ScalingStacks

5.1. The variety with corners X Σ ​ ( ℝ ≥ 0 ) [02SU]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

5.1. The variety with corners XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})

Let KK be either ℝ\mathbb{R}, ℂ\mathbb{C} or a complete field with respect to an absolute value associated to a nontrivial discrete valuation. When K=ℝK=\mathbb{R} we will use the technique of Remark 2.5 and in the non-Archimedean case we will use the notations of §2.3. Let 𝕋\mathbb{T} be an nn-dimensional split torus over KK and let NN and M=N∨M=N^{\vee} be the corresponding lattices. Let Σ\Sigma be a fan in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. For each cone σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma, we will denote by XσanX_{\sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}} the complex analytic space Xσ​(ℂ)X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{C}) in Archimedean case or the Berkovich analytic space associated to the scheme Xσ,KX_{\sigma,K} in the non-Archimedean case. These analytic spaces glue together in an analytic space XΣanX_{\Sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}}.

Given any cone σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma, we write

Xσ​(ℝ≥0)=Homsg⁡(Mσ,(ℝ≥0,×)).X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})=\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{sg}}(M_{\sigma},(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0},\times)).

On Xσ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}), we put the coarsest topology such that, for each m∈Mσm\in M_{\sigma}, the map Xσ​(ℝ≥0)→ℝ≥0X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\to\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} given by γ↦γ⁡(m)\gamma\mapsto\gamma(m) is continuous. Observe that if τ\tau is a face of σ\sigma, then there is a dense open immersion Xτ​(ℝ≥0)↪Xσ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\tau}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\hookrightarrow X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}). Hence the topological spaces Xσ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) glue together to define a topological space XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}). This is the variety with corners associated to XΣX_{\Sigma}. Analogously to the algebraic case, one can prove that this topological space is Hausdorff and that the spaces Xσ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) can be identified with open subspaces of XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) satisfying

Xσ​(ℝ≥0)∩Xσ′​(ℝ≥0)=Xσ∩σ′​(ℝ≥0).X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\cap X_{\sigma^{\prime}}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})=X_{\sigma\cap\sigma^{\prime}}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}).

For each σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma there is a continuous map ρσ:Xσan→Xσ​(ℝ≥0)\rho_{\sigma}\colon X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\sigma}\to X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}). This map is given, in the Archimedean case, by

Xσan=Homsg⁡(Mσ,(ℂ,×))​⟶|⋅|​Homsg⁡(Mσ,(ℝ≥0,×))=Xσan​(ℝ≥0).X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\sigma}=\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{sg}}(M_{\sigma},(\mathbb{C},\times))\overset{|\cdot|}{\longrightarrow}\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{sg}}(M_{\sigma},(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0},\times))=X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}).

While, in the non-Archimedean case, since a point p∈Xσanp\in X_{\sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}} corresponds to a multiplicative seminorm on K⁡[Mσ]K[M_{\sigma}] and a point in Xσ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) corresponds to a semigroup homomorphism from MσM_{\sigma} to (ℝ≥0,×)(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0},\times), we can define ρσ​(p)\rho_{\sigma}(p) as the semigroup homomorphism that, to an element m∈Mσm\in M_{\sigma}, corresponds |χm​(p)||\chi^{m}(p)|. These maps glue together to define a continuous map ρΣ:XΣan→XΣ​(ℝ≥0)\rho_{\Sigma}:X_{\Sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\to X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}).

Lemma 5.1.

The map ρΣ\rho_{\Sigma} satisfies ρΣ−1​(Xσ​(ℝ≥0))=Xσan\rho_{\Sigma}^{-1}(X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}))=X_{\sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}}.

Proof.

By definition Xσan⊂ρΣ−1​(Xσ​(ℝ≥0))X_{\sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\subset\rho_{\Sigma}^{-1}(X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})). For the reverse inclusion we will write only the non-Archimedean case. Assume that p∈ρΣ−1​(Xσ​(ℝ≥0))p\in\rho_{\Sigma}^{-1}(X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})). There is a σ′\sigma^{\prime} with p∈Xσ′anp\in X_{\sigma^{\prime}}^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Let τ=σ∩σ′\tau=\sigma\cap\sigma^{\prime} be the common face. Then pp is a multiplicative seminorm of K⁡[Mσ′]K[M_{\sigma^{\prime}}] and we show next that it can be extended to a multiplicative seminorm of K⁡[Mτ]K[M_{\tau}]. By [Ful93, §1.2 Proposition 2] there is an element u∈Mσ′u\in M_{\sigma^{\prime}} such that Mτ=Mσ′+ℤ≥0​(−u)M_{\tau}=M_{\sigma^{\prime}}+\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}(-u). Hence K⁡[Mτ]=K⁡[Mσ′+ℤ≥0​(−u)]K[M_{\tau}]=K[M_{\sigma^{\prime}}+\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}(-u)]. Since ρΣ​(p)∈Xτ​(ℝ≥0)\rho_{\Sigma}(p)\in X_{\tau}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) we have that |χu​(p)|≠0|\chi^{u}(p)|\not=0. Therefore pp extends to a multiplicative seminorm of K⁡[Mτ]K[M_{\tau}]. Hence p∈Xτan⊂Xσanp\in X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\tau}\subset X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\sigma}. ∎

When Σ\Sigma is complete, the analytic space XΣanX_{\Sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}} is compact, and the map ρΣ\rho_{\Sigma} is proper. By Lemma 5.1, for each cone σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma, the map ρσ\rho_{\sigma} is proper. Since every rational cone belongs to a complete fan, the map ρΣ\rho_{\Sigma} is proper even if Σ\Sigma is not complete. Of particular interest is the case when σ={0}\sigma=\{0\}. Then 𝕋an:=X0an\mathbb{T}^{{\text{\rm an}}}:=X_{0}^{{\text{\rm an}}} is an Abelian analytic group, that is, an Abelian group object in the category of analytic spaces. In particular, for any field extension K′K^{\prime} of KK, the set X0an​(K′)X_{0}^{{\text{\rm an}}}(K^{\prime}) is an Abelian group. Also 𝕋⁡(ℝ≥0):=X0​(ℝ≥0)≃(ℝ≥0)n\mathbb{T}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}):=X_{0}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\simeq(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})^{n} is a topological Abelian group. Moreover, 𝕋an\mathbb{T}^{{\text{\rm an}}} acts on XΣanX^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\Sigma}, 𝕋⁡(ℝ≥0)\mathbb{T}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) acts on XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) and the map ρΣ\rho_{\Sigma} is equivariant with respect to these actions. The kernel of the map ρ0\rho_{0} is a closed subgroup, that we call the compact torus of 𝕋an\mathbb{T}^{{\text{\rm an}}} and we denote by 𝕊an\mathbb{S}^{{\text{\rm an}}}. In the Archimedean case it is isomorphic to (S1)n(S^{1})^{n}, while in the non-Archimedean case it is the compact torus of Example 2.8. In fact, the fibres of the map ρΣ\rho_{\Sigma} are orbits under the action of 𝕊an\mathbb{S}^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Therefore the space Xσ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) is the quotient of XσanX_{\sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}} by the action of the closed subgroup 𝕊an\mathbb{S}^{{\text{\rm an}}}. We warn the reader that the compact topological space underlying 𝕊an\mathbb{S}^{{\text{\rm an}}} is not an abstract group (see [Ber90, Chapter 5]).

The maps ρσ\rho_{\sigma}, σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma, have canonical sections that we denote θσ\theta_{\sigma}. These sections glue together to give a section θΣ\theta_{\Sigma} of ρΣ\rho_{\Sigma}. In the Archimedean case θσ\theta_{\sigma} is induced by the semigroup inclusion ℝ≥0⊂ℂ\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}\subset\mathbb{C}. In the non-Archimedean case θσ\theta_{\sigma} is defined by the following result.

Proposition-Definition 5.2.

Assume that we are in the non-Archimedean case. For each γ∈Homsg⁡(Mσ,ℝ≥0)\gamma\in\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{sg}}(M_{\sigma},\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}), the seminorm that, to a function ∑αm​χm∈K⁡[Mσ]\sum\alpha_{m}\chi^{m}\in K[M_{\sigma}] assigns the value supm(|αm|​γ​(m))\sup_{m}(|\alpha_{m}|\gamma(m)), is a multiplicative seminorm on K⁡[Mσ]K[M_{\sigma}] that extends the norm of KK. Therefore it determines a point of XσanX^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\sigma} that we denote as θσ​(γ)\theta_{\sigma}(\gamma). The maps θσ\theta_{\sigma} are injective, continuous and proper. Moreover, they glue together to define a map

θΣ:XΣ​(ℝ≥0)⟶XΣan\theta_{\Sigma}\colon X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\longrightarrow X_{\Sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}}

that is injective, continuous and proper. Every point in the image of θΣ\theta_{\Sigma} is fixed under the action of 𝕊an\mathbb{S}^{{\text{\rm an}}}.

Proof.

The fact that the seminorm θσ​(γ)\theta_{\sigma}(\gamma) extends the norm of KK is clear. Let now f=∑mαm​χmf=\sum_{m}\alpha_{m}\chi^{m} and g=∑lβl​χlg=\sum_{l}\beta_{l}\chi^{l} and write f​g=∑kεk​χkfg=\sum_{k}\varepsilon_{k}\chi^{k} with εk=∑m+l=kαm​βl\varepsilon_{k}=\sum_{m+l=k}\alpha_{m}\beta_{l}. Then, since the absolute value of KK is ultrametric,

supk∈Mσ(|εk|​γ​(k))≤supm∈Mσ(|αm|​γ​(m))​supl∈Mσ(|βl|​γ​(l)).\sup_{k\in M_{\sigma}}(|\varepsilon_{k}|\gamma(k))\leq\sup_{m\in M_{\sigma}}(|\alpha_{m}|\gamma(m))\sup_{l\in M_{\sigma}}(|\beta_{l}|\gamma(l)).

Let Mf={m∈Mσ|supm′(|αm′|​γ​(m′))=|αm|​γ​(m)}M_{f}=\{m\in M_{\sigma}|\sup_{m^{\prime}}(|\alpha_{m^{\prime}}|\gamma(m^{\prime}))=|\alpha_{m}|\gamma(m)\}. We define MgM_{g} analogously. Let rr be a vertex of the Minkowski sum conv⁡(Mf)+conv⁡(Mg)\operatorname{conv}(M_{f})+\operatorname{conv}(M_{g}). Then there is a unique decomposition r=mr+lrr=m_{r}+l_{r} with mr∈Mfm_{r}\in M_{f} and lr∈Mgl_{r}\in M_{g}. Hence εr=αmr​βlr\varepsilon_{r}=\alpha_{m_{r}}\beta_{l_{r}}. Thus

supk∈Mσ(|εk|​γ​(k))≥|εr|​γ​(r)=supm∈Mσ(|αm|​γ​(m))​supl∈Mσ(|βl|​γ​(l)).\sup_{k\in M_{\sigma}}(|\varepsilon_{k}|\gamma(k))\geq|\varepsilon_{r}|\gamma(r)=\sup_{m\in M_{\sigma}}(|\alpha_{m}|\gamma(m))\sup_{l\in M_{\sigma}}(|\beta_{l}|\gamma(l)).

Thus θσ​(γ)​(f​g)=θσ​(γ)​(f)​θσ​(γ)​(g)\theta_{\sigma}(\gamma)(fg)=\theta_{\sigma}(\gamma)(f)\theta_{\sigma}(\gamma)(g). Hence, it is a multiplicative.

We show next that the map θσ\theta_{\sigma} is continuous. The topology of XσanX^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\sigma} is the coarsest topology that makes the functions p→|f⁡(p)|p\to|f(p)| continuous for all f∈K⁡[Mσ]f\in K[M_{\sigma}]. Thus to show that θσ\theta_{\sigma} is continuous it is enough to show that the map γ→|f⁡(θσ​(γ))|\gamma\to|f(\theta_{\sigma}(\gamma))| is continuous on Xσ​(ℝ≥0)=Homsg⁡(Mσ,ℝ≥0)X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})=\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{sg}}(M_{\sigma},\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}). The topology of Xσ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) is the coarsest topology such that, for each m∈Mσm\in M_{\sigma}, the map γ→γ⁡(m)\gamma\to\gamma(m) is continuous. Since, for f=∑m∈Mσαm​χmf=\sum_{m\in M_{\sigma}}\alpha_{m}\chi^{m}, we have that

|f⁡(θσ​(γ))|=max⁡(|αm|​γ​(m)),|f(\theta_{\sigma}(\gamma))|=\max(|\alpha_{m}|\gamma(m)),

we obtain that θσ\theta_{\sigma} is continuous. Since each θσ\theta_{\sigma} is a section of ρσ\rho_{\sigma}, they are injective.

The fact that the maps θσ\theta_{\sigma} glue together to give a continuous map θΣ\theta_{\Sigma} and that θΣ\theta_{\Sigma} is a section of ρΣ\rho_{\Sigma} follows easily from the definitions. This implies in particular that θΣ\theta_{\Sigma} is injective. When Σ\Sigma is complete, since XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) is compact and XΣanX^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\Sigma} is Hausdorff, the map θΣ\theta_{\Sigma} is proper. We deduce that the map θΣ\theta_{\Sigma} is proper in general, by using the same argument that shows that the function ρΣ\rho_{\Sigma} is proper.

The last assertion is clear from the definition of θσ​(γ)\theta_{\sigma}(\gamma). ∎

Let now

(5.3) λK={1, if ​K=ℂ,−log⁡|ϖ|, otherwise.\lambda_{K}=\begin{cases}1,&\text{ if }K=\mathbb{C},\\ -\log|\varpi|,&\text{ otherwise.}\end{cases}

and denote by 𝐞K:ℝ→ℝ>0{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K}\colon\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}_{>0} the map u↦exp⁡(−λK​u)u\mapsto\exp(-\lambda_{K}u). This map induces an homeomorphism Nℝ→X0​(ℝ>0)N_{\mathbb{R}}\rightarrow X_{0}(\mathbb{R}_{>0}) that we also denote by 𝐞K{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K}.

In the non-Archimedean case, the map val:𝕋⁡(K)→N{\operatorname{val}}\colon\mathbb{T}(K)\to N of Definition 4.71, can be extended to a map 𝕋an→Nℝ\mathbb{T}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\to N_{\mathbb{R}} that we denote valK{\operatorname{val}}_{K} or, when KK is clear from the context by val{\operatorname{val}}. For each p∈X0anp\in X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{0} we denote by valK⁡(p)∈Homsg⁡(M,ℝ)=Nℝ{\operatorname{val}}_{K}(p)\in\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{sg}}(M,\mathbb{R})=N_{\mathbb{R}} the morphism

(5.4) m⟼⟨m,valK⁡(p)⟩=−log⁡|χm​(p)|λK.m\longmapsto\langle m,{\operatorname{val}}_{K}(p)\rangle=\frac{-\log|\chi^{m}(p)|}{\lambda_{K}}.

In the Archimedean case we will denote by valℂ{\operatorname{val}}_{\mathbb{C}} or simply by val{\operatorname{val}} the map defined by the same equation. Then, the diagram

(5.5) X0an\textstyle{X_{0}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}valK\scriptstyle{{\operatorname{val}}_{K}}ρ0\scriptstyle{\rho_{0}}Nℝ\textstyle{N_{\mathbb{R}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝐞K\scriptstyle{{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K}}X0​(ℝ≥0)\textstyle{X_{0}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})}

is commutative.

The map 𝐞K{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K} allows us to see XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) as a partial compactification on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. Following [AMRT75, Chapter I, §1] we can give another description of the topology of XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}). For σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma, we denote

Nσ=∐τ​ face of ​σN​(τ)ℝ.N_{\sigma}=\coprod_{\tau\text{ face of }\sigma}N(\tau)_{\mathbb{R}}.

We choose a positive definite bilinear pairing in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. Hence we can identify the quotient spaces N​(τ)ℝN(\tau)_{\mathbb{R}} with subspaces of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}, that, for simplicity, we will denote also by N​(τ)ℝN(\tau)_{\mathbb{R}}. For a point u∈N​(τ)ℝu\in N(\tau)_{\mathbb{R}}, let U⊂N​(τ)ℝU\subset N(\tau)_{\mathbb{R}} be a neighbourhood of uu. For each τ′\tau^{\prime} face of τ\tau, τ\tau induces a cone πτ′​(τ)\pi_{\tau^{\prime}}(\tau) contained in N​(τ′)ℝN(\tau^{\prime})_{\mathbb{R}}. If p∈τp\in\tau its image πτ′​(p)\pi_{\tau^{\prime}}(p) in N​(τ′)ℝN(\tau^{\prime})_{\mathbb{R}}, is contained in πτ′​(τ)\pi_{\tau^{\prime}}(\tau). We write

(5.6) W⁡(τ,U,p)=∐τ′​ face of ​τπτ′​(U+p+τ).W(\tau,U,p)=\coprod_{\tau^{\prime}\text{ face of }\tau}\pi_{\tau^{\prime}}(U+p+\tau).

Moving UU and pp we obtain a basis of neighbourhoods of uu in NσN_{\sigma}. This defines a topology on NσN_{\sigma} such that the map 𝐞K:Nℝ→Xσ​(ℝ≥0){\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K}\colon N_{\mathbb{R}}\to X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) extends to a homeomorphism Nσ→Xσ​(ℝ≥0)N_{\sigma}\to X_{\sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}).

We write

NΣ=∐σ∈ΣN​(σ)ℝ,N_{\Sigma}=\coprod_{\sigma\in\Sigma}N(\sigma)_{\mathbb{R}},

and put in NΣN_{\Sigma} the topology that makes {Nσ}σ∈Σ\{N_{\sigma}\}_{\sigma\in\Sigma} an open cover. Then the map 𝐞K{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K} extends to a homeomorphism between NΣN_{\Sigma} and XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) and the map valK{\operatorname{val}}_{K} extends to a proper continuous map XΣan→NΣX^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\Sigma}\to N_{\Sigma} such that the diagram

(5.7) XΣan\textstyle{X_{\Sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}valK\scriptstyle{{\operatorname{val}}_{K}}ρΣ\scriptstyle{\rho_{\Sigma}}NΣ\textstyle{N_{\Sigma}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}𝐞K\scriptstyle{{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K}}XΣ​(ℝ≥0)\textstyle{X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})}

is commutative.

Remark 5.8.

In case we are given a strictly concave support function Ψ\Psi on a fan Σ\Sigma, then NΣN_{\Sigma} is homeomorphic to the polytope ΔΨ\Delta_{\Psi} introduced in §4.4. An homeomorphism is obtained as the composition of 𝐞K{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K} with the moment map μ:XΣ​(ℝ≥0)→ΔΨ\mu\colon X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\rightarrow\Delta_{\Psi} induced by Ψ\Psi:

NΣ⟶𝐞KXΣ​(ℝ≥0)⟶μΔΨu⟼𝐞K⁡(u)⟼∑exp⁡(−λK​⟨m,u⟩)​m∑exp⁡(−λK​⟨m,u⟩)\begin{matrix}N_{\Sigma}&\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\longrightarrow}\limits^{{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K}}}&X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})&\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\longrightarrow}\limits^{\mu}}&\Delta_{\Psi}\\[5.69054pt] u&\longmapsto&{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K}(u)&\longmapsto&\frac{\sum\exp(-\lambda_{K}\langle m,u\rangle)m}{\sum\exp(-\lambda_{K}\langle m,u\rangle)}\end{matrix}

where the sums in the last expression are over the elements m∈M∩ΔΨm\in M\cap\Delta_{\Psi}.

We end this section stating the functorial properties of the space XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}). The proofs are left to the reader. Let NN and Σ\Sigma be as before and σ∈Σ\sigma\in\Sigma. Recall that the associated closed subvariety V⁡(σ)V(\sigma) is canonically isomorphic to the toric variety XΣ⁡(σ)X_{\Sigma(\sigma)}.

Proposition 5.9.

The natural map N​(σ)ℝ↪NσN(\sigma)_{\mathbb{R}}\hookrightarrow N_{\sigma} extends to a continuous map XΣ⁡(σ)​(ℝ≥0)→XΣ​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma(\sigma)}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\to X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}). Moreover, there are commutative diagrams

XΣ⁡(σ)an\textstyle{X_{\Sigma(\sigma)}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ρΣ⁡(σ)\scriptstyle{\rho_{\Sigma(\sigma)}}XΣan\textstyle{X_{\Sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ρΣ\scriptstyle{\rho_{\Sigma}}XΣ⁡(σ)​(ℝ≥0)\textstyle{X_{\Sigma(\sigma)}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}XΣ​(ℝ≥0),\textstyle{X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}),} XΣ⁡(σ)an\textstyle{X_{\Sigma(\sigma)}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}XΣan\textstyle{X_{\Sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}}}XΣ⁡(σ)​(ℝ≥0)\textstyle{X_{\Sigma(\sigma)}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}θΣ⁡(σ)\scriptstyle{\theta_{\Sigma(\sigma)}}XΣ​(ℝ≥0).\textstyle{X_{\Sigma}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}).\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}θΣ\scriptstyle{\theta_{\Sigma}}

Let N1N_{1} and N2N_{2} be lattices and let Σ1\Sigma_{1} and Σ2\Sigma_{2} be complete fans in N1,ℝN_{1,\mathbb{R}} and N2,ℝN_{2,\mathbb{R}} respectively. Let H:N1→N2H\colon N_{1}\to N_{2} be a linear map such that, for each cone σ1∈Σ1\sigma_{1}\in\Sigma_{1}, there is a cone σ2∈Σ2\sigma_{2}\in\Sigma_{2} with H⁡(σ1)⊂σ2H(\sigma_{1})\subset\sigma_{2}. Let p∈XΣ2,0​(K)p\in X_{\Sigma_{2},0}(K) and let A:N1,ℝ→N2,ℝA\colon N_{1,\mathbb{R}}\to N_{2,\mathbb{R}} be the affine map A=H+val⁡(p)A=H+{\operatorname{val}}(p).

Proposition 5.10.

The affine map A:N1,ℝ→N2,ℝA\colon N_{1,\mathbb{R}}\to N_{2,\mathbb{R}} extends to a continuous map XΣ1​(ℝ≥0)→XΣ2​(ℝ≥0)X_{\Sigma_{1}}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\to X_{\Sigma_{2}}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}) that we also denote by φp,H\varphi_{p,H}. Moreover, there are commutative diagrams

XΣ1an\textstyle{X_{\Sigma_{1}}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}φp,H\scriptstyle{\varphi_{p,H}}ρΣ1\scriptstyle{\rho_{\Sigma_{1}}}XΣ2an\textstyle{X_{\Sigma_{2}}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ρΣ2\scriptstyle{\rho_{\Sigma_{2}}}XΣ1​(ℝ≥0)\textstyle{X_{\Sigma_{1}}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}φp,H\scriptstyle{\varphi_{p,H}}XΣ2​(ℝ≥0),\textstyle{X_{\Sigma_{2}}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}),} XΣ1an\textstyle{X_{\Sigma_{1}}^{{\text{\rm an}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}φp,H\scriptstyle{\varphi_{p,H}}XΣ2an\textstyle{X_{\Sigma_{2}}^{{\text{\rm an}}}}XΣ1​(ℝ≥0)\textstyle{X_{\Sigma_{1}}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}φp,H\scriptstyle{\varphi_{p,H}}θΣ1\scriptstyle{\theta_{\Sigma_{1}}}XΣ2​(ℝ≥0).\textstyle{X_{\Sigma_{2}}(\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}).\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}θΣ2\scriptstyle{\theta_{\Sigma_{2}}}

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.