7.1.3. A modification of the degenerating family [055P]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
We now recall the set-up in the introduction. Let be an integer. Let be homogeneous polynomials of degree respectively, and let be a family of Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in defined by the equation , where
(7.17)
and is the complex parameter on the unit disc . Let be the projection map and we denote .
We further assume are sufficiently general so that the following hold:
(i)
, where and are smooth;
(ii)
is smooth for .;
(iii)
is a smooth complete intersection;
(iv)
is a smooth complete intersection in .
The total space is singular along and transverse to the singularities are locally modeled on a two dimensional ordinary double point. For our purpose we need to perform certain birational transformations to keeping the general fibers unchanged.
We first do a base change , and work on the new family, which we still denote by . Then
now has singularities along , transversal to which generically it is a two dimensional singularity, which becomes worse along . This is usually referred to as a compounded Du Val (cDV) singularity .
Now we apply the family version of the above model partial resolution to . Let be the subvariety in the projective bundle over cut out by the equations
(7.18)
where naturally we view , , and denotes a point in the fiber of the projective bundle over the point .
For our discussion in the rest of this section we shall always take to be the homogeneous coordinates of a point on . On the affine chart of we denote by the affine coordinates, and we view as a local trivialization of . Then on this chart we can view any holomorphic sections of powers of as local holomorphic functions. In particular, for a homogeneous function , we denote by the corresponding inhomogeneous function. On the
affine trivialization of the projective bundle , we denote by the affine coordinates on the fibers.
We define
(7.19)
(7.20)
Lemma 7.2.
is smooth away from the union , and transverse to each the singularity is a two dimensional singularity.
Proof.
We know is isomorphic to away from , so it suffices to consider around a point where . Locally in an affine chart , is then cut out by the equations
(7.21)
These can be reduced to two equations on the coordinates , and , given by
(7.22)
By our assumption (iii) locally we may use and to replace (say) as local holomorphic coordinates on a neighborhood of in . Then it is easy to see the corresponding subvariety is smooth if , and has transversal singularities along .
So this gives the local description of in a neighborhood of . Similarly on we also know the space is smooth except with transversal singularities along .
On , we use as coordinates, and we get the constraint equations
(7.23)
We only need to consider the points where , so in particular we also have . At such a point, the differentials of these three equations are . This is non-zero by our assumption (iv).
β
One can see that the new central fiber consists of a chain of three smooth components intersecting transversally, given by the proper transforms of respectively and the submanifold in the projective bundle over cut out by the equation (so that is a quadric bundle over , and singular fibers are over ). Notice itself is a smooth manifold.
Figure 7.1. The modified family
We then have
(7.24)
It is straightforward to see that the normal bundle of in is .
Next we consider holomorphic volume forms.
Viewing as an anti-canonical divisor in , then away from , is smooth and we then obtain a holomorphic volume form . In the affine chart , the meromorphic volume form is given by
It is easy to check using the equation and the genericity assumptions that is indeed holomorphic on .
Now applying the above discussion to the global function on , then we get a holomorphic family of holomorphic volume forms on each .
Differentiating the equation , we get
(7.27)
In the above affine chart, on the set where , we have
Now we pass to the resolution . Abusing notation we still denote by its pull-back.
Lemma 7.3.
extends to a global holomorphic volume form on .
Proof.
We only need to consider around a point on the exceptional set , so . Without loss of generality may assume . Since is a complete intersection by assumption (iii), we may use and to replace (say) as local holomorphic coordinates on a neighborhood of in . So we can write
(7.29)
where is the Jacobian given by
(7.30)
Suppose first we work on the affine chart . Then we get the local equations for given by (7.22). Since we are away from , we must have . Then we can use as local holomorphic coordinates on . We have
(7.31)
(7.32)
and
(7.33)
So we get
(7.34)
Hence we get
(7.35)
Near we see is smooth around such a point. Similarly we can deal with the chart .
Now on , we only need to consider a point on where , then by our assumption (iv) we may use as a local holomorphic coordinate to replace for instance. Then we can write
(7.36)
where is the Jacobian for the change of coordinates. We have