5.7. Approachable and integrable metrics [02VK]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
5.7. Approachable and integrable metrics
We are now in position to characterize the approachable metrics. In this section is either , or a complete field with respect to an absolute value associated to a nontrivial discrete valuation. We fix a complete fan of , so that is proper. Let be a support function on , the corresponding polytope, and the corresponding toric line bundle and section. For short, write , and .
Theorem 5.73.
Assume the previous hypothesis.
- (1)
The assignment is a bijection between the space of approachable toric metrics on and the space of continuous concave functions on such that is bounded.
- (2)
The assignment is a bijection between the space of approachable toric metrics on and the space of continuous concave functions on .
Proof.
Let be an approachable toric metric. By Corollary 5.17 the function is bounded. By approachability there is a sequence of smooth (resp. algebraic) semipositive metrics that converges to . Since is toric, . Hence, the sequence of toric metrics also converges to . We denote . By Proposition 5.38 and Proposition 5.67 the functions are concave. Since the sequence converge uniformly to , the latter is concave.
Let now be a concave function on such that is bounded. Then determines a metric on the restriction of to . Since , by Proposition 3.81 there is a sequence of rational piecewise affine concave functions that converge uniformly to and with . By Remark 5.46, the functions can be extended to continuous functions on . Therefore, can be extended to a continuous function on . Consequently the metric can be extended to . Let be the metric associated to . Then the sequence of metrics converges to . By Corollary 5.28, the metrics are approachable. We deduce that is approachable. ∎
Remark 5.74.
For the case , statement (2) in the above result is related to the Guillemin-Abreu classification of Kähler structures on symplectic toric varieties as explained in [Abr03]. By definition, a symplectic toric variety is a compact symplectic manifold of dimension together with a Hamiltonian action of the compact torus . These spaces are classified by Delzant polytopes of , see for instance [Gui95]. For a given Delzant polytope , the possible -invariant Kähler forms on the symplectic toric variety corresponding to are classified by smooth convex functions on satisfying some conditions near the border of . Several differential geometric invariants of a Kähler toric variety can be translated and studied in terms of this convex function, also called the ‘‘symplectic potential’’.
For a smooth positive toric metric on , the Chern form defines a Kähler structure on the complex toric variety . It turns out that the corresponding symplectic potential coincides with minus the function . It would be most interesting to explore further this connection.
We now study the compatibility of the restriction of approachable toric metrics to toric orbits and its inverse image by equivariant maps with direct and inverse image of concave functions. This is an extension of propositions 4.99 and 4.108. We start with the case of orbits, and we state a variant of Proposition 5.22 for approachable metrics.
Proposition 5.75.
Let be an approachable toric metric on , and denote and the associated concave function on . Let and such that . Let be the projection, the dual inclusion and the closed immersion. Set . Then
| (5.76) |
Dually, we have that
| (5.77) |
In other words, the Legendre-Fenchel dual of is the restriction of to the face translated by .
Proof.
As in the proof of Proposition 4.99, it is enough to prove equation (5.76). By replacing by , we can assume without loss of generality that . By the continuity of the metric, the function can be extended to a continuous function on . Fix , write and let such that . By definition
It is clear that . Suppose that . Let such that and let . By the definition of the topology of , there exists a such that
| (5.78) |
Since is a cone of maximal dimension in , there exists a point . By the right inequality of equation (5.78) . By concavity of this implies that
| (5.79) |
Since, by construction is contained in , equation (5.79) contradicts the left inequality of equation (5.78). Hence , which proves equation (5.76). ∎
We now interpret the inverse image of an approachable toric metric by an equivariant map whose image intersects the principal open subset in terms of direct and inverse images of concave functions.
Proposition 5.80.
Let and be lattices and a complete fan in , . Let be a linear map such that, for each , there exists with . Let and write for the affine map . Let be an approachable toric metric on . Then
Moreover, the Legendre-Fenchel dual of this function is given by
Proof.
We next characterize the measures associated to an approachable metric.
Theorem 5.81.
Let be a complete fan of , let be a support function on and let . Let be an approachable metric on and let be the corresponding concave function. Then
| (5.82) |
Moreover, the measure is characterized, in the Archimedean case, by equation (5.82) and the fact of being toric, while in the non-Archimedean case it is given by
Proof.
For short, denote . Let be a sequence of semipositive smooth (respectively algebraic) metrics converging to . By Proposition 2.33, the measures converge to . Therefore, the measures converge to the measure on . Proposition 2.37 implies that the measure of with respect to is zero. Therefore has -measure zero. Denote . By Proposition 3.108, the measures converge to the measure . Thus . If we add to this that the measure of is zero, we deduce equation (5.82). The last statement of the theorem is clear from Theorem 5.33 and Theorem 5.70. ∎
We end this section by characterizing integrable metrics.
Corollary 5.83.
Let be a complete fan. Then the map is a bijection between the space of integrable toric metrics on and the space of functions such that , were is the space of functions of Definition 3.82.