ScalingStacks

5.6. Algebraic metrics and their associated measures [02VC]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

5.6. Algebraic metrics and their associated measures

We come back to the case of general dimension. Let Σ\Sigma be a complete fan, Ψ\Psi a support function on Σ\Sigma and (L,s)=(LΨ,sΨ)(L,s)=(L_{\Psi},s_{\Psi}). Since Ψ\Psi is a support function, the line bundle LL is generated by global sections.

Proposition 5.67.

Let ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| be a semipositive algebraic metric on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Then the function ψ∥⋅∥\psi_{\|\cdot\|} is concave.

Proof.

Assume that ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| is semipositive. Let u0u_{0} be a point of NℚN_{\mathbb{Q}} and let v0∈Nv_{0}\in N be primitive. Since the condition of being concave is closed, if we prove that, for all choices of u0∈Nℚu_{0}\in N_{\mathbb{Q}} and v0∈Nv_{0}\in N, the restriction of ψ∥⋅∥\psi_{\|\cdot\|} to the line u0+ℝ​v0u_{0}+\mathbb{R}v_{0} is concave, we will deduce that the function ψ∥⋅∥\psi_{\|\cdot\|} is concave. Let e∈ℕ×e\in\mathbb{N}^{\times} such that e​u0∈Neu_{0}\in N. Then H=K⁡(ϖ1/e)H=K(\varpi^{1/e}) is a finite extension of KK and there is a unique extension of the absolute value of KK to HH. We will denote with ′ the objects obtained by base change to HH. Let p∈X0,H​(H)p\in X_{0,H}(H) such that valH⁡(p)=e​u0{\operatorname{val}}_{H}(p)=eu_{0}. We consider the affine map A:ℤ→NA\colon\mathbb{Z}\to N given by l↦v0​l+e​u0l\mapsto v_{0}l+eu_{0}, and let HH be the linear part of AA. We consider the equivariant morphism φ=φp,H:ℙH1→XΣ,H\varphi=\varphi_{p,H}\colon\mathbb{P}^{1}_{H}\to X_{\Sigma,H} of Theorem 4.9. The metric ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| induces an algebraic semipositive metric φ∗∥⋅∥′\varphi^{\ast}\|\cdot\|^{\prime} on the restriction of L′L^{\prime} (the line bundle obtained from LL by base change to HH) to ℙH1\mathbb{P}^{1}_{H}. By propositions 5.24 and 5.53(3) we obtain that

ψφ∗∥⋅∥(u)=eψ∥⋅∥(u0+e−1uv0).\psi_{\varphi^{\ast}\|\cdot\|}(u)=e\psi_{\|\cdot\|}(u_{0}+e^{-1}uv_{0}).

By Corollary 5.66 the left-hand side function is concave. Thus the restriction of ψ∥⋅∥\psi_{\|\cdot\|} to u0+ℝ​v0u_{0}+\mathbb{R}v_{0} is concave. We conclude that ψ=ψ∥⋅∥\psi=\psi_{\|\cdot\|} is concave. ∎

Corollary 5.68.

Let ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| be a semipositive algebraic metric on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Then the toric metric ∥⋅∥𝕊\|\cdot\|_{\mathbb{S}} is a semipositive toric algebraic metric.

Proof.

By Proposition 5.67, the function ψ∥⋅∥\psi_{\|\cdot\|} is concave. By Proposition 5.52 it is also rational piecewise affine. By Corollary 5.47, the metric ∥⋅∥𝕊=∥⋅∥ψ\|\cdot\|_{\mathbb{S}}=\|\cdot\|_{\psi} is toric algebraic and semipositive. ∎

Putting together Proposition 5.67 and Theorem 5.49, we see that the relationship between semipositivity of the metric and concavity of the associated function given in the Archimedean case by Proposition 5.29 carries over to the non-Archimedean case.

Corollary 5.69.

Let ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| be a toric algebraic metric and ψ∥⋅∥\psi_{\|\cdot\|} the associated function. Then the metric is semipositive if and only if the function ψ∥⋅∥\psi_{\|\cdot\|} is concave.

We can now characterize the Chambert-Loir measure associated to a toric semipositive algebraic metric.

Theorem 5.70.

Let ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| be a toric semipositive algebraic metric on LanL^{{\text{\rm an}}} and let ψ=ψ∥⋅∥\psi=\psi_{\|\cdot\|} be the associated function on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}}. Let c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣc_{1}(\overline{L})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}} be the associated measure. Then

(5.71) (valK)∗​(c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣ)=n!​ℳ¯M​(ψ),({\operatorname{val}}_{K})_{\ast}(c_{1}(\overline{L})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}})=n!{\overline{\mathcal{M}}}_{M}(\psi),

where ℳ¯​(ψ){\overline{\mathcal{M}}}(\psi) is the measure of Definition 5.32. Moreover,

(5.72) c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣ=(θΣ)∗​(𝐞K)∗​n!​ℳ¯M​(ψ).c_{1}(\overline{L})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}}=(\theta_{\Sigma})_{\ast}({\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K})_{\ast}n!{\overline{\mathcal{M}}}_{M}(\psi).
Proof.

Since the metric is semipositive and toric, by Proposition 5.67 the function ψ\psi is concave. Since, moreover it is algebraic, by Theorem 5.49 it is defined by a toric model (𝒳Π,Dψ,e)({\mathcal{X}}_{\Pi},D_{\psi},e) of (XΣ,DΨ)(X_{\Sigma},D_{\Psi}) in the equivalence class determined by ψ\psi. As in Remark 4.66, the irreducible components of 𝒳Π,o{\mathcal{X}}_{\Pi,o} are in bijection with the vertices of Π\Pi. For each vertex v∈Π0v\in\Pi^{0}, let ξv\xi_{v} be the point of XΣanX_{\Sigma}^{{\text{\rm an}}} corresponding to the generic point of V⁡(v)V(v) defined by equation (2.15). Then, by equation (2.29),

c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣ=1en​∑v∈Π0νv​degDψ⁡V⁡(v)​δξv.c_{1}(\overline{L})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}}=\frac{1}{e^{n}}\sum_{v\in\Pi^{0}}\nu_{v}\deg_{D_{\psi}}V(v)\delta_{\xi_{v}}.

Thus, by Corollary 5.40,

(valK)∗​(c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣ)=1en​∑v∈Π0νv​degDψ⁡V⁡(v)​δv.({\operatorname{val}}_{K})_{\ast}(c_{1}(\overline{L})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}})=\frac{1}{e^{n}}\sum_{v\in\Pi^{0}}\nu_{v}\deg_{D_{\psi}}V(v)\delta_{v}.

But, using Proposition 3.95 and Proposition 4.105, the Monge-Ampère measure is given by

ℳM​(ψ)\displaystyle\mathcal{M}_{M}(\psi) =1en​ℳM​(e​ψ)\displaystyle=\frac{1}{e^{n}}\mathcal{M}_{M}(e\psi)
=1en​∑v∈Π0volM⁡(v∗)​δv\displaystyle=\frac{1}{e^{n}}\sum_{v\in\Pi^{0}}\operatorname{vol}_{M}(v^{\ast})\delta_{v}
=1n!​en​∑v∈Π0νv​degDψ⁡V⁡(v)​δv.\displaystyle=\frac{1}{n!e^{n}}\sum_{v\in\Pi^{0}}\nu_{v}\deg_{D_{\psi}}V(v)\delta_{v}.

Since ℳM​(ψ)\mathcal{M}_{M}(\psi) is a finite sum of Dirac deltas, we obtain that

ℳ¯M​(ψ)=1n!​en​∑v∈Π0νv​degDψ⁡V⁡(v)​δv.{\overline{\mathcal{M}}}_{M}(\psi)=\frac{1}{n!e^{n}}\sum_{v\in\Pi^{0}}\nu_{v}\deg_{D_{\psi}}V(v)\delta_{v}.

Hence we have proved (5.71). To prove equation (5.72) we just observe that xv=(θ0∘𝐞K)​(v)x_{v}=(\theta_{0}\circ{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{K})(v). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.