8.2. Height of toric bundles [02YE]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
8.2. Height of toric bundles
Let and write for short. Given , consider the bundle of hyperplanes of the vector bundle
where denotes the -th power of the universal line bundle of . Equivalently, can be defined as the bundle of lines of the dual vector bundle . The fibre of the map over each point is a projective space of dimension . This bundle is a smooth toric variety over of dimension , see [Oda88, pp. 58-59], [Ful93, p. 42]. The particular case corresponds to Hirzebruch surfaces: for , we have for any .
The tautological line bundle of , denoted , is defined as a subbundle of . Its fibre over a point of is the inverse image under of the line in which is dual to the hyperplane of defining the given point. The universal line bundle of is defined as the dual of the tautological one. Since , , is ample, the universal line bundle is also ample [Har66]. This is the line bundle corresponding to the Cartier divisor , where denotes the inverse image in of the hyperplane at infinity of and . Observe that, although is isomorphic to the bundle associated to the family of integers for any , this is not the case for the associated universal line bundle, that depends on the choice of .
Following Example 4.3, we regard as a toric variety over equipped with the action of the split torus . Let be the toric section of which corresponds to the hyperplane at infinity and let , which is a section of . Let . The restriction of to is isomorphic to through the map defined, for and , as
The torus can then be included as an open subvariety of through the map composed with the standard inclusion of into . The action of on itself by translation extends to an action of the torus on the whole of . Hence is a toric variety over . With this action the divisor is a -Cartier divisor.
By abuse of notation, we also denote the total space associated to the vector bundle . The map defined as
induces a no-where vanishing section of the tautological line bundle of over the open subset . Its inverse, denoted , is a no-where vanishing section of over . In particular, this section induces a structure of toric line bundle on . The divisor of the section is precisely the -Cartier divisor considered above.
We now introduce an adelic toric metric on . For , we consider the complex vector bundle that can be naturally metrized by the direct sum of the Fubiny-Study metric on each factor . By duality, this gives a metric on , which induces by restriction a metric on the tautological line bundle. Applying duality once more time, we obtain a smooth metric, denoted , on . For , we equip with the canonical metric (Proposition-Definition 5.20). We write for the obtained adelic metrized toric line bundle.
We have made a choice of splitting of and therefore a choice of an identification . Thus we obtain a system of coordinates in the real vector space associated to the toric variety , . Since the metric considered at each non-Archimedean place is the canonical one, the only nontrivial contribution to the global height will come from the Archimedean place. The restriction to the principal open subset of the valuation map is expressed, in these coordinates, as the map defined by
Let be the natural inclusion of real variety in and let be the homeomorphism , both defined in §5.1. In these coordinates, the composition map is given by .
Write for the function corresponding to the metric and the toric section defined above.
Lemma 8.17.
The function is defined, for and , as
with the convention . It is a strictly concave function.
Proof.
The metric on is given, for and , by
where is the norm of with respect to the Fubini-Study metric on . By Example 2.2,
Let be the monomial section of the tautological line bundle defined by . Then
| (8.18) |
By Proposition 5.19(2), is times the logarithm of the above expression.
For the last statement, observe that the functions are log-strictly convex, because times their logarithm is the function associated to the Fubini-Study metric on , which is a strictly concave function. Their sum is also log-strictly convex [BV04, §3.5.2]. Hence, is strictly concave. ∎
Corollary 8.19.
The metric is a semipositive smooth toric metric.
The following result summarizes the toric structure of and of .
Proposition 8.20.
- (1)
Let , , and , , be the -th and -th vectors of the standard basis of . Set and . The fan corresponding to is the fan in whose maximal cones are the convex hull of the rays generated by the vectors
for . This is a complete regular fan.
- (2)
The support function corresponding to the universal line bundle is defined, for and , as
where, for short, we have set .
- (3)
The polytope in associated to is
with . Using the convention and , then and the polytope can be written as
- (4)
The Legendre-Fenchel dual of is the concave function defined, for , as
where, for , is the function defined in (3.54). For , the concave function is the indicator function of .
Proof.
By Corollary 5.17, we have . By equation (3.49), we have . Statement (2) follows readily from this and from the expression for in Lemma 8.17.
The function is strictly concave on , because is an ample line bundle. Hence and this is the fan described in statement (1).
Let be the dual basis of induced by the basis of . By Proposition 3.64 and statement (2), we have
Statement (3) follows readily from this.
For the first part of statement (4), it suffices to compute the Legendre-Fenchel dual of at a point in the interior of the polytope. Lemma 8.17 shows that is strictly concave. Hence, by Theorem 3.52(3), is a homeomorphism between and . Thus, there exist a unique such that, for and ,
We use the conventions , , and as before, and also and , so that . Computing the gradient of , we obtain, for and ,
Combining these expressions, we obtain, for and ,
From the case we deduce and from the case it results . From this, one can verify
From Theorem 3.52(4), we have . Inserting the expressions above for , and in terms of , we obtain the stated formula.
For , we have . The last statement follows from Example 3.16. ∎
We now compute these volume and integral giving the degree and the height of . We show, in particular, that the height is a rational number. Recall that and are the standard simplexes of and , respectively.
Lemma 8.22.
With the above notation, we have
| (8.23) | ||||
| (8.24) | ||||
where is the height of the projective space relative to the Fubini-Study metric.
Proof.
Equation (8.21) shows that the degree of is equal to . The same equation together with Proposition 8.20(4) gives that the height of is equal to :
| (8.25) |
Let and be the two above integrals. Observe . Then
since . And, for the second integral,
since and
The expression for gives the formula for the degree. Carrying the expressions of and in (8.25) concludes the proof of Lemma 8.22. ∎
Proposition 8.26.
In the above setting, one has :
where . In particular, the height of is a positive rational number.