ScalingStacks

2.3. Algebraic metrics in the non-Archimedean case [02IT]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.3. Algebraic metrics in the non-Archimedean case

Let KK be a field complete with respect to a nontrivial non-Archimedean absolute value, as in the previous section. For simplicity, we will assume from now on that K∘K^{\circ} is a discrete valuation ring (DVR), and we will fix a generator ϖ\varpi of its maximal ideal K∘⁣∘K^{\circ\circ}. This is the only case we will need in the sequel and it allows us to use a more elementary definition of measures and local heights. Nevertheless, the reader can consult [Gub03, Gub07] for the general case.

Let XX be an algebraic variety over KK and LL a line bundle on XX. Let XanX^{{\text{\rm an}}} and LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} be their respective analytifications.

Definition 2.10.

A metric on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} is an assignment that, to each local section ss of LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} on an open subset U⊂XanU\subset X^{{\text{\rm an}}}, associates a continuous function

‖s⁡(⋅)‖:U⟶ℝ≥0,\|s(\cdot)\|\colon U\longrightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0},

such that, for all p∈Up\in U,

  1. (1)

    ‖s⁡(p)‖=0\|s(p)\|=0 if and only if s⁡(p)=0s(p)=0;

  2. (2)

    for any λ∈𝒪Xan​(U)\lambda\in\mathcal{O}_{X^{{\text{\rm an}}}}(U), it holds ‖(λ​s)​(p)‖=|λ⁡(p)|​‖s⁡(p)‖.\|(\lambda s)(p)\|=|\lambda(p)|\,\|s(p)\|.

The pair L¯:=(L,∥⋅∥){\overline{L}}:=(L,\|\cdot\|) is called a metrized line bundle.

Models of varieties and line bundles give rise to an important class of metrics. To introduce and study these metrics, we first consider the notion of model of varieties. Write S=Spec⁡(K∘)S=\operatorname{Spec}(K^{\circ}). The scheme SS has two points: the special point oo and the generic point η\eta. Given a scheme 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} over SS, we set 𝒳o=𝒳×Spec⁡(k)\mathcal{X}_{o}=\mathcal{X}\times\operatorname{Spec}(k) and 𝒳η=𝒳×Spec⁡(K)\mathcal{X}_{\eta}=\mathcal{X}\times\operatorname{Spec}(K) for its special fibre and its generic fibre, respectively.

Definition 2.11.

A model over SS of XX is a flat scheme 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} of finite type over SS together with a fixed isomorphism X≃𝒳ηX\simeq\mathcal{X}_{\eta}. This isomorphism is part of the model, and so we can identify 𝒳η{\mathcal{X}}_{\eta} with XX. When XX is proper, we say that the model is proper whenever the scheme 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is proper over SS.

Given a model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} of XX, there is a reduction map defined on a closed subset of XanX^{{\text{\rm an}}} with values in 𝒳o\mathcal{X}_{o} [Ber90, §2.4]. This map can be described as follows. Let {𝒰i}i∈I\{\mathcal{U}_{i}\}_{i\in I} be a finite open affine cover of 𝒳\mathcal{X} by schemes over SS of finite type and, for each ii, let 𝒜i{\mathcal{A}}_{i} be a K∘K^{\circ}-algebra such that 𝒰i=Spec⁡(𝒜i){\mathcal{U}}_{i}=\operatorname{Spec}({\mathcal{A}}_{i}). Set Ui=𝒰i∩XU_{i}=\mathcal{U}_{i}\cap X and let CiC_{i} be the closed subset of UianU_{i}^{{\text{\rm an}}} defined as

(2.12) Ci={p∈Uian∣|a(p)|≤1,∀a∈𝒜i}C_{i}=\{p\in U_{i}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\mid|a(p)|\leq 1,\forall a\in{\mathcal{A}}_{i}\}

For each p∈Cip\in C_{i}, the prime ideal 𝔮p:={a∈𝒜i∣|a⁡(p)|<1}⊂𝒜i\mathfrak{q}_{p}:=\{a\in{\mathcal{A}}_{i}\mid|a(p)|<1\}\subset{\mathcal{A}}_{i} contains K∘⁣∘​𝒜iK^{\circ\circ}{\mathcal{A}}_{i} and so it determines a point red⁡(p):=𝔮p/K∘⁣∘​𝒜i∈𝒰i,o⊂𝒳o{\operatorname{red}}(p):=\mathfrak{q}_{p}/K^{\circ\circ}{\mathcal{A}}_{i}\in\mathcal{U}_{i,o}\subset\mathcal{X}_{o}. Consider the closed subset C=⋃iCi⊂XanC=\bigcup_{i}C_{i}\subset X^{{\text{\rm an}}}. The above maps glue together to define a map

(2.13) red:C⟶𝒳o.{\operatorname{red}}\colon C\longrightarrow\mathcal{X}_{o}.

This map is surjective and anti-continuous, in the sense that the preimages of the open subsets are closed [Ber90, §2.4]. For each irreducible component VV of 𝒳o{\mathcal{X}}_{o}, there is a unique point ξV∈C\xi_{V}\in C such that

(2.14) red⁡(ξV)=ηV,{\operatorname{red}}(\xi_{V})=\eta_{V},

where ηV\eta_{V} denotes the generic point of VV [Ber90, Proposition 2.4.4]. The finite subset {ξV}V⊂Xan\{\xi_{V}\}_{V}\subset X^{{\text{\rm an}}} is called the Shilov boundary of XanX^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Observe that it depends on the choice of 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}.

If both XX and 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} are proper, then C=XanC=X^{{\text{\rm an}}} and the reduction map is defined on the whole of XanX^{{\text{\rm an}}}. If both XX and 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} are normal, we can compute the Shilov boundary. Let VV be an irreducible component of 𝒳o\mathcal{X}_{o} and choose a finite type affine open subset 𝒰=Spec⁡(𝒜)⊂𝒳\mathcal{U}=\operatorname{Spec}({\mathcal{A}})\subset{\mathcal{X}} containing ηV\eta_{V}. Put A=𝒜⊗K∘K{A}={\mathcal{A}}\otimes_{K^{\circ}}K and U=𝒰∩XU={\mathcal{U}}\cap X. Then the point ξV∈U⊂Xan\xi_{V}\in U\subset X^{{\text{\rm an}}} is the multiplicative seminorm on AA given by

(2.15) |a⁡(ξV)|=|ϖ|ordV⁡(a)/ordV⁡(ϖ),|a(\xi_{V})|=|\varpi|^{{\operatorname{ord}}_{V}(a)/{\operatorname{ord}}_{V}(\varpi)},

for each a∈Aa\in A, where ordV⁡(f){\operatorname{ord}}_{V}(f) is the order of ff at the generic point of VV.

Next we recall the definition of models of line bundles. Let LL be a line bundle on XX.

Definition 2.16.

A model over SS of (X,L)(X,L) is a triple (𝒳,ℒ,e)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},e), where 𝒳\mathcal{X} is a model over SS of XX, ℒ\mathcal{L} is a line bundle on 𝒳\mathcal{X} and e≥1e\geq 1 is an integer, together with a fixed isomorphism ℒ|X≃L⊗e\mathcal{L}|_{X}\simeq L^{\otimes e}. When e=1e=1, the model (𝒳,ℒ,1)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},1) will be denoted (𝒳,ℒ)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L}) for short. A model of (𝒳,ℒ,e)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},e) is called proper whenever 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is proper.

We assume that the variety XX is proper for the rest of this section. To a proper model of a line bundle we can associate a metric.

Definition 2.17.

Let (𝒳,ℒ,e)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}},e) be a proper model of (X,L)(X,L). Let ss be a local section of LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} defined at a point p∈Xanp\in X^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Let 𝒰⊂𝒳\mathcal{U}\subset{\mathcal{X}} be a trivializing open neighbourhood of red⁡(p){\operatorname{red}}(p) and σ\sigma a generator of ℒ|𝒰{\mathcal{L}}|_{{\mathcal{U}}}. Let U=𝒰∩XU={\mathcal{U}}\cap X and λ∈𝒪Uan\lambda\in{\mathcal{O}}_{U^{{\text{\rm an}}}} such that s⊗e=λ​σs^{\otimes e}=\lambda\sigma on UanU^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Then, the metric induced by the proper model (𝒳,ℒ,e)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}},e) on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}},, denoted ∥⋅∥𝒳,ℒ,e\|\cdot\|_{{\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}},e}, is given by

‖s⁡(p)‖𝒳,ℒ,e=|λ⁡(p)|1/e.\|s(p)\|_{{\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}},e}=|\lambda(p)|^{1/e}.

This definition does neither depend on the choice of the open set 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} nor of the section σ\sigma, and it gives a metric on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}}. The metrics on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} obtained in this way are called algebraic, and a pair L¯:=(L,∥⋅∥𝒳,ℒ,e){\overline{L}}:=(L,\|\cdot\|_{{\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}},e}) is called an algebraic metrized line bundle.

Different models may give rise to the same metric.

Proposition 2.18.

Let (𝒳,ℒ,e)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},e) and (𝒳′,ℒ′,e′)(\mathcal{X}^{\prime},{\mathcal{L}}^{\prime},e^{\prime}) be proper models of (X,L)(X,L), and f:𝒳′→𝒳f\colon\mathcal{X}^{\prime}\to\mathcal{X} a morphism of models such that (ℒ′)⊗e≃f∗​ℒ⊗e′({\mathcal{L}}^{\prime})^{\otimes e}\simeq f^{\ast}{\mathcal{L}}^{\otimes e^{\prime}}. Then the metrics on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} induced by both models agree.

Proof.

Let ss be a local section of LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} defined on a point p∈Xanp\in X^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Let 𝒰⊂𝒳{\mathcal{U}}\subset{\mathcal{X}} be a trivializing open neighbourhood of red𝒳⁡(p){\operatorname{red}}_{{\mathcal{X}}}(p), the reduction of pp with respect to the model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, and σ\sigma a generator of ℒ|𝒰{\mathcal{L}}|_{{\mathcal{U}}}. Let λ\lambda be an analytic function on (𝒰∩X)an({\mathcal{U}}\cap X)^{{\text{\rm an}}} such that s⊗e=λ​σs^{\otimes e}=\lambda\sigma.

We have that red𝒳′⁡(p)=f−1​(red⁡(p)){\operatorname{red}}_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(p)=f^{-1}({\operatorname{red}}(p)) and 𝒰′:=f−1​(𝒰){\mathcal{U}}^{\prime}:=f^{-1}({\mathcal{U}}) is a trivializing open set of ℒ′⊗e{\mathcal{L}}^{\prime\otimes e} with generator f∗​σ⊗e′f^{*}\sigma^{\otimes e^{\prime}}. Then s⊗e​e′=λe′​f∗​σ⊗e′s^{\otimes ee^{\prime}}=\lambda^{e^{\prime}}f^{*}\sigma^{\otimes e^{\prime}} on (𝒰′∩X)an=(𝒰∩X)an({\mathcal{U}}^{\prime}\cap X)^{{\text{\rm an}}}=({\mathcal{U}}\cap X)^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Now the proposition follows directly from Definition 2.17. ∎

The inverse image of an algebraic metric is algebraic.

Proposition 2.19.

Let φ:X1→X2\varphi\colon X_{1}\to X_{2} be a morphism of proper algebraic varieties over KK and L¯2{\overline{L}}_{2} a line bundle on X2X_{2} equipped with an algebraic metric. Assume that X1X_{1} admits a proper model. Then φ∗​L¯2\varphi^{*}{\overline{L}}_{2}, the inverse image under φ\varphi of L¯2{\overline{L}}_{2}, is a line bundle on X1X_{1} equipped with an algebraic metric.

Proof.

Let (𝒳2,ℒ2,e)({\mathcal{X}}_{2},{\mathcal{L}}_{2},e) be a proper model of (X2,L2)(X_{2},L_{2}) which induces the metric in L¯2{\overline{L}}_{2}, and 𝒳1′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}_{1} be a proper model of X1X_{1}. Let 𝒳1{\mathcal{X}}_{1} be the Zariski closure of the graph of φ\varphi in 𝒳1′×S𝒳2{\mathcal{X}}_{1}^{\prime}\times_{S}{\mathcal{X}}_{2}. This is a proper model of X1X_{1} equipped with a morphism φS:𝒳1→𝒳2\varphi_{S}\colon{\mathcal{X}}_{1}\to{\mathcal{X}}_{2}. Then (𝒳1,φS∗​ℒ2,e)({\mathcal{X}}_{1},\varphi_{S}^{*}{\mathcal{L}}_{2},e) is a proper model of (X1,φ∗​L2)(X_{1},\varphi^{*}L_{2}) which induces the metric of φ∗​L¯2\varphi^{*}{\overline{L}}_{2}. ∎

Next we give a second description of an algebraic metric. As before, let XX be a proper variety over KK and LL a line bundle on XX, and ∥⋅∥𝒳,ℒ,e\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},e} an algebraic metric on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Let p∈Xanp\in X^{{\text{\rm an}}} and put H=ℋ⁡(p)H=\mathscr{H}(p), which is a complete extension of KK. Let H∘H^{\circ} be its valuation ring, and oo and η\eta the special and the generic point of Spec⁡(H∘)\operatorname{Spec}(H^{\circ}), respectively. The point pp induces a morphism of schemes Spec⁡(H)→X\operatorname{Spec}(H)\to X. By the valuative criterion of properness, there is a unique extension

(2.20) p~:Spec⁡(H∘)⟶𝒳.\widetilde{p}\colon\operatorname{Spec}(H^{\circ})\longrightarrow\mathcal{X}.

It satisfies p~​(η)=π​(p)\widetilde{p}(\eta)=\pi(p), where π:Xan→X\pi\colon X^{{\text{\rm an}}}\rightarrow X is the natural map introduced at the beginning of §2.2, and p~​(o)=red⁡(p)\widetilde{p}(o)={\operatorname{red}}(p).

Proposition 2.21.

With notation as above, let ss be a local section of LL in a neighbourhood of π⁡(p)\pi(p). Then

(2.22) ∥s(p)∥𝒳,ℒ,e=inf{|a|1/e|a∈H×,a−1p~∗s⊗e∈p~∗ℒ}.\|s(p)\|_{\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},e}=\inf\big\{|a|^{1/e}\big|a\in H^{\times},a^{-1}{\widetilde{p}}^{\ast}s^{\otimes e}\in\widetilde{p}^{\ast}\mathcal{L}\big\}.
Proof.

Write ∥⋅∥=∥⋅∥𝒳,ℒ,e\|\cdot\|=\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},e} for short. Let 𝒰=Spec⁡(𝒜)∋red⁡(p)\mathcal{U}=\operatorname{Spec}({\mathcal{A}})\ni{\operatorname{red}}(p) be an open affine trivializing set of ℒ\mathcal{L} and σ\sigma be a generator of ℒ|𝒰\mathcal{L}|_{{\mathcal{U}}}. Then s⊗e=λ​σs^{\otimes e}=\lambda\sigma with λ\lambda in the fraction field of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. We have that λ⁡(p)∈H\lambda(p)\in H and, by definition, ‖s⁡(p)‖=|λ⁡(p)|1/e\|s(p)\|=|\lambda(p)|^{1/e}. If λ⁡(p)=0\lambda(p)=0, the equation is clearly satisfied. Denote temporarily by CC the right-hand side of (2.22). If λ⁡(p)≠0\lambda(p)\not=0,

λ​(p)−1​p~∗​s⊗e=p~∗​σ∈p~∗​ℒ.\lambda(p)^{-1}\widetilde{p}^{\ast}s^{\otimes e}=\widetilde{p}^{\ast}\sigma\in{\widetilde{p}}^{*}\mathcal{L}.

Hence ‖s⁡(p)‖≥C\|s(p)\|\geq C. Moreover, if a∈H×a\in H^{\times} is such that a−1​p~∗​s⊗e∈p~∗​ℒa^{-1}\widetilde{p}^{\ast}s^{\otimes e}\in{\widetilde{p}}^{*}\mathcal{L}, then there is an element α∈H∘∖{0}\alpha\in H^{\circ}\setminus\{0\} with a−1​p~∗​s⊗e=α​p~∗​σa^{-1}\widetilde{p}^{\ast}s^{\otimes e}=\alpha\widetilde{p}^{\ast}\sigma. Therefore, a=λ⁡(p)/αa=\lambda(p)/\alpha and |a|1/e=|λ⁡(p)|1/e/|α|1/e≥|λ⁡(p)|1/e|a|^{1/e}=|\lambda(p)|^{1/e}/|\alpha|^{1/e}\geq|\lambda(p)|^{1/e}. Thus, ‖s⁡(p)‖≤C\|s(p)\|\leq C. ∎

We give a third description of an algebraic metric in terms of intersection theory that makes evident the relationship with higher dimensional Arakelov theory. Let (𝒳,ℒ,e)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}},e) be a proper model of (X,L)(X,L) and ι:𝒴→𝒳\iota\colon{\mathcal{Y}}\to{\mathcal{X}} a closed algebraic curve. Let 𝒴~{\widetilde{{\mathcal{Y}}}} be the normalization of 𝒴{\mathcal{Y}} and ι~:𝒴~→𝒳{\widetilde{\iota}}\colon{\widetilde{{\mathcal{Y}}}}\to{\mathcal{X}} and ρ:𝒴~→Spec⁡(K∘)\rho\colon{\widetilde{{\mathcal{Y}}}}\to\operatorname{Spec}(K^{\circ}) the induced morphisms. Let ss be a rational section of ℒ{\mathcal{L}} such that div⁡(s)\operatorname{div}(s) intersects properly 𝒴{\mathcal{Y}}. Then the intersection number (ι⋅div⁡(s))(\iota\cdot\operatorname{div}(s)) is defined as

(ι⋅div⁡(s))=deg⁡(ρ∗​(div⁡(ι~∗​s))).(\iota\cdot\operatorname{div}(s))=\deg(\rho_{\ast}(\operatorname{div}({\widetilde{\iota}}^{\ast}s))).
Proposition 2.23.

With the above notation, let p∈Xalganp\in X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{{\text{\rm alg}}}. Let p~\widetilde{p} as in (2.20). This is a closed algebraic curve. Let ss be a local section of LL defined at pp and such that s⁡(p)≠0s(p)\not=0. Then

log⁡‖s⁡(p)‖log⁡|ϖ|=(p~⋅div⁡(s⊗e))e[ℋ(p):K].\frac{\log\|s(p)\|}{\log|\varpi|}=\frac{(\widetilde{p}\cdot\operatorname{div}(s^{\otimes e}))}{e[\mathscr{H}(p):K]}.
Proof.

We keep the notation in the proof of Proposition 2.21. In particular, s⊗e=λ​σs^{\otimes e}=\lambda\sigma with λ\lambda in the fraction field of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}, and ℋ⁡(p)=H\mathscr{H}(p)=H. We verify that

log⁡‖s⁡(p)‖log⁡|ϖ|=log⁡|λ⁡(p)|e​log⁡|ϖ|=log⁡|NH/K⁡(λ⁡(p))|e[H:K]log|ϖ|=ordϖ⁡(NH/K⁡(λ⁡(p)))e[H:K]\frac{\log\|s(p)\|}{\log|\varpi|}=\frac{\log|\lambda(p)|}{e\log|\varpi|}=\frac{\log|\operatorname{N}_{H/K}(\lambda(p))|}{e[H:K]\log|\varpi|}=\frac{{\operatorname{ord}}_{\varpi}(\operatorname{N}_{H/K}(\lambda(p)))}{e[H:K]}

and

(p~⋅div⁡(s⊗e))=deg⁡(ρ∗​(div⁡(p~∗​s⊗e)))=deg⁡(ρ∗​(div⁡(λ⁡(p))))=deg⁡(div⁡(NH/K⁡(λ⁡(p))))=ordϖ⁡(NH/K⁡(λ⁡(p))),({\widetilde{p}}\cdot\operatorname{div}(s^{\otimes e}))=\deg(\rho_{\ast}(\operatorname{div}({\widetilde{p}}^{\ast}s^{\otimes e})))=\deg(\rho_{\ast}(\operatorname{div}(\lambda(p))))\\ =\deg(\operatorname{div}(\operatorname{N}_{H/K}(\lambda(p))))={\operatorname{ord}}_{\varpi}(\operatorname{N}_{H/K}(\lambda(p))),

which proves the statement. ∎

Example 2.24.

Let X=ℙK0=Spec⁡(K)X=\mathbb{P}^{0}_{K}=\operatorname{Spec}(K). A line bundle LL on XX is necessarily trivial, that is, L≃KL\simeq K. Consider the model (𝒳,ℒ,e)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}},e) of (X,L)(X,L) given by 𝒳=Spec⁡(K∘){\mathcal{X}}=\operatorname{Spec}(K^{\circ}), e≥1e\geq 1, and ℒ{\mathcal{L}} a free K∘K^{\circ}-submodule of L⊗eL^{\otimes e} of rank one. Let v∈L⊗ev\in L^{\otimes e} be a basis of ℒ{\mathcal{L}}. For a section ss of LL we can write s⊗e=α​vs^{\otimes e}=\alpha v with α∈K\alpha\in K. Hence,

‖s‖=|α|1/e.\|s\|=|\alpha|^{1/e}.

All algebraic metrics on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} can be obtained in this way.

Example 2.25.

Let X=ℙKnX=\mathbb{P}_{K}^{n} and L=𝒪⁡(1)L=\mathcal{O}(1), the universal line bundle of ℙKn{\mathbb{P}_{K}^{n}}. As a model for (X,L)(X,L) we consider 𝒳=ℙK∘n\mathcal{X}=\mathbb{P}_{K^{\circ}}^{n}, the projective space over Spec⁡(K∘)\operatorname{Spec}(K^{\circ}), ℒ=𝒪ℙK∘n​(1)\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}_{K^{\circ}}^{n}}(1), and e=1e=1. A rational section ss of LL can be identified with a homogeneous rational function ρs∈K⁡(x0,…,xn)\rho_{s}\in K(x_{0},\dots,x_{n}) of degree 1.

Let p=(p0:…:pn)∈(ℙKn)an∖div(s)p=(p_{0}:\dots:p_{n})\in(\mathbb{P}_{K}^{n})^{\text{\rm an}}\setminus\operatorname{div}(s) and set H=ℋ⁡(p)H=\mathscr{H}(p). Let i0i_{0} be such that |pi0|=maxi⁡{|pi|}|p_{i_{0}}|=\max_{i}\{|p_{i}|\}. Take U≃𝔸KnU\simeq\mathbb{A}_{K}^{n} (respectively 𝒰≃𝔸K∘n\mathcal{U}\simeq\mathbb{A}_{K^{\circ}}^{n}) as the affine set xi0≠0x_{i_{0}}\not=0 over HH (respectively H∘H^{\circ}). The point pp corresponds to the algebraic morphism

p∗:K⁡[X0,…,Xi0−1,Xi0+1,…,Xn]⟶Hp^{\ast}\colon K[X_{0},\dots,X_{i_{0}-1},X_{i_{0}+1},\dots,X_{n}]\longrightarrow H

that sends XiX_{i} to pi/pi0p_{i}/p_{i_{0}}. The extension p~{\widetilde{p}} factors through the algebraic morphism

p~∗:K∘​[X1,…,Xi0−1,Xi0+1,…,Xn]⟶H∘,{\widetilde{p}}^{\ast}\colon K^{\circ}[X_{1},\dots,X_{i_{0}-1},X_{i_{0}+1},\dots,X_{n}]\longrightarrow H^{\circ},

with the same definition. Then

‖s⁡(p)‖\displaystyle||s(p)|| =inf{|z||z∈H×,z−1p~∗s∈p~∗ℒ}\displaystyle=\inf\big\{|z|\ \big|z\in H^{\times},z^{-1}{\widetilde{p}}^{\ast}s\in{\widetilde{p}}^{*}{\mathcal{L}}\big\}
=inf{|z||z∈H×,z−1ρs(p0/pi0,…,1,…,pn/pi0)∈H∘}\displaystyle=\inf\big\{|z|\ \big|z\in H^{\times},z^{-1}\rho_{s}(p_{0}/p_{i_{0}},\dots,1,\dots,p_{n}/p_{i_{0}})\in H^{\circ}\big\}
=|ρr​(p0,…,pn)pi0|\displaystyle=\left|\frac{\rho_{r}(p_{0},\dots,p_{n})}{p_{i_{0}}}\right|
=|ρr​(p0,…,pn)|maxi⁡{|pi|}.\displaystyle=\frac{|\rho_{r}(p_{0},\dots,p_{n})|}{\max_{i}\{|p_{i}|\}}.

We call this the canonical metric of 𝒪​(1)an{\mathcal{O}}(1)^{{\text{\rm an}}} and we denote it by ∥⋅∥can\|\cdot\|_{{\operatorname{can}}}.

Many other algebraic metrics can be obtained from Example 2.25, by considering maps of varieties to projective spaces. Let XX be a proper variety over KK equipped with a line bundle LL such that L⊗eL^{\otimes e} is generated by global sections for an integer e≥1e\geq 1. A set of global sections in Γ⁡(X,L⊗e)\Gamma(X,L^{\otimes e}) that generates L⊗eL^{\otimes e} induces a morphism φ:X→ℙKn\varphi\colon X\to\mathbb{P}_{K}^{n} and, by inverse image, a metric φ∗∥⋅∥can\varphi^{*}\|\cdot\|_{{\operatorname{can}}} on LL. If XX admits a a proper model, Proposition 2.19 shows that this metric is algebraic.

Now we recall the notion of semipositivity for algebraic metrics. A curve CC in 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is vertical if it is contained in 𝒳o{\mathcal{X}}_{o}.

Definition 2.26.

Let ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| be an algebraic metric on LL and set L¯=(L,∥⋅∥){\overline{L}}=(L,\|\cdot\|). We say that L¯{\overline{L}} is semipositive if there is a model (𝒳,ℒ,e)(\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},e) of (X,L)(X,L) that induces the metric such that, for every vertical curve CC in 𝒳{\mathcal{X}},

degℒ⁡(C)≥0.\deg_{\mathcal{L}}(C)\geq 0.

With the hypothesis in Proposition 2.19, the inverse image of a semipositive algebraic metric is also a semipositive algebraic metric.

Example 2.27.

The canonical metric in Example 2.25 is semipositive: for a vertical curve CC, its degree with respect to 𝒪ℙK∘n​(1){\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}^{n}_{K^{\circ}}}(1) equals its degree with respect to the restriction of this model to the special fibre. This restriction identifies with 𝒪ℙkn​(1){\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}^{n}_{k}}(1), the universal line bundle of ℙkn\mathbb{P}^{n}_{k}, which is ample. Hence all the metrics obtained by inverse image of the canonical metric of 𝒪​(1)an{\mathcal{O}}(1)^{{\text{\rm an}}} are also semipositive.

Finally, we recall the definition of the signed measures associated with algebraic metrics.

Definition 2.28.

Let L¯i{\overline{L}}_{i}, i=0,…,d−1i=0,\dots,d-1, be line bundles on XX equipped with algebraic metrics. For each ii, choose a model (𝒳i,ℒi,ei)(\mathcal{X}_{i},\mathcal{L}_{i},e_{i}) that realizes the metric of L¯i{\overline{L}}_{i}. We can assume without loss of generality that the models 𝒳i\mathcal{X}_{i} agree with a common model 𝒳\mathcal{X}. Let YY be a dd-dimensional subvariety of XX and YanY^{{\text{\rm an}}} its analytification. Let 𝒴⊂𝒳\mathcal{Y}\subset\mathcal{X} be the closure of YY, 𝒴~{\widetilde{\mathcal{Y}}} be its normalization, 𝒴~o{\widetilde{{\mathcal{Y}}}}_{o} its special fibre, and 𝒴~o(0){\widetilde{{\mathcal{Y}}}}_{o}^{(0)} the set of irreducible components of this special fibre. For each V∈𝒴~o(0)V\in{\widetilde{{\mathcal{Y}}}}_{o}^{(0)}, consider the point ξV∈Yan\xi_{V}\in Y^{{\text{\rm an}}} defined by (2.15). Let δξV\delta_{\xi_{V}} be the Dirac delta measure on XanX^{{\text{\rm an}}} supported on ξV\xi_{V}. We define a discrete signed measure on XanX^{{\text{\rm an}}} by

(2.29) c1⁡(L¯0)∧⋯∧c1⁡(L¯d−1)∧δY=∑V∈𝒴~o(0)ordV⁡(ϖ)​degℒ0,…,ℒd−1⁡(V)e0​…​ed−1​δξV.\operatorname{c}_{1}({\overline{L}}_{0})\land\dots\land\operatorname{c}_{1}({\overline{L}}_{d-1})\land\delta_{Y}=\sum_{V\in{\widetilde{{\mathcal{Y}}}}_{o}^{(0)}}{\operatorname{ord}}_{V}(\varpi)\frac{\deg_{\mathcal{L}_{0},\dots,\mathcal{L}_{d-1}}(V)}{e_{0}\dots e_{d-1}}\delta_{\xi_{V}}.

This notion extends by linearity to the group of dd-dimensional cycles of XX.

This signed measure only depends on the metrics and not on the particular choice of models [Cha06, Proposition 2.7]. Observe that ordV⁡(ϖ){\operatorname{ord}}_{V}(\varpi) is the multiplicity of the component VV in 𝒴~o{\widetilde{{\mathcal{Y}}}}_{o} and that the total mass of this measure equals degL0,…,Ld−1⁡(Y)\deg_{L_{0},\dots,L_{d-1}}(Y). If L¯i{\overline{L}}_{i} is semipositive for all ii and YY is effective, this signed measure is a measure.

Remark 2.30.

The above measure was introduced by Chambert-Loir [Cha06]. For the subvarieties of a projective space equipped with the canonical metric, it is also possible to define similar measures through the theory of Chow forms, see [Phi94].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.