ScalingStacks

Proof. [056S]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

First, we prove the integral formula for IνI_{\nu}. The idea of the proof was originally inspired by Hankel’s representation formula for the reciprocal gamma function. In fact, let ℒ⊂ℂ\mathcal{L}\subset\mathbb{C} be a contour winding around the negative O​xOx-axis. In our particular case, ℒ=ℒ1+ℒ2+ℒ3\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_{1}+\mathcal{L}_{2}+\mathcal{L}_{3}, where ℒ1\mathcal{L}_{1} and ℒ3\mathcal{L}_{3} are two rays parallel to O​xOx and ℒ2\mathcal{L}_{2} is an arc of the unit circle centered at the origin (See Figure A.1). So Hankel’s representation formula gives that

(A.9) 1Γ⁡(k+ν+1)=12​π​−1​∫ℒew​w−(k+ν+1)​𝑑w,w∈ℂ.\frac{1}{\Gamma(k+\nu+1)}=\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}}\int_{\mathcal{L}}e^{w}w^{-(k+\nu+1)}dw,\ w\in\mathbb{C}.

By the power series definition of IνI_{\nu},

(A.10) Iν​(y)\displaystyle I_{\nu}(y) =\displaystyle= ∑k=0∞1Γ⁡(k+1)​Γ​(k+ν+1)​(y2)2​k+ν\displaystyle\sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\Gamma(k+1)\Gamma(k+\nu+1)}\Big(\frac{y}{2}\Big)^{2k+\nu}
=\displaystyle= (y2)ν​12​π​−1​∫ℒew​w−ν−1​∑k=0∞(y24​w)kk!​𝑑w\displaystyle(\frac{y}{2})^{\nu}\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}}\int_{\mathcal{L}}e^{w}w^{-\nu-1}\sum\limits_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(\frac{y^{2}}{4w})^{k}}{k!}dw
=\displaystyle= (y2)ν​12​π​−1​∫ℒew+y24​w​w−ν−1​𝑑w.\displaystyle(\frac{y}{2})^{\nu}\frac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{-1}}\int_{\mathcal{L}}e^{w+\frac{y^{2}}{4w}}w^{-\nu-1}dw.

For every y>0y>0, we make change of variables for each w∈ℂw\in\mathbb{C},

(A.11) w=y⋅eζ2=y​et2⋅e−1​θ, 0<t<∞, 0≤θ≤2​π.w=\frac{y\cdot e^{\zeta}}{2}=\frac{ye^{t}}{2}\cdot e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta},\ 0<t<\infty,\ 0\leq\theta\leq 2\pi.

Letting ℒ1\mathcal{L}_{1} and ℒ3\mathcal{L}_{3} tend to each other, then in terms of the variables (t,θ)(t,\theta),

(A.12) ∫ℒew+y24​w​w−ν−1​𝑑w=1π​∫0πey​cos⁡θ​cos⁡(ν​θ)​𝑑θ−sin⁡(ν​π)π​∫0∞e−y​cosh⁡t−ν​t​𝑑t.\int_{\mathcal{L}}e^{w+\frac{y^{2}}{4w}}w^{-\nu-1}dw=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}e^{y\cos\theta}\cos(\nu\theta)d\theta-\frac{\sin(\nu\pi)}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-y\cosh t-\nu t}dt.

The integral formula for KνK_{\nu} follows easily from the above integral representation for IνI_{\nu} and the definition

(A.13) Kν​(y)=π⁡(I−ν​(y)−Iν​(y))2​sin⁡(ν​π).K_{\nu}(y)=\frac{\pi(I_{-\nu}(y)-I_{\nu}(y))}{2\sin(\nu\pi)}.
ℒ2\mathcal{L}_{2}OOxxyyℒ1\mathcal{L}_{1}ℒ3\mathcal{L}_{3}
Figure A.1. The contour ℒ=ℒ1+ℒ2+ℒ3\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_{1}+\mathcal{L}_{2}+\mathcal{L}_{3} for the integral (A.9)

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.