ScalingStacks

2.4 Construction for two adjacent maximal cones [04NW]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.4 Construction for two adjacent maximal cones

Let σ\sigma and σ′\sigma^{\prime} be two maximal cones of Σ\Sigma intersecting along a face of codimension one. Setting Lσ​σ′=Lσ∩Lσ′L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}=L_{\sigma}\cap L_{\sigma^{\prime}}, we may write Lσ=Lσ​σ′∪{i0}L_{\sigma}=L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\cup\{i_{0}\} and Lσ′=Lσ​σ′∪{i∞}L_{\sigma^{\prime}}=L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\cup\{i_{\infty}\}. The sets ℬ=((vi)i∈Lσ​σ′,vi0,(vj)j∈J)\mathcal{B}=((v_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}},v_{i_{0}},(v_{j})_{j\in J}) and ℬ′=((vi)i∈Lσ​σ′,vi∞,(vj)j∈J)\mathcal{B}^{\prime}=((v_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}},v_{i_{\infty}},(v_{j})_{j\in J}) are bases of N^=N⊕ℤJ\hat{N}=N\oplus\mathbb{Z}^{J}. They induce isomorphisms β,β′:ℤr⊕ℤJ→N^\beta,\beta^{\prime}:\mathbb{Z}^{r}\oplus\mathbb{Z}^{J}\rightarrow\hat{N} such that the change of basis from ℬ\mathcal{B} to ℬ′\mathcal{B}^{\prime} is

Mℬ′​ℬ=β′∘β−1=Lσ​σ′i0JId(−C⋅Di)i∈Lσ​σ′0Lσ​σ′0−10i∞0(−C⋅Dj)j∈JIdJ and ​(vivi∞vj)=Mℬ′​ℬT​(vivi0vj).M_{\mathcal{B}^{\prime}\mathcal{B}}=\beta^{\prime}\circ\beta^{-1}=\begin{array}[]{cccc}L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}&i_{0}&J\\ \Id&(-C\cdot D_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}}&0&L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\\ 0&-1&0&i_{\infty}\\ 0&(-C\cdot D_{j})_{j\in J}&\Id&J\\ \end{array}\quad\textrm{ and }\left(\begin{matrix}v_{i}\\ v_{i_{\infty}}\\ v_{j}\end{matrix}\right)=M_{\mathcal{B}^{\prime}\mathcal{B}}^{T}\left(\begin{matrix}v_{i}\\ v_{i_{0}}\\ v_{j}\end{matrix}\right).

Denote by ((εi)i∈Lσ​σ′,εi0,(εj)j∈J)((\varepsilon_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}},\varepsilon_{i_{0}},(\varepsilon_{j})_{j\in J}) the basis of M^≔Hom⁡(N^,ℤ)\hat{M}\coloneqq\Hom(\hat{N},\mathbb{Z}) dual to ℬ\mathcal{B}, and ((εi′)i∈Lσ​σ′,εi∞′,(εj′)j∈J)((\varepsilon^{\prime}_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}},\varepsilon^{\prime}_{i_{\infty}},(\varepsilon^{\prime}_{j})_{j\in J}) the basis dual to ℬ′\mathcal{B}^{\prime}. It follows that

(2.4.1) (εi′εi∞′εj′)=Mℬ′​ℬ​(εiεi0εj).\left(\begin{matrix}\varepsilon^{\prime}_{i}\\ \varepsilon^{\prime}_{i_{\infty}}\\ \varepsilon^{\prime}_{j}\end{matrix}\right)=M_{\mathcal{B}^{\prime}\mathcal{B}}\left(\begin{matrix}\varepsilon_{i}\\ \varepsilon_{i_{0}}\\ \varepsilon_{j}\end{matrix}\right).

The isomorphisms β\beta and β′\beta^{\prime} allow us to view

Wσ≔((Wiσ)i∈Lσ​σ′,Wi0σ,(Wjσ)j∈J)∈(ℤr⊕ℤJ)⊗Div0⁡(𝒳)≃(Div0⁡(𝒳))n+1W^{\sigma}\coloneqq((W^{\sigma}_{i})_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}},W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}},(W^{\sigma}_{j})_{j\in J})\,\in\,(\mathbb{Z}^{r}\oplus\mathbb{Z}^{J})\otimes\Div_{0}(\mathscr{X})\simeq(\Div_{0}(\mathscr{X}))^{n+1}

and Wσ′W^{\sigma^{\prime}} as elements of N^⊗Div0⁡(𝒳)\widehat{N}\otimes\Div_{0}(\mathscr{X}), that we will still denote by WσW^{\sigma} and Wσ′W^{\sigma^{\prime}} .

Lemma 2.4.2.

Let C⊆ZC\subseteq Z be the curve associated with the cone σ∩σ′\sigma\cap\sigma^{\prime}. We have

{Wiσ′=Wiσ−(C⋅Di)​Wi0σ for ​i∈Lσ​σ′Wi∞σ′=−Wi0σWjσ′=Wjσ−(C⋅Dj)​Wi0σ for ​j∈J\begin{cases}W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i}=W^{\sigma}_{i}-(C\cdot D_{i})W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}&\textrm{ \hskip 10.22217ptfor }i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\\ W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i_{\infty}}=-W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}&\\ W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{j}=W^{\sigma}_{j}-(C\cdot D_{j})W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}&\textrm{ \hskip 10.22217ptfor }j\in J\end{cases}

In other words, the relation Wσ′=(Mℬ′​ℬ⊗Id)WσW^{\sigma^{\prime}}=(M_{\mathcal{B}^{\prime}\mathcal{B}}\otimes\Id)W^{\sigma} holds.

Proof.

By Eq. 1.2.4 we have ui∞=−ui0−∑m∈Lσ​σ′(C⋅Dm)​umu_{i_{\infty}}=-u_{i_{0}}-\sum_{m\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}}(C\cdot D_{m})u_{m}, so

for i∈Lσ​σ′, Wiσ′\displaystyle\textrm{for $i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}$, }\quad W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i} =−det(Δ,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′∖{i},ui∞)det(ui,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′∖{i},ui∞)\displaystyle=-\frac{\det(\Delta,(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\setminus\{i\}},u_{i_{\infty}})}{\det(u_{i},(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\setminus\{i\}},u_{i_{\infty}})}
=−det(Δ,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′∖{i},ui0)det(ui,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′∖{i},ui0)−∑m∈Lσ​σ′(C⋅Dm)​det(Δ,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′∖{i},um)det(ui,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′∖{i},ui0)\displaystyle=-\frac{\det(\Delta,(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\setminus\{i\}},u_{i_{0}})}{\det(u_{i},(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\setminus\{i\}},u_{i_{0}})}-\sum_{m\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}}(C\cdot D_{m})\frac{\det(\Delta,(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\setminus\{i\}},u_{m})}{\det(u_{i},(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\setminus\{i\}},u_{i_{0}})}
=Wiσ−(C⋅Di)​det(Δ,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′∖{i},ui)det(ui,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′∖{i},ui0)=Wiσ−(C⋅Di)​Wi0σ;\displaystyle=W^{\sigma}_{i}-(C\cdot D_{i})\frac{\det(\Delta,(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\setminus\{i\}},u_{i})}{\det(u_{i},(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\setminus\{i\}},u_{i_{0}})}=W^{\sigma}_{i}-(C\cdot D_{i})W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}};
for i=i∞, Wi∞σ′\displaystyle\textrm{for $i=i_{\infty}$, }\quad W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i_{\infty}} =det(Δ,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′)det(ui∞,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′)=−det(Δ,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′)det(ui0,(ul)l∈Lσ​σ′)=−Wi0σ.\displaystyle=\frac{\det(\Delta,(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}})}{\det(u_{i_{\infty}},(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}})}=-\frac{\det(\Delta,(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}})}{\det(u_{i_{0}},(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}})}=-W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}.

For j∈Jj\in J

∑i∈Lσ′λj,i​Wiσ′\displaystyle\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma^{\prime}}}\lambda_{j,i}W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i} =−λj,i∞​Wi0σ+∑i∈Lσ​σ′λj,i​(Wiσ−(C⋅Di)​Wi0σ)\displaystyle=-\lambda_{j,i_{\infty}}W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}+\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}}\lambda_{j,i}\left(W^{\sigma}_{i}-(C\cdot D_{i})W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}\right)
=(−λj,i∞−∑i∈Lσ​σ′λj,i​(C⋅Di)−λj,i0)​Wi0σ+∑i∈Lσλj,i​Wiσ\displaystyle=\Big(-\lambda_{j,i_{\infty}}-\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}}\lambda_{j,i}(C\cdot D_{i})-\lambda_{j,i_{0}}\Big)W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}+\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\lambda_{j,i}W^{\sigma}_{i}
=(C⋅Dj)Wi0σ+∑i∈Lσλi,jWiσby Eq. 2.1.7\displaystyle=(C\cdot D_{j})W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}+\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\lambda_{i,j}W^{\sigma}_{i}\hskip 30.0pt\textrm{by \lx@cref{creftype~refnum}{equ fan}}
Wjσ′\displaystyle W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{j} =−Dj−∑l∈Lλj,l​Dl−∑i∈Lσ′λj,i​Wiσ′\displaystyle=-D_{j}-\sum_{l\in L}\lambda_{j,l}D_{l}-\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma^{\prime}}}\lambda_{j,i}W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i}
=−Dj−∑l∈Lλj,l​Dl−∑i∈Lσλj,i​Wiσ−(C⋅Dj)​Wi0σ=Wjσ−(C⋅Dj)​Wi0σ.\displaystyle=-D_{j}-\sum_{l\in L}\lambda_{j,l}D_{l}-\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\lambda_{j,i}W^{\sigma}_{i}-(C\cdot D_{j})W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}=W^{\sigma}_{j}-(C\cdot D_{j})W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}.

These relations can be summed up as (Wiσ′Wi∞σ′Wjσ′)=Mℬ′​ℬ​(WiσWi0σWjσ)\left(\begin{matrix}W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i}\\ W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i_{\infty}}\\ W^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{j}\end{matrix}\right)=M_{\mathcal{B}^{\prime}\mathcal{B}}\left(\begin{matrix}W^{\sigma}_{i}\\ W^{\sigma}_{i_{0}}\\ W^{\sigma}_{j}\end{matrix}\right), i.e. Wσ′=(Mℬ′​ℬ⊗Id)WσW^{\sigma^{\prime}}=(M_{\mathcal{B}^{\prime}\mathcal{B}}\otimes\Id)W^{\sigma}. ∎

The inverse (si0σ)−1(s^{\sigma}_{i_{0}})^{-1} is a section on 𝔛\mathfrak{X} of ℒi∞σ′\mathscr{L}^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i_{\infty}}, so by Lemma 2.4.2 the sections

{siσ′≔siσ⋅(si0σ)−(C⋅Di) for ​i∈Lσ​σ′si∞σ′≔(si0σ)−1sjσ′≔sjσ⋅(si0σ)−(C⋅Dj) for ​j∈J\begin{cases}s^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i}\coloneqq s^{\sigma}_{i}\cdot(s^{\sigma}_{i_{0}})^{-(C\cdot D_{i})}&\textrm{ \quad for }i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}\\ s^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i_{\infty}}\coloneqq(s^{\sigma}_{i_{0}})^{-1}&\\ s^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{j}\coloneqq s^{\sigma}_{j}\cdot(s^{\sigma}_{i_{0}})^{-(C\cdot D_{j})}&\textrm{ \quad for }j\in J\end{cases}

are sections on 𝔛\mathfrak{X} of the line bundles ℒiσ′\mathscr{L}^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i} and ℒjσ′\mathscr{L}^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{j}. By Lemma 2.3.1 these give equations for DiD_{i} and DjD_{j} on the open subscheme 𝔛σ′,\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma^{\prime}}, and on 𝔛σ∩𝔛σ′\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma}\cap\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma^{\prime}} we have

(2.4.3) (siσ′si∞σ′sjσ′)=Mℬ′​ℬ​(siσsi0σ′sjσ)\left(\begin{matrix}s^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i}\\ s^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i_{\infty}}\\ s^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{j}\end{matrix}\right)=M_{\mathcal{B}^{\prime}\mathcal{B}}\left(\begin{matrix}s^{\sigma}_{i}\\ s^{\sigma^{\prime}}_{i_{0}}\\ s^{\sigma}_{j}\end{matrix}\right)

where the additive notation on the matrix corresponds to the multiplicative notation on the sections. Moreover, on 𝔛σ∩𝔛σ′\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma}\cap\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma^{\prime}} we have

(2.4.4) wσ′≔t⋅∏j∈J(sjσ′)−1⋅∏i∈Lσ′(siσ′)−1=t⋅∏j∈J(sjσ)−1​(si0σ)C⋅Dj⋅∏i∈Lσ​σ′(siσ)−1​(si0σ)C⋅Di⋅(si0σ)=t⋅∏j∈J(sjσ)−1⋅∏i∈Lσ​σ′(siσ)−1⋅(si0σ)∑j∈JC⋅Dj+∑i∈Lσ​σ′C⋅Di+1=wσ,\displaystyle\begin{split}w_{\sigma^{\prime}}&\coloneqq t\cdot\prod_{j\in J}(s_{j}^{\sigma^{\prime}})^{-1}\cdot\prod_{i\in L_{\sigma^{\prime}}}(s_{i}^{\sigma^{\prime}})^{-1}=t\cdot\prod_{j\in J}(s^{\sigma}_{j})^{-1}(s^{\sigma}_{i_{0}})^{C\cdot D_{j}}\cdot\prod_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}}(s^{\sigma}_{i})^{-1}(s^{\sigma}_{i_{0}})^{C\cdot D_{i}}\cdot(s^{\sigma}_{i_{0}})\\ &=t\cdot\prod_{j\in J}(s^{\sigma}_{j})^{-1}\cdot\prod_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}}(s^{\sigma}_{i})^{-1}\cdot(s^{\sigma}_{i_{0}})^{\sum_{j\in J}C\cdot D_{j}+\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma\sigma^{\prime}}}C\cdot D_{i}+1}=w_{\sigma},\end{split}

hence the invertible function wσw_{\sigma} on 𝔛σ\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma} extends to 𝔛σ∪𝔛σ′\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma}\cup\mathfrak{X}_{\sigma^{\prime}} by wσ′w_{\sigma^{\prime}}.

Original source context: S2.SS1.E7

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.