3.3.3 Dispersion of singularities [04PW]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
3.3.3 Dispersion of singularities
We construct a third singular integral affine structure on pushing forward the techniques developed so far. This can be viewed as a dispersion of singularieties with respect to the integral affine structure studied in Section 3.3.2: on each edge we pass from one singular point around which the monodromy is , to singular points around each of which the monodromy is . in the literature Such singularities are called focus-focus and are the most standard examples of singularities for -affine structures in dimension 2. Those arise for instance when considering the hyperkähler rotation of a generic elliptic K3 surface , with an elliptic fibration: the hyperkähler rotation is a complex surface with same underlying topological space as , and hence comes with a map , induced by at the level of topological spaces. The map is no longer holomorphic, but is a symplectic torus fibration inducing a -affine structure with 24 focus-focus singularities on and acting as an SYZ fibration for . We refer the reader to [GW00] for more details.
Let be an edge of , let be the corresponding stratum curve in . We recall that as the degree four polynomial is generic, contains four singular points of , which are ordinary double points. Around each , is étale locally of the form , with and being local equations for and away from . Blowing-up the singular point yields an exceptional divisor . Contracting one or the other ruling of , we obtain two distinct small resolutions of around , respectively with an exceptional curve inside or .
For , we denote by the following small resolution of : around for we consider the small resolution such that the exceptional curve over lies in , while for the small resolution such that the exceptional curves lie in . The gluing of these local small resolutions is done in the étale topology, so that in general the obtained models are no longer schemes but only algebraic spaces. Nevertheless, is dominated by (defined in Section 3.3.2) and still induces a Berkovich retraction , as described in Section 5. In particular, by Proposition 5.0.4, is an affinoid torus fibration over .
We construct the following continuous retraction
where is the Berkovich retraction onto the skeleton , and is a retraction of the 24 wings of to the sphere given as follows. We fix four distinct, ordered, interior points of each edge . Then the map on the wing attached to is defined as the map of Section 3.3.2, setting , for each
Proposition 3.3.3.
The map is an affinoid torus fibration away from the points . Furthermore, the monodromy of the -affine structure induced by , around each singular point, is -conjugate to
Proof.
Over of any -dimensional face , is equal to , hence is an affinoid torus fibration. Around any vertex , is equal to for any triple such that . It follows from Section 3.3.1 that is an affinoid torus fibration around . We denote by the boundary of , with and ; we write and , and denote by the open segment joining two points. Then, for , is equal to over , thus is an affinoid torus fibration. We conclude that is an affinoid torus fibration away from the points for .
For a singular point , we consider a loop around it and contained in . We apply Corollary 3.2.4 to compute the monodromy along : the numbers and differ by , as the model has an additional exceptional curves in with respect to . Therefore, we obtain
with respect to the basis and origin . ∎
Note that for a generic family of quartic surfaces , the metric aspects of the Kontsevich-Soibelman conjecture suggest that there should exist a distinguished singular affine structure on (coming from the Gromov-Hausdorff limit of the family), and hence a canonical choice of interior points for each edge. To the authors’ knowledge there does not exist a way to produce such a canonical set of ’s using non-archimedean techniques.