ScalingStacks

7. Metrics from polytopes [02X1]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

7. Metrics from polytopes

7.1. Integration on polytopes

In this section, we present a closed formula for the integral over a polytope of a function of one variable composed with a linear form, extending in this direction Brion’s formula for the case of a simplex [Bri88], see Proposition 7.3 and Corollary 7.14 below. In the next section, these formulae will allow us to compute the height of toric varieties with respect to some interesting metrics arising from polytopes.

Let Δ⊂ℝn\Delta\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} be a polytope of dimension nn and u∈ℝnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} a vector. An aggregate of Δ\Delta in the direction uu is defined as the union of the faces of Δ\Delta lying in some affine hyperplane orthogonal to uu, provided that the union is non-empty. We write Δ⁡(u)\Delta(u) for the set of aggregates of Δ\Delta in the direction uu. Note that, for V∈Δ⁡(u)V\in\Delta(u) and xx a point in the affine space spanned by VV, the value ⟨u,x⟩\langle u,x\rangle is independent of xx. We denote this common value by ⟨u,V⟩\langle u,V\rangle. For any two aggregates V1,V2∈Δ⁡(u)V_{1},V_{2}\in\Delta(u), we have V1=V2V_{1}=V_{2} if and only if ⟨u,V1⟩=⟨u,V2⟩\langle u,V_{1}\rangle=\langle u,V_{2}\rangle.

In each facet FF of Δ\Delta we choose a point mFm_{F}. Let LFL_{F} be the linear hyperplane defined by FF. Hence, F−mFF-m_{F} is a polytope in LFL_{F} of full dimension n−1n-1. Observe that, for V∈Δ⁡(u)V\in\Delta(u), the intersection V∩FV\cap F is an aggregate of FF. We write πF\pi_{F} for the orthogonal projection of ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n} onto LFL_{F}. We also denote by uFu_{F} the vector inner normal to FF of norm 1.

Definition 7.1.

For each aggregate V∈Δ⁡(u)V\in\Delta(u), we define the polynomial

C⁡(Δ,u,V)=∑k=0dim(V)k!dim(V)!​Ck​(Δ,u,V)​zdim(V)−k∈ℝ⁡[z]C(\Delta,u,V)=\sum_{k=0}^{\dim(V)}\frac{k!}{\dim(V)!}C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)z^{\dim(V)-k}\in\mathbb{R}[z]

recursively. For k>dim(V)k>\dim(V) we set Ck​(Δ,u,V)=0C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)=0. For convenience, we set C⁡(Δ,u,∅)=0C(\Delta,u,\emptyset)=0 for all Δ\Delta and uu. If u=0u=0, then V=ΔV=\Delta and we define Cn​(Δ,0,Δ)C_{n}(\Delta,0,\Delta) as the Lebesgue measure of Δ\Delta and Ck​(Δ,0,Δ)=0C_{k}(\Delta,0,\Delta)=0, for k<nk<n. If u≠0u\neq 0, we set

(7.2) Ck(Δ,u,V)=−∑F⟨uF,u⟩‖u‖2Ck(F,πF(u),V∩F),C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)=-\sum_{F}\frac{\langle u_{F},u\rangle}{\|u\|^{2}}C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V\cap F),

where the sum is over the facets FF of Δ\Delta.

As usual, we write 𝒞n​(ℝ)\mathscr{C}^{n}(\mathbb{R}) for the space of functions of one real variable which are nn-times continuously differentiable. For f∈𝒞n​(ℝ)f\in\mathscr{C}^{n}(\mathbb{R}) and k≥0k\geq 0, we write f(k)f^{(k)} for the kk-th derivative of ff. Write voln\operatorname{vol}_{n} for the Lebesgue measure of ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

We want to give a formula that, for f∈𝒞n​(ℝ)f\in\mathscr{C}^{n}(\mathbb{R}), computes ∫Δf(n)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​voln\int_{\Delta}f^{(n)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n} in terms of the values of f∘uf\circ u at the vertices of Δ\Delta. However, when uu is orthogonal to some faces of Δ\Delta of positive dimension, such a formula necessarily depends on the values of the derivatives of ff.

Proposition 7.3.

Let Δ⊂ℝn\Delta\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} be a polytope of dimension nn and u∈ℝnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Then, for any f∈𝒞n​(ℝ)f\in\mathscr{C}^{n}(\mathbb{R}),

∫Δf(n)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​voln\displaystyle\int_{\Delta}f^{(n)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n} =∑V∈Δ⁡(u)(C⁡(Δ,u,V)​(z)⋅f⁡(z+⟨u,V⟩))(dim(V))​(0)\displaystyle=\sum_{V\in\Delta(u)}\big(C(\Delta,u,V)(z)\cdot f(z+\langle u,V\rangle)\big)^{(\dim(V))}(0)
(7.4) =∑V∈Δ⁡(u)∑k≥0Ck​(Δ,u,V)​f(k)​(⟨u,V⟩).\displaystyle=\sum_{V\in\Delta(u)}\sum_{k\geq 0}C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)f^{(k)}(\langle u,V\rangle).

The coefficients Ck​(Δ,u,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u,V) are uniquely determined by this identity.

Proof.

In view of Definition 7.1 both formulae in the above statement are equivalent and so it is enough to prove the second one. In case u=0u=0, we have Δ⁡(u)={Δ}\Delta(u)=\{\Delta\} and formula (7.4) holds because

∫Δf(n)​(⟨0,x⟩)​d​voln=vol⁡(Δ)​f(n)​(0)=∑k≥0Ck​(Δ,0,Δ)​f(k)​(0),\int_{\Delta}f^{(n)}(\langle 0,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n}=\operatorname{vol}(\Delta)f^{(n)}(0)=\sum_{k\geq 0}C_{k}(\Delta,0,\Delta)f^{(k)}(0),

We prove (7.4) by induction on the dimension nn. In case n=0n=0, we have u=0u=0 and so the verification reduces to the above one. Hence, we assume n≥1n\geq 1 and u≠0u\neq 0. For short, we write d​x=d​x1∧⋯∧d​xn\,\text{\rm d}x=\,\text{\rm d}x_{1}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}x_{n}. Choose any vector v∈ℝnv\in\mathbb{R}^{n} of norm 11 and such that ⟨u,v⟩≠0\langle u,v\rangle\not=0. Performing an orientation-preserving orthonormal change of variables, we may assume v=(1,0,…,0)v=(1,0,\dots,0). We have

f(n)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​x=1⟨u,v⟩​d​(f(n−1)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​x2∧⋯∧d​xn).f^{(n)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}x=\frac{1}{\langle u,v\rangle}\,\text{\rm d}\left(f^{(n-1)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}x_{2}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}x_{n}\right).

With Stokes’ theorem, we obtain

(7.5) ∫Δf(n)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​voln\displaystyle\int_{\Delta}f^{(n)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n} =∫Δf(n)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​x\displaystyle=\int_{\Delta}f^{(n)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}x
=1⟨u,v⟩​∑F∫Ff(n−1)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​x2∧⋯∧d​xn.\displaystyle=\frac{1}{\langle u,v\rangle}\sum_{F}\int_{F}f^{(n-1)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}x_{2}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}x_{n}.

where the sum is over the facets FF of Δ\Delta, and we equip each facet with the induced orientation.

For each facet FF of Δ\Delta, we let ιuF​(d​x)\iota_{u_{F}}(\,\text{\rm d}x) be the differential form of order n−1n-1 obtained by contracting d​x\,\text{\rm d}x with the vector uFu_{F}. The form d​x2∧⋯∧d​xn\,\text{\rm d}x_{2}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}x_{n} is invariant under translations and its restriction to the linear hyperplane LFL_{F} coincides with ⟨uF,v⟩​ιuF​(d​x)\langle u_{F},v\rangle\iota_{u_{F}}(\,\text{\rm d}x). Therefore,

∫Ff(n−1)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​x2∧⋯∧d​xn=⟨uF,v⟩​∫F−mFf(n−1)​(⟨u,x+mF⟩)​ιuF​(d​x).\int_{F}f^{(n-1)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}x_{2}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}x_{n}=\langle u_{F},v\rangle\int_{F-m_{F}}f^{(n-1)}(\langle u,x+m_{F}\rangle)\iota_{u_{F}}(\,\text{\rm d}x).

Let voln−1\operatorname{vol}_{n-1} denote the Lebesgue measure on LFL_{F}. We can verify that voln−1\operatorname{vol}_{n-1} coincides with the measure induced by integration of −ιuF​(d​x)-\iota_{u_{F}}(\,\text{\rm d}x) along LFL_{F}. Let g:ℝ→ℝg\colon\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be the function defined as g⁡(z)=f⁡(z+⟨u,mF⟩)g(z)=f(z+\langle u,m_{F}\rangle). Then f(n−1)​(⟨u,x+mF⟩)=g(n−1)​(⟨πF​(u),x⟩)f^{(n-1)}(\langle u,x+m_{F}\rangle)=g^{(n-1)}(\langle\pi_{F}(u),x\rangle) for all x∈LFx\in L_{F}. Hence,

∫F−mFf(n−1)(⟨u,x+mF⟩)ιuF(dx)=−∫F−mFg(n−1)(⟨πF(u),x⟩)dvoln−1.\int_{F-m_{F}}f^{(n-1)}(\langle u,x+m_{F}\rangle)\iota_{u_{F}}(\,\text{\rm d}x)=-\int_{F-m_{F}}g^{(n-1)}(\langle\pi_{F}(u),x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n-1}.

Applying the inductive hypothesis to FF and the function gg we obtain

∫Fg(n−1)​(⟨πF​(u),x⟩)​d​voln−1\displaystyle\int_{F}g^{(n-1)}(\langle\pi_{F}(u),x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n-1} =∑V′∈F⁡(πF​(u))∑k≥0Ck​(F,πF​(u),V′)​g(k)​(⟨πF​(u),V′⟩)\displaystyle=\sum_{V^{\prime}\in F(\pi_{F}(u))}\sum_{k\geq 0}C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V^{\prime})g^{(k)}(\langle\pi_{F}(u),V^{\prime}\rangle)
=∑V′∈F⁡(πF​(u))∑k≥0Ck​(F,πF​(u),V′)​f(k)​(⟨u,V′⟩).\displaystyle=\sum_{V^{\prime}\in F(\pi_{F}(u))}\sum_{k\geq 0}C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V^{\prime})f^{(k)}(\langle u,V^{\prime}\rangle).

Each aggregate V′∈F⁡(πF​(u))V^{\prime}\in F(\pi_{F}(u)) is contained in a unique V∈Δ⁡(u)V\in\Delta(u) and it coincides with V∩FV\cap F. Therefore, we can transform the right-hand side of the last equality in

∑V∈Δ⁡(u)∑k≥0Ck​(F,πF​(u),V∩F)​f(k)​(⟨u,V⟩),\sum_{V\in\Delta(u)}\sum_{k\geq 0}C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V\cap F)f^{(k)}(\langle u,V\rangle),

where, for simplicity, we have set Ck​(F,πF​(u),V∩F)=0C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V\cap F)=0 whenever V∩F=∅V\cap F=\emptyset. Plugging the resulting expression into (7.5) and exchanging the summations on VV and FF, we obtain that ∫Δf(n)​(⟨x,u⟩)​d​voln\int_{\Delta}f^{(n)}(\langle x,u\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n} is equal to

(7.6) ∑V∈Δ⁡(u)∑k≥0(−∑F⟨uF,v⟩⟨u,v⟩Ck(F,πF(u),V∩F)f(k)(⟨u,V⟩)).\sum_{V\in\Delta(u)}\sum_{k\geq 0}\bigg(-\sum_{F}\frac{\langle u_{F},v\rangle}{\langle u,v\rangle}C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V\cap F)f^{(k)}(\langle u,V\rangle)\bigg).

Specialising this identity to v=uv=u, we readily derive formula (7.4) from Definition 7.1 of the coefficients Ck​(Δ,u,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u,V).

For the last statement, observe that the values f(k)​(⟨u,V⟩)f^{(k)}(\langle u,V\rangle) can be arbitrarily chosen. Hence, the coefficients Ck​(Δ,u,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u,V) are uniquely determined from the linear system obtained from the identity (7.4) for enough functions ff. ∎

Corollary 7.7.

Let Δ⊂ℝn\Delta\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} be a polytope of dimension nn and u∈ℝnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Then,

voln⁡(Δ)=∑V∈Δ⁡(u)∑k=0dim(V)Ck​(Δ,u,V)​⟨u,V⟩n−k(n−k)!.\operatorname{vol}_{n}(\Delta)=\sum_{V\in\Delta(u)}\sum_{k=0}^{\dim(V)}C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)\frac{\langle u,V\rangle^{n-k}}{(n-k)!}.
Proof.

This follows from formula (7.4) applied to the function f⁡(z)=zn/n!f(z)=z^{n}/n!. ∎

Proposition 7.8.

Let Δ⊂ℝn\Delta\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} be a polytope of dimension nn and u∈ℝnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Let V∈Δ⁡(u)V\in\Delta(u) and k≥0k\geq 0.

  1. (1)

    The coefficient Ck​(Δ,u,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u,V) is homogeneous of weight k−nk-n, in the sense that, for λ∈ℝ×\lambda\in\mathbb{R}^{\times},

    Ck​(Δ,λ​u,V)=λk−n​Ck​(Δ,u,V).C_{k}(\Delta,\lambda u,V)=\lambda^{k-n}C_{k}(\Delta,u,V).
  2. (2)

    The coefficients Ck​(Δ,u,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u,V) satisfy the vector relation

    (7.9) Ck(Δ,u,V)⋅u=−∑FCk(F,πF(u),V∩F)⋅uF,C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)\cdot u=-\sum_{F}C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V\cap F)\cdot u_{F},

    where the sum is over the facets FF of Δ\Delta.

  3. (3)

    Let Δ1,Δ2⊂ℝn\Delta_{1},\Delta_{2}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} be two polytopes of dimension nn intersecting along a common facet and such that Δ=Δ1∪Δ2\Delta=\Delta_{1}\cup\Delta_{2}. Then V∩Δi=∅V\cap\Delta_{i}=\emptyset or V∩Δi∈Δi​(u)V\cap\Delta_{i}\in\Delta_{i}(u) and

    Ck​(Δ,u,V)=Ck​(Δ1,u,V∩Δ1)+Ck​(Δ2,u,V∩Δ2).C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)=C_{k}(\Delta_{1},u,V\cap\Delta_{1})+C_{k}(\Delta_{2},u,V\cap\Delta_{2}).
Proof.

Statement (1) follows easily from the definition of Ck​(Δ,u,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u,V). For statement (2), we use that, from (7.6), the integral formula in Proposition 7.3 also holds for the choice of coefficients

−∑F⟨uF,v⟩⟨u,v⟩Ck(F,πF(u),V∩F)-\sum_{F}\frac{\langle u_{F},v\rangle}{\langle u,v\rangle}C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V\cap F)

for any vector vv of norm 1 such that ⟨u,v⟩≠0\langle u,v\rangle\neq 0. But the coefficients satisfying that formula are unique. Hence, this choice necessarily coincides with Ck​(Δ,u,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u,V) for all such vv. Hence,

⟨u,v⟩Ck(Δ,u,V)=−∑F⟨uF,v⟩Ck(F,πF(u),V∩F)\langle u,v\rangle C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)=-\sum_{F}\langle u_{F},v\rangle C_{k}(F,\pi_{F}(u),V\cap F)

and formula (7.9) follows. Statement (3) follows from Formula (7.4) applied to Δ\Delta, Δ1\Delta_{1} and Δ2\Delta_{2} together with the additivity of the integral and the fact that the coefficients Ck​(Δ,u,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u,V) are uniquely determined. ∎

Example 7.10.

In case Δ\Delta is a simplex, its aggregates in a given direction u∈ℝnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} are some of its faces and the corresponding coefficients can be made explicit. Indeed, they satisfy the linear system

∑V∈Δ⁡(u)∑k=0min⁡{i,dim(V)}Ck​(Δ,u,V)​⟨u,V⟩i−k(i−k)!={0for ​i=0,…,n−1,Voln​(Δ)for ​i=n.\sum_{V\in\Delta(u)}\sum_{k=0}^{\min\{i,\dim(V)\}}C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)\frac{\langle u,V\rangle^{i-k}}{(i-k)!}=\begin{cases}0&\mbox{for }i=0,\dots,n-1,\\ {\rm Vol}_{n}(\Delta)&\mbox{for }i=n.\end{cases}

This system has as many unknowns as equations and might be solved using Cramer’s rule. These coefficients admit the closed formula below, which the reader might check using the recurrence relation (7.9):

(7.11) Ck​(Δ,u,V)=(−1)dim(V)−k​n!k!​voln⁡(Δ)​∑|β|=dim(V)−k∏ν∉V⟨V−ν,u⟩−βν−1,C_{k}(\Delta,u,V)=(-1)^{\dim(V)-k}\frac{n!}{k!}{\operatorname{vol}}_{n}(\Delta)\sum_{|\beta|=\dim(V)-k}\prod_{\nu\notin V}\langle V-\nu,u\rangle^{-\beta_{\nu}-1},

where the products are over the vertices ν\nu of Δ\Delta not lying in VV and the sum is over the tuples β\beta of non negative integers of length dim(V)−k\dim(V)-k, indexed by those same vertices of Δ\Delta that are not in VV, that is, β∈ℕn−dim(V)\beta\in\mathbb{N}^{n-\dim(V)} and |β|=dim(V)−k|\beta|=\dim(V)-k. In case V=ν0V=\nu_{0} is a vertex of Δ\Delta, the above formula reduces to

(7.12) C0​(Δ,u,ν0)=n!​voln⁡(Δ)​∏ν≠ν0⟨ν0−ν,u⟩−1.C_{0}(\Delta,u,\nu_{0})=n!{\operatorname{vol}}_{n}(\Delta)\prod_{\nu\neq\nu_{0}}\langle\nu_{0}-\nu,u\rangle^{-1}.

Suppose that the simplex is presented as the intersection of n+1n+1 halfspaces as Δ=⋂i=0n{x∈ℝn|⟨ui,x⟩−λi≥0}\Delta=\bigcap_{i=0}^{n}\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}|\,\langle u_{i},x\rangle-\lambda_{i}\geq 0\} for some ui∈ℝnu_{i}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and λi∈ℝ\lambda_{i}\in\mathbb{R}. Up to a reordering, we can assume that u0u_{0} is normal to the unique face of Δ\Delta not containing ν0\nu_{0} and that det(u1,…,un)>0\det(u_{1},\dots,u_{n})>0. Then the above coefficient can be alternatively written as

(7.13) C0​(Δ,u,ν0)=det(u1,…,un)n−1∏i=1ndet(u1,…,ui−1,u,ui+1,…,un).C_{0}(\Delta,u,\nu_{0})=\frac{\det(u_{1},\dots,u_{n})^{n-1}}{\prod_{i=1}^{n}\det(u_{1},\dots,u_{i-1},u,u_{i+1},\dots,u_{n})}.

We obtain the following extension of Brion’s ‘‘short formula’’ for the case of a simplex [Bri88, Théorème 3.2], see also [BBDL+11].

Corollary 7.14.

Let Δ⊂ℝn\Delta\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} be a simplex of dimension nn that is the convex hull of points νi\nu_{i}, i=0,…,ni=0,\dots,n, and let u∈ℝnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} such that ⟨u,νi⟩≠⟨u,νj⟩\langle u,\nu_{i}\rangle\neq\langle u,\nu_{j}\rangle for i≠ji\neq j. Then, for any f∈𝒞n​(ℝ)f\in\mathscr{C}^{n}(\mathbb{R}),

∫Δf(n)​(⟨u,x⟩)​d​voln=n!​voln⁡(Δ)​∑i=0nf⁡(⟨u,νi⟩)∏j≠i⟨νi−νj,u⟩.\displaystyle\int_{\Delta}f^{(n)}(\langle u,x\rangle)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n}=n!{\operatorname{vol}}_{n}(\Delta)\sum_{i=0}^{n}\frac{f(\langle u,\nu_{i}\rangle)}{\prod_{j\neq i}\langle\nu_{i}-\nu_{j},u\rangle}.
Proof.

This follows from Proposition 7.3 and equation (7.12). ∎

In the next section, we will have to compute integrals over a polytope of functions of the form ℓ⁡(x)​log⁡(ℓ⁡(x))\ell(x)\log(\ell(x)) where ℓ\ell is an affine function. The following result gives the value of such integral for the case of a simplex.

Proposition 7.15.

Let Δ⊂ℝn\Delta\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} be a simplex of dimension nn and let ℓ:ℝn→ℝ\ell\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be an affine function which is non-negative on Δ\Delta. Write ℓ⁡(x)=⟨u,x⟩−λ\ell(x)=\langle u,x\rangle-\lambda for some vector uu and constant λ\lambda. Then 1voln⁡(Δ)​∫Δℓ⁡(x)​log⁡(ℓ⁡(x))​d​voln\displaystyle\frac{1}{\operatorname{vol}_{n}(\Delta)}\int_{\Delta}\ell(x)\log(\ell(x))\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n} equals

(7.16) ∑V∈Δ⁡(u)∑β′(nn−|β′|)​ℓ⁡(V)​(log⁡(ℓ⁡(V))−∑j=2|β′|+11j)(|β′|+1)​∏ν∉V(−(ℓ⁡(ν)ℓ⁡(V)−1)βν′),\sum_{V\in\Delta(u)}\sum_{\beta^{\prime}}\binom{n}{n-|\beta^{\prime}|}\frac{\ell(V)\left(\log(\ell(V))-\sum_{j=2}^{|\beta^{\prime}|+1}\frac{1}{j}\right)}{(|\beta^{\prime}|+1)\prod_{\nu\notin V}\left(-\big(\frac{\ell(\nu)}{\ell(V)}-1\big)^{\beta^{\prime}_{\nu}}\right)},

where the second sum is over β′∈(ℕ×)n−dim(V)\beta^{\prime}\in(\mathbb{N}^{\times})^{n-\dim(V)} with |β′|≤n|\beta^{\prime}|\leq n and the product is over the n−dim(V)n-\dim(V) vertices ν\nu of Δ\Delta not in VV. In case ℓ⁡(x)\ell(x) is the defining equation of a hyperplane containing a facet FF of Δ\Delta,

(7.17) 1voln⁡(Δ)​∫Δℓ⁡(x)​log⁡(ℓ⁡(x))​d​x=ℓ⁡(νF)n+1​(log⁡(ℓ⁡(νF))−∑j=2n+11j),\frac{1}{\operatorname{vol}_{n}(\Delta)}\int_{\Delta}\ell(x)\log(\ell(x))\,\text{\rm d}x=\frac{\ell(\nu_{F})}{n+1}\bigg(\log(\ell(\nu_{F}))-\sum_{j=2}^{n+1}\frac{1}{j}\bigg),

where νF\nu_{F} denotes the unique vertex of Δ\Delta not contained in FF.

Proof.

This follows from formulae (7.4) and (7.11) with the function f(n)​(z)=(z−λ)​log⁡(z−λ)f^{(n)}(z)=(z-\lambda)\log(z-\lambda), a (n−k)(n-k)-th primitive of which is

f(k)​(z)=(z−λ)n−k+1(n−k+1)!​(log⁡(z−λ)−∑j=2n−k+11j).f^{(k)}(z)=\frac{(z-\lambda)^{n-k+1}}{(n-k+1)!}\left(\log(z-\lambda)-\sum_{j=2}^{n-k+1}\frac{1}{j}\right).

∎

We end this section with a lemma specific to integration on the standard simplex.

Lemma 7.18.

Let Δr\Delta^{r} be the standard simplex of ℝr\mathbb{R}^{r} and β=(β0,…,βr−1)∈ℕr\beta=(\beta_{0},\dots,\beta_{r-1})\in\mathbb{N}^{r}. Let f∈𝒞|β|+r​(ℝ)f\in\mathscr{C}^{|\beta|+r}(\mathbb{R}) where |β|=β0+⋯+βr−1|\beta|=\beta_{0}+\dots+\beta_{r-1}. For (w1,…,wr)∈Δr(w_{1},\dots,w_{r})\in\Delta^{r} write w0=1−w1−⋯−wrw_{0}=1-w_{1}-\dots-w_{r}. Then

∫Δr(∏i=0r−1wiβiβi!)​f(|β|+r)​(wr)​d​w1∧⋯∧d​wr=f⁡(1)−∑j=0|β|+r−1f(j)​(0)j!.\int_{\Delta^{r}}\bigg(\prod_{i=0}^{r-1}\frac{w_{i}^{\beta_{i}}}{\beta_{i}!}\bigg)f^{(|\beta|+r)}(w_{r})\,\text{\rm d}w_{1}\wedge\cdots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}w_{r}=f(1)-\sum_{j=0}^{|\beta|+r-1}\frac{f^{(j)}(0)}{j!}.
Proof.

We proceed by induction on rr. Let r=1r=1. Applying β0+1\beta_{0}+1 successive integrations by parts, the integral computes as

∑j=0β0[(1−w1)jj!​f(j)​(w1)]01=f⁡(1)−∑j=0β0f(j)​(0)j!,\sum_{j=0}^{\beta_{0}}\left[\frac{(1-w_{1})^{j}}{j!}f^{(j)}(w_{1})\right]_{0}^{1}=f(1)-\sum_{j=0}^{\beta_{0}}\frac{f^{(j)}(0)}{j!},

as stated. Let r≥2r\geq 2. Applying the case r−1r-1 to the function f⁡(z)=z|β|+r−1(|β|+r−1)!f(z)=\frac{z^{|\beta|+r-1}}{(|\beta|+r-1)!},

1β0!​…​βr−1!​∫Δr−1w0β0​w1β1​…​wr−1βr−1​d​w1∧⋯∧d​wr−1=1(|β|+r−1)!\frac{1}{\beta_{0}!\dots\beta_{r-1}!}\int_{\Delta_{r-1}}w_{0}^{\beta_{0}}w_{1}^{\beta_{1}}\dots w_{r-1}^{\beta_{r-1}}\,\text{\rm d}w_{1}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}w_{r-1}=\frac{1}{(|\beta|+r-1)!}

and, after rescaling,

1β0!​…​βr−1!​∫(1−wr)​Δr−1w0β0​w1β1​…​wr−1βr−1​d​w1∧⋯∧d​wr−1=(1−wr)|β|+r−1(|β|+r−1)!.\frac{1}{\beta_{0}!\dots\beta_{r-1}!}\int_{(1-w_{r})\Delta_{r-1}}w_{0}^{\beta_{0}}w_{1}^{\beta_{1}}\dots w_{r-1}^{\beta_{r-1}}\,\text{\rm d}w_{1}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}w_{r-1}=\frac{(1-w_{r})^{|\beta|+r-1}}{(|\beta|+r-1)!}.

Therefore, the left-hand side of the equality to be proved reduces to

1(|β|+r−1)!​∫01(1−wr)|β|+r−1​f(|β|+r)​(wr)​d​wr.\frac{1}{(|\beta|+r-1)!}\int_{0}^{1}(1-w_{r})^{|\beta|+r-1}f^{(|\beta|+r)}(w_{r})\,\text{\rm d}w_{r}.

Applying the case r=1r=1 and index |β|+r−1∈ℕ|\beta|+r-1\in\mathbb{N}, we find that this integral equals f⁡(1)−∑j=0|β|+r−1f(j)​(0)/j!f(1)-\sum_{j=0}^{|\beta|+r-1}f^{(j)}(0)/j!, which concludes the proof. ∎

Corollary 7.19.

Let α∈ℕr+1\alpha\in\mathbb{N}^{r+1}. For (w1,…,wr)∈Δr(w_{1},\dots,w_{r})\in\Delta^{r}, write w0=1−w1−⋯−wrw_{0}=1-w_{1}-\dots-w_{r}. Then

∫Δrw0α0​w1α1​…​wrαr​d​w1∧⋯∧d​wr=α0!​…​αr!(|α|+r)!\int_{\Delta^{r}}w_{0}^{\alpha_{0}}w_{1}^{\alpha_{1}}\dots w_{r}^{\alpha_{r}}\,\text{\rm d}w_{1}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}w_{r}=\frac{\alpha_{0}!\dots\alpha_{r}!}{(|\alpha|+r)!}

and, for i=0,…,ri=0,\dots,r,

∫Δrw0α0w1α1…wrαrlog(wi)dw1∧⋯∧dwr=−α0!​…​αr!(|α|+r)!∑j=αi+1|α|+r1j.\int_{\Delta^{r}}w_{0}^{\alpha_{0}}w_{1}^{\alpha_{1}}\dots w_{r}^{\alpha_{r}}\log(w_{i})\,\text{\rm d}w_{1}\wedge\dots\wedge\,\text{\rm d}w_{r}=-\frac{\alpha_{0}!\dots\alpha_{r}!}{(|\alpha|+r)!}\sum_{j=\alpha_{i}+1}^{|\alpha|+r}\frac{1}{j}.
Proof.

The first integral follows from Lemma 7.18 applied to β=(α0,…,αr−1)\beta=(\alpha_{0},\dots,\alpha_{r-1}) and f⁡(z)=z|α|+r(|α|+r)!f(z)=\frac{z^{|\alpha|+r}}{(|\alpha|+r)!}. The second one follows similarly, applying Lemma 7.18 to the function f⁡(z)=z|α|+r(|α|+r)!​(log⁡(z)−∑j=αi+1|α|+r1j)f(z)=\frac{z^{|\alpha|+r}}{(|\alpha|+r)!}\left(\log(z)-\sum_{j=\alpha_{i}+1}^{|\alpha|+r}\frac{1}{j}\right), after some possible permutation (for i=1,…,r−1i=1,\dots,r-1) or linear change of variables (for i=0i=0). ∎

7.2. Metrics, heights and entropy

In this section we will consider some metrics arising from polytopes. We will use the notation of §4 and §5. In particular, we consider a split torus over the field of rational numbers 𝕋≃𝔾m,ℚn\mathbb{T}\simeq\mathbb{G}_{m,\mathbb{Q}}^{n} and we denote by N,M,Nℝ,MℝN,M,N_{\mathbb{R}},M_{\mathbb{R}} the lattices and dual spaces corresponding to 𝕋\mathbb{T}.

Let Δ⊂Mℝ\Delta\subset M_{\mathbb{R}} be a lattice polytope of dimension nn. Let ℓi\ell_{i}, i=1,…,ri=1,\dots,r, be affine functions on MℝM_{\mathbb{R}} defined as ℓi​(x)=⟨ui,x⟩−λi\ell_{i}(x)=\langle u_{i},x\rangle-\lambda_{i} for some ui∈Nℝu_{i}\in N_{\mathbb{R}} and λi∈ℝ\lambda_{i}\in\mathbb{R} such that ℓi≥0\ell_{i}\geq 0 on Δ\Delta and let also ci>0c_{i}>0. Write ℓ=(ℓ1,…,ℓr)\ell=(\ell_{1},\dots,\ell_{r}) and c=(c1,…,cr)c=(c_{1},\dots,c_{r}). We consider the function ϑΔ,ℓ,c:Δ→ℝ\vartheta_{\Delta,\ell,c}\colon\Delta\to\mathbb{R} defined, for x∈Δx\in\Delta, by

(7.20) ϑΔ,ℓ,c(x)=−∑i=1rciℓi(x)log(ℓi(x)).\vartheta_{\Delta,\ell,c}(x)=-\sum_{i=1}^{r}c_{i}\ell_{i}(x)\log(\ell_{i}(x)).

When Δ,ℓ,c\Delta,\ell,c are clear from the context, we write for short ϑ=ϑΔ,ℓ,c\vartheta=\vartheta_{\Delta,\ell,c}.

Lemma 7.21.

Let notation be as above.

  1. (1)

    The function ϑΔ,ℓ,c\vartheta_{\Delta,\ell,c} is concave.

  2. (2)

    If the family {ui}i\{u_{i}\}_{i} generates NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}, then ϑΔ,ℓ,c\vartheta_{\Delta,\ell,c} is strictly concave.

  3. (3)

    If Δ=⋂i{x∈Mℝ|ℓi​(x)≥0}\Delta=\bigcap_{i}\{x\in M_{\mathbb{R}}|\ell_{i}(x)\geq 0\}, then the restriction of ϑΔ,ℓ,c\vartheta_{\Delta,\ell,c} to Δ∘\Delta^{\circ} is of Legendre type (Definition 3.51).

Proof.

Let 1≤i≤r1\leq i\leq r and consider the affine map ℓi:Δ→ℝ≥0\ell_{i}\colon\Delta\to\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}. We have that −z​log⁡(z)-z\log(z) is a strictly concave function on ℝ≥0\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} and −ℓi​log⁡(ℓi)=ℓi∗​(−z​log⁡(z))-\ell_{i}\log(\ell_{i})=\ell_{i}^{*}(-z\log(z)). Hence, each function −ci​ℓi​(x)​log⁡(ℓi​(x))-c_{i}\ell_{i}(x)\log(\ell_{i}(x)) is concave and so is ϑ\vartheta, as stated in (1)

For statement (2), let x1,x2x_{1},x_{2} be two different points of Δ\Delta. The assumption that {ui}i\{u_{i}\}_{i} generates NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} implies that ℓi0​(x1)≠ℓi0​(x2)\ell_{i_{0}}(x_{1})\neq\ell_{i_{0}}(x_{2}) for some i0i_{0}. Hence, the affine map ℓi0\ell_{i_{0}} gives an injection of the segment x1​x2¯{\overline{x_{1}x_{2}}} into ℝ≥0\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}. We deduce that −ci0​ℓi0​log⁡(ℓi0)-c_{i_{0}}\ell_{i_{0}}\log(\ell_{i_{0}}) is strictly concave on x1​x2¯{\overline{x_{1}x_{2}}} and so is ϑ\vartheta. Varying x1,x2x_{1},x_{2}, we deduce that ϑ\vartheta is strictly concave on Δ\Delta.

For statement (3), it is clear that ϑ|Δ∘\vartheta|_{\Delta^{\circ}} is differentiable. Moreover, the assumption that Δ\Delta is the intersection of the halfspaces defined by the ℓi\ell_{i}’s implies that the uiu_{i}’s generate NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} and so ϑ\vartheta is strictly concave. The gradient of ϑ\vartheta is given, for x∈Δ∘x\in\Delta^{\circ}, by

(7.22) ∇ϑ(x)=−∑i=1rciui(log(ℓi(x)+1).\nabla\vartheta(x)=-\sum_{i=1}^{r}c_{i}u_{i}(\log(\ell_{i}(x)+1).

Let ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| be a fixed norm on MℝM_{\mathbb{R}} and (xj)j≥0(x_{j})_{j\geq 0} a sequence in Δ∘\Delta^{\circ} converging to a point in the border. Then there exists some i1i_{1} such ℓi1​(xj)→j0\ell_{i_{1}}(x_{j})\stackrel{{\scriptstyle j}}{{\to}}0. Thus, ‖∇ϑ​(x)‖→j∞\|\nabla\vartheta(x)\|\stackrel{{\scriptstyle j}}{{\to}}\infty and the statement follows. ∎

Definition 7.23.

Let ΣΔ\Sigma_{\Delta} and ΨΔ\Psi_{\Delta} be the fan and the support function on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} induced by Δ\Delta. Let (XΣΔ,DΨΔ)(X_{\Sigma_{\Delta}},D_{\Psi_{\Delta}}) be the associated polarized toric variety over ℚ\mathbb{Q} and write L=𝒪⁡(DΨΔ)L={\mathcal{O}}(D_{\Psi_{\Delta}}). By Lemma 7.21(1), ϑ\vartheta is a concave function on Δ\Delta. By Theorem 5.73, it corresponds to some approachable toric metric on L⁡(ℂ)L(\mathbb{C}). We denote this metric by ∥⋅∥Δ,ℓ,c\|\cdot\|_{\Delta,\ell,c}. We write L¯{\overline{L}} for the line bundle LL equipped with the metric ∥⋅∥Δ,ℓ,c\|\cdot\|_{\Delta,\ell,c} at the Archimedean place of ℚ\mathbb{Q} and with the canonical metric at the non-Archimedean places. This is an example of an adelic toric metric.

Example 7.24.

Following the notation in Example 3.53, consider the standard simplex Δn\Delta^{n} and the concave function ϑ=12​εn\vartheta=\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon_{n} on Δn\Delta^{n}. From examples 3.53 and 5.18(1), we deduce that the corresponding metric is the Fubini-Study metric of 𝒪​(1)an{\mathcal{O}}(1)^{{\text{\rm an}}}.

In case Δ\Delta is the intersection of the halfspaces defined by the ℓi\ell_{i}’s, Lemma 7.21(3) shows that ϑ|Δ∘\vartheta|_{\Delta^{\circ}} of Legendre type (Definition 3.51). By Theorem 3.52 and equation (7.22), the gradient of ϑ\vartheta gives a homeomorphism between Δ∘\Delta^{\circ} and NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} and, for x∈Δ∘x\in\Delta^{\circ},

(7.25) ϑ∨(∇ϑ(x))=−∑i=1rciλilog(ℓi(x))+ci⟨ui,x⟩.\vartheta^{\vee}(\nabla\vartheta(x))=-\sum_{i=1}^{r}c_{i}\lambda_{i}\log(\ell_{i}(x))+c_{i}\langle u_{i},x\rangle.

This gives an explicit expression of the function ψ∥⋅∥Δ,ℓ,c=ϑ∨\psi_{\|\cdot\|_{\Delta,\ell,c}}=\vartheta^{\vee}, and a fortiori of the metric ∥⋅∥Δ,ℓ,c{\|\cdot\|_{\Delta,\ell,c}}, in the coordinates of the polytope. Up to our knowledge, there is no simple expression for ψ\psi in linear coordinates of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}, except for special cases like Fubini-Study.

Remark 7.26.

This kind of metrics are interesting when studying the Kähler geometry of toric varieties. Given a Delzant polytope Δ⊂Mℝ\Delta\subset M_{\mathbb{R}}, Guillemin has constructed a “canonical” Kähler structure on the associated symplectic toric variety [Gui95]. The corresponding symplectic potential is the function −ϑΔ,ℓ,c-\vartheta_{\Delta,\ell,c}, for the case when rr is the number of facets of Δ\Delta, ci=1/2c_{i}=1/2 for all ii, and uiu_{i} is a primitive vector in NN and λi\lambda_{i} is an integer such that Δ={x∈Mℝ|⟨ui,x⟩≥λi,i=1,…,r}\Delta=\{x\in M_{\mathbb{R}}|\langle u_{i},x\rangle\geq\lambda_{i},i=1,\dots,r\}, see [Gui95, Appendix 2, (3.9)].

In this case, the metric ∥⋅∥Δ,ℓ,c\|\cdot\|_{\Delta,\ell,c} on the line bundle 𝒪​(DΨ)an{\mathcal{O}}(D_{\Psi})^{{\text{\rm an}}} is smooth and positive and, as explained in Remark 5.74, its Chern form gives this canonical Kähler form.

We obtain the following formula for the height of XΣΔX_{\Sigma_{\Delta}} with respect to the adelic metrized line bundle L¯\overline{L}, in terms of the coefficients Ck​(Δ,ui,V)C_{k}(\Delta,u_{i},V).

Proposition 7.27.

Let notation be as in Definition 7.23. Then hL¯⁡(XΣΔ)\operatorname{h}_{\overline{L}}(X_{\Sigma_{\Delta}}) equals

(n+1)!​∑i=1rci​∑V∈Δ⁡(ui)∑k=0dim(V)Ck​(Δ,ui,V)​ℓi​(V)n−k+1(n−k+1)!​(∑j=2n−k+11j−log⁡(ℓi​(V))).{(n+1)!}\sum_{i=1}^{r}c_{i}\sum_{V\in\Delta(u_{i})}\sum_{k=0}^{\dim(V)}C_{k}(\Delta,u_{i},V)\frac{\ell_{i}(V)^{n-k+1}}{(n-k+1)!}\left(\sum_{j=2}^{n-k+1}\frac{1}{j}-\log(\ell_{i}(V))\right).

Suppose furthermore that Δ⊂ℝn\Delta\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} is a simplex, r=n+1r=n+1 and that ℓi\ell_{i}, i=1,…,n+1i=1,\dots,n+1, are affine functions such that Δ=⋂i{x∈Mℝ|ℓi​(x)≥0}\Delta=\bigcap_{i}\{x\in M_{\mathbb{R}}|\ell_{i}(x)\geq 0\}. Then

(7.28) hL¯⁡(XΣΔ)=n!​volM⁡(Δ)​∑i=1n+1ci​ℓi​(νi)​(∑j=2n+11j−log⁡(ℓi​(νi))).\operatorname{h}_{\overline{L}}(X_{\Sigma_{\Delta}})=n!\operatorname{vol}_{M}(\Delta)\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}c_{i}\ell_{i}(\nu_{i})\bigg(\sum_{j=2}^{n+1}\frac{1}{j}-\log(\ell_{i}(\nu_{i}))\bigg).

where νi\nu_{i} is the unique vertex of Δ\Delta not contained in the facet defined by ℓi\ell_{i}.

Proof.

The first statement follows readily from Theorem 6.37 and Proposition 7.3 applied to the functions fi​(z)=(log⁡(z−λi)−∑j=2n+11j)​(z−λi)n+1/(n+1)!f_{i}(z)=\left(\log(z-\lambda_{i})-\sum_{j=2}^{n+1}\frac{1}{j}\right)(z-\lambda_{i})^{n+1}/(n+1)!. The second statement follows similarly from Proposition 7.15. ∎

Example 7.29.

Let 𝒪⁡(1){\mathcal{O}}(1) be the universal line bundle of ℙn\mathbb{P}^{n}. The Fubini-Study metric of 𝒪​(1)an{\mathcal{O}}(1)^{{\text{\rm an}}} corresponds to the case of the standard simplex, ℓi​(x)=xi\ell_{i}(x)=x_{i}, i=1,…,ni=1,\dots,n and ℓn+1​(x)=1−∑i=1nxi\ell_{n+1}(x)=1-\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i} and the choice ci=1/2c_{i}=1/2 for all ii. Hence we recover from (7.28) the well known expression for the height of ℙn\mathbb{P}^{n} with respect to the Fubini-Study metric in [BGS94, Lemma 3.3.1]:

h𝒪⁡(1)¯⁡(ℙn)=n+12​∑j=2n+11j.\operatorname{h}_{{\overline{{\mathcal{O}}(1)}}}(\mathbb{P}^{n})=\frac{n+1}{2}\sum_{j=2}^{n+1}\frac{1}{j}.
Example 7.30.

In dimension 11, a polytope is an interval of the form Δ=[m0,m1]\Delta=[m_{0},m_{1}] for some mi∈ℤm_{i}\in\mathbb{Z}. The corresponding roof function in (7.20) writes down, for x∈[m0,m1]x\in[m_{0},m_{1}], as

(7.31) ϑ(x)=−∑i=1rciℓi(x)log(ℓi(x))\vartheta(x)=-\sum_{i=1}^{r}c_{i}\ell_{i}(x)\log(\ell_{i}(x))

for affine function ℓi=ui​x−λi\ell_{i}=u_{i}x-\lambda_{i} which take non negative values on the Δ\Delta and ci>0c_{i}>0

The polarized toric variety corresponding to Δ\Delta is ℙ1\mathbb{P}^{1} together with the ample divisor m1​[(0:1)]−m0​[(1:0)]m_{1}[(0:1)]-m_{0}[(1:0)]. Write L=𝒪ℙ1​(x1−x0)L={\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(x_{1}-x_{0}) for the associate line bundle and L¯{\overline{L}} for the adelic metrized line bundle corresponding to the function ϑ\vartheta. The Legendre-Fenchel dual to −ci​ℓi​(x)​log⁡(ℓi​(x))-c_{i}\ell_{i}(x)\log(\ell_{i}(x)) is the function fi:ℝ→ℝf_{i}\colon\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} defined, for v∈ℝv\in\mathbb{R}, by

fi​(v)=λiui​v−ci​e−1−vci​ui.f_{i}(v)=\frac{\lambda_{i}}{u_{i}}v-c_{i}{\operatorname{e}}^{-1-\frac{v}{{c_{i}u_{i}}}}.

Therefore, the function ψ=ϑ∨\psi=\vartheta^{\vee} is the sup-convolution of these function, namely ψ=f1⊞⋯⊞fm\psi=f_{1}\boxplus\dots\boxplus f_{m} For the height, a simple computation shows that

hL¯⁡(ℙ1)=∫m0m1ϑ​d​x=∑i=1rci4​ui​[ℓi​(x)2​(1−2​log⁡(ℓi​(x)))]m0m1{\operatorname{h}_{\overline{L}}(\mathbb{P}^{1})}=\int_{m_{0}}^{m_{1}}\vartheta\,\text{\rm d}x=\sum_{i=1}^{r}\frac{c_{i}}{4u_{i}}\Big[\ell_{i}(x)^{2}\left(1-2\log(\ell_{i}(x))\right)\Big]^{m_{1}}_{m_{0}}

In some cases, the height of a toric variety with respect to the metrics constructed above has an interpretation in terms of the average entropy of some natural random processes. Let Γ\Gamma be an arbitrary polytope containing Δ\Delta. For a point x∈ri⁡(Δ)x\in\operatorname{ri}(\Delta), we consider the partition Πx\Pi_{x} of Γ\Gamma which consists of the cones ηx,F\eta_{x,F} of vertex xx and base the relative interior of each proper face FF of Γ\Gamma.

We consider Γ\Gamma as a probability space endowed with the uniform probability distribution and βx\beta_{x} the random variable which, for a point y∈Γy\in\Gamma, returns the base FF of the unique cone ηx,F\eta_{x,F} it belongs to. Clearly, the probability that a given face FF is returned is the ratio of the volume of the cone based on FF to the volume of Γ\Gamma. We have voln⁡(ηx,F)=n−1​dist⁡(x,F)​voln−1⁡(F){\operatorname{vol}}_{n}(\eta_{x,F})={n}^{-1}{\operatorname{dist}}(x,F){\operatorname{vol}}_{n-1}(F) where, as before, voln\operatorname{vol}_{n} and voln−1\operatorname{vol}_{n-1} denote the Lebesgue measure on ℝn\mathbb{R}^{n} and on LFL_{F}, respectively. Hence,

(7.32) P⁡(βx=F)={dist⁡(x,F)​voln−1⁡(F)n​voln​(Γ) if ​dim(F)=n−1,0 if ​dim(F)≤n−2.P(\beta_{x}=F)=\begin{cases}\displaystyle\frac{{\operatorname{dist}}(x,F){\operatorname{vol}}_{n-1}(F)}{n{\operatorname{vol}}_{n}(\Gamma)}&\text{ if }\dim(F)=n-1,\\ 0&\text{ if }\dim(F)\leq n-2.\end{cases}

The entropy of the random variable βx\beta_{x} is

ℰ(x)=−∑FP(βx=F)log(P(βx=F)),{\mathcal{E}}(x)=-\sum_{F}P(\beta_{x}=F)\log(P(\beta_{x}=F)),

where the sum is over the facets FF of Γ\Gamma.

For each facet FF of Γ\Gamma we let uF∈ℝnu_{F}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} be the inner normal vector to FF of Euclidean norm (n−1)!​voln−1⁡(F)(n-1)!\operatorname{vol}_{n-1}(F) and λF=ΨΓ​(uF)∈ℝ\lambda_{F}=\Psi_{\Gamma}(u_{F})\in\mathbb{R} and consider the affine form ℓF\ell_{F} defined as ℓF​(x)=⟨uF,x⟩−λF\ell_{F}(x)=\langle u_{F},x\rangle-\lambda_{F}. Hence, Γ={x∈Mℝ|ℓF​(x)≥0}\Gamma=\{x\in M_{\mathbb{R}}|\ell_{F}(x)\geq 0\}. Let also cF=cc_{F}=c for some constant c>0c>0. By the Minkowski condition, ∑FuF=0\sum_{F}u_{F}=0. Hence ∑FℓF=−∑FλF\sum_{F}\ell_{F}=-\sum_{F}\lambda_{F}.

Remark 7.33.

Suppose that Γ\Gamma is a lattice polytope and let FF be a facet of Γ\Gamma. Recall that M⁡(F)M(F) is the lattice LF∩ML_{F}\cap M and let M​(F)′M(F)^{\prime} be the sublattice of M⁡(F)M(F) generated by the differences of the lattice points in FF. Then the vector uFu_{F} can be alternatively defined as [M(F):M(F)′][M(F):M(F)^{\prime}] times the primitive inner normal vector to the facet FF.

The concave function ϑ=−∑FcℓF(x)log(ℓF(x))\vartheta=-\sum_{F}{c\,\ell_{F}(x)}\log({\ell_{F}(x)}) belongs to the class of functions considered in Definition 7.23. Thus, we obtain a line bundle with an adelic toric metric L¯{\overline{L}} on XΔX_{\Delta}. For short, we write X=XΔX=X_{\Delta}. The following result shows that the average entropy of the random variable βx\beta_{x} with respect to the uniform distribution on Δ\Delta can be expressed in terms of the height of the toric variety XX with respect to L¯{\overline{L}}.

Proposition 7.34.

With the above notation,

1voln⁡(Δ)​∫Δℰ⁡(x)​d​voln=1n!​voln​(Γ)​(hL¯⁡(X)c⁡(n+1)​degL​(X)−log⁡(n!​voln⁡(Γ))​(∑FλF))\frac{1}{\operatorname{vol}_{n}(\Delta)}\int_{\Delta}{\mathcal{E}}(x)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n}=\frac{1}{n!\operatorname{vol}_{n}(\Gamma)}\bigg(\frac{\operatorname{h}_{{\overline{L}}}(X)}{c(n+1)\deg_{L}(X)}-{\log(n!\operatorname{vol}_{n}(\Gamma))}\Big(\sum_{F}\lambda_{F}\Big)\bigg)

where the sum is over the facets FF of Γ\Gamma. In particular, if Γ=Δ\Gamma=\Delta,

1voln⁡(Δ)​∫Δℰ⁡(x)​d​voln=hL¯⁡(X)c⁡(n+1)​degL​(X)2−log⁡(degL⁡(X))degL⁡(X)​(∑FλF).\frac{1}{\operatorname{vol}_{n}(\Delta)}\int_{\Delta}{\mathcal{E}}(x)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n}=\frac{\operatorname{h}_{{\overline{L}}}(X)}{c(n+1)\deg_{L}(X)^{2}}-\frac{\log(\deg_{L}(X))}{\deg_{L}(X)}\Big(\sum_{F}\lambda_{F}\Big).
Proof.

For x∈ri⁡(Δ)x\in\operatorname{ri}(\Delta) and FF a facet of Γ\Gamma, we deduce from equation (7.32) that P⁡(βx=F)=ℓF​(x)/(n!​voln⁡(Γ))P(\beta_{x}=F)=\ell_{F}(x)/(n!\operatorname{vol}_{n}(\Gamma)). Hence,

ℰ⁡(x)\displaystyle{\mathcal{E}}(x) =−∑FℓF​(x)n!​voln​(Γ)log(ℓF​(x)n!​voln​(Γ))\displaystyle=-\sum_{F}\frac{\ell_{F}(x)}{n!{\operatorname{vol}_{n}}(\Gamma)}\log\Big(\frac{\ell_{F}(x)}{n!{\operatorname{vol}_{n}}(\Gamma)}\Big)
=1n!​voln​(Γ)(−∑FℓF(x)log(ℓF(x))−log(n!voln(Γ))(∑FλF))\displaystyle=\frac{1}{n!{\operatorname{vol}_{n}}(\Gamma)}\bigg(-\sum_{F}{\ell_{F}(x)}\log({\ell_{F}(x)})-\log({n!{\operatorname{vol}_{n}}(\Gamma)})\Big(\sum_{F}\lambda_{F}\Big)\bigg)
=1n!​voln​(Γ)​(ϑ⁡(x)c−log⁡(n!​voln⁡(Γ))​(∑FλF)).\displaystyle=\frac{1}{n!{\operatorname{vol}_{n}}(\Gamma)}\bigg(\frac{\vartheta(x)}{c}-\log({n!{\operatorname{vol}_{n}}(\Gamma)})\Big(\sum_{F}\lambda_{F}\Big)\bigg).

The result then follows from Theorem 6.37. ∎

Example 7.35.

The Fubini-Study metric of 𝒪​(1)an{\mathcal{O}}(1)^{{\text{\rm an}}} corresponds to the case when Γ\Gamma and Δ\Delta are the standard simplex Δn\Delta^{n} and c=1/2c=1/2. In that case, the average entropy of the random variable βx\beta_{x} is

1n!​∫Δnℰ⁡(x)​d​voln=2​h𝒪⁡(1)¯​(ℙn)(n+1)=∑j=2n+11j.\frac{1}{n!}\int_{\Delta^{n}}{\mathcal{E}}(x)\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{n}=\frac{2\operatorname{h}_{{\overline{{\mathcal{O}}(1)}}}(\mathbb{P}^{n})}{(n+1)}=\sum_{j=2}^{n+1}\frac{1}{j}.
Remark 7.36.

In case Δ\Delta is a Delzant polytope whose facets have lattice volume 1, Γ=Δ\Gamma=\Delta, and c=1/2c=1/2, the roof function ϑ\vartheta coincides with the symplectic potential of Guillemin canonical Kähler metric, see Remark 7.26.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.