ScalingStacks

1.6 Affinoid torus fibrations and integral affine structures [04MW]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

1.6 Affinoid torus fibrations and integral affine structures

Let XX be a smooth proper variety over KK.

Definition 1.6.1.

Let ρ:Xan⟶B\rho:X^{\text{an}}\longrightarrow B be a continuous map to a topological space BB. For any point b∈Bb\in B, we say that ρ\rho is an affinoid torus fibration at bb if there exists an open neighbourhood UU of bb in BB, such that the restriction to ρ−1​(U)\rho^{-1}(U) fits into a commutative diagram:

ρ−1​(U){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\rho^{-1}(U)}val−1⁡(V){\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces\val^{-1}(V)}U{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces U}V,{\lx@inpgf@ignorespaces V,}≃\simeqρ\rhoval\val≃\simeq

VV being an open subset of ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n}, the upper horizontal map an isomorphism of analytic spaces, the lower horizontal map a homeomorphism, and the map val\val defined as in Section 1.5.

Example 1.6.2.

It follows from the definition of good dlt model 𝒳\mathscr{X} of XX that the Berkovich retraction ρ𝒳:Xan→Sk⁡(𝒳)\rho_{\mathscr{X}}:X^{\an}\rightarrow\Sk(\mathscr{X}) is an affinoid torus fibration over the interior of the maximal faces τ\tau of Sk⁡(𝒳)\Sk(\mathscr{X}). Indeed, the retraction over Int​(τ)\textrm{Int}({\tau}) only depends on the formal completion of 𝒳\mathscr{X} along the corresponding 0-dimensional stratum pp. The pair (𝒳,𝒳k)(\mathscr{X},\mathscr{X}_{k}) is snc at pp, hence the claim.

Example 1.6.3.

If 𝒳/R\mathscr{X}/R is a toric model of X=𝕋X=\mathbb{T}, it follows from Proposition 1.5.2 that the Berkovich retraction:

ρ𝒳:𝒳^η⟶Sk⁡(𝒳)\rho_{\mathscr{X}}:\widehat{\mathscr{X}}_{\eta}\longrightarrow\Sk(\mathscr{X})

is an affinoid torus fibration over the interior of Sk⁡(𝒳)\Sk(\mathscr{X}). This also holds when XX is a regular proper toric variety over KK, and 𝒳\mathscr{X} a regular proper toric model, by [GJKM19, Theorem A.4].

Note that the above definition implies that BB is a topological manifold at bb; in the case of a Berkovich retraction ρ𝒳\rho_{\mathscr{X}}, this does not necessarily hold at every point of Sk⁡(𝒳)\Sk(\mathscr{X}).

Given a continuous map ρ:Xan⟶B\rho:X^{\text{an}}\longrightarrow B, we denote by BsmB^{\textrm{sm}} the locus of points in BB where ρ\rho is an affinoid torus fibration at; we call B∖BsmB\setminus B^{\textrm{sm}} the discriminant or singular locus of BB. BsmB^{\textrm{sm}} is endowed with an integral affine structure; we recall the definition and describe such structure.

Definition 1.6.4.

An integral affine structure on a topological manifold is an atlas of charts with transition functions in GLn​(ℤ)⋉ℝn\textrm{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{Z})\ltimes\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Definition 1.6.5.

An integral affine function on an open subset of ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n} is a continuous real-valued function locally of the form f⁡(x1,…,xn)=a1​x1+…+an​xn+bf(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n})=a_{1}x_{1}+\ldots+a_{n}x_{n}+b, with ai∈ℤa_{i}\in\mathbb{Z} and b∈ℝb\in\mathbb{R}. We denote by Affℝn\textrm{Aff}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} the sheaf of integral affine functions on ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Lemma 1.6.6 ([KS06, 2.1]).

An integral affine structure on a topological manifold MM is equivalent to the datum of a subsheaf AffM\mathrm{Aff}_{M} of the sheaf of continuous functions on MM such that (M,AffM)(M,\mathrm{Aff}_{M}) is locally isomorphic to (ℝn,Affℝn)(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathrm{Aff}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}).

If ρ\rho is an affinoid torus fibration over Bsm⊆BB^{\textrm{sm}}\subseteq B, the integral affine structure on BsmB^{\textrm{sm}} is the pull-back of Affℝn\textrm{Aff}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} via the charts in Definition 1.6.1. An alternative description of this structure is given in [KS06, 4.1, Theorem 1]: let U⊂BsmU\subset B^{\textrm{sm}} be a connected open subset. Then if hh is an invertible analytic function on ρ−1​(U)\rho^{-1}(U), its modulus |h|\lvert h\rvert is constant on the fibers of ρ\rho by the maximum principle, so that it defines a continuous function on the base. We now have:

AffBsm​(U)={−log⁡|h||h∈𝒪Xan×​(ρ−1​(U))}.\mathrm{Aff}_{B^{\textrm{sm}}}(U)=\{-\log\lvert h\rvert\,|\,h\in\mathcal{O}^{\times}_{X^{\an}}(\rho^{-1}(U))\}.
Remark 1.6.7.

Given an integral affine structure on a topological manifold MM, there is a monodromy representation

T:π1​(M)→GLn​(ℤ)⋉ℝnT:\pi_{1}(M)\rightarrow\textrm{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{Z})\ltimes\mathbb{R}^{n}

defined by covering a loop in MM by affine charts and composing the corresponding transition functions. See [KS06, 2.2] for more details.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.