ScalingStacks

2.2 Construction of the divisors [04NN]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.2 Construction of the divisors

We set

Δ:=∑l∈Lul⊗Dl∈N⊗Div0⁡(𝒳)≃(Div0⁡(𝒳))r;\Delta:=\sum_{l\in L}u_{l}\otimes D_{l}\,\in\,N\otimes\Div_{0}(\mathscr{X})\simeq(\Div_{0}(\mathscr{X}))^{r};

this is an rr-tuple of divisors on 𝒳\mathscr{X}. Moreover, the restriction of any of these to ZZ is a principal divisor by Corollary 1.2.2. Given a maximal cone σ\sigma of Σ\Sigma, for any i∈Lσi\in L_{\sigma}, we define

Wiσ≔−det(Δ,(ul)l∈Lσ∖{i})det(ui,(ul)l∈Lσ∖{i})∈Div0⁡(𝒳)W^{\sigma}_{i}\coloneqq-\frac{\det(\Delta,(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma}\setminus\{i\}})}{\det(u_{i},(u_{l})_{l\in L_{\sigma}\setminus\{i\}})}\in\Div_{0}(\mathscr{X})

where the column vectors ulu_{l} are in the same order in the numerator and in the denominator, and the denominator has value ±1\pm 1 by Lemma 2.1.3.

Lemma 2.2.1.

The divisor WiσW^{\sigma}_{i} has multiplicity −1-1 along DiD_{i}, multiplicity 00 along DlD_{l} for l∈Lσ∖{i}l\in L_{\sigma}\setminus\{i\}, and along DjD_{j} for j∈Jj\in J. In other words, we may write:

Wiσ=−Di+∑l∈L∖Lσci,l​DlW^{\sigma}_{i}=-D_{i}+\sum_{l\in L\setminus L_{\sigma}}c_{i,l}D_{l}

for some coefficients ci,l∈ℤc_{i,l}\in\mathbb{Z}. Moreover, the restriction of WiσW^{\sigma}_{i} to ZZ is principal.

Proof.

The statement on the multiplicities follows from the definition of WiσW^{\sigma}_{i}, as

Wσi=−∑l∈Ldet(ul,(ul′)l′∈Lσ∖{i})det(ui,(ul′)l′∈Lσ∖{i})Dl.W^{\sigma}_{i}=-\sum_{l\in L}\frac{\det(u_{l},(u_{l^{\prime}})_{l^{\prime}\in L_{\sigma}\setminus\{i\}})}{\det(u_{i},(u_{l^{\prime}})_{l^{\prime}\in L_{\sigma}\setminus\{i\}})}D_{l}.

Moreover, WiσW^{\sigma}_{i} is a linear combination of the divisors of the rr-tuple Δ\Delta, hence its restriction to ZZ is principal by Corollary 1.2.2. ∎

For j∈Jj\in J, we define the divisor on 𝒳\mathscr{X}

(2.2.2) Wjσ≔−Dj−∑l∈Lλj,l​Dl−∑i∈Lσλj,i​Wiσ=−Dj−∑l∈L∖Lσλj,l​Dl−∑l∈Lσλj,l​Dl−∑i∈Lσλj,i​(−Di+∑l∈L∖Lσci,l​Dl)=−Dj+∑l∈L∖Lσdj,lDl with dj,l=−λj,l−∑i∈Lσλj,ici,l.\displaystyle\begin{split}W^{\sigma}_{j}&\coloneqq-D_{j}-\sum_{l\in L}\lambda_{j,l}D_{l}-\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\lambda_{j,i}W^{\sigma}_{i}\\ &=-D_{j}-\sum_{l\in L\setminus L_{\sigma}}\lambda_{j,l}D_{l}-\cancel{\sum_{l\in L_{\sigma}}\lambda_{j,l}D_{l}}-\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\lambda_{j,i}\big(\cancel{-D_{i}}+\sum_{l\in L\setminus L_{\sigma}}c_{i,l}D_{l}\big)\\ &=-D_{j}+\sum_{l\in L\setminus L_{\sigma}}d_{j,l}D_{l}\quad\textrm{ with }\quad d_{j,l}=-\lambda_{j,l}-\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}\lambda_{j,i}c_{i,l}.\end{split}

The restriction of WjσW^{\sigma}_{j} to ZZ is a principal divisor, as the Wσi|Z{W^{\sigma}_{i}}_{|Z} are principal and −Dj|Z{-D_{j}}_{|Z} is linearly equivalent to ∑l∈Lλj,l​Zl\sum_{l\in L}\lambda_{j,l}Z_{l} by Eq. 2.1.4.

Lemma 2.2.3.

The relation ∑j∈JWσj+∑i∈LσWσi=−∑j∈JDj−∑l∈LDl\sum_{j\in J}W^{\sigma}_{j}+\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}W^{\sigma}_{i}=-\sum_{j\in J}D_{j}-\sum_{l\in L}D_{l} holds.

Proof.

Write W≔∑j∈JWjσ+∑i∈LσWiσ∈Div0⁡(𝒳).W\coloneqq\sum_{j\in J}W^{\sigma}_{j}+\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}W^{\sigma}_{i}\in\Div_{0}(\mathscr{X}). We have

for ​j∈JordDj⁡(W)\displaystyle\textrm{for }j\in J\quad\ord_{D_{j}}(W) =ordDj⁡(Wjσ)=−1\displaystyle=\ord_{D_{j}}(W^{\sigma}_{j})=-1
for ​i∈LσordDi⁡(W)\displaystyle\textrm{for }i\in L_{\sigma}\quad\ord_{D_{i}}(W) =ordDi⁡(Wiσ)=−1\displaystyle=\ord_{D_{i}}(W^{\sigma}_{i})=-1
for ​l∈L∖LσordDl⁡(W)\displaystyle\textrm{for }l\in L\setminus L_{\sigma}\quad\ord_{D_{l}}(W) =∑j∈Jdj,l+∑i∈Lσci,l=−∑j∈Jλj,l+∑i∈Lσci,l(1−∑j∈Jλj,i)=−1\displaystyle=\sum_{j\in J}d_{j,l}+\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}c_{i,l}=-\sum_{j\in J}\lambda_{j,l}+\sum_{i\in L_{\sigma}}c_{i,l}(1-\sum_{j\in J}\lambda_{j,i})=-1

by Lemma 2.2.1, Eq. 2.2.2 and Eq. 2.1.5. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.