ScalingStacks

7.1.3. A modification of the degenerating family [055P]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

7.1.3. A modification of the degenerating family

We now recall the set-up in the introduction. Let nβ‰₯2n\geq 2 be an integer. Let f1,f2,ff_{1},f_{2},f be homogeneous polynomials of degree d1β‰₯d2,d1+d2=n+2d_{1}\geq d_{2},d_{1}+d_{2}=n+2 respectively, and let π’³βŠ‚β„‚β€‹β„™n+1Γ—Ξ”\mathcal{X}\subset\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}\times\Delta be a family of Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in ℂ​ℙn+1\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1} defined by the equation Ft​(x)=0F_{t}(x)=0, where

(7.17) Ft​(x)≑f1​(x)​f2​(x)+t​f​(x)F_{t}(x)\equiv f_{1}(x)f_{2}(x)+tf(x)

and tt is the complex parameter on the unit disc Ξ”βŠ‚β„‚\Delta\subset\mathbb{C}. Let p:𝒳→Δp:\mathcal{X}\rightarrow\Delta be the projection map and we denote X^t=pβˆ’1​(t)\widehat{X}_{t}=p^{-1}(t).

We further assume f1,f2,ff_{1},f_{2},f are sufficiently general so that the following hold:

  1. (i)

    X0=Y1βˆͺY2X_{0}=Y_{1}\cup Y_{2}, where Y1={f1=0}Y_{1}=\{f_{1}=0\} and Y2={f2=0}Y_{2}=\{f_{2}=0\} are smooth;

  2. (ii)

    X^t\widehat{X}_{t} is smooth for t≠0t\neq 0.;

  3. (iii)

    D={f1=f2=0}D=\{f_{1}=f_{2}=0\} is a smooth complete intersection;

  4. (iv)

    H={f1=f2=f=0}H=\{f_{1}=f_{2}=f=0\} is a smooth complete intersection in ℂ​ℙn+1\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}.

The total space 𝒳\mathcal{X} is singular along HH and transverse to HΓ—{0}H\times\{0\} the singularities are locally modeled on a two dimensional ordinary double point. For our purpose we need to perform certain birational transformations to 𝒳\mathcal{X} keeping the general fibers unchanged.

We first do a base change t↦tn+2t\mapsto t^{n+2}, and work on the new family, which we still denote by 𝒳\mathcal{X}. Then 𝒳\mathcal{X} now has singularities along DΓ—{0}D\times\{0\}, transversal to which generically it is a two dimensional Adβˆ’1A_{d-1} singularity, which becomes worse along HΓ—{0}H\times\{0\}. This is usually referred to as a compounded Du Val (cDV) singularity .

Now we apply the family version of the above model partial resolution to 𝒳\mathcal{X}. Let 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}} be the subvariety in the projective bundle ℙ⁑(π’ͺ⁑(d2)βŠ•π’ͺ⁑(d1)βŠ•β„‚)\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{O}(d_{2})\oplus\mathcal{O}(d_{1})\oplus\mathbb{C}) over ℂ​ℙn+1Γ—Ξ”\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}\times\Delta cut out by the equations

(7.18) {td1​s1=s3​f2​(x);td2​s2=s3​f1​(x);s1βŠ—s2+s32​f​(x)=0;td1βˆ’d2​s1βŠ—f1​(x)=f2​(x)βŠ—s2;td2​s3​f​(x)+s1βŠ—f1​(x)=0.\begin{cases}t^{d_{1}}s_{1}=s_{3}f_{2}(x);\\ t^{d_{2}}s_{2}=s_{3}f_{1}(x);\\ s_{1}\otimes s_{2}+s_{3}^{2}f(x)=0;\\ t^{d_{1}-d_{2}}s_{1}\otimes f_{1}(x)=f_{2}(x)\otimes s_{2};\\ t^{d_{2}}s_{3}f(x)+s_{1}\otimes f_{1}(x)=0.\end{cases}

where naturally we view fi∈H0​(ℂ​ℙn+1,π’ͺ⁑(di))f_{i}\in H^{0}(\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1},\mathcal{O}(d_{i})), f∈H0​(ℂ​ℙn+1,π’ͺ⁑(n+2))f\in H^{0}(\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1},\mathcal{O}(n+2)), and [s1:s2:s3][s_{1}:s_{2}:s_{3}] denotes a point in the fiber of the projective bundle over the point (x,t)βˆˆβ„‚β€‹β„™n+1Γ—Ξ”(x,t)\in\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}\times\Delta.

For our discussion in the rest of this section we shall always take [x0:x1:β‹―:xn+1][x_{0}:x_{1}:\cdots:x_{n+1}] to be the homogeneous coordinates of a point xx on ℂ​ℙn+1\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}. On the affine chart {xiβ‰ 0}\{x_{i}\neq 0\} of ℂ​ℙn+1\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1} we denote by u={uj=xj/xi,jβ‰ i}u=\{u_{j}=x_{j}/x_{i},j\neq i\} the affine coordinates, and we view xix_{i} as a local trivialization of π’ͺ⁑(1)\mathcal{O}(1). Then on this chart we can view any holomorphic sections of powers of π’ͺ⁑(1)\mathcal{O}(1) as local holomorphic functions. In particular, for a homogeneous function R⁑(x)R(x), we denote by R⁑(u)R(u) the corresponding inhomogeneous function. On the affine trivialization of the projective bundle {siβ‰ 0}\{s_{i}\neq 0\}, we denote by {ΞΆj=sj/si,jβ‰ i}\{\zeta_{j}=s_{j}/s_{i},j\neq i\} the affine coordinates on the fibers.

We define

(7.19) D1\displaystyle D_{1} ≑{f1(x)=f2(x)=t=0,s2=s3=0},\displaystyle\equiv\{f_{1}(x)=f_{2}(x)=t=0,s_{2}=s_{3}=0\},
(7.20) D2\displaystyle D_{2} ≑{f1(x)=f2(x)=t=0,s1=s3=0}.\displaystyle\equiv\{f_{1}(x)=f_{2}(x)=t=0,s_{1}=s_{3}=0\}.
Lemma 7.2.

𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}} is smooth away from the union D1βˆͺD2D_{1}\cup D_{2}, and transverse to each DiD_{i} the singularity is a two dimensional Adiβˆ’1A_{d_{i}-1} singularity.

Proof.

We know 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}} is isomorphic to 𝒳\mathcal{X} away from DΓ—{0}D\times\{0\}, so it suffices to consider around a point (x,0)(x,0) where f1​(x)=f2​(x)=0f_{1}(x)=f_{2}(x)=0. Locally in an affine chart {s1β‰ 0}\{s_{1}\neq 0\}, 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}} is then cut out by the equations

(7.21) {f2​(u)​΢3=td1;f1​(u)​΢3=td2​΢2;ΞΆ2+ΞΆ32​f​(u)=0;f2​(u)​΢2=td1βˆ’d2​f1​(u);td2​΢3​f​(u)+f1​(u)=0.\begin{cases}f_{2}(u)\zeta_{3}=t^{d_{1}};\\ f_{1}(u)\zeta_{3}=t^{d_{2}}\zeta_{2};\\ \zeta_{2}+\zeta_{3}^{2}f(u)=0;\\ f_{2}(u)\zeta_{2}=t^{d_{1}-d_{2}}f_{1}(u);\\ t^{d_{2}}\zeta_{3}f(u)+f_{1}(u)=0.\end{cases}

These can be reduced to two equations on the coordinates uu, tt and ΞΆ3\zeta_{3}, given by

(7.22) {f2​(u)​΢3βˆ’td1=0td2​΢3​f​(u)+f1​(u)=0.\begin{cases}f_{2}(u)\zeta_{3}-t^{d_{1}}=0\\ t^{d_{2}}\zeta_{3}f(u)+f_{1}(u)=0.\end{cases}

By our assumption (iii) locally we may use v1=f1​(u)v_{1}=f_{1}(u) and v2=f2​(u)v_{2}=f_{2}(u) to replace u1,u2u_{1},u_{2} (say) as local holomorphic coordinates on a neighborhood of xx in ℂ​ℙn+1\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}. Then it is easy to see the corresponding subvariety is smooth if ΞΆ3β‰ 0\zeta_{3}\neq 0, and has transversal Ad1βˆ’1A_{d_{1}-1} singularities along D1D_{1}. So this gives the local description of 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}} in a neighborhood of D1D_{1}. Similarly on {s2β‰ 0}\{s_{2}\neq 0\} we also know the space is smooth except with transversal Ad2βˆ’1A_{d_{2}-1} singularities along D2D_{2}.

On {s3β‰ 0}\{s_{3}\neq 0\}, we use u,t,ΞΆ1,ΞΆ2u,t,\zeta_{1},\zeta_{2} as coordinates, and we get the constraint equations

(7.23) {ΞΆ1​΢2+f⁑(u)=0,f2​(u)βˆ’td1​΢1=0,f1​(u)βˆ’td2​΢2=0.\begin{cases}\zeta_{1}\zeta_{2}+f(u)=0,\\ f_{2}(u)-t^{d_{1}}\zeta_{1}=0,\\ f_{1}(u)-t^{d_{2}}\zeta_{2}=0.\end{cases}

We only need to consider the points where ΞΆ1=ΞΆ2=t=0\zeta_{1}=\zeta_{2}=t=0, so in particular we also have f⁑(u)=0f(u)=0. At such a point, the differentials of these three equations are (βˆ‡f​(u),βˆ‡f2​(u),βˆ‡f1​(u))(\nabla f(u),\nabla f_{2}(u),\nabla f_{1}(u)). This is non-zero by our assumption (iv). ∎

One can see that the new central fiber X^0\hat{X}_{0} consists of a chain of three smooth components intersecting transversally, given by the proper transforms Y^1,Y^2\hat{Y}_{1},\hat{Y}_{2} of Y1,Y2Y_{1},Y_{2} respectively and the submanifold 𝒩\mathcal{N} in the projective bundle ℙ⁑(L1βŠ•L2βŠ•β„‚)\mathbb{P}(L_{1}\oplus L_{2}\oplus\mathbb{C}) over DD cut out by the equation s1​s2=s32​f​(x)s_{1}s_{2}=s_{3}^{2}f(x) (so that 𝒩\mathcal{N} is a quadric bundle over DD, and singular fibers are over HH). Notice 𝒩\mathcal{N} itself is a smooth manifold.

βˆ™\bulletβˆ™\bulletβˆ™\bulletβˆ™\bulletβˆ™\bulletX^t\widehat{X}_{t}Y^1\hat{Y}_{1}Y^2\hat{Y}_{2}D1D_{1}D2D_{2}𝒩\mathcal{N}HΓ—{t}H\times\{t\}X^0=Y^1βˆͺD1𝒩βˆͺD2Y^2\widehat{X}_{0}=\hat{Y}_{1}\cup_{D_{1}}\mathcal{N}\cup_{D_{2}}\hat{Y}_{2}
Figure 7.1. The modified family 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}}

We then have

(7.24) D1=Y^1βˆ©π’©,D2=Y^2βˆ©π’©.D_{1}=\hat{Y}_{1}\cap\mathcal{N},\ \ D_{2}=\hat{Y}_{2}\cap\mathcal{N}.

It is straightforward to see that the normal bundle of DiD_{i} in 𝒩\mathcal{N} is Liβˆ’1L_{i}^{-1}.

Next we consider holomorphic volume forms. Viewing 𝒳\mathcal{X} as an anti-canonical divisor in ℂ​ℙn+1Γ—Ξ”\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}\times\Delta, then away from DΓ—{0}D\times\{0\}, 𝒳\mathcal{X} is smooth and we then obtain a holomorphic volume form Ξ“\Gamma. In the affine chart {x0β‰ 0}Γ—Ξ”βŠ‚β„‚β„™n+1Γ—Ξ”\{x_{0}\neq 0\}\times\Delta\subset\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}\times\Delta, the meromorphic volume form is given by

(7.25) 1Ft​(u)​d​t∧d​u1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§d​un+1.\frac{1}{F_{t}(u)}dt\wedge du_{1}\wedge\cdots\wedge du_{n+1}.

So the PoincarΓ© residue on 𝒳\mathcal{X} is

(7.26) Ξ“=βˆ’1(n+2)​tn+1​f​(u)du1βˆ§β‹―dun+1.\Gamma=-\frac{1}{(n+2)t^{n+1}f(u)}du_{1}\wedge\cdots du_{n+1}.

It is easy to check using the equation and the genericity assumptions that Ξ“\Gamma is indeed holomorphic on π’³βˆ–DΓ—{0}\mathcal{X}\setminus D\times\{0\}.

Now applying the above discussion to the global function tt on 𝒳\mathcal{X}, then we get a holomorphic family of holomorphic volume forms Ξ“t\Gamma_{t} on each X^t\widehat{X}_{t}. Differentiating the equation Ft​(u)=f1​(u)​f2​(u)+tn+2​f​(u)=0F_{t}(u)=f_{1}(u)f_{2}(u)+t^{n+2}f(u)=0, we get

(7.27) (n+2)​tn+1​f​(u)​d​t+du​Ft=0.(n+2)t^{n+1}f(u)dt+d_{u}F_{t}=0.

In the above affine chart, on the set where βˆ‚Ftβˆ‚u1β‰ 0\frac{\partial F_{t}}{\partial u_{1}}\neq 0, we have

(7.28) Ξ“t=1βˆ‚Ft​(u)βˆ‚u1du2βˆ§β‹―dun+1.\Gamma_{t}=\frac{1}{\frac{\partial F_{t}(u)}{\partial u_{1}}}du_{2}\wedge\cdots du_{n+1}.

This is indeed well-defined on X^t\widehat{X}_{t} for tβ‰ 0t\neq 0 and also on X0βˆ–DX_{0}\setminus D. On each component YiY_{i} of X0X_{0}, it has a simple pole along DD. Notice Ξ“t\Gamma_{t} is also the natural holomorphic volume form on X^t\widehat{X}_{t} when we apply the PoincarΓ© residue to the divisor X^t\widehat{X}_{t} in ℂ​ℙn+1\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}.

Now we pass to the resolution 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}}. Abusing notation we still denote by Ξ“\Gamma its pull-back.

Lemma 7.3.

Ξ“\Gamma extends to a global holomorphic volume form on 𝒳^βˆ–(D1βˆͺD2)\widehat{\mathcal{X}}\setminus(D_{1}\cup D_{2}).

Proof.

We only need to consider around a point (x,t,s)(x,t,s) on the exceptional set 𝒩\mathcal{N}, so (x,t)∈DΓ—{0}(x,t)\in D\times\{0\}. Without loss of generality may assume x0β‰ 0x_{0}\neq 0. Since DD is a complete intersection by assumption (iii), we may use v1=f1​(u)v_{1}=f_{1}(u) and v2=f2​(u)v_{2}=f_{2}(u) to replace u1,u2u_{1},u_{2} (say) as local holomorphic coordinates on a neighborhood of xx in ℂ​ℙn+1\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^{n+1}. So we can write

(7.29) Ξ“=βˆ’Jβˆ’1(n+2)​tn+1​f​(u)​d​v1∧d​v2∧d​u3βˆ§β‹―βˆ§d​un+1,\Gamma=-\frac{J^{-1}}{(n+2)t^{n+1}f(u)}dv_{1}\wedge dv_{2}\wedge du_{3}\cdots\wedge du_{n+1},

where JJ is the Jacobian given by

(7.30) J=βˆ‚f1βˆ‚u1β€‹βˆ‚f2βˆ‚u2βˆ’βˆ‚f1βˆ‚u2β€‹βˆ‚f2βˆ‚u1.J=\frac{\partial f_{1}}{\partial u_{1}}\frac{\partial f_{2}}{\partial u_{2}}-\frac{\partial f_{1}}{\partial u_{2}}\frac{\partial f_{2}}{\partial u_{1}}.

Suppose first we work on the affine chart {s1β‰ 0}\{s_{1}\neq 0\}. Then we get the local equations for 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}} given by (7.22). Since we are away from D1D_{1}, we must have ΞΆ3β‰ 0\zeta_{3}\neq 0. Then we can use ΞΆ3,t,u3,β‹―,un+1\zeta_{3},t,u_{3},\cdots,u_{n+1} as local holomorphic coordinates on 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}}. We have

(7.31) d​v1=βˆ’td2​f​d​΢3βˆ’d2​td2βˆ’1​΢3​f​d​tβˆ’tn+2​΢3​d​f,dv_{1}=-t^{d_{2}}fd\zeta_{3}-d_{2}t^{d_{2}-1}\zeta_{3}fdt-t^{n+2}\zeta_{3}df,
(7.32) d​v2=d1​td1βˆ’1​΢3βˆ’1​d​tβˆ’ΞΆ3βˆ’2​td1​d​΢3dv_{2}=d_{1}t^{d_{1}-1}\zeta_{3}^{-1}dt-\zeta_{3}^{-2}t^{d_{1}}d\zeta_{3}

and

(7.33) d​f=βˆ‚fβˆ‚v1​d​v1+βˆ‚fβˆ‚v2​d​v2+βˆ‘jβ‰₯3βˆ‚fβˆ‚uj​d​uj.df=\frac{\partial f}{\partial v_{1}}dv_{1}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial v_{2}}dv_{2}+\sum_{j\geq 3}\frac{\partial f}{\partial u_{j}}du_{j}.

So we get

(1+td2​΢3β€‹βˆ‚fβˆ‚v1)​d​v1\displaystyle(1+t^{d_{2}}\zeta_{3}\frac{\partial f}{\partial v_{1}})dv_{1}
(7.34) =\displaystyle= (βˆ’td2​f+tn+2​΢3βˆ’1β€‹βˆ‚fβˆ‚v2)​d​΢3βˆ’(d2​td2βˆ’1​΢3​f+d1​tn+1β€‹βˆ‚fβˆ‚v2)​d​t\displaystyle(-t^{d_{2}}f+t^{n+2}\zeta_{3}^{-1}\frac{\partial f}{\partial v_{2}})d\zeta_{3}-(d_{2}t^{d_{2}-1}\zeta_{3}f+d_{1}t^{n+1}\frac{\partial f}{\partial v_{2}})dt mod(d​u3,β‹―,d​un+1).\displaystyle\mod(du_{3},\cdots,du_{n+1}).

Hence we get

(7.35) Ξ“=ΞΆ3βˆ’1(1+td2​΢3β€‹βˆ‚fβˆ‚v1)​Jβˆ’1​d​΢3∧d​t∧d​u3βˆ§β‹―βˆ§d​un+1.\Gamma=\frac{\zeta_{3}^{-1}}{(1+t^{d_{2}}\zeta_{3}\frac{\partial f}{\partial v_{1}})}J^{-1}d\zeta_{3}\wedge dt\wedge du_{3}\wedge\cdots\wedge du_{n+1}.

Near t=0t=0 we see Ξ“\Gamma is smooth around such a point. Similarly we can deal with the chart {s2β‰ 0}\{s_{2}\neq 0\}.

Now on {s3β‰ 0}\{s_{3}\neq 0\}, we only need to consider a point on DD where f=0f=0, then by our assumption (iv) we may use v3=fv_{3}=f as a local holomorphic coordinate to replace u3u_{3} for instance. Then we can write

(7.36) Ξ“=βˆ’1(n+2)​tn+1​f​Kβˆ’1​d​v1∧d​v2∧d​v3∧d​u4βˆ§β‹―βˆ§d​un+1,\Gamma=-\frac{1}{(n+2)t^{n+1}f}K^{-1}dv_{1}\wedge dv_{2}\wedge dv_{3}\wedge du_{4}\cdots\wedge du_{n+1},

where KK is the Jacobian for the change of coordinates. We have

(7.37) d​v3=βˆ’(ΞΆ1​d​΢2+ΞΆ2​d​΢1),dv_{3}=-(\zeta_{1}d\zeta_{2}+\zeta_{2}d\zeta_{1}),
(7.38) d​v1=td2​d​΢2+d2​΢2​td2βˆ’1​d​t,dv_{1}=t^{d_{2}}d\zeta_{2}+d_{2}\zeta_{2}t^{d_{2}-1}dt,
(7.39) d​v2=td1​d​΢1+d1​΢1​td1βˆ’1​d​t.dv_{2}=t^{d_{1}}d\zeta_{1}+d_{1}\zeta_{1}t^{d_{1}-1}dt.

Then we get

(7.40) Ξ“=Kβˆ’1​d​t∧d​΢1∧d​΢2∧d​u4βˆ§β‹―βˆ§d​un+1,\Gamma=K^{-1}dt\wedge d\zeta_{1}\wedge d\zeta_{2}\wedge du_{4}\cdots\wedge du_{n+1},

which is smooth. ∎

Now we can apply the previous PoincarΓ© residue to the function tt on 𝒳^\widehat{\mathcal{X}}. Since the exceptional set of the resolution lies over DΓ—{0}D\times\{0\}, we still get Ξ“t\Gamma_{t} for tβ‰ 0t\neq 0. On the central fiber X^0\hat{X}_{0}, we still get Ξ“0\Gamma_{0} on Y^1βˆ–D1\hat{Y}_{1}\setminus D_{1} and Y^2βˆ–D2\hat{Y}_{2}\setminus D_{2}. Over π’©βˆ–(D1βˆͺD2)\mathcal{N}\setminus(D_{1}\cup D_{2}), using (7.35) and (7.40) we get the corresponding PoincarΓ© residue

(7.41) Γ𝒩=Jβˆ’1​d​΢1ΞΆ1∧d​u3βˆ§β‹―βˆ§d​un+1=βˆ’Jβˆ’1​d​΢2ΞΆ2∧d​u3βˆ§β‹―βˆ§d​un+1.\Gamma_{\mathcal{N}}=J^{-1}\frac{d\zeta_{1}}{\zeta_{1}}\wedge du_{3}\wedge\cdots\wedge du_{n+1}=-J^{-1}\frac{d\zeta_{2}}{\zeta_{2}}\wedge du_{3}\wedge\cdots\wedge du_{n+1}.

Notice by applying PoincarΓ© residue twice to the complete intersection D={f1=f2=0}D=\{f_{1}=f_{2}=0\}, we obtain a holomorphic volume form Ξ©D\Omega_{D} on DD, which in the above local coordinates can be written as

(7.42) Ξ©D=Jβˆ’1​d​u3βˆ§β‹―βˆ§d​un+1.\Omega_{D}=J^{-1}du_{3}\wedge\cdots\wedge du_{n+1}.

So we get

(7.43) Γ𝒩=d​΢1ΞΆ1∧ΩD.\Gamma_{\mathcal{N}}=\frac{d\zeta_{1}}{\zeta_{1}}\wedge\Omega_{D}.

This means that up to multiplying by βˆ’βˆ’1-\sqrt{-1}, Γ𝒩\Gamma_{\mathcal{N}} agrees with the natural holomorphic volume form Ξ©0\Omega_{0} on 𝒩0\mathcal{N}_{0} defined in Section 4.2, under the identification kβˆ’=d2,k+=βˆ’d1k_{-}=d_{2},k_{+}=-d_{1}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.