Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Source coverage notes Source fidelity gap: the original arXiv HTML omits an author TeX footnote attached to equation e:def-omega, including its reference to Remark r:error-function. The retained HTML is preserved as published; the original author TeX remains available. TeX correspondence is not complete. Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
Let y = − j z n y=-jz^{n} , then
it is straightforward that
(5.150)
d F ^ ( y ) d y = 1 2 + t 0 ( y ) + F ′ ( t 0 ( y ) ) ⋅ d t 0 ( y ) d y = 1 2 + t 0 ( y ) = 1 2 1 + 4 Q − y ≥ 1 2 . \displaystyle\frac{d\widehat{F}(y)}{dy}=\frac{1}{2}+t_{0}(y)+F^{\prime}(t_{0}(y))\cdot\frac{dt_{0}(y)}{dy}=\frac{1}{2}+t_{0}(y)=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1+\frac{4Q}{-y}}\geq\frac{1}{2}.
This implies that, as z ≥ η 2 n z\geq\eta^{\frac{2}{n}} ,
(5.151)
d ( F ^ ( z ) + η z n 2 ) d z = d F ^ ( y ) d y ⋅ ( − n j ⋅ z n − 1 ) + n ⋅ η 2 ⋅ z n 2 − 1 ≤ − n 2 ⋅ z n 2 − 1 ( j ⋅ z n 2 − η ) ≤ 0 . \displaystyle\frac{d(\widehat{F}(z)+\eta z^{\frac{n}{2}})}{dz}=\frac{d\widehat{F}(y)}{dy}\cdot(-nj\cdot z^{n-1})+\frac{n\cdot\eta}{2}\cdot z^{\frac{n}{2}-1}\leq-\frac{n}{2}\cdot z^{\frac{n}{2}-1}(j\cdot z^{\frac{n}{2}}-\eta)\leq 0.
By similar calculations, one can also obtain that G ^ ( z ) − η ⋅ z n 2 \widehat{G}(z)-\eta\cdot z^{\frac{n}{2}}
is increasing as z ≥ η 2 n z\geq\eta^{\frac{2}{n}} .