2.5 Construction of the morphism [04NZ]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2.5 Construction of the morphism
Let be the graph with vertices the maximal cones of (hence the maximal cones of ) and with an edge between and if and only if is a common face of codimension one. Note that since is proper, if is a sphere with center the origin, then is a triangulation of . In particular, is the 1-skeleton of the dual complex of a triangulation of the sphere, and is thus connected.
Let be a maximal cone, and the corresponding vertex, that we will use as a reference point. We fix a tuple of sections of as in Section 2.3.
Let be a maximal cone, and the corresponding vertex. By connectedness of , there exists a path from to , hence a sequence of maximal cones such that is a codimension one face of both and , for . The construction of Section 2.4 allows us to construct inductively along a tuple of sections of .
Lemma 2.5.1.
The tuple of sections is independent on the choice of path.
Proof.
By Eq. 2.4.3, for any , the sections are constructed from by multiplication by the matrix for the change of basis from to . Thus, by composition, the sections only depends on and the change of basis from to . ∎
This provides us with a tuple of sections of for each maximal cone , and the function
By Eq. 2.4.4 the glue to an invertible function on ; admits a -th root on , since it is constant, and by Hensel’s lemma we obtain an invertible function on such that . We use the sections and the function to define a morphism
as follows. Denoting by the dual basis to , the toric chart has the following explicit description:
Indeed, is the formal completion along of
, where ; since on , the relation holds.
The map is now defined at the level of function rings by
where the sections are viewed as functions on thanks to the proof of Lemma 2.3.1.
Lemma 2.5.2.
For any pair of maximal cones intersecting along a codimension one face, the morphisms and coincide on the overlap .
Proof.
The cones and correspond to adjacent vertices in . Thus, by Lemma 2.5.1 we construct from any path joining to , and from by the relation in Eq. 2.4.3.
The functions transform into via the change of dual bases, which is given by in Eq. 2.4.1. Comparing the two formulas, it follows that on . ∎
Proposition 2.5.3.
The morphism of formal -schemes obtained by gluing the morphisms is an isomorphism.
Proof.
We follow the argument in [NXY19, Proposition 5.4].
Since the source and the target have same dimension and are integral, it is enough to check that is a closed immersion.
If is the largest ideal of definition of , i.e. the defining ideal of , then is the largest ideal of definition of . Indeed, since is cut out inside by the for , the ideal is locally generated by the for ; the same reasoning shows that is locally generated by the . The equality now follows directly from the local definition of .
We
use [Gro61, 4.8.10] and the fact that induces an isomorphism on the reductions to infer that is a closed immersion, and thus an isomorphism by equality of dimensions.
∎
This concludes the proof of Theorem B: is toric along .