal dlt model of the K3 surface , but it is not good in the sense of Section 1.1 since the prime components of the special fiber are not -Cartier.
Our goal is to construct some explicit minimal models of starting from , and then to study the integral affine structure on induced by these models or by combining several of them. To this purpose, we will apply Corollary 3.1.6 and Corollary 3.2.4.
Some good minimal models of are obtained by performing the following small resolutions of . For any triple of elements in and any fixed order on them, we blow-up in order the divisors , and , and denote the resulting model by and the morphism by
The exceptional locus of consists of smooth rational curves whose images via are the singular points of . In particular, the strict transform of is isomorphic to the blow-up of along the singular points in ; similarly for at points, and for at the remaining singular points. Instead, for , is isomorphic to its strict transform. These facts follow from local computations on .
Blowing-up induces an exceptional curve inside the strict transform , which is isomorphic to the blow-up of along . The above claims now follow, since the singularities of are isolated.
If we denote by for the irreducible components of the special fiber of , and by the strata curves, then the intersection numbers in are
| (3.3.1) |
|
3.3.1 Integral affine structure induced by the model
By [NXY19] the non-archimedean SYZ fibration is an affinoid torus fibration (at least) away from the vertices of the triangulation of induced by the special fiber of , i.e. away from the ’s.
By Theorem B, is an affinoid torus fibration over for , as and is an isomorphism on the strict transform of . Moreover, by Remark 3.1.7 and Eq. 3.3.1 the integral affine structure induced by does not extend to , and .
We conclude that the singular points of the affine structure on induced by are precisely , and . Corollary 3.1.6 establishes that the monodromies around these vertices are
3.3.2 Integral affine structure induced combining more models
We recall a construction from [KS06, §4.2.5]. Consider the resolution obtained by blowing-up the singular points of , which in particular dominates any model . Then the special fiber is and the associated dual complex is the boundary of a tetrahedron with four additional -cells glued along each edge of the tetrahedron; following Kontsevich–Soibelman we call such -cells wings.
We parametrize each edge of by the interval , and each wing glued to by the -simplex in bounded by and .
Lemma 3.3.2.
Let be a wing over the edge , for and assume all distinct. Then the retraction is the contraction of to the edge parallel to the edge :
Proof.
The morphism is the blow-up of the 24 exceptional curves of . In particular, the exceptional divisor is the preimage in of a curve contained in ; it follows that and , where are local equations for on . The Berkovich retraction is linear on and hence depends only on the image of , which is determined by and . Thus we conclude that and we have the result. ∎
Kontsevich and Soibelman define a retraction
where is the Berkovich retraction onto the skeleton , and is a retraction of the 24 wings of to the sphere given as follows. For each edge of we choose a point in the interior of , and define the retraction of onto by
| if | ||
| if | ||
| otherwise. |
We note that
- -
over the interior of any -dimensional face , is equal to , thus it is an affinoid torus fibration (see Example 1.6.2).
- -
Around any vertex , is equal to for any triple such that , as follows from the previous lemma. Thus, from Section 3.3.1, is an affinoid torus fibration around , and the affine structure induced there is the fan structure induced by , by Corollary 2.6.1.
- -
For any edge corresponding to , adopting the notation of Section 3.2,
and thus is an affinoid torus fibration over the union of these two open sets.
We conclude that induces an integral affine structure on away from the points . By Corollary 3.2.4, we can compute the monodromy around the singularities. As all these computations are analogous, we exhibit the case :
with respect to the basis and origin . This formula was already stated in [KS06, §4.2.5].
3.3.3 Dispersion of singularities
We construct a third singular integral affine structure on pushing forward the techniques developed so far. This can be viewed as a dispersion of singularieties with respect to the integral affine structure studied in Section 3.3.2: on each edge we pass from one singular point around which the monodromy is , to singular points around each of which the monodromy is . in the literature Such singularities are called focus-focus and are the most standard examples of singularities for -affine structures in dimension 2. Those arise for instance when considering the hyperkähler rotation of a generic elliptic K3 surface , with an elliptic fibration: the hyperkähler rotation is a complex surface with same underlying topological space as , and hence comes with a map , induced by at the level of topological spaces. The map is no longer holomorphic, but is a symplectic torus fibration inducing a -affine structure with 24 focus-focus singularities on and acting as an SYZ fibration for . We refer the reader to [GW00] for more details.
Let be an edge of , let be the corresponding stratum curve in . We recall that as the degree four polynomial is generic, contains four singular points of , which are ordinary double points. Around each , is étale locally of the form , with and being local equations for and away from . Blowing-up the singular point yields an exceptional divisor . Contracting one or the other ruling of , we obtain two distinct small resolutions of around , respectively with an exceptional curve inside or .
For , we denote by the following small resolution of : around for we consider the small resolution such that the exceptional curve over lies in , while for the small resolution such that the exceptional curves lie in . The gluing of these local small resolutions is done in the étale topology, so that in general the obtained models are no longer schemes but only algebraic spaces. Nevertheless, is dominated by (defined in Section 3.3.2) and still induces a Berkovich retraction , as described in Section 5. In particular, by Proposition 5.0.4, is an affinoid torus fibration over .
We construct the following continuous retraction
where is the Berkovich retraction onto the skeleton , and is a retraction of the 24 wings of to the sphere given as follows. We fix four distinct, ordered, interior points of each edge . Then the map on the wing attached to is defined as the map of Section 3.3.2, setting , for each
Proposition 3.3.3.
The map is an affinoid torus fibration away from the points . Furthermore, the monodromy of the -affine structure induced by , around each singular point, is -conjugate to
Proof.
Over of any -dimensional face , is equal to , hence is an affinoid torus fibration. Around any vertex , is equal to for any triple such that . It follows from Section 3.3.1 that is an affinoid torus fibration around . We denote by the boundary of , with and ; we write and , and denote by the open segment joining two points. Then, for , is equal to over , thus is an affinoid torus fibration. We conclude that is an affinoid torus fibration away from the points for .
For a singular point , we consider a loop around it and contained in . We apply Corollary 3.2.4 to compute the monodromy along : the numbers and differ by , as the model has an additional exceptional curves in with respect to . Therefore, we obtain
with respect to the basis and origin . ∎
Note that for a generic family of quartic surfaces , the metric aspects of the Kontsevich-Soibelman conjecture suggest that there should exist a distinguished singular affine structure on (coming from the Gromov-Hausdorff limit of the family), and hence a canonical choice of interior points for each edge. To the authors’ knowledge there does not exist a way to produce such a canonical set of ’s using non-archimedean techniques.
3.3.4 Collision of singularities
In Section 3.3.2, the retraction depends on the choice of the points ; the same holds for the induced integral affine structure, whose singular locus consists indeed of the points . Moving a point in the interior of the edge affects the location of the singular points, but it does not change the monodromy around the point (see Section 3.3.3). We observe now, in two examples, what happens if we let a point move to a vertex of . We write to emphasize the dependency on the choice of singular points.
When all the points lie in the interior of the respective edges as in Section 3.3.2, on , the induced integral affine structure is smooth at and such that
When collides with the vertex , on is equal to , the integral affine structure is singular at with
When both and collide with , on is equal to , the integral affine structure is singular at with
The computations above suggest that the singularities and the monodromy representation induced by the non-archimedean SYZ fibration can be viewed respectively as a collision of singular points and a product of monodromies induced by the when the ’s collide. The affine structure induced by turns out to be more symmetric and simpler, as all the singular points have the same monodromy and are of focus-focus type.