ScalingStacks

2.5 Construction of the morphism [04NZ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.5 Construction of the morphism

Let Γ\Gamma be the graph with vertices the maximal cones of Σ\Sigma (hence the maximal cones of Σ^\widehat{\Sigma}) and with an edge between σ\sigma and σ′\sigma^{\prime} if and only if σ∩σ′\sigma\cap\sigma^{\prime} is a common face of codimension one. Note that since ZZ is proper, if 𝕊⊂Nℝ\mathbb{S}\subset N_{\mathbb{R}} is a sphere with center the origin, then Σ∩𝕊\Sigma\cap\mathbb{S} is a triangulation of 𝕊\mathbb{S}. In particular, Γ\Gamma is the 1-skeleton of the dual complex of a triangulation of the sphere, and is thus connected.

Let σ0∈Σ\sigma_{0}\in\Sigma be a maximal cone, and p0∈Γp_{0}\in\Gamma the corresponding vertex, that we will use as a reference point. We fix a tuple of sections sσ0s^{\sigma_{0}} of Wσ0W^{\sigma_{0}} as in Section 2.3.
Let σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma be a maximal cone, and p∈Γp\in\Gamma the corresponding vertex. By connectedness of Γ\Gamma, there exists a path γ\gamma from p0p_{0} to pp, hence a sequence of maximal cones σ0,…,σq=σ\sigma_{0},\ldots,\sigma_{q}=\sigma such that σh∩σh+1\sigma_{h}\cap\sigma_{h+1} is a codimension one face of both σh\sigma_{h} and σh+1\sigma_{h+1}, for h=0,…,q−1h=0,\ldots,q-1. The construction of Section 2.4 allows us to construct inductively along γ\gamma a tuple of sections sσhs^{\sigma_{h}} of WσhW^{\sigma_{h}}.

Lemma 2.5.1.

The tuple of sections sσs^{\sigma} is independent on the choice of path.

Proof.

By Eq. 2.4.3, for any h=0,…,q−1h=0,\ldots,q-1, the sections sσh+1s^{\sigma_{h+1}} are constructed from sσhs^{\sigma_{h}} by multiplication by the matrix for the change of basis from ((vi)i∈Lσh,(vj)j∈J)((v_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma_{h}}},(v_{j})_{j\in J}) to ((vi)i∈Lσh+1,(vj)j∈J)((v_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma_{h+1}}},(v_{j})_{j\in J}). Thus, by composition, the sections sσs^{\sigma} only depends on sσ0s^{\sigma_{0}} and the change of basis from ((vi)i∈Lσ0,(vj)j∈J)((v_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma_{0}}},(v_{j})_{j\in J}) to ((vi)i∈Lσ,(vj)j∈J)((v_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma}},(v_{j})_{j\in J}). ∎

This provides us with a tuple of sections sσs^{\sigma} of WσW^{\sigma} for each maximal cone σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma, and the function

wσ=t⋅∏j∈J(sjσ)−1⋅∏i∈Lσ(siσ)−1∈𝒪​(𝔛σ)×.w_{\sigma}=t\cdot\prod_{j\in J}(s_{j}^{\sigma})^{-1}\cdot\prod_{i\in L_{\sigma}}(s_{i}^{\sigma})^{-1}\,\in\mathcal{O}(\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma})^{\times}.

By Eq. 2.4.4 the wσw_{\sigma} glue to an invertible function ww on 𝔛\mathfrak{X}; ww admits a (n+1)(n+1)-th root on ZZ, since it is constant, and by Hensel’s lemma we obtain an invertible function w′w^{\prime} on 𝔛\mathfrak{X} such that (w′)n+1=w(w^{\prime})^{n+1}=w. We use the sections sσs^{\sigma} and the function w′w^{\prime} to define a morphism

fσ:𝔛σ⟶𝔑σf_{\sigma}:\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma}\longrightarrow\mathfrak{N}_{\sigma}

as follows. Denoting by ((εi)i∈Lσ,(εj)j∈J)((\varepsilon_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma}},(\varepsilon_{j})_{j\in J}) the dual basis to ((vi)i∈Lσ,(vj)j∈J)((v_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma}},(v_{j})_{j\in J}), the toric chart 𝔑σ\mathfrak{N}_{\sigma} has the following explicit description:

𝔑σ=Spf⁡R⁡[χεi,i∈Lσ]​[[χεj,j∈J]]/{t−χ∑i∈Lσεi+∑j∈Jεj}.\mathfrak{N}_{\sigma}=\Spf R[\chi^{\varepsilon_{i}},i\in L_{\sigma}][[\chi^{\varepsilon_{j}},j\in J]]/\{t-\chi^{\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\varepsilon_{i}+\sum_{j\in J}\varepsilon_{j}}\}.

Indeed, 𝔑σ\mathfrak{N}_{\sigma} is the formal completion along ZZ of 𝒩σ^×𝔸1R\mathcal{N}_{\hat{\sigma}}\times_{\mathbb{A}^{1}}R, where 𝒩σ^=Spec⁡k⁡[(σ^)∨∩N^]\mathcal{N}_{\hat{\sigma}}=\Spec k[(\hat{\sigma})^{\vee}\cap\hat{N}]; since ord⁡(t)=∑i∈Lσεi+∑j∈Jεj\ord(t)=\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\varepsilon_{i}+\sum_{j\in J}\varepsilon_{j} on σ^\widehat{\sigma}, the relation t=χ∑i∈Lσεi+∑j∈Jεjt=\chi^{\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\varepsilon_{i}+\sum_{j\in J}\varepsilon_{j}} holds.
The map fσf_{\sigma} is now defined at the level of function rings by

fσ#:𝒪⁡(𝔑σ)\displaystyle f^{\#}_{\sigma}:\mathcal{O}(\mathfrak{N}_{\sigma}) ⟶𝒪⁡(𝔛σ)\displaystyle\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}(\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma})
χεi\displaystyle\chi^{\varepsilon_{i}} ↦w′​siσ​ for ​i∈Lσ\displaystyle\mapsto w^{\prime}s^{\sigma}_{i}\;\textrm{ \quad for }i\in L_{\sigma}
χεj\displaystyle\chi^{\varepsilon_{j}} ↦w′​sjσ​ for ​j∈J\displaystyle\mapsto w^{\prime}s_{j}^{\sigma}\;\textrm{ \quad for }j\in J

where the sections sσs^{\sigma} are viewed as functions on 𝔛σ\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma} thanks to the proof of Lemma 2.3.1.

Lemma 2.5.2.

For any pair of maximal cones σ,σ′\sigma,\sigma^{\prime} intersecting along a codimension one face, the morphisms fσf_{\sigma} and fσ′f_{\sigma^{\prime}} coincide on the overlap 𝔛σ∩𝔛σ′\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma}\cap\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma^{\prime}}.

Proof.

The cones σ\sigma and σ′\sigma^{\prime} correspond to adjacent vertices in Γ\Gamma. Thus, by Lemma 2.5.1 we construct sσs^{\sigma} from any path joining σ0\sigma_{0} to σ\sigma, and sσ′s^{\sigma^{\prime}} from sσs^{\sigma} by the relation sσ′=Mℬ′​ℬ​sσs^{\sigma^{\prime}}=M_{\mathcal{B^{\prime}}\mathcal{B}}\,s^{\sigma} in Eq. 2.4.3.

The functions χε\chi^{\varepsilon} transform into χε′\chi^{\varepsilon^{\prime}} via the change of dual bases, which is given by ε′=Mℬ′​ℬ​ε\varepsilon^{\prime}=M_{\mathcal{B^{\prime}}\mathcal{B}}\,\varepsilon in Eq. 2.4.1. Comparing the two formulas, it follows that fσ=fσ′f_{\sigma}=f_{\sigma^{\prime}} on 𝔛σ∩𝔛σ′\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma}\cap\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma^{\prime}}. ∎

Proposition 2.5.3.

The morphism of formal RR-schemes f:𝒳/Z^⟶𝒩/Z^f:\widehat{\mathscr{X}_{/Z}}\longrightarrow\widehat{\mathscr{N}_{/Z}} obtained by gluing the morphisms fσf_{\sigma} is an isomorphism.

Proof.

We follow the argument in [NXY19, Proposition 5.4].
Since the source and the target have same dimension and are integral, it is enough to check that ff is a closed immersion.
If 𝒥\mathscr{J} is the largest ideal of definition of 𝒩/Z^\widehat{\mathscr{N}_{/Z}}, i.e. the defining ideal of Z⊂𝒩Z\subset\mathscr{N}, then f∗​𝒥=ℐZf^{*}\mathscr{J}=\mathscr{I}_{Z} is the largest ideal of definition of 𝒳/Z^\widehat{\mathscr{X}_{/Z}}. Indeed, since ZZ is cut out inside 𝒳\mathscr{X} by the DjD_{j} for j∈Jj\in J, the ideal ℐZ\mathscr{I}_{Z} is locally generated by the sjs_{j} for j∈Jj\in J; the same reasoning shows that 𝒥\mathscr{J} is locally generated by the χεj\chi^{\varepsilon_{j}}. The equality f∗​𝒥=ℐZf^{*}\mathscr{J}=\mathscr{I}_{Z} now follows directly from the local definition of ff.
We use [Gro61, 4.8.10] and the fact that ff induces an isomorphism on the reductions to infer that ff is a closed immersion, and thus an isomorphism by equality of dimensions. ∎

This concludes the proof of Theorem B: 𝒳\mathscr{X} is toric along ZZ.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.